Iranians thank Trump for liberating them, while Dems & UN damn him for doing so.

The US Air Force, the US Navy, and the Israeli IDF said, "Time's up," to the 47 year-long cold-blood killer of Iran; a person who suppressed Persian creativity and engineering skills ... as well as artistic potential, religious freedom, and stylish clothing, as well as something called Complete Freedom.

Donald Trump terminated the Iranian Turbanator, Ali Hosseini Khamenei, as B-2a bombers, Super Hornets, and Israeli F-15s soared into Iranian airspace, to neutralize a murderous regime.  Even nine Iranian Navy ships were sunk in Operation Epic Fury which began on February 28th, 2026, at 1:15 am.

Hopefully, this means that women in Persia no longer have to wear those super oppressive hijabs, along with those burkas (niqabs) which are great if you are practicing Ninjitsu and are trying to sneak on to a Tel Aviv bus with a dynamite belt wrapped around you.  However, if you wanna be a woman of peace, love, and inspiration, then the Burka has got to go.

In fact, a few women in Iran literally died when their hijabs got tangled in machinery and even in a escalator.  Concerning this, my work experience is in construction, and I purposely NEVER wear/wore a scarf to work in wintertime ... solely for safety purposes.  So, I learned the benefit of turtle neck shirts on cold winter days.  

Anyway, the proven danger of the hijab shows that religious fanatics all lack common sense.  They're idiots, and they are completely different than devoutly religious people who actually do have consciences and do have a sense of human decency.  

In as much, a devoutly religious person you can absolutely trust.  A religious fanatic will end up killing you ... or getting you killed.  Read all about the idiocy of religious fanatism here:

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202503048023

Below is a video that shows a scene that transpired a month before Donald Trump saved the world from another murderous tyrant.  It's an expose on people who end up becoming against religious fanatic behavior.  Such people can't take it anymore and go wild.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ7jqf4bzBw

Tehran, February 28th, 2026.   The Ayatollah Khamenei was easily struck.

Iranians are literally dancing in the streets, thanking Donald Trump for the initial stage of liberating them.  In fact, one former Ontario legislative assembly member whose family fled Iran thanked every human who voted for Donald Trump.  Yet, the typical democrat party propagandist damns Trump for Stage 1 of the Liberation of humans in Iran.  

The UN condemned Trump too, and I personally believe that the United States should withdraw from a very unequal United Nations and start a new league and/or convention designed to keep lines of communication between nations, thereby keeping military bullets in their magazines.

Incidentally, the inequality of the UN exists in a five-nation security council, where none of the other nations have a vote.  It's time to pull away and start something new ... which happens to be fair.  

I can go into detail about the UN, the length of a book.  But, this post has one specific purpose:  To show what con artist hypocrites democrat politicians are.

The bottom line is that, no matter what Donald Trump does, the dems and the Democrat-backed mainstream media will find a manipulative way to damn Trump for it, thereby making him look like the most evil being on Earth.  It's annoying.  It's sickening.

In fact, the media, in its constant showing of the Airheaded AOC and the Charlatan Ilhan Omar is super annoying.  There are 535 members of the US Congress.  But, the mainstream media only shows the same small minority of them over and over and over again.  Such a thing is Anti-Democracy.  The Dems are doing nothing more than seeking to be a dictatorship over us all.  

None the less, instead of making political propaganda speeches over the three US military men recently killed ... and the five severely injured ... how about you democrats go to a religious place and pray for their souls?  In fact, why don't you democrats shut up and let their families be at peace.  

No matter what you say on the View, the families know that those soldiers are not coming back, and Whoopie Goldberg, aka Karin Johnson, does not have the power to go back into time and change things.  

So, how about you dems respect the dead and not use their deaths as another propaganda ploy designed to outrage the people into rioting against Trump and even assassinating Trump?

There were 405,000+ American troops who died during WWII, and no one was speaking out against putting out of business Hitler, Hideki Tojo, and Mussolini  So, how about you Dems shut the ~!@#!!%&~ up, for now?  Okay?  

And remember, I am a registered Independent with an extremely Latin last name, who is native to Pittsburgh PA, and who officially left the Democrat Party 12 days before the near-hit assassination attempt on Donald Trump.  In fact, my dad looked a lot like Desi Arnez, aka Ricky Ricardo.  So, how about you cooling it with the "white supremacy" bull crap?  

I was raised to be a JFK Democrat and an FDR Democrat.  The problem is that that party no longer exists.  There is only the Sexual Pervert party, the Baby-Killer party, the Jihad party, the Fentanyl party, the Free Heroin-Needles party, etc, all under the name democrat.

So, whatever Kelly, Omar, AOC, Warren, Raskins, Walz, Frey, and Schumer say, they have no right to comment about Iran, being that they did NOT have to endure life there, at the hands of a murderous tyrant ... or or or had to flee Iran, because of the same murderous tyrant.  

As far as I'm concerned, Kelly, Omar, AOC, Warren the Lifetime Liar, Raskin, Walz, Frey, and Schumer can all go to Hell, where they belong, and join Khamenei there.  This is an Iran who killed its own people, to the tune of tens of thousands, even recently.  We need to bring back Persia.

Yet, the Dems have the audacity to condemn Trump for the deaths of two citizens obstructing justice in Minneapolis and who instilled fear in the legitimate LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS there who shot those obstructors, out of a sense of self-defense.  

One of the officers was literally hit by one of the protestor's 4,000 lb SUV.  If she would have kept her SUV in park, she would still be alive today.  And if the tail-light-kicker-outer guy didn't bring a gun to his confrontation, done in the middle of a through-traffic street, then he would still be alive today.  

Those two people simply needed to stand the Hell out of the way and refrain from committing Obstruction of Justice against duly authorized law enforcement agents.

These are the people who liberated Iran, because these are the people who voted for Donald Trump, in 2024.  Watch the lying democrats take credit for the Liberation of Iran a few months from now.

Anyway, the videos linked below show that Iranians who are NOT on any of the ayatollahs' payrolls ... and who are not in direct contact with Iran's greatest killers ... are celebrating, feeling a sense of relief, and thanking those who voted for Donald Trump. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uXUZ6Y47_Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fuw8VqyGRb0

In the video below, those flags are Iranian flags, and not Mexican ones.  This is mentioned, because both flags look alike, from a distance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw1JZlL2EZg

The video below is of the Iranians celebrating in LA, carrying the OLD PERSIAN flag and NOT the current Iranian flag which was first established in 1925 when Cossacks took control of Persia, due to the effects of World War One.  

In 2026, Iranians are waving their ancient ancestors' Persian flag, which had a sun lion holding a victor's sword, in the center of it.  Such a sword is called, a Shamshir ... شمشیر

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBB5d7zAC3k

The video below gives a detailed account of what actually occurred in the attack  upon Planet's Earth's Greatest Murderer of the past 46 years.  Well, almost 47 years.

China Observer video:  Multi-billion dollar Chinese air defenses were trash: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hNCD1EPpmI

Below: Iranian-born Goldie Ghamari, doctor of juris prudence and former Ontario Legislative Assembly member, has an important lesson for Americans who have only read and only heard the lying propaganda from the US media and Democrat Party politicians.

Below: a second China Observer video:  Iran recently signed a missile deal with China, and shortly thereafter, Khamenei was targeted for death.  So, do the math on why Khamenei was killed in February of 2026.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Jsbvjp3ak

War ::: How to conduct one.

ABOVE:  A depiction of revolutionary France, on July 14, 1789.

BELOW: The real France, 155 years later, at a V-1 rocket site, after a visit from the United States Strategic Air Forces, otherwise known as the Mighty 8th.

 When Your Destiny Places You in the Arena of War ...

1a] The first assignment at the start of every war is that of putting out of commission the enemy's eyes & ears, as well as its ground-to-air defenses.  Hitting radar installations, surface-to-air missile batteries, and communications posts are always Objectives #1, 2, and 3 simultaneously.  Technically, this is the act of putting out of commission the enemy's Command & Control centers.

 1b] Equally important to General Objective #1 is that of disconnecting your enemy from his supply lines and drop zones.  It's far more effective to go behind enemy lines and end your enemy's ability to manufacture war materiel than to go to the front line and bring enemy platoons to their untimely end.  

This means that, if the enemy is being supplied by another nation, then you have to attack the supplier nation, in order to end its ability to supply your main enemy.  If you are not going to do this, then don't go to war against the nation being supplied from elsewhere.

                             

                              Even decorated combat vets taught us that, in war, there are no winners;
                             only the survivors of incendiary, smoke-flooded, and blood-ridden battles.
                               Keep in mind that those who didn't survive also received medals. 

1c] Of course, the other objective at the start of warfare is to achieve air superiority and to prevent your own ships from being blocked at bay.  This necessitates mine sweeping technology which involves the need for wooden ships or similar, in order to prevent those ships from being mine magnets during the mine sweeping process.

1d] Throughout the war, NEVER interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.

2] All wars are won in the Research and Development Department ... in the R&D Section.  This includes psychological research and troop training techniques.

2b] Incidentally, the one war which gave military science a treasure of learning in the tactical arts was none other than . . . the tragic & frustrating Vietnam War which was nothing more than a Military Industrial Complex Money Making Endeavor, at the expense of 58,000 American lives and even more American minds.

3] Never order a logistics unit to drive through a town during war.  Have it go the extra distance in circumventing the town, or else it will never drive to anywhere again.  Laziness in war leads to death.

4a] If you see a structure that looks totally foreign and unrecognizable to you, and it's certain that it neither contains civilians nor is booby-trapped, either hit it or commandeer it and reverse engineer it.  

The Nazis had no idea that the metal towers over which their pilots flew were the radar installations that alerted the British of the return of the German Luftwaffe.  The Nazis ignored the British radar installations.

5a]  Shock & Awe is an entire waste of time.  Your enemy will only surrender after he is drained and fatigued, not able to take any more of what he has been enduring.  Wearing down the enemy is more effective than initial shock & awe.  

You must save your most devastating fire power for either defending yourself at the point of attack or for depleting your enemy's stockpiles.  Don't use ordnance for intimidation purposes, because it's a waste of time.  Howe tried to do so at the start of the American Revolutionary War.  He failed in the process.

5b]  It's an erroneous and arrogant presumption to think that you want your enemy to be intimidated and frightened by your arrival, as was publicly stated during the George WMD Bush years.  An enemy thinking that it is to face a strong opponent is one placed in a state of heightened readiness, and this state of awareness will be deadly for many of your troops.

Instead, you want your enemy to be entirely unprepared for you.  You want your enemy to be lackadaisical when you arrive, thinking that you're nothing more than a Gomer Pyle.  

Then, when your fire power strikes the enemy's line, frustration and bewilderment will rocket throughout his psyche, as he drains his emotional strength in trying to handle the fact that something much worse than what he anticipated struck for his jugular vein.  The lesson to memorize is this:

Shock and awe will only work if you were originally underestimated by your enemy.  General Sun Tzu was the author of the time-tested military treatise, The Art of War.  Within it he stated: 

       

Even though you are competent, appear to be incompetent.  

Though effective, appear to be ineffective."

 5c] Nothing intimidates a person more than realizing that the poody cat he thought he saw in the distance turned out to be a full scale lion or a pack of wolves on a relentless mission toward him, entirely aware of where he is.  The fear of the unknown will drain the strength out of anyone.  

When the enemy is emotionally drained, he loses the flag waving inspiration to fight back.  There upon, you win the psychological aspect of the war.  If you have not yet triggered the fear of the unknown in your enemy, then you have not yet won the war.

5d]  Achieving air superiority isn't optional in the tactical sense.  The British Navy learned this in Norway, as early as 1940.  When air superiority is guaranteed by one of the warring parties, the war's eventual outcome is generally ascertained.

6] If you're escaping a mall or school that is under attack by terrorists, only crawl three or so feet away from a concrete, stone, or metal-girded wall.  If you are too close to the wall, a ricocheting bullet will hit you.

7] If you are combating drugged-up terrorists, keep firing at each one, even if you already hit each one three times.  Death by gunfire usually comes from the ensuing shock to the body.  A drugged-up terrorist doesn't feel the shock.  Thus, if drugged-up terrorists are in the equation, a gun won't suffice.  You need to hit a major artery ... literally.

 8a] If you are going to dock a ship during war, get your sailors off of it, or else you will have made them sitting ducks.  During the Falkland Islands/Malvinas war between Argentina and England, an exocete missile hit an aluminum clad ship at port.  British sailors were harmed and killed.  Aluminum reaches a higher temperature than does steel.

8b] If you believe that the French are cowards, then how do you explain Napoleon's army and his 56 victories, as well as the French empire, the Marquis of La Fayette, St. Joan of Arc, General Rochembeau,  the Battle of the Marne, Charles Martel, Charlesmagne, Simon of Montfort, the Battle of the Somme, and the Francs' victory over Danish Vikings during the Siege of Paris, and the Maginot Line that the Nazi avoided, knowing it would result in a massacre?

In May of 1940, a million German troops and 1,500 tanks invaded the parts of France and Belgium not protected by the Maginot Line's troops.  It was Operation Sichlschnitt, as in cutting with a sickle.   It was the ultimate flanking maneuver.  Therefore, it was not the French who avoided a fight.  It was the Germans who did.  

Ironically enough, German military personnel were against starting a war on the Western Front.  Some of them attempted to assassinate Adolph Hitler even before the Nazi invasion of France began.  France was the NINTH nation the Nazis attacked.

9] Concerning surrounding your enemy, the danger of drawing your enemy into a trap is that your enemy is becoming concentrated in the process, with a concentrated fire-power ready to be fired upon your forces.  Compacted army units are powerful ones, at least for a short period of time.

Fort Pitt was surrounded, under siege on account of Pontiac dishonoring a treaty.
None the less, the Fort Pitt Blockhouse is still standing, meaning that the siege
failed, as the ancient commander, Sun Tzu,  would have forecast.

10] It's more important to scatter the enemy than to trap and surround him.  A tiger whom you back into a corner will pounce you.  An enemy whom you surround will have an added incentive to fight, along with a dose of adrenaline and focus that your platoons won't have.  So remember, divide and then conquer.

Never provide your enemy with the inspiration to fight.  Surrounding him will put him in the mindset one gets when he has nothing left to lose.  As Gerald Celente once stated, "When people have nothing left to lose, they lose it."

11] Needless to say, the objective in surrounding the enemy is to get the enemy to surrender its surrounded forces.  However:  

I} Governor Paulinus did not have the luxury of surrender to a Queen Boudicca who wanted every Roman on her British Isle dead. ... II} The Francs did not surrender to the Danish Vikings during the Siege of Paris. ... III} The Austrians did not surrender to the Turks during the 1529 Siege of Vienna ...

... IV} Jacobite troops did not surrender to Cromwell's army during the 1690 Siege of Limerick. ... V} Union forces did not surrender to any of the Confederate forces at Little Round Top. ... VI} The Russians did not surrender to the Nazi Germans during the Battle  of Leningrad. ... 

... VII} the Nazi Germans did not surrender to the allied troops at Monte Cassino. ... VIII} Japanese forces did not surrender to the Americans during the Battle of Guadalcanal ... IX} the 101st Airborne Division did not surrender at Bastogne ...

... XI} and the Americans did not surrender to the Viet Cong during the Battle of Khe Sanh.  Concerning the Battle of Khe Sanh, General Westmoreland stated:

Our entire philosophy [is] to allow the enemy to surround us closely, to mass about us, to reveal his troop and logistic routes, to establish his dumps and assembly areas, and to prepare his siege works as energetically as he desires.  The result [will be] an enormous quantity of targets ... ideal for heavy bombers.

http://books.google.com/books?id=G35yog6wKv0C&pg=PA105&lpg=PA105&dq=westmoreland+khe+sanh+b-52+to+reveal+his+troop+and+logistic+routes&source=bl&ots=fUw5iF5TwK&sig=UEKQWwprrxBR2W5q0rre6dzkgF4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=H2veUaLUCsHkygH2o4Eg&ved=0CFQQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=westmoreland%20khe%20sanh%20b-52%20to%20reveal%20his%20troop%20and%20logistic%20routes&f=false

12a] General Sun Tzu was the author of the time-tested treatise the Art of War.  In it he stated, "the psychology of soldiers is to resist when surrounded."  He then went on to state, "Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive.  Plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live.  When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory."

Concerning an enemy, he stated,"Do not press a desperate enemy."   He also stated, "A surrounded army must be given a way out."

This means that being surrounded is not automatic defeat, while surrounding an enemy can backfire.  Actually, when your enemy surrounds you, it's thinning out its lines.  Pick an arc in that thinned-out circle and fire away, while closing your gaps.  If you can break a circle, you just broke the enemy.  

You then proceed with a flanking maneuver if you are not faster than the enemy.  You retreat to safety, if you are faster and outnumbered ...  if and only if you aren't being visited with tactical air strikes against you.

12b] Disconnecting the enemy from its supply lines is partially similar to placing him under siege.  Whenever he is separated from his supply lines, the enemy is confronted with the choice of surrendering or scattering.  In both instances, you win, if you don't surround your enemy.  

When you surround your enemy, expect him to become relentless and uncontrollable in one arc of the circle you have around your enemy.

Whenever you can do so, manipulate your enemy into thinning out his line, always and in every way.  Now, if you are playing Feigning Retreat and are drawing the enemy into a trap, you are initially doing the opposite of thinning out enemy lines.   However, if you give your enemy the incentive to gain ground fast, he will be thinning out his line in the overly zealous pursuit of you.

12c] In the same mind set, when you break through an enemy's line, expect tactical air fire to rain down upon you.  This means that the only viable alternative for you is to outflank the enemy and get so close to him that you are literally in enemy fox holes, inviting a lot of friendly fire casualties.  

In order to get out of a tactical air strike (after breaking out of an encirclement), you will literally have to take some of your enemy soldiers prisoner, so as to provoke a temporary truce.  However, if you have already gained air superiority, you will have no problem breaking out.  

Thus, the reason why the Battle of the Bulge was an American success was because the allies already had air superiority over the Germans.

13a] When it comes to breaking an enemy's circle, a relatively comparable situation occurred during the American Civil War.  Union batteries would first target a confederate artillery unit or a single canon and fire away.  

When the single canon or artillery unit would get put out of action, the Union battery would go to its next target.  It was the systematic decimation of artillery units.

13b] Alexander the Great did something similar in battle.  He took a chariot unit and traveled along the face of an enemy phalanx.  As soon as he saw an opening, he attacked and broke the opened wedge even wider.  

You can break a circle in a similar fashion, when you are surrounded.  If you get defeated while surrounded, it was only because you faced superior numbers that were layered.  It wasn't because of being surrounded, per se.  Being surrounded, in itself, is not guaranteed defeat.  Bastogne confirmed this.  However, during a breakout, look up at the sky and respond accordingly.

13c] Incidentally, Alexander the Great was the ultimate military genius.

13d] Surrounding the enemy involves placing the enemy under siege, and in today's technological societies, sieges are not advisable.  This is due to the existence of air drops, air support, and air cavalry forces.  Thus, it is even less expected for military forces to surrender when surrounded in the modern era.

13e] If a child runs up to your unit and pleads for you to quickly go to his town, to defuse a bomb in the middle of the street, expect to be ambushed.  This literally happened in Afghanistan.  T

he general rule is that, if the local citizens aren't bearing gifts, they are bearing trouble.  Even at that, don't readily eat food that is offered to you by a native of the land you invaded.  The other rule is that, if the official mayor doesn't approach you with an official request, then expect to be set up for the kill.

13f] However, if the townsfolk, in a collective effort, offer your soldiers something such as bed sheets during winter, then chances are that they are your friends.  This literally happened during the Battle of the Bulge.  American soldiers were clad in white bed sheets, compliments of the nearby villagers.  They served as camouflage in midst of snow-ridden terrain.

14a] Don't be foolish enough to drive through a ravine.  The general rule is that, if you can see Terra Firma above you, something will be hurled down upon you by the enemy.  Taking the high ground is a general rule. Taking the low ground is asinine, unless you are placing the enemy under siege and are trying to get him to thirst to death.  

As was previously stated, in this era of air cavalry, air drops, and air support, performing a seize is very very very limited in its ability to be effective.

14b] As a general rule, the air force is to be regarded as soldiers on high ground.

15a] Always approach battle in wolf pack formations.  If you thin out your lines, you lose.  This happened to Czechoslovakia in WWII.  Think phalanx formation or wolf pack formation.  If you don't have the numbers, then your war will be an attack on the enemy's supply installations behind the lines, in raid after raid.  

Needless to say, if you approach battle in wolf pack form, you will still have to cover your flank, as was the case with Patton and Montgomery in Sicily.  He who gets outflanked loses the battle.  This happened to a thoroughly incompetent military commander named George Washington during the Battle of Brooklyn Heights.

15b] It is of the utmost importance for you to know that a Wolf Pack Formation is NOT a Sardine Formation or a Bowling Pin Formation.  If soldier are too tightly packed, one hand grenade could put them out of action.

15c] If you're en route to the main front and pass a solitary house containing enemy troops, bypass it, lest you lose a lot of ordinance and soldiers in attempting to take it.  Henry Knox learned this the hard way during the American Revolution.

16a] If you are in a foreign nation, fighting an army foreign to the land where you find yourself, the people there are likely to befriend you.  If you're in a foreign nation, fighting the army native to that nation, expect the people there to regard you as the enemy and not as the liberator, even if you're liberating them from a dictator.  This is because their relatives are in the army you are attacking.

For example, the Belgians were friendly to the Americans who were fighting the German army on land where the German military did not belong.  In contrast, the Iraqi people were not friendly to the American GI's who came to fight the Iraqi army who was native to Iraq.

16b] The George Walker Bush administration mistakenly assumed that the invasion in Iraq in 2003 was going to be equivalent to invading France and then Holland in 1944. 

16c] Concerning what was erroneously presumed to have been the end of the Second Iraq War, in 2003:

If soldiers exit their tanks and proceed to walk away, 

the solders only do so, to fight another day.

There is a difference between retreat and surrender.

The lesson is that, if your enemy doesn't physically perform an outward act of surrender in front of you, it didn't surrender.  He will continue to fight you, in the shadows, via sabotage.  The war didn't end until eight years after Bush II claimed that the "mission was accomplished." 

17a] During the Cold War, the Soviet Union's high command didn't think in terms of Shock and Awe.  It's military policy was literally Brute Force.  Such a thing results in a lot of casualties on your side and on the enemy side.  

Therefore, if the United States and the Soviet Union would have gone to war with each other in the 1980's, NATO's high command would have drawn Soviet land forces into an array of killing field scenarios, thereby making the B-52 bomber heavily indemand and heavily in peril.  The Soviet high command would have responded by firing missiles at the U.S. air base in Spain (Diego Garcia.)

17b] No matter how Ronald Reaganish and Rush Limbaughish you are, do not bedeceived:  War between the United States and the Soviet Union would have been guaranteed mutual destruction, resulting in Madd Maxx types of societies.

And remember, both Mitt Romney and Rush Limbaugh were cowardly chicken hawks who hid from combat service during war time.  They  were the opposite of experts.  

 

In addition, even drugs conquered Limbaugh.  None the less, World War IV would have been fought with sticks and stones, after a Soviet/American World War III. 

17c] The NATO forces in Europe were originally designed to survive for six weeks.  Then, in the 1980s, the life expectancy of a NATO unit, in the event of war, was 22 to 32 minutes.

17d] Plus, the mark of a dictatorship is that it's battle plan is to lose its first wave of soldiers.  This is a plan of mutual attrition.  In a dictatorship, even the citizens are expendable. 

18a] More important than hitting the enemy front line is the assignment of destroying or even commandeering enemy supplies.  Charles Martel did this in France.  So too did the 8th Army Air Force do this in the European Theater of Operation.  In fact, before the arrival of D-Day, there were numerous air raids upon Nazi railroad yards.  This was done, so that the Nazis wouldn't be able to quickly send reinforcements to Normandy's coastline.  

The objective in attacking railroad yards was not to disrupt train tracks.  The objective was to destroy the ordnance, vehicles, and even soldiers on those train tracks.   

18b] The bombing of the Hamm marshaling yards, done shortly after the cessation of Operation Market Garden, was done so that the Nazis couldn't readily send reinforcements into Holland.  Bombing truck assembly plants, armament factories, and fuel supply depots is what wins wars.  

Uprooting landing strips is equally as important.  Targeting civilian neighborhoods is a waste of time and ordnance.

18c] It was repeatedly stated that, if Hitler immediately sent all available Panzer units to Normandy Beach on D-Day, the Nazis would have pushed the allied forces back into the English Channel.  This is a complete lie.  

If all of the available Panzer units roared toward Normandy Beach on D-Day, they all would have been decimated by the 8th and 9th Army Air Forces the same way in which the Panzer Lehr Division was decimated at St. Lo, France, on July 25, 1944.  The war would have ended much sooner.

18d] Concerning the St. Lo Air Raid, Lieutenant-General Fritz Bayerlein, recounted the event, as was witnessed from his German position.   Concerning this account, his mention of heavy bombs was a reference to that fact that the numerous small bombs which assailed the troops and tanks that day were dropped out of heavy bombers: 

"The entrenched infantry was either smashed by the heavy bombs whilein their foxholes and dugouts or else they were killed and buried by the blast.

Infantry and artillery positions were blown up.   The bombed area was entirely transformed into a field covered with craters, where no human was left alive.   Tanks and guns were destroyed  and overturned unable to be recovered, because all roads and passages were blocked."   

"The shock effect was nearly as strong the physical effect"  ...  "Some of the men got crazy and were unable to carry out anything.  I was personally in the center of the bombardment and could experience the tremendous effect.   

For me, one who, during this war, was at every theater of operation, and who had been assigned to the places of the main efforts, this was the worst thing I ever saw."

Bayerlein summarized the aftermath in the following way: 

"My front lines looked like the face of the moon, and at least 70% of my troops were out of action - dead, wounded, crazed, or numb." 

18e] Now, it's important to note that the shock effect came from the fact that the Nazi panzer unit originally underestimated the 8th and 9th Army Air Forces.  You see, the day before was the original date of the air raid, but it was canceled when most of the bomb groups were in mid-flight.

Such a cancellation was known as a RTB Order; a Return to Base Order.  This meant that very few bombs dropped on the Panzer division on July 24.

As a result, the panzer troops assumed that the 8th & 9th Army Air Forces offered little challenge on that day.  Then, when the two U.S. air  forces came back the following day and converged upon the Nazis in full force, the vast majority of the panzer troops couldn't handle it.  They were unprepared for what was to come.   Therefore, Sun Tzu was completely correct in having stated, 

"Even though you are competent, appear to be incompetent.  Though effective, appear to be ineffective."  

On the day when it was decimated, the Panzer Lehr Division thought that the U.S. tactical & strategic air forces would be ineffective.

18f] Famed war correspondent and eventual war casualty, Ernie Pyle, witnessed the July 25th air raid from the American encampment: 

"And then a new sound gradually droned into our ears.   The sound was deep and all encompassing, with no notes in it --- just a gigantic faraway surge of doom-like sound.   It was the heavies." ...

"I've never known a storm or a machine or any resolve of man that had about it the aura of such ghastly relentlessness." ...

" ...  and then the bombs came.  They began ahead of us as a crackle of popcorn and almost instantly swelled into a monstrous fury of noise that seemed surely to destroy all the world ahead of us.  

"From then on,  for an hour and a half that had in it the agonies of the centuries, the bombs came down." ...

"By now everything was an indescribable cauldron of sound.  Individual noises did not exist.  The thundering of motors in the sky and the roar of the bombs ahead filled all the space (all the spatial capacity) for noise on earth.   Our own artillery was crashing all around us, yet we could hardly hear it."

The bottom line is that, if all available Panzer units stormed toward the Normandy Coastline on June 6, 1944, the July 25th St. Lo news report would have been the June 7th and 8th report coming from the Normandy Coastline.

18g] The July 25th air raid was known as Operation Cobra, and the greatest lesson that it taught was the many smaller bombs are far more devastating than a few large bombs of the same total tonnage.  

Some of the Eighth Army Air Force bombers only carried 20 lb. fragmentation bombs @ 240 bombs per bomber, while other ones went to St. Lo with a load of 260 lb fragmentation bombs @ 20 bombs per bombers.  Yet other ones carried 100 lb demolition bombs @ 38 bombs per bomber.  Neither 500 lb bombs, nor 1,000 pounders, nor 2,000 lb bombs were used that day.

19a] Concerning WWII, it was George Patton's doctrine to never never never dig in.  It was Charles DeGaulle's doctrine also.   Think outflank, outflank, outflank, or think deplete the enemy's supply.   If you dig in, you will not deplete the enemy's supply.  The enemy's supply of ammunition will deplete your dug-in troops.

19b] The bottom line is this:  

When you destroy the enemy's war-making machine, the war is over.

20]  The Nazis were the first ones to place jet-propelled fighters into the air.  The first jet fighter in history was the ME262.  Yes, it was much faster than a P-51, but all of the WWII Nazi jet fighters were shot down.  This is because, in order for them to return to base, they had to coast downward.   They were only jet propelled while going up.

21a]  Do not target any civilian area of any kind.  If you strike a civilian target on purpose, you will awaken a lion of vengeance.  The city of Hamburg only burned because of the bombing of  London.  Therefore, always always always accommodate your enemy with a civilized incentive for ceasing hostilities.  You do this by giving him a civilian sanctuary to the neighborhoods where he can return.

21b] In addition, a bombed-out civilian area can become a fortress of rubble for the enemy, enabling for a roster of future Sniper Hall-of-Fame inductees.  For example, the Bombing of civilian sectors in Leningrad and Monte Casino resulted in a lot of casualties after the bombings thereof.

21c]  In order to prevent a shooting war, keep talking at the negotiating table, especially if you and your enemy do little more than yell at each other.  Keep in mind the observation made centuries ago by Sun Tzu:  In modern terms, those who saber rattle are poised to cower, while those who speak humbly are poised to attack.

21d] The first sign of eminent war is silence.  After all,  George Bush II refused to talk to the Saddam Hussein who actually didn't have the weaponry that the Bush administration claimed him to possess.   

Should the negotiators at the conference table act like a dysfunctional family during the holidays, let them keep talking and you will prevent the occurrence of something known as a daily body count.

22a] Treat every enemy prisoner of war as either a captured king or a cast member in a Shakespearean tragedy.  A man or a woman whom you treat kindly wil not be inclined to hang you from a noose after the war.  

Do NOT water board your enemy.  Let your enemy know that there are nice guys on the other side who will treat him or her humanely should he/she think of surrendering.  Your goal is to get the enemy to stop firing at you.  Such an enemy, after the war,might even become your ally.

22b]  Chapter II of  the Art of War prescribes that captured prisoners be treated well and respectfully.  This is contrary to the failed and fatally expensive water boarding Bush II war years which cost trillions of dollars in term of lives, the physical health of many vets, and the psychological health of military personnel, as well as the cost to the Iraqi's in their land being arrayed with a depleted uranium. 

22c]  One more thing:   Make it appear that you are impressed that your captured enemy was man enough to face you, if he were captured in battle.  If your enemy looked for you, act as if he is a wearied pilgrim looking for sanity in the world.  

You don't want your captured enemy to be intimidated or humiliated by you.  You want him to feel sorry for you, as if you have too many burdens in life.  You want the Stockholm Syndrome to take effect.  

If your captured enemies are made to fear you, it will be equivalent to surrounding your enemy, and you never ever should do that in warfare.  At the end of every war is the peace treaty.  Begin the motion to peace during the war.

22d]  In order to make escape difficult for your prisoners of war, you need to make the perimeter of your P.O.W. camp a deep trench of sand.  Prisoners can digtunnels from earth effectively.  However, making a tunnel in a sand pit takes engineering skills and added materials.  In addition, make life in the prison camp so nice that the prisoners won't want to leave it.

 23] Require all of your officers to eat exactly what the troops in the theaters of battle are eating.  In this way, high command, local command, and field command will know how much physical strength and alertness the soldiers have remiaing in them.

Do NOT be a miser when it comes to your soldiers' cuisine.  Rather, think in terms of perishable food vs. non-perishable items.

Let it be repeated:  No gourmet treats for your officers during military operations, and NEVER while in a theater of war, unless your frontline troops, sailors, and airmen get the exact same thing.

24] The most audacious military maneuver in history was when Napoleon ordered his cavalry to enter the Austrian trenches.  In second place would be Alexander the Great's attack on Tyre.  In third place would be the scaling of the Cliffs of Omaha Beach.  That act placed D-Day in the "You gotta be nuts" Department.

All that the American forces had to do was change course and land on Sword Beach.  The British liberated it quickly.  The Americans could have liberated Omaha Beach from behind.

25] One of  the reasons why Napoleon lost at Waterloo was because it rained the night before the battle.  His artillery used something known as canister shot.  It didn't explode until it hit the ground.  This meant that the mud was buffering the explosions of anti-personnel ball bearings and pellets.  It were as if Napoleon had no artillery on that day.  

Yes, rainfall ended Napoleon's reign.  Plus, Napoleon attacked later than usual.  He wanted to attack the British as soon as possible, because the Prussians were on their way.  

Napoleon's army was on the verge of breaking the line of the army of Arthur Wellesley, the first duke of Wellington.  Wellesley then ordered his remaining troops to lie down, slightly beyond the ridge of the hill where the fight was soon to be decisive.  This place was known as the Hougoumont farm.  

The French were then ambushed when they went over the crest of the hill there.  The area had pine trees that were tapped regularly for their gum and turpentine.  Napoleon sent 14,000 troops to the Hougoumont farm, while Wellesley kept 12,000 British troops in the area, to defend it.

        

In addition, the French cavalry performed a flanking maneuver that was misunderstood by the infantry.  The infantry thought that the cavalry was retreating.  The French infantry then fled in retreat.  

Napoleon's greatest error was leaving the battlefield and not calling the play by play orders.  His greatest misfortune was that the Prussians arrived at 4:30 in the afternoon, requiring the French to fight one battle on two fronts.  Their arrival was inevitable.

26] Napoleon's navy lost the Battle of Alexandria (the Battle of the Nile), because the British were smart enough to park close to the coast, thereby making one side of each ship unable to be attacked by the French navy.

27a] George Washington was an incompetent military commander, dating back to the French & "Indian" War.  One of the few reasons why the Americans outlasted the British was because the Comte de Rochambeau was in America, convincing Washington to not be so foolish as to fight the British in New York. 

Yorktown was to be the place of destiny, but not until the French fleet came north during the Caribbean hurricane season.

27b] Even though Daniel Morgan's victory at Cowpens helped greatly, if it weren't for the French navy, the Comte de Rochambeau, and the money provided by King Louis XVI, there would have been no United States of America.  America owes everything to the French, in that department of history.

27c] During the Battle of Yorktown, American troops repeatedly shouted "Rush on Boys"  as their battle cry.  It was a play on words, concerning Rochambeau.

27d] The Comte de Rochambeau was Jean Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur.  He was the youngest son of his family.  King David was the youngest son of his family, too, as was the Joseph of Egyptian fame.  

Simon V of Montfort, victor of the Battle of Lewes & originator of the parliamentary concept, was also the youngest son, as was Andrew Jackson, victor of the Battle of New Orleans and heralded capturer of Pensacola.  

General Robert E. Lee was the youngest son of major-general Henry Lee.  Even Alfred the Great, along with Peter the Great, were youngest sons.  Going one step further, General Norman Schwarzkopf was the youngest of three children.

27e] In light of this pattern, there is an instinct possessed by the youngest male of a family that the other males don't possess.  This makes the youngest the ultimate military strategist.  The youngest male knows what it is to be the little one.  He has the survival instinct, as well as an instantaneous defensive mechanism.  

In fact, there is also the matter of having observed the family who came before him and learning from its influence.  The eldest in a family might be able to give effective financial advice, but it's the youngest male who will prevail in the most brutal of wars ... according to the pattern found in history.

However, this does not apply to the youngest brothers of men who already were in military power.  The prime example would be Napoleon Bonaparte's youngest brother, Jérôme, who misinterpreted his orders at Waterloo and the lacked the needed reinforcements to defend Westphalia, in another military conflict.  None the less, he had a prestigious political career.

Concerning Napoleon Bonaparte, he was the fourth of eleven children, and he entered military schooling at the age of ten.  Dwight Eisenhower was a middle child.  Polk, the American/Mexican War president, was the eldest.  Harry Truman was the eldest also, and he was a WWI artillery officer during the end of the war.  

In addition, Paul Gilbert, the Marquis of La Fayette, was an only child who become a wealthy orphan relatively early in life.  So, the youngest child tendency is only a very broad generality which did have in its ranks notable military figures.

As a point of interest, a grandson of Napoleon Bonaparte's youngest brother was Secretary of the United States Navy and United States Attorney General.  In 1908, he founded the prototype of the FBI.  Charles Joseph Bonaparte was his name.

28a] The greatest outnumbered military victory in history was logically the Battle of Watling Street, in 61 C.E., when governor Gaius Suetonius Paulinus' army of 8,000 to 12,000 Romans completely decimated Queen Boudicca's army of 60,000 to 80,000 or more in southern England.  

Roman pila (javelins) were designed to bend as soon as they hit enemy shields, thereby taking away from the enemy its ability to toss  the javelins back at the Romans.  The Romans hurled two volleys at Boudicca's advancing army.  The Romans kept repelling each attack and then counterattacked.  It turned out to be a massacre upon the attacking British.

28b] The lesson learned is that, if your initial military game plan fails, stop attempting it.  After the Watling Street defeat, no one in Britain took on the Roman legions until the early 400s.  The ancient Rome Empire did not fall until September 4, 476 C.E.

29] The fatal error of the Confederate forces at Gettysburg was attacking Little Big Top and then sending in Pickett's soldiers from the right, in an advertised attack.

The Southern forces simply needed to start marching eastward, toward Washington DC, in order to bring the Union forces out of their protective embankments.

 30] Never disband a conquered army.  This was Bush's fatal error in Iraq.  Make it as if your enemy combatants just became your new allies.  In this way, you will keep track of men who would otherwise become terrorists, firing at you from the shadows.  

Keep in mind that you went to war against a government whose officials held its military personnel on puppet strings.  When the enemy government or targeted dictator is no longer in power, you need let surviving military units know that they have been released from the puppet strings.  Conquered troops still need to be called to roll call.

 31] Any society who understands the following is in possession of great wisdom:  War is a punishment from God for mankind's sins. 

Sincerely,

Patrick Pontillo,  youngest son of an authentic liberator of France and all-around cool guy.

      _______________________________________________________

The reason why "giving them 1789" now will result in "getting Napoleon 1799" later

It's called ANACYCLOSIS and it was discovered by an ancient Greek historian, noble, and government official, named Polybius.  It involves the cycle of governments.

Polybius lived from 200 BCE to 118 BCE, and he was the one put in charge of formulating governments in Greek cities, after the Fall of Carthage & the Destruction of Corinth.  Both events occurred in 146 BCE, 37 years after the Carthaginian king, Hannibal, died in exile.  

Concerning Carthage, it was founded by the Phoenicians.  They would come to have a leader who would who had a seething hatred toward the Romans.  

Well, concerning the Polybius who witnessed the end of the mighty Hannibal, he noticed that governments morph ... change ... in cycles.  The cycles, according to Polybius, go as follows:

Monarchy (which is usually started by a conquering military man who won the trust of his soldiers) eventually transforms into Aristocracy, where a privileged class has developed.

Then, things transform into Democracy, followed by powers being narrowed into the hands of a few.  Such a narrowing results in Oligarchy.

From the Oligarchical class rises a tyrant.  This is followed by Mob Rule, otherwise known as OCHLOCRACY.  This is then followed by the re-establishment of Monarchy.

As of Today

Now, 2,100 years of history have shown us that the Government Cycle is slightly different than the Polybius Model of it.  It has basically shown itself to be:

Monarchy ... transforming into Aristocracy which is actually Oligarchy.

Then comes representative governments, as in Republics of one sort or another.  This has involved "electors," as well as representatives, as well as parliamentary members.  

Oligarchy once again sets in, amongst corrupted representative government officials such as Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff.  

Next comes Anarchy, aka Mob Rule.  After Mob Rule comes the re-establishment of none other than Monarchy.

God save the kings to come, being that we want no more ~Nancy Pelosis, ~Chuck Schumers, ~Eric Swalwells, ~Joe Bidens, ~Adam Schiffs, ~AOC's, ~Kamala Harrises, ~Liz Cheneys, ~Dick Cheneys, ~George Bush Juniors, ~Jefferson Davises, ~Hillary Clintons, ~Spiro T, Agnews, ~Richard Nixons, ~Lester Maddoxes, ~Elizabeth Warrens, ~Tim Walzes, ~Jacob Frey types, ~Maxine Walters types, ~Mehmed II types, ~Abdul Hamid II types, ~Selim I types, ~Ilhan Omar types, ~Jamie Raskin types, ~Daniel Goldman types, ~James Buchanan types, ~Oliver Cromwell types, etc, etc, etc, etc.   

And for those unaware, Oliver Cromwell was the first British ruler to order attacks upon the American colonies, specifically against Maryland (the only Roman Catholic friendly colony) and Virginia (the first colony to establish a college). 

In addition, the Jefferson Davis trial was cancelled, due to the General Amnesty that the first President Johnson granted to all Confederate combatants, as of Christmas Day, 1868.

Back to France 1789 which lead to Napoleon 1799

The French Revolution WAS Mob Rule.  It was Anarchy, where a small faction in France ... and a small fraction of humanity ... tried to insert itself as the new Oligarchy.  This was accompanied by the overuse of the guillotine.  

In as much, when terrorism starts, you're revolution is over.  See Maximilien Robespierre & the Reign of Terror.

Now, at the start of the French Revolution, there was a Corsican Italian artillery lieutenant in the French Army, named Napoleon Bonaparte.  He was a Second Lieutenant at the time and he was of average height for his era.

Napoleon was neither a 4'11" short guy nor a corporal.  In fact, it was in 1785 when Napoleon graduated from a military academy, immediately resulting in him being commissioned as a second lieutenant.   He was reported to have been quite skilled in mathematics.

Napoleon was called the Little Corporal as a sign of affection by his own troops who were willing to die for him.  Napoleon would ride up to the artillery lines and occasionally load a canon or two, by himself.  Napoleon was a "hands-on leader" and his soldiers admired him for this.  

Then, in 1792, Bonaparte was promoted to regular army captain.  Next came the Siege of Toulon, in 1793, where Napoleon stepped-in after the injury of a pivotal officer.  He quickly had the influence to get Commissioner Antoine Saliceti to assign General Jacques Dugommier as the prime field marshal of Toulon and to allow the Dugommier Plan to proceed. 

In the end, the French Republicans captured Toulon and Napoleon was eventually given the commission of Brigadier General.  Before this occurred, Napoleon was arrested shortly after Robespierre was executed.  But, in 1795, Napoleon became the Commander of the Army of the Interior.

King Maker

In as much, Commissioner Saliceti was the King Maker of post-revolutionary France which was temporarily Republican France.  Yes, the defender of the French Republic created an Italian emperor.  

Saliceti was a friend of the Bonaparte family, being that Saliceti was born in Corsica, as was Napoleon.  Saliceti succeeded in getting a hometown boy from his own home province to lead France.  

BTW, Saliceti's home province was actually a colony.  Thus, Napoleon becoming emperor ... very unexpectedly ... was like a Hawaiian resident becoming President of the United States.  

It was also like the son of Cuban refugees becoming the United States Secretary of State, as well as an United States senator.  

It was also equivalent to the daughter of Iraqi immigrants becoming a senior advisor to the Attorney General for United States Attorneys.

2028

In as much, if there still is an United States in 2028, I'm voting for either Marco Rubio or Ron DeSantis ... unless someone beyond exceptional comes out of nowhere.  

I would also advocate either Rubio or DeSantis becoming US Secretary of State in 2029 to 2032.  Thus, one of them as il presidento and one of them as Sec of State.  

Alina Habba would make for an alert vice president, unlike the absolutely airheaded anti-Catholic one of 2021 to 2024.  Plus, Alina is a female and she's a racial minority.   Bingo City on this choice.

Plus, plus, plus, she's a Jersey Girl.  Thus, us Italian-Americans would feel completely at home with her in office.  She would work well, despite the lying propagandist slurs against her ... made by Democrat Party operatives whose only talent is that of lying to humanity.   

So, the 2028 winning presidential ticket should be either Rubio-Habbas or DeSantis-Habbas.  That's where my vote is going, if voting in the USA is still in existence, come 2028.  

And yes, I officially withdrew from the Democrat Party in July of 2024, becoming an Independent instead.  This is because that party became a thoroughly Sick Joke.  In library book shelves, the Democrat Party needs to be filed under "you've-got-to-be-kidding."

At present there are numerous attempts at having revolutionaries rise in America and elsewhere, to effect anarchy, somewhat like the France of 1789.  It will only result in another Napoleon of 1799.  So, it would do you well to familiarize yourself with Napoleon, as well as Saliceti, in addition to Polybius. 

The Pivotal Question:  Who will be the next Napoleon?  ANS:  The last man standing, literally.  

It will have nothing to do with "seducing the masses" in any kind of a political campaign.  It will involve someone accomplished in having personal discipline and who notices things a lot quicker than the average bear.  

It will involve a grateful people ... somewhere ... who were spared from destruction ... or textbook-defined disaster ... by the individual who, in the end, will be the last man standing ... and who will be able to start society anew.  There will be no anti-Catholic whores of Willy Brown is the future governments, after the Last Man Standing phase of history.

It will be a matter of everyone formerly in power running for cover, leaving the job up to someone who didn't live the life of oligarchs & aristocrats ... who did not live the life of luxury.  Thus comes the discipline aspect and the ability to suddenly notice things others don't.  Napoleon had that ability.  None the less, even geniuses have their limitations & shortcomings.

All in all, in the 18th Century, the French traded-in a French king for an Italian emperor.  Expect something and/or someone somewhat similar in some way to come about in the near future.  This is because ... history repeats itself.

And remember one more thing:  World War II was won in a wheelchair ... in a wheelchair owned by an FDR who didn't even get to see the end of the war he won.

As a note to you Americans who regard yourselves as "Bible-believing Christians:"  

Firstly, I believe in the Nazarene as the Son of the Living God, too.  In fact, I believe in those displayed and/or witnessed miracles such as bleeding hosts, the Tilma of Guadalupe, the October 13th, 1917, Miracle at Fatima, the Padre Pio Phenomenon, the Saint Charbel Phenomenon, the January 25th, 1938, fulfillment of a Fatima prophecy, etc, etc, etc.  

Thus, I believe in the Bible and then some.  This includes me believing in the power of an officially assigned exorcist, the sacramental absolution from sin, Apostolic Succession in the form of a priesthood, etc, etc, etc.

As far as goes you claiming that America was founded by the Nazarene in a spiritual fashion, and that God will save the USA, know this:  

There is no way that an Eternal God is going to save and preserve a political government that slaughtered its most helpless citizens for the past 50 years, to the tune of thousands per day.  These are citizens who never got to see their own mother's faces and who never got to see sunlight.  

God saves people, and not man-made institutions.  God raises kings, and not democrat party politicians who advocate baby-killing and then make millions of dollars off of insider trading, while never creating a single private sector job ... 

... while wasting taxpayer dollars on sex-change operations for sexual perverts who will always have the xy or xx chromosome arrangement with which they were molecularly born.  Sex-change operations do not delete the XY Chromosome.

All in all, keep one thing in mind, you Bible-believing Christians out there, it's Christ the King and NOT Christ the Speaker of the House.  It's Christ the King of Angels and NOT Christ the Majority Leader ... or the Majority Whip ... or the Minority Whip ... or the Party Leader ... or the Chairman ... or the Commissioner.

⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨⛨

Below is an instance of 1789 occurring in late February of 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSXtNCXzagM

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

The video of the gentleman below shows that this anarchy is NOT something in the future.  It's already underway.  The gentleman narrating the video below is a black man ... aka an African American ... and he has over a million subscribers.  He's also a military veteran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nStteHi3Pn4

By the way, did you know that a border patrol agent was shot dead by a Transexual, on I-91, in Coventry, Vermont, on January 20, 2025?  If you didn't know this, then it's because you are a low-information puppet who only watches CNN and MS Now, as well as Democracy Now which has nothing to do with democracy ... now or ever.

Below:  The voices of Bill Maher and Stephen A in the present tense, in what's known as "a reaction" video.  A "reaction video" is a loophole, to get around ... to sidestep ... copyright infringement accusations.  So, listen to what Bill and Stephen have to say these days.  Bill and I both of Irish Catholic ancestry, as well as Mediterranean ancestry.  His is Jewish and mine is Italian, both Northern and Southern Italian:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVGtY2YvNW0

🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉🌉

Below:  A thirteen year old got a brutally beaten on school grounds, for supporting Donald Trump and ICE.  This is why events like the Nuremberg Trials transpire, from time to time.  Teachers must pay for brainwashing their students, when they were in charge of educating them, instead.  

Nazis in Germany brainwashed their students.  Today's left is the modern-day Nazi Party.  After all, they arrested Catholics for praying, under the stolen-presidency of the corrupt hypocrite, Joe Biden ... and his magical autopen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVGtY2YvNW0

And remember, there were 13 Nuremberg Trials.  Meanwhile, in the same general time span, there were 28 high ranking Japanese officers put on trial, along with Tokyo Rose.  Seven of them were sentenced to Death, and 16 of them were sentenced to Life in Prison.  Two defendants died during the trials and one was declared unfit for trial, due to mental illness.  

BTW, Tokyo Rose ... namely, Iva Toguri D'Aquino ... was granted a presidential pardon by the Sunday School President, Jimmy Carter, who was well versed in the Bible.  Jimmy was also a Navy vet.  He was also the Three Mile Island president ... and the Iran Hostage president.

Iva married a Filipino man which explains her last name.  She, herself, was all Japanese in her ancestry, and she was the seventh person ever to be convicted of Treason, in U.S. history.

Today's American teachers and youth think that they are immune to their hate-filled speech and violent actions.  No, they are not.  You'll see.  They'll see.  History repeats itself.  Stay tuned ... to American current events, wherever they are being honestly reported, and not hidden by those hijacked mainstream media propaganda outlets such as ABC & Disney, Inc.  [For those unaware, Disney has owned ABC TV since 1996.]