Report from the Ghost of Glaciers Past
post is for all of you who have read or heard that the world is undergoing
"unprecedented" glacier melt and the subsequent End of the World. The reality is that all weather events and melting scenarios happened before --- long before --- over and over again --- and sometimes in greater intensity --- when atmospheric co2 was very low, such as the early 20th Century's 297 to 312 ppm. In comparison, 2022's atmospheric co2 count has been 417 ppm. Glacier melt made the papers, back in the early 20th Century, when the co2 count was much lower than today. Therefore, it's not unprecedented. Go look it up, yourself.
The photocopies of twelve archived newspaper articles of varying length are located below, for evidentiary support purposes. Their datelines are 1902, 1903, 1905, 1907, 1910, 1912, 1927, 1934, 1936, 1939, 1950, and 1952. Their topics are Melting Glaciers, Shrinking Glaciers, and Vanishing Glaciers. It has been the same old story, all along, within intervals of time, being that Climate is Cyclical.
Now, there's a lot on this subject to convey. The point at present is to show you that this phenomenon occurred WHILE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 WAS LOW --- from 297 to 312 ppm.
Below: Braidwood Dispatch & Mining Journal, New South Wales; Weds, Sept 28, 1910, pg 4.
|NOW REMEMBER: This was when the co2 level was much LOWER than today.|
|The co2 count in 1927 was 306 ppm. Today it's 417 ppm.|
|This was published 72 years ago, when the co2 level was 312 ppm.|
Above: Prediction that the SVARTISEN GLACIER of Norway would be gone by the Year 2000.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Below: Today, in 2022, the Svartisen Glacier is the 2ND LARGEST in Norway, at 142 sq miles in size. It certainly did NOT disappear by the Year 2000, as was predicted by experts of the era, and as was reported by AAP-Reuters.
|This is only a small part of the glacier which did NOT vanish in the Year 2000.|
Below is a super important lesson in how fast glaciers form. In 1916, there was no glacier there, in Mounta Danello, Italy. Rather, there were 15 Austrian soldiers there. Twenty years later, a glacier melts and reveals the soldiers' remains. It didn't even take twenty years for the glacier to form. Thus, glacier size is quite flexible over relatively short periods of time. Glaciers can form quite rapidly.
Below: A receding glacier in 1912, when co2 was at 301 ppm. It was receding a mile a year. Thus, we have yet more evidence that the 2020s are not unprecedented or unique, in any capacity at all, whatsoever, in the least. Even the lying scientists and lying media members of today is nothing new. It's all the same old same old. Greed. And the American taxpayer gets to be the swindled sucker.
Below: Newspaper report of January 14, 1939, when the co2 count was 311. That's 106 ppm LOWER than today. Yet, it states that "geologists all over the world" were puzzled by the continuous retreat of ice glaciers. That worldwide glacier retreat occurred 83 years ago. Thus, any glacier retreat reported today, tomorrow, or next year is NOT something unprecedented. It's the same old same old. So, don't let Michael Mann's false science provoke you into suicide ... or even clinical depression.
BTW, Michael Mann was NEVER nominated as "co-winner" of any type of Nobel Prize, and therefore, he NEVER was co-awarded (or exclusively awarded) any Nobel Prize in anything. Democracy Now lied on air. Michael Mann's lawyer lied on paper, and Michael Mann repeatedly lied, period. In fact, Michael Mann simply lies, per se. In as much, the weather and/or climate was NOT mild throughout the 1,000 years preceding the Industrial Age.
If the atmospheric co2 level gets cut in half, as Michael Mann said it should be, then the co2 level will be very near the level where photosynthesis stops occurring. Australia is resilient, and NOT dying, as Michael Mann said.
Plus, Mann did NOT submit to Dr. Tim Ball the data set for Mann's ridiculous hockey-stick temperature graph, as Mann promised a Canadian court he would do. And Mann did hide the 1960s & '70s temperature decline of Briffa's much more honest temperature graph. And all that Tim Ball wanted was for Mann to show his methodology, in arriving at the hockey-stick graph which omitted the existence of the Medieval Warm Period and Renaissance-era & Baroque-era Little Ice Age.
One more thing: Michael Mann is not going to get China to cease its extensive coal plant construction projects. And concerning India, in the Years 2021 & 2022, it commissioned EIGHT coal plants with 4.49 GW (gigawatt) capacity. Plus, 39 coal plants are under construction there --- in India.. What is Michael Mann and John Kerry and Bill Nye and Al Gore doing about it?
Coal releases mercury. Mercury is obviously not good for health. Sulfur Dioxide gets released during coal-burning. Not good, either. Fly-ash too, as well as certain nitrogen oxides, emit from coal when coal is being burnt. So, instead of suing Tim Ball, Rand Simberg, and Mark Steyn, Mann should have been reaching out to India and China.
Mann's purported "expert witnesses" were declared invalid by a DC court judge, incidentally. They were officially declared NOT experts in the lawsuit which has been dragging-on for years. The reason is that they did NOT show the methodology that resulted in their conclusions. And of course, they claim that the Little Ice Age & Medieval Warm Period were only local events, and not worldwide. They showed zero methodology for their conclusions which are contrary to chronicles, ledgers, journals, and strontium isotope analysis.
Go through newspaper archives, and you will see that Mann, Al Gore, PBS, & taxpayer-money-grabbing scientists have been lying to you, in a "false light," sleight-of-hand fashion. They have been omitting lots of facts.
Below: In 1905, Swiss glaciers were known to be shrinking. Yet, the article had a global reach to it. It mentioned "the fact seems to be that glaciers all over the world are shrinking," even though the co2 count was only 298 ppm; 119 ppm LOWER than today.
Below: This article mentions that Swiss glaciers were shrinking since 1922. And of course, I called 1922 "the Year of the Great Meltdown." None the less, did you ever hear about the 36 year glacier cycle by which a glacier waxes and wanes, like the phases of the moon? Well, it's mentioned here:
|This article was truncated ... cut ... for the sake of space.|
All in all, glacier melt is NOT a new 2022-only phenomenon, or even a 21st-Century-only problem. It was happening as far back as the beginning of the prior century, and one can logically deduce that glacier melt was rampant during the  Medieval Warm Period,  Roman Warm Period, and  Minoan Warm Period, as well as the Eemian Warm Period (when seas level was 8 to 12 to 16 feet higher than today.)
The media was completely wrong about Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, and it was wrong about several other things, including climate doom predictions. The media is not the Eternal God. It has been repeatedly shown to be wrong, time after time. It's an industry run by people looking for ratings and profit ... or sizable Congressional (Public TV) funding. Let's be really honest here: Truth & Justice is NOT the American Way, Superman.
|In 1902, the co2 level was 296 and a half ppm, 120+ ppm LOWER than today.|
Below: At the very least, look at "July 27, 1903." Then look at, "MELTING GLACIERS."
This is a report that the famous Jakobshavn Glacier of Greenland was
receding --- 119 years ago, when co2 was 297 ppm. Well, in the vicinity
of 2016 to 2019, the same glacier was reported as having had three consecutive
years of ice gain. Climate is cyclical, much like the phases of the moon. It waxes and it wanes.
|70 years ago, when co2 was 312 parts per million, 115 ppm lower than today.|
All twelve of these samples should help you realize that you have been told a long line of lies about climate history and the present climate. Look through newspaper and magazine archives, yourself. The recent claim of a "climate crisis" has all been a con game, played by the media, fund-raising scientists, money-grabbing politicians who want re-elected, ex-politicians who want a second or third home. The doomsayers all have a financial conflict of interest. Thus, they are NOT unbiased. You don't have to submit to Mind Dictators. Go and be free.
The Ghost of Glaciers Past