Simple publicly-known stats prove that there was no foreign collusion of any kind during the 2016 election ... except for Hillary getting $12 million from Morocco and similar foreign donations addressed to the Clinton Name. Let's start with the 2016 Presidential Election where accusations of "Russian Collusion" were on the airwaves for years.
The Year 2016
Let's review the Year 2016. The accusation from the mainstream media was that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians, in order for Donald Trump to win more votes than Trump usually would have won, based on the prevailing Republican Party voter trend. A pronounced change in the 2016 vote count ... from 2012, 2008, and 2004 ... would indicate Russian collusion.
Likewise, if the number of votes received by each Republican Party candidate of each recent election were basically the same each election year, then that would be evidence that there was no collusion of any kind, coming from any nation. This includes the election years of 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016
We need to compare the 2016 election to the elections of 2012, 2008, and 2004. I need to show you, at the outset, that there most certainly was no Russian Collusion in 2016, as is evidenced by public statistics appropriated by the U.S. government. We do this, by beginning with a question or two:
Q: Prior to the 2016 election, who was the most recent Republican Party presidential nominee to win the presidential election? ANS: George Bush II, in 2004.
Q: How many votes did Bush receive in 2004? ANS: 62,039,572
Twelve years later was the next time when the Republican nominee won the presidency. The winner was Donald Trump, in 2016.
Q: How many votes did Trump receive in 2016? ANS: 62,985,153. He received almost the same amount of votes as did Bush, in 2004. This indicates the opposite of Russian Collusion. This indicates a Republican voter trend by which voters in 2016 weren't swayed by anything or anyone other than their voter tradition.
Conclusion: The Republican Party vote count between 2004 & 2016 thus far seems to be generally the same.
We now need to include the election results of 2008 & 2012, to see if there were a genuine trend during the years 2004, 2008, 2012, & 2016. If there were a vote count trend ... and if there were no drastic & sudden change in the vote count in 2008 or 2012 or 2016 ... then there was absolutely no collusion from any nation, entity, or person, including Russia.
Q: What was the Republican Party vote count in the 2008 presidential election?
ANS: 59,950,323 Therefore, the Republican candidate's 2008 vote count was 95% of the 2016 Republican candidate vote count. Incidentally, the Year 2012 Republican candidate's vote count was 96.6% of the 2016 vote count. This means that the votes received by each Republican presidential candidate in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016 were basically the same; quite similar. Below are the vote stats for 2008 and then 2012.
The new accusations are that right wing bloggers and podcasters are spreading the talking points given to them by Moscow, to influence the American voter to vote for Donald Trump. This is claimed to be the case, despite the fact that Putin stated in front of a camera that he preferred Kamala Harris. And of course, that's supposed to be some kind of a Russian trick, to get Americans to flock toward Trump.
The present effort from the DOJ is to get right wing conservatives deleted from the Internet. And of course, this is a frontal assault upon Freedom of Speech. Even if the conservatives were actually spewing out all of Moscow's talking points, a reader (or a viewer) could give counterpoint to all of those Moscow talking points and sway the American voter away from Moscow's influence. Thus, Freedom of Speech and of the Press prevails.
There used to be [1] Point, followed by [2] Counterpoint, followed by [3] Response to Counterpoint, and then [4] Rebuttal, where each debating entity had two opportunities to state his/her views. Now, it's all a matter of the left wing liberals being the oppressors and censurers of speech ... and of the press.
However, if you can employ free speech and then answer Moscow's propaganda with counterpoint, then it's no longer propaganda. It's subject matter for a debate. Propaganda and political influence only occurs where there is censorship. It only occurs in a closed society. When you can dialogue and debate, the propaganda element vanishes.
And of course, the Biden Administration are the Censorship People who are trying hard to hide the fact that Kamala is a terrible candidate ... who never received a primary vote in 2024 ... and who only received 844 primary votes in 2020 ... and who happens to be the vice president with the lowest approval rating in the history of approval ratings. The Dems are stilling trying to rig the election, as usual.
The only reason why there would be complete deletion of conservative writings in 2024 is if the writings contain truths that reveal any evil about the liberal left wing which will destroy their chances at an election victory, whatever be the election involved.
Apparently, the Democrats are trying hard to hide the fact that 1] 91% of Kamala's vice presidential staff resigned, 2] and that specific staffers stated that Kamala is very abusive toward workers, 3] and the Kamala doesn't know the first thing about basic economics, 4] and that Kamala sued the Obama administration, in the attempt to make fracking illegal, 5] and that the accumulative inflation rate throughout Kamala's VP tenure is thus far 19.2%,
6] and that Kamala was vehemently against the Southern Border Wall, before she was suddenly all for it, 7] and that Laken Riley is still dead, along the other victims of violent illegal immigrants who were given free reign throughout the United States, 8} and that the National debt is now up to $35 trillion, when it was $27 trillion when Kamala was put into office ... and ... 9] in January of 2024, Joe Biden banned fracking in its tertiary stage, by placing "a temporary pause on the approval of Liquefied Natural Gas exports." Such a suspension is a snake's way of banning fracking ... or of backing up the production line to the point of oppressing production
The list goes on and on and on, including Kamala giving sex to a married man 30 years older than her, so that she could get a launch into politics. It appears that the Biden Administration People are simply trying to hide Kamala's evils and incompetency, under the guise that not doing so is Russian Interference. Well, to censure such information is election interference, just like it was in 2020, when 51 unconscionable former employees of the federal government claimed that the Hunter laptop showed all the signs of a Russian hoax.
If those 51 didn't lie about the Hunter Laptop, Trump would have won the 2020 election, by a small margin. And Laken Riley would still be alive. Those 51 need to be criminally prosecuted, along with the persons who orchestrated the statement and who recruited the 51 persons who now are publicly known to be 51 liars.
