Simple publicly-known stats prove that there was no foreign collusion of any kind during the 2016 election ... except for Hillary getting $12 million from Morocco and similar foreign donations addressed to the Clinton Name. Let's quickly analyze the 2016 Presidential Election where accusations of "Russian Collusion" were on the airwaves for years.
 |
| The map above was posted pursuant to 17 USC 107, the Fair Use Act. |
To make a long story short, the vote count of 2016 and 2004 were almost the same for the Republican Party nominee. Thus, no collusion. Case closed. Some people need to be held heavily accountable for orchestrating a hoax which caused seething hatred toward Donald J Trump.
Let's continue, for the sake of understanding this matter a bit more thoroughly than how the mainstream media reported it. For starters, the most obvious reason why there was no indication of any successful collusion in 2016 was that Hillary Clinton won the Popular Vote by 2.86 MILLION votes. If there were any Russian collusion with the Trump Campaign, Hillary won have even lost the popular vote.
Moreover, both Donald Trump & Hillary Clinton received less than a majority of the National Vote. Donald only received 46.1% of the vote, while Hillary only won 48.2% of it. If there were any coordinated Russian Collusion with the Trump Campaign, then Donald Trump would have at least won 48.1% of the vote. That is the percentage guaranteed to be won by the democrat party nominee in any given modern-day election, due to countywide election analysis. Thus, if there were collusion, then Hillary would have won less than the predictable 48.1%.
Similarities between Hillary and the thoroughly Airheaded Kamala
If the vote results of the 2016 and the 2024 elections has a numerical similarity on the democrat party side, then this too will prove there to have been no Russia collusion in 2016. Well, it was previously stated that Hillary won 48.2% of the popular vote. Kamala the Airbrushed Airhead won 48.3% of the popular vote in 2024.
The vote count trend was exactly the same between Hillary and Kamala. This, ladies & gentlemen of the jury, is undoubted proof that there was no Russian collusion in 2016. And remember, it was countywide election result analysis which showed that any democrat party nominee will get at least 48.1% of the popular vote, in any given modern-day presidential election.
Plus, if you only get the minimum percentage of 48.1% or similar, it means that you were a worthless candidate who failed to convince Independents and open-minded voters to vote for you. Case closed. A number of people must pay for the Russian Collusion Hoax.
Motive
The Russian Collusion Hoax was understood to have been committed, in order to divert attention away from Hillary Clinton's use of government emails through her private email system. It was also understood to have been designed to deflect attention away from Hillary's donation income which even included $12 million dollars from Morocco.
The bottom line is this: If the number of votes received by each Republican Party candidate of each recent election were basically the same each election year, then that would be evidence that there was no collusion of any kind, coming from any nation. This includes the election years of 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016
We need to compare the 2016 election to the elections of 2012, 2008, and 2004. I need to show you, at the outset, that there most certainly was no Russian Collusion in 2016, as is evidenced by public statistics appropriated by the U.S. government. We do this, by beginning with a question or two:
Q: Prior to the 2016 election, who was the most recent Republican Party presidential nominee to win the presidential election? ANS: George Bush II, in 2004.
Q: How many votes did Bush receive in 2004? ANS: 62,039,572
Twelve years later was the next time when the Republican nominee won the presidency. The winner was Donald Trump, in 2016.
Q: How many votes did Trump receive in 2016? ANS: 62,985,153. He received almost the same amount of votes as did Bush, in 2004. This indicates the opposite of Russian Collusion. This indicates a Republican voter trend by which voters in 2016 weren't swayed by anything or anyone other than their voter tradition.
So, who won the election for Trump? ANS: It was NOT the Russians in the least. It was MIKE PENCE who managed to convince millions of "born-again", "evangelical," "Pentecostal" Pro-life Protestants to get to the voting booths on time. These are the people who regard themselves as "Bible Believing People" ... or even "Bible Believing Christians."
Abortion was the deciding issue in 2016, and Mike Pence was the major cause of Trump's victory. Kelly Ann Conway was the mathematical navigator. It was a matter of securing the electoral votes of the "fly-over states."
We now need to include the election results of 2008 & 2012. Q: What was the Republican Party vote count in the 2008 presidential election?
ANS: 59,950,323 Therefore, the Republican candidate's 2008 vote count was 95% of the 2016 Republican candidate vote count. Incidentally, the Year 2012 Republican candidate's vote count was 96.6% of the 2016 vote count. This means that the votes received by each Republican presidential candidate in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016 were basically the same; quite similar. Below are the vote stats for 2008 and then 2012.
The 2024 effort from the DOJ was to get right wing conservatives deleted from the Internet. And of course, this is a frontal assault upon Freedom of Speech. Even if the conservatives were actually spewing out all of Moscow's talking points, a reader (or a viewer) could give counterpoints to all of those Moscow talking points and sway the American voter away from Moscow's influence. Thus, Freedom of Speech and of the Press would prevail.
There used to be [1] Point, followed by [2] Counterpoint, followed by [3] Response to Counterpoint, and then [4] Rebuttal, where each debating entity had two opportunities to state his/her views. Now, it's all a matter of the left wing liberals being the oppressors and censurers of speech ... and of the press.
However, if you can employ free speech and then answer Moscow's propaganda with counterpoint, then it's no longer propaganda. It's subject matter for a debate. Propaganda and political influence only occur where there is censorship. It only occurs in a closed society. When you can dialogue and debate, the propaganda element vanishes.
And of course, the Biden Administration people were the Censorship People who were trying hard to hide the fact that Kamala was a terrible candidate ... who never received a primary vote in 2024 ... and who only received 844 primary votes in 2020 ... and who happens to have been the vice president with the lowest approval rating in the history of NBC approval ratings. The Dems were trying to rig the 2024 election, as usual.
The only reason why there would be complete deletion of conservative writings in 2024 is if the writings contain truths that reveal any evil about the liberal left wing which will destroy the candidate's chances of winning.
Apparently, the Democrats were trying hard to hide the fact that 1] 91% of Kamala's vice presidential staff resigned, 2] and that specific staffers stated that Kamala was very abusive toward workers, 3] and that Kamala doesn't know the first thing about basic economics, 4] and that Kamala sued the Obama administration, in the attempt to make fracking illegal, 5] and that the accumulative inflation rate throughout Kamala's VP tenure was 19.2% in 2024 ...
6] ... and that Kamala was vehemently against the Southern Border Wall, before she was suddenly all for it, 7] and that Laken Riley is still dead, along the other victims of violent illegal immigrants who were given free reign throughout the United States, 8} and that the National debt shot up to $36 trillion, when it was $27 trillion when Kamala was put into office ... and ...
9] ... in January of 2024, Joe Biden's Jennifer Granholm impeded fracking in its tertiary stage, by placing "a temporary pause on the approval of Liquefied Natural Gas exports." Such a suspension is a snake's way of banning fracking ... or of backing up the production line to the point of oppressing production. The irony to all of this was that American was the #1 producer of Liquid Natural Gas in 2023.
The list goes on and on and on, including Kamala giving sex to a married man 30 years older than her, so that she could get a launch into politics. It appears that the Biden Administration People were simply trying to hide Kamala's evils and incompetency, under the guise that not hiding them is Russian Interference. Well, to censure such information is election interference, just like it was in 2020, when 51 unconscionable former federal government intell officers claimed that the Hunter laptop showed all the signs of a Russian hoax.
If those 51 people didn't lie about the Hunter Laptop, Trump would have won the 2020 election, by a small margin. And Laken Riley would still be alive. Those 51 people need to be criminally prosecuted.
