Below: 21 pieces of photo-copied evidentiary support, to prove that Glacier Recession ... aka glacier shrinkage ... had long since between identified, in cyclical intervals of time, when the atmospheric CO2 count much lower than it is today. Thus, there is no NEW climate crisis that was started by CO2 and which will cause the world to come to its end. Whatever has been the weather event of the past five years, it has all happened before, having come and gone in cyclical intervals.
Concerning the 21 pieces of evidentiary support, one of them shows that not much glacial ice loss in the Alpine Region occurred between 1973 and 2016. Yet, that was when CO2 was on the rise. This shows that CO2 does NOT drive the climate. The Sun does. Moreover, CO2 is NOT the Predominate Greenhouse Gas. Water vapor is, by far. All in all, the Earth's Climate is much like the Phases of the Moon. It waxes and wanes.
Intro
The part of Pittsburgh where I live is the part where exists four colleges, including Pitt and the Carnegie Mellon which gave the world its first robotics institute and a number of celebrities who are household names. Therefore, I'm an East Ender, and this is the area where you will find many a person native to lands far away. This includes the Himalayan region of Planet Earth. Specifically Nepal.
Well, I was talking to a couple of natives from the Himalayan mountain region whom I know on an informal and casual basis, and I said, "I guess that all the glaciers in the Himalayas are shrinking." One of them instantly said, "No. They're growing." The other Himalayan gentleman then mentioned how brutally cold it gets in his Himalayan hometown.
Despite the claim of a climate crisis by a Biden Administration known for its liars ... and an U.N. known for the same type of liar ... the United States had a couple record high crop yields in 2024. In fact, crop success has been the American way of recent years, and crop yield success is the opposite of a climate crisis. Thus, Joe Rogan, Donald Trump, Michael Schellenberg, and Randall Carlson had distinct historic reasons for calling " this Climate Crisis" a hoax.
The irony to this repeated crop harvest success is in the observation that the Al Gore People claimed a rise in CO2 to be the guaranteed common occurrence of crop failure throughout Planet Earth. Well, it's CO2 which causes the photosynthesis that causes the crops to grow, in the first place. The members of the Al Gore Propaganda Team apparently have no idea how asinine they sound. Professional growers inject added CO2 into their greenhouses, for greatest yields.
If interested in looking at a couple news reports on the 2024 American harvest, refer to the links below. If not, then feel free to move on to the glacier topic presented in this discourse. And remember, this is a discourse for novices ... and for people who have been totally deceived by the American public school system and the mainstream corporate media, as well as the Biden Shadow Presidency.
🌽🌽🌽🌽🌽🌽🌽🌽
Corn & Soybeans Experiencing Record-Breaking Yields: Report by GreenStone farm credit services.
“Record-Breaking Yield for 2024-2025 US Corn Crop: US Grains Council Report”
🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒
And of course, it has also been said that the glaciers around Planet Earth are shrinking into non-existence ... and that mankind will lose its drinking water in the glacial regions. In fact, one prediction was that the glaciers of Glacier National Park (in Montana) would all vanish by the Year 2020. However, even more pronounced glacier melt occurred in the mid & early 20th Century, and mankind survived well enough to only get obliterated by World War II, instead of CO2. .
Below are photo-copies of 15 newspaper articles dating back to the very early 20th century. Also below are links to pertinent tutorials of scientific information. These articles teach us that, eighty-five years ago, as well as one hundred and fourteen years ago, scientists were telling mankind that the glaciers all over the world were melting away. Drastic glacier melt in the Swiss Alps was reported 122 years ago. Deja vu, folks. That which happened to the glaciers in recent years have happened to them 8 to 10 to 12 decades ago. Climate History repeats itself, just like regular history does.
There's a lot to see here. Come aboard to the Freedom of Speech & Freedom of the Press Train and let's discover ... discover Planet Earth as it really was, before Michael Mann, Al Gore, David Attenborough, John Kerry, and the Biden Shadow Presidency showed us how good they were at telling lies, while keeping a straight face ... as they they told us that the sky was falling.
It's Nothing New.
~Swiss/Alpine Glacier Ice Loss was a small percentage from 1973 to 2016.
~True MAJOR Alpine Ice Loss was identified & catalogued from 1902 to 1936 & 1950 to 1952.
~In 1912 & 1927, it was Canadian glacial melt. In 1936, ice loss was reported in the Dolomites.
~In 1950, it was Norway's Black Ice Glacier that was predicted to vanish. It still exists today.
~Worldwide Glacial Retreating was reported in 1910 & in 1939.
~Between 1900 and 1938, Montana's Sperry Glacier went from 840 acres in surface area to 390.
A Report from the Ghost of Glaciers Past
This post is for all of you who have read or heard that the world is undergoing "unprecedented" glacier melt that has never happened previously. Therefore, you need to see what glaciers really were like in the early 1900s ... and even in the late 19th Century ... when the CO2 count was much lower than it is today. The reality is that all weather events and melting scenarios happened before --- long before --- over and over again --- and sometimes in greater intensity --- when atmospheric co2 was very low.
In the early 20th Century, the CO2 count went from 297 to 312 ppm. That's very low when compared to today. Yet, there were climate catastrophes in the first three decades of the 20th Century and in the last three decades of the 19th Century ... as well as a drought in the middle of the 19th Century ... and a vicious potato and wheat famine, too. Add cholera epidemics as well, and one would have concluded that the End of the World was going to happen in the 19th Century, when the CO2 count was low.
In comparison to 1902 and to 1922, 2022's atmospheric co2 count was 417 ppm. It was 422.43 ppm in 2023. In 2024, it's 425, due to the increase in Eastern Asian and Southern Asian coal-burning power plants which need more filtration.
Plus, water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas. It's 90% of all greenhouse gases, by volume. And you're not going to be able to get rid of water. It comprises 70% of Planet Earth's surface.
The photocopies of fifteen archived newspaper articles of varying length are located below, for evidentiary support purposes, as to the fact that the glaciers were in a pronounce melting previously. The articles' datelines are 1902, 1903, 1905, 1907, 1910, 1911, 1912, 1915, 1927, 1934, 1936, 1939, 1950, and 1952. Their news topics are Melting Glaciers, Shrinking Glaciers, and Vanishing Glaciers. It has been the same old story, all along, within intervals of time, being that Climate is Cyclical.
Now, there's a lot on this subject to convey. The point at present is to show you that this phenomenon occurred WHILE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 WAS LOW --- from 297 to 312 ppm.
We begin with a newspaper article dating back to 1902, where within it is reported that the Swiss glaciers were receding. This was 120 years before the mainstream media kept rattling off the cliche "Climate Crisis." In fact, one glacier melted 800 yards, from 1876 to 1902. The Year 1876 was 148 years ago.
Glacier melting was occurring as far back as 148 years ago, and the world did not come to an end. This brings us to a question: Why did NOT Greta's handlers ever show her these many news reports on glacier melt occurring in the late 1800s and early 20th Century?
The reading of them could have spare Greta of a lot of intentional inflicted emotional trauma. And why do not the students of the American public school system sue to Biden Era and even Obama Era public school system for the same intention infliction of emotional distress? Look and see what Obama, Gore, Kerry, Biden, Harris, Nye, and Michael Mann hid from all of you students and parents of the traumatized students.
I have repeatedly stated that nothing which occurred in the weather throughout the past 5 years was new. It all happened previously, 75 to 100 to 175 years to 575 years prior, and it often happened more intensely. See for yourself:
 |
| Above: A 1911 article out of Alaska and then published in Denton TX and elsewhere. |
Below: Braidwood Dispatch & Mining Journal, New South Wales; Weds, Sept 28, 1910, pg 4. This shows us that, as far back as 1910, the worldwide & universal MELTING OF GLACIERS was common knowledge amongst the maritime industry, explorers, researchers, and journalists.
From 1850 to 1910, the famous JAKOBSHAVN GLACIER melted FOUR MILES. Yet, it still exists in 2024, even to the point of having gained size, from time to time. Thus, the End of the World narrative of Michael Mann and the Biden People was one big lie, much like everything else said by the Biden People. The Number 1 commodity lacking during the Biden Years was the truth.
**************************************************************************** |
| NOW REMEMBER: This was when the co2 level was much LOWER than today. |
 | ||||
| The co2 count in 1927 was 306 ppm. Today it's 425 ppm. |
%20-%2028%20Jul%201950.png) |
| This was published 74 years ago, when the co2 level was 312 ppm. |
Above: Prediction that the SVARTISEN GLACIER of Norway would be gone by the Year 2000.
******************************************************************************
Below: As of 2022, the Svartisen Glacier has been the 2ND LARGEST in Norway, at 142 sq miles in size. It certainly did NOT disappear by the Year 2000, as was predicted by experts of the era, and as was reported by AAP-Reuters.
 |
| This is only a small part of the glacier which did NOT vanish in the Year 2000. |
**********************************************************
Below is a super important lesson in how fast glaciers form. In 1916, there was no glacier there, in Mounta Danello, Italy. Rather, there were 15 Austrian soldiers there. Twenty years later (1936), a glacier melts and reveals the soldiers' remains. It didn't even take twenty years for the glacier to form. Thus, glacier size is quite flexible over relatively short periods of time. Glaciers can form quite rapidly.
%20-%2023%20Sep%201936.png)
Below: A receding glacier in 1912, when co2 was at 301 ppm. It was receding a mile a year. Thus, we have yet more evidence that the 2020s are not unprecedented or unique, in any capacity at all, whatsoever, in the least. Even the lying scientists and lying media members of today is nothing new. It's all the same old same old. Greed. And the American taxpayer gets to be the swindled sucker.
%20-%2014%20Sep%201912.png)
Below: Newspaper report of January 14, 1939, when the co2 count was 311. That's 106 ppm LOWER than today. Yet, it states that "geologists all over the world" were puzzled by the continuous retreat of ice glaciers. That worldwide glacier retreat occurred 85 years prior to 2024. Thus, any glacier retreat reported today, tomorrow, or next year is NOT something unprecedented. It's the same old same old. So, don't let Michael Mann's false science provoke you into suicide ... or even clinical depression. ****%20-%2014%20Jan%201939.png)
%20-%2013%20Dec%201907.png)
************************************************************************
Below: In 1905, Swiss glaciers were known to be shrinking. Yet, the article had a global reach to it. It mentioned "the fact seems to be that glaciers all over the world are shrinking" ... in 1905 ... 120 years ago ... even though the co2 count was only 298 ppm ... 127 ppm LOWER than it is today. That 1905 article looks a lot like a 2024 news article. Deja vu, climate crisis peddlers.
%20-%2024%20Jun%201905.png)
****************************************************************************
Below: This article mentions that Swiss glaciers were shrinking since 1922. And of course, I called 1922 "the Year of the Great Meltdown." None the less, did you ever hear about the 36 year glacier cycle by which a glacier waxes and wanes, like the phases of the moon? Well, it's mentioned here:
%20-%2031%20Dec%201934.png) |
| This article was truncated ... cut ... for the sake of space. |
%20-%2018%20Dec%201902.png) |
| In 1902, the co2 level was 296 and a half ppm, 129 ppm LOWER than Dec 2024. |
***************************************************************
Below are the copies of four pages of an 1882 California Geological Survey Report. The survey was the result of the California gold rush. The topic was gold-bearing gravel (aka auriferous gravel.) Glaciers came into the topic anyway. The bottom line is that notable glacier shrinking (aka receding) was occurring in the 1870s & 1880s, when the atmospheric CO2 was extremely low, proving that CO2 is NOT the driver of climate and the cause of glacial melt. There is not enough of it in the sky, for it to drive any climate.
*****************************************************************************
Below: At the very least, look at "July 27, 1903." Then look at, "MELTING GLACIERS." This is a report that the famous Jakobshavn Glacier of Greenland was receding --- 121 years ago, when co2 was 297 ppm. For a 53 year period, up to 1902, the glacier melted eight miles. Then, in the vicinity of 2016 to 2019, the same glacier was reported as having had three consecutive years of ice gain. Climate is cyclical, much like the phases of the moon. It waxes and it wanes.
 |
| 70 years ago, when co2 was 312 parts per million, 113 ppm lower than today. |
All twelve of these samples should help you realize that you have been told a long line of lies about climate history and the present climate. Look through newspaper and magazine archives, yourself. The recent claim of a "climate crisis" has all been a con game, played by the media, fund-raising scientists, and money-grabbing politicians who want re-elected. The doomsayers all have a financial conflict of interest. Thus, they are NOT unbiased. You don't have to submit to Mind Dictators. Go and be free.
🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎🌎
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/are-some-of-the-earth-s-glaciers-actually-becoming-larger.html
🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍
Other sources include: https://www.severe-weather.eu/cryosphere/earth-youngest-glacier-healthy-cryosphere-losing-battle-global-warming-rrc/
Below is a report on Antarctic Ice per se. It's very important to view. At least skim through it. At least look at the opening paragraphs.
https://www.antarcticajournal.com/antarctic-ice-sheet-mass-gains-greater-than-losses/
And of course, you can venture-off on your own and discover more reference sources. If you have the time and money to do an in-depth ... deep-dive ... investigation of the world's many glaciers, then you would be doing many a person a favor and a half. Some of us don't have the money or the time or even the health to go into such a deep dive. And of course, if there were a Climate Crisis, you would know it. You wouldn't have to wait for CNN or Tim Walz or Barack Obama or Greta to tell you.
It has all happened before; time & time again
By now you should get the point. There is no new, "never-before," climate crisis with the glaciers. All of the aforementioned instances of severe glacial ice melt occurred when the atmospheric CO2 level was much much LOWER than it is today, and therefore, they should have never melted as they did between 1902 and 1938, according to the Al Gore Theory of Climate & Temperature.
Likewise, all instances of minor glacial melt occurred when the outdoor CO2 count was higher than it was between 1902 and 1938. Therefore, those glaciers should have melted much more in the 21st Century than they did in the early 20th Century. But, they did not do so. This is one of many instances where the Al Gore Theory of Climate is an expensive LIE.
In fact, in the very late 1970s, there was the abundance of polar ice. Yet, the CO2 count was much higher in 1979 than it was during 1922, when northern polar ice melt was reported to be at its most severe stage of ice-melt. So, the ice volume should have been less in 1979. This means that the Al Gore Theory is not true. There is much more involved in constructing Planet Earth's weather. CO2, at its 2024 level, is still LESS THAN 1/2 of 1%. Actually, it's 1/2 of 1/10 of 1%, at 425 ppm or so. It's 0.042%.
And remember, CO2 reached its height ... in volume and in yearly growth rate ... during the Biden-Harris Years, when Draconian measures were shoved down everybody's throat. Those measures failed, due to the counter-active force of coal-burning plants being put online in Southern & Eastern Asia. Those coal-fired power plants are causing the continued rise in CO2. HOWEVER, other molecular substances coming from those plants are more serious. This includes mercury, particulate matter, fly ash, sulfur dioxide, etc.
The great irony here is that sulfur dioxide acts as tiny mirrors, deflecting sunlight back into outer space, causing cooling. In fact, volcanoes have resulted in notable temperature declines on Planet Earth, such as in 1816, due to Mount Tambora's eruption in the previous calendar year. The prime component responsible for time spans of temperature decline was the large amount of sulfur dioxide which spewed out of the volcanoes at the time. This was especially the case for the disaster year, known as 536.
By 541, there was the dreaded Justinian Plague. That era was known as the Late Antique Little Ice Age which endured until 660 CE. It was followed yet more cold bouts, even into the Year 822. Some time in the 10th Century came the Medieval Warm Period. This was followed by the Little Ice Age which existed from 1284 (the start of the Wolf Minimum to 1840 (When the Phytophthora Infestans infested potatoes in Europe)
The outrageously large amount of Congressional Funding is why you cannot instantly take an American scientist for his word. There is also the conflict of interest known as NGO funding, as well. People throughout history have been known to tell lies for money. It's called Theft by Deception. Concerning this, if a scientist says that there is no climate crisis, then he gets no funding. So, the claim that there is an end-of-the-world climate crisis outside is a sales pitch.
Let us proceed to the Swiss glaciers of TODAY.
The Swiss glaciers were recently reported to be uniformly shrinking at a disastrous rate ... as of the past two years. At the least, it is true that the Year 2022 was as hot as was the Year 1922, and 1922 was the year when newspapers and magazines reported the greatest loss of Arctic ice in newspaper history. Yet, the World did not come to a disastrous end shortly after 1922 ... or even during the Dust Bowl Years of the 1930s. Far more people died in the 1940s, thanks to Hitler & Tojo.
Now, to discern and identify any land's climate is NOT a mere two year journey. Discerning Climate is a 30 year process. Climate is the Trend of Weather. Climate is Average Weather of the Past Thirty Years or so. So, let's take a look at the amount of Swiss glacial melt that has occurred between 1973 and 2016, when using eight major glaciers as a sample ... and when judging by length.
Now, there are about 42 or so major glaciers in the Swiss region that have been officially measured. Eight sample glaciers are below. You can see the difference in their lengths between 1973 and 2016, in that "table" which people call a "chart."
Now, 2016 was ten years after the Al Gore propaganda movie which claimed that, from the Year 2006 onward, ice melting would accelerate, while hurricanes will intensify. Thus, the 2016 glacial length readings below should have shown alarming rates of Swiss Ice Melt. How much of a difference in length are those eight glaciers, between a 43 year period? Look for yourself.
ANS: For those who are reading a copy-and-paste version of this discourse ... and who can't see the chart which is actually a statistical table ... there was NOT very much ice loss at all. It's an insult to the common sensed citizen's intelligence.
This particular Swiss glacier ice melt survey, for the time span queried, should be filed under "You've-got-to-be-kidding." Perhaps a person reading this can realize that all that your teachers, politicians, news reporters, and nearby climate activists have been doing nothing more than performing the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. In the spirit of Michael Schellenberg, it compels one to say, =====> What Climate Crisis?
No weather event or meteorological condition of the past five years is new. It has all happened before, and at a more intense degree, as well. The photocopies of historic newspaper clips below tell the true story. John Kerry does not. Kerry needs to be filed in the You've-got-to-be-kidding dept, also. He's supposed to be smart. But, I don't see it.
At present, there are glaciers that have been growing very successfully around Planet Earth. Yet, with a population of eight billion humans, we need more green fields of every sort than we need glaciers of any kind. No crop ever grew on a glacier. Crops do not grow on ice.
Keep in mind that the Swiss glaciers were reported in early 20th Century newspapers to have been severely retreating during the early 20th Century, also. Thus, climate conditions come in cycles.
So remember, the Climate Crisis hype of today is a sales pitch for more Congressional Funding & NGO Funding. NGO stands for Non-Governmental Organization. This Climate Activism has been nothing more than a bunch of money-grabbers standing up in a crowded theater called Planet Earth and screaming "fire!!!" as loudly as they could.
In re: Severe glacier melt ALSO reported in early 20th Century, when the CO2 level was low:
Over 75, 89, 98, 102, 115, and 123 years ago, reports of drastically receding glaciers made the newspapers, logs, almanacs, magazines, and journals of the time. In fact, 1922 was the year of the most Arctic Ice Melt ever reported in newspaper history. This was the time span when the co2 count was 110-125 ppm LOWER than it is today. Therefore, you CANNOT blame the 1922 Arctic Ice Melt on CO2. Glacial ice comes and glacial ice goes.
What is concluded is that Sigourney Weaver in 2016, ex-Gov Cuomo later, and numerous others LIED when they claimed that none of today's weather events and polar cap conditions ever happened before. Today has been no different than in days past, and the polar caps don't change all that much anyway, when measuring them on a long-term percentage basis. This has already been illustrated at the Blue Marble Album, in 60+ discourses which did take time to research.
It has all happened before, and even more intensely
In fact, in decades and centuries past, the adverse weather events were a modest-to-significant. This concerns floods, droughts, hurricanes, heatwaves, cold-snaps, and any other type of atmospheric turbulence that is recorded and kept for historical purposes. For example, in December of 1287, one "storm tide" rearranged the coastline of the Netherlands, while killing 50,00 to 80,000 humans.
Then came a heavy extratropical cyclone's storm surge on November 18th, 1421. It also came upon the Netherlands, killing 2,000 to 10,000. The Grote Waard was destroyed. Parts of the Netherlands near Holland remained underwater for decades.
MOREOVER, there is the matter of the Blue Holes in the Bahamas. Core samples of the sediment can detect hurricane activity of centuries past. It was reported ... by the mainstream Smithsonian Institute ... that hurricane activity was very rampant during specific time phases in the past. Yet, CO2 levels were NOT high. They were much lower than today, thereby abolishing the Al Gore Theory of Climate. CO2 was NOT causing the rise in hurricane activity between the 1720s and 1820s, as well as during the first half of the 16th Century.
As far as goes today, there are more SHORT DURATION CYCLONES and more LOW GRADE CYCLONES ... inferior to a Category 1 hurricane ... CALLED TROPICAL STORMS. Gore was completely wrong in having stated that the rise in CO2 was going to cause more intense and more frequent (and even longer-duration) hurricanes.
 |
| Attribution here goes to the Smithsonian Institute which "considers megadata to be in the public domain," anyway. Refer to the following link, for the article attached to this graph. In as much, cyclone activity, at specific time spans, was eight times more than it was in 2020 or so. In other specific time spans, the activity was twice and thrice as much as it was in 2020 or so. |
There is much to convey about the findings of the probable cause of hurricane intensity or lack thereof in specific time spans. It deals with the Latitudinal Forcing ... involving currents ... instead of climate fluctuations which involves temperature. This is because the northeastern US landfall hurricanes weren't in tune with the Gulf/Bahama Area cyclones, in detailed research. Actually, it's all based on Pressure Gradient Forcing, and this scientific behavior of climate has already been explained at the Blue Marble Album. Such a thing involves Baroclinic Stability and Instability. BTW, "baro" means pressure, as in air pressure.
Now, a hurricane's intrinsic bio-markers are beyond the scope of this discourse. The bottom line is that there were many weather events ... including hurricanes ... that were worse decades and centuries ago, when the CO2 count was lower than it is today. This means that it is a complete lie to claim that the rise in atmospheric CO2 results in more natural disasters, at more intense levels. Read the writing linked two paragraphs above this one. It's detailed with enlightenment.
The other lesson is that, when the world does come to the point where it's coming to an end, you are not going to need Greta to tell you. You will know, by instinct. In your personal life today, how bad have things been, when compared to the 1927 Mississippi River Flooding and the 1931 Yangtze River Flood, as well as numerous droughts throughout the centuries?
And then came western American wildfires so intense that it created the need to publish the Smokey the Bear Fire Prevention Campaign. Those fires went unchecked for miles at a time, in the 1930s, because there was neither the population nor the technology to curtail them. In fact, 1934 was declared a few years ago ... by NASA, etc ... to have been the worst drought year in the past 1,000 years. That intense amount of dryness will cause massive acreage of trees to ignite.
And when it comes to Al Gore's prediction that hurricanes will increase in intensity and number, the truth is that, since 1851 only FOUR of the hurricanes that made landfall upon the Continental United States were Cat 5 hurricanes. A hurricane or two or three or four or five has turned Cat 5 in an Atlantic Hurricane season, in remote ocean water. As such things near land, their intensities reduce.
The Great Deceit from Congressional-dollar minded scientists today
The great deceit of today is that Category 3 hurricanes in the Pacific Ocean are now called Super Typhoons. This was done to scare the People into believing that only those scientists can save the world. They are committing theft by deception. Super typhoons are nothing more than average hurricanes and hurricanes have been a part of Atlantic & Pacific History, since the beginning of maritime history.
The early 1960s had the true Super Typhoons in the Pacific, and the world survived quite well afterward. Only conventional war and a certain African drought made life imperiled on Planet Earth, along with the threat of Nuclear War between the Good Ole USA and the Soviet Union. A devastating heat wave would come to Europe, in 1976. Blizzards would hit America. Weather fluctuates, and it does so because the Earth rotates at a 23.5 degree tolt. That's called obliquity; a fancy word for tilt. All in all, Al Gore turned out to be a false prophet who made a ridiculously large amount of money on his "theatrics."
And where it concerns heatwaves, places such as Athens are actually "Rain Shadow Terrains" where it has gotten up to 117F decades ago, when the co2 count was much lower than it is today. Go and scour through the newspapers and journals of decades and centuries past. And then learn about "Leeward mountain side adiabatic heating & Chinook Winds."
Incidentally, Chinook Winds are the same as Foehn Winds and Santa Ana Winds, and such things involve compressed mountain top air which translates into "mountain slope heating" and which involves very dry air. Such a heat has nothing to do with CO2. Even when it comes to weather history, history repeats itself, even concerning Santa Ana Winds.
This brings us to the recent claim that the glaciers are melting and we're gonna die because of it
There have been a modest number of glaciers which have been growing in this modern era, all along. This means that glacial melt is NOT uniform. Yet, the CO2 level throughout the Earth's atmosphere is understood to be uniform. Thus, if CO2 is melting one mountain range of glaciers, it must be melting all other mountain ranges of glaciers. But, it is not doing so. This is proof that the small concentration of CO2 in Planet Earth's atmosphere does NOT drive the climate. And the percentage of CO2 in the sky occupies a mere 0.042% of that sky. 425 ppm is not all that much CO2. That's not enough to cause a towering inferno.
If there are growing glaciers out there ... while there are simultaneously melting ones ... then it's proof that CO2 does NOT drive the climate. It would then be time to identify Al Gore, Michael Mann, David Attenborough, and John Kerry as the perpetrators of Theft by Deception & the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.
One of the "evidentiary sources" below here ... aka reference sources ... comes from none other than worldatlas.com. It's "easy reading" for novices. There are other articles linked here, too. However, you need to take at least a quick peek at the 12 newspapers article photo-copies posted below. Those links come afterward.
My goal is to see to it that you realize that you have been the recipient of a huge money-making lie, ever since the publication of Al Gore's non-factual movie, in 2006. And always remember the CLIMATEGATE EMAILS of 2009. When the news came out, everyone basically said, "Okay. Got it. Typical. Fraud for money ... money from congress. Case Closed. Move on. Find a better money-making lie, the next time"
However, there was too much congressional funding to ignore. So, the name, "Global Warming" (which was not occurring at that particular time) was changed to "Climate Change," which happens to be a vague, one-size-fits-all phrase. It then got to the point where everything caused climate change. As a result, hundreds of billions of dollars were tossed out to the climate activists.
There are 60+ climate discourses here, at the Blue Marble Album, which can definitely set you free of the terror that Greta endured, at the hands of activists who were emotionally abusing her. How embarrassing for her, especially in light of the fact that the World did not come to an end, in 2023, after all! Greta said that a certain scientist said that the world was going to come to an end, unless we hand over all of our freedom to Al Gore-approved scientists.
The #1 proof that the Al Gore, Jim Hansen, & Michael Mann Climate Disaster Predictions were completely false exists in the fact that the Maldives did NOT go underwater by the predicted year of 2018. The Maldives is a tourist attraction with airfields and hotels.
Roll Call of the Growing Glaciers
Now, for every glacier or set of glaciers found to have been growing, there is always negative press accompanying it, so as to reinforce the belief that the CO2 which inhabits only 0.042% of the sky and which has a radiative forcing of no more than 3.7 watts per meter squared is causing a climate crisis. There is even one case where a growing glacier was said to have been caused by none other than ... "global warming." However, it's not a warm glacier.
A major Greenland glacier started to regrow in 2016 or 2017, and the report of its growth was followed by a prediction that the glacier will start shrinking again. Well, in order for these heavily paid press releasers to be believable, there needs to be numerical empirical evidence of one sort or another. None the less, it's the Jakobshavn Glacier that was reported. After its third consecutive year of growing, it fell off the media's proverbial radar. None the less, it was growing recently enough to merit recognition.
Moreover, glaciers in a California mountain range were found to have been growing, while glaciers in an Oregon range were reported as having disastrously shrunk within the same general time span. More specifically the Hotum & Wintun Glaciers of Shasta Mountain were found to have doubled in size betwen 1951 to 2002. Meanwhile, a few Klamath mountain range glaciers were said to have significantly shrunk, between 1888 and 2013. Well, if CO2 were the driver of climate, then both glacier sets would have responded in the same way. Either all would have grown or all would have shrunk.
None the less, the growing glaciers are NOT located in the same general location. They are all over the world, as in Argentina, Alaska, California, Antarctica, Washington State, Greenland, Pakistan, etc. They prove that glaciers do NOT respond uniformly to the atmospheric CO2 level, thereby proving that CO2 is not driving the climate. If CO2 were the driver of climate, then all glaciers would be either growing or shrinking in unison.
Crater Glacier, aka the Tulutson Glacier. It's the youngest in the world. It formed inside the remaining structure of the Mount Saint Helen Volcano which is still active and which is expected to blow within 65 to 260 years. A volcanic dome started growing there, in 2004. Two lava domes are there now, along with the horseshoe glacier.
The glacier within was discovered by aerial photography in 1996. The glacier was officially reported to have been GROWING in ice volume at a rate of 135 feet per year, in length, and 50 feet per year in thickness, until 2004, when the volcanic dome started growing. Crater Glacier was said to be 1.71 miles long & 656 feet thick. It's shaped like a horseshoe.
See the following, even if you're not a kid anymore: https://kids.kiddle.co/Crater_Glacier
Hotlum Glacier and Wintun Glacier, both on Mt. Shasta, California. Both were found to have doubled in sized between 1951 and 2002. There are seven glaciers in all, on Mount Shasta. All were found to be growing at some time in the 21st Century. This includes the Whitney Glacier which is larger today than it was in 1890.
Perito Moreno, in the Argentine Patagonia. It has been advancing at a pace of 7 feet per day. None the less, journalists reported that the land of the Patagonia is rising at some kind of record pace, due to the lessening of the weight of ice on it. The media stated that Patagonia is "rapidly rising up." Well, the rapid rise has been 1.6 inches per year. That's one point six inches ... less than two inches. Do you see how the media and journalists lie to humanity with false light presentations and hyper-exaggerations?
Do you know how tall the three highest peaks of the Patagonia are? ANS: 10,250 feet (Cerro Torre), 11,000 feet (Mt Fitz Roy), 9,186 feet (Torres del Plaine). In inches, they are 123,000 inches high, 132,000 inches high, and 110,232 inches high. Now compare them to 1.6 inches per year.
Plus, the glacier is 19 miles in length. And this is supposed to make us believe that we are nearing the End of World? None the less, remember that, when ice departs through melting or sublimation, the land rises. But, it is not very high in rise of land in any one year or in any one decade.
Incidentally, sublimation is when ice turns into vapor, without first becoming liquid. The opposite is called, deposition, as in "deposit."
One more point: If land rises an inch and a half, then the sea level needs to rise an inch and a half, in order for the ocean to encroach upon the land and cause a climate crisis. If you get more land, then you need more water, to cause a climate crisis on your shorelines.
 |
| 21st Century photo of Saint Augustine Florida. Show me where this Climate Crisis is here. |
Sea Level
Take note that, for the time period of 19,000 years ago to 12,900 years ago, sea level rose about 280 feet or 3,360 inches. Then, after the Younger Dryas Glacial Era (which ended 11,700 years ago) until 3,000 years ago, the sea level rose another 150 feet or 1,800 inches. That amounts to 430 feet or 5,160 inches of a sea level rise since the end of the Great Ice Age.
From 1880 or so until today, the sea level rose 8 to 9 inches. The scientists claim that 4 of those inches came in the past 31 years. But, of course, they could be lying, being that they have been caught lying previously.
None the less, this possibly means that today's scientists claim that our "Climate Crisis Weather" will cause the oceans to rise 12.9 inches every 100 years with all this "Climate Crisis Carbon Footprint" insertion into the atmosphere, even though the atmosphere is already 99.9% carbon free. That's one foot and one inch per century of sea level rise. Now compare it to 430 feet.
Now, does this sound very much like the End of the World to you? Does this sound like we all have to give our freedom to Al Gore and/or Michael Mann and/or Jim Hansen and/or Barack "Sequester" Obama and/or to Who Ever Else? You have to tell a scarier campfire story than that one.
Hubbard Glacier, Alaska. It's 76 miles long and 6 miles wide. Without further ado, being that I really don't have time for these climate con artists, know that the glacier is growing.
For more on Hubbard, see: https://www.online-field-guide.com/hubbard-glacier-facts/
At this point, there is an important point to make. Throughout the most recent "Quaternary Glaciation," aka Major Ice Age, Mainland Alaska (minus its peninsula & a sliver of its eastern border with present-day Vancouver) was entirely glacier-free throughout the Major Ice Age. It was a sanctuary for life.
Bruggen Glacier, aka the Pio XI Glacier: This one has been growing the most aggressively, except for Crater Glacier, I think. Well, it has been a very health growth, if you call ice healthy. It's in the southern part of the Argentine Patagonia, and it's 41 miles long.
The word one uses to describe this particular Patagonian glacier was ACCUMULATION. This certainly shows that CO2 doesn't drive the climate, being that it is not a shrinking glacier, like many other ones. Perhaps scientists can get Congressional funding, to find the true cause of today's glacier retreat. The same thing happened in the early 20th Century, when CO2 was much lower than it is today. Newspaper articles posted below illustrate that glacier retreat ... severe glacial melting ... is nothing new, at all. Thus, the rise in CO2 did not cause it, being that there wasn't enough CO2 in the 1900s, 1910s, and 1920s to have caused any glacier shrinkage, during that past era. But, there were tons of melting, way back then.
https://www.revistaterraaustralis.cl/index.php/rgch/article/view/18
The Karakoram Mountain Glaciers, in Pakistan, India, and China.
These are the glaciers that are getting the most propaganda hurled at them, in the attempt to dispel them as anomalies that should have never happened. For example, one article trying to explain away the Karakoram glacial growth started by mentioning that an Icelandic glacier recently melted away, as if glaciers everywhere were dying all at once.
There are numerous glaciers on Planet Earth, proving that we are still in an Ice Age. Some of those glaciers already melted away, especially during warm periods, including the Minoan, the Roman, and the Medieval Warm Periods, as well as the Modern Warm Period which actually started in 1840 and resulted in a potato famine, followed by a Civil War Era Drought between 1856 to the end of the tragic American Civil War.
The Glaciers and Outdoor CO2 Count are NOT on the Same Page
One more time in review. Many glaciers had significant ... though temporary ... ice melt in 1901, 1905, 1911, 1922, 1936, and 1950, as well as during present times. CO2 levels were low back then. So, if there is and was any Greenhouse Gas causing glaciers to melt, it can only be Water Vapor, being that water vapor is 90% of all greenhouse gases, when measuring by volume ... and 80% of all Greenhouse Gases when measuring by mass.
New Zealand has glaciers that were significantly shrinking, until 1983. Then came a growing phase until 2008, followed by significant decrease in glacial length. Meanwhile, CO2 rose consistently throughout that time span. So, how do you explain the New Zealand glacier growth episode, in light of the fact that the Al Gore Theory of Climate proposes than the glaciers should have steadily decreased in size commensurate with the rate of the atmosphere's increase in CO2?
How do you explain any glacier than is still growing ... as well as those glaciers which had temporary growth periods during the rise of atmospheric CO2? Well, the answer is that either the Sun or the oceans determine Planet Earth's average ... median ... mean ... usual temperature. El Nino certainly has a definitive effect ... and that topic has already been addressed at the Blue Marble Album for viewing.
Other glaciers on Earth are outrageously gigantic. Do you demand that those ones continue to grow until the Earth is covered completely by ice? Moreover, even a far back as 1936 ... when outdoor CO2 was low ... receding/melting glaciers resulted in the discovery that people were "living there" in previous decades and in previous centuries. This means that those glaciers were not a permanent part of the Earth's landscape. This indicates that "things were just as warm back then."
HOWEVER, outdoor CO2 was low at the time. So, how do you explain the melting of glaciers during low CO2 concentration. Moreover, CO2 is still in a low concentration, being that it only comprises 0.0425% of the sky. And remember, WATER VAPOR comprises 90% of all greenhouse gases.
Of course, this glacial-melt occurred during the first three decades of the 20th Century. If people would only look at the weather articles of the 1890s, 1900s, 1910s, 1920s, and 1930s, then the common citizen would snap out of the hypnotic trance imposed upon them by Al Gore, Michael Mann, John Kerry and other dishonest people.
The last time when there was true climate change, a jungle the size of the United States was turned into the Sahara Desert ... due to the development of the 30th Parallel Convection Cell which is now called the Hadley Cell. This was 6,000 years ago, and both hemispheres got a Convection Cell banded across their 30th Parallel.
This 30th Parallel phenomenon is beyond the scope of this discourse. In fact, those convection cell features are beyond the scope of most career politicians' minds. You need to understand that you have been voting for self-seeking & mean-spirited idiots, all along, when voting for a career politician. It also shows that humans are Creatures of Habit, not inclined to welcome change. So, they keep voting for the same politician.
BTW, Michael Mann was NEVER nominated as "co-winner" of any type of Nobel Prize, and therefore, he NEVER was co-awarded (or exclusively awarded) any Nobel Prize in anything. Democracy Now lied on air. Michael Mann's lawyer lied on paper, and Michael Mann repeatedly lied, period. In fact, Michael Mann simply lies, per se. In as much, the weather and/or climate was NOT mild throughout the 1,000 years preceding the Industrial Age, as Michael Mann falsely claimed.
If the atmospheric co2 level gets cut in half, as Michael Mann said it should be, then the co2 level will be very near the level where photosynthesis stops occurring. Australia is resilient, and NOT dying, as Michael Mann said.
Plus, Mann did NOT submit to Dr. Tim Ball the data set for Mann's ridiculous hockey-stick temperature graph, as Mann promised a Canadian court he would do. And Mann did hide the 1960s & '70s temperature decline of Briffa's much more honest temperature graph. And all that Tim Ball wanted was for Mann to show his methodology, in arriving at the hockey-stick graph which omitted the existence of the Medieval Warm Period and Renaissance-era & Baroque-era Little Ice Age.
One more thing: Michael Mann is not going to get China to cease its extensive coal plant construction projects. And concerning India, in the Years 2021 & 2022, it commissioned EIGHT coal plants with 4.49 GW (gigawatt) capacity. Plus, 39 coal plants are already under construction there --- in India.. What is Michael Mann and John Kerry and Bill Nye and Al Gore doing about it?
Coal releases mercury. Mercury is obviously not good for health. Sulfur Dioxide gets released during coal-burning. Not good, either. Fly-ash too, as well as certain nitrogen oxides, emit from coal when coal is being burnt. So, instead of suing Tim Ball, Rand Simberg, and Mark Steyn for defamation, Mann should have been reaching out to India and China.
Mann's purported "expert witnesses" were declared invalid by a DC court judge, incidentally. They were officially declared NOT experts in the lawsuit which has been dragging-on for years. The reason is that they did NOT show the methodology that resulted in their conclusions. And of course, they claim that the Little Ice Age & Medieval Warm Period were only local events, and not worldwide. They showed zero methodology for their conclusions which are contrary to chronicles, ledgers, journals, and strontium isotope analysis.
Go through newspaper archives, and you will see that Mann, Al Gore, PBS, & taxpayer-money-grabbing scientists have been lying to you, in a "false light," sleight-of-hand fashion. They have been omitting lots of facts.
Concerning the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere, an electrical engineering major who never studied atmosphere ... because he had enough to study as it was ... said to me, "Oh, CO2 is at ten percentage (up in the sky)." For the record, if any human is in an airspace of 10% or more of CO2, that person will die instantly; within the 15 minutes of time it takes to suffocate. In addition, if a human is in an airspace which comprises 8.4% of CO2, then that person will die in one hour or so. So, compare 8.4% to 0.042%. That's 84,000 ppm vs 425 ppm. Big difference.
☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇☇
The Ghost of Glaciers Past & the Ghost of Glaciers Present
