May 27, 2025

Kamala Harris got shellacked in multiple facets of election statistics.

Posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.  At the outset of election night, it was Trump 154 to Harris 027.
This was updated in April of 2025   
The gift to all Americans of good will is the uncontroverted & undisputed defeat of Death Cult Kamala.

Above:  The 2024 presidential election results map for America's counties.  Red stands for Donald Trump.  Blue stands for Kamala.  The 
In the 2024 election, Donald Trump ::: 

[1a] ... won the popular vote by 2.43 million votes, according to the Economist ... a similar 2.42 million votes, according to Reuters ... 2.29 million votes, according to Bloomberg ... and a similar 2,284,952 votes, according to the Council of Foreign Relations.

[1b]  Therefore, the Economist, Bloomberg, and Reuters reported that 152 to 154 million people cast votes in the 2024 presidential election.  Meanwhile, the Council of Foreign Relations reported that 156,302,318 people voted in the presidential election of 2024, with 77,284,118 of those people voting for Trump and 74,999,116 of those people voting for Kamala "the Repeater" Harris.  

[1c]  Of course, "Repeater" refers to "32 days. 32 days. 32 days." ... as well as "the significance of the passage of time" ... and other imitations of a scratched vinyl LP, such as "I was raised in the middle class," which happened to have been a complete lie.  The truth is that Kamala was raised in a very affluent & high-end region known as Westmount, Montreal.  It is one of the most posh places in Quebec, with its Greene Avenue boutiques.  At one time, Westmount was the richest place in all of Canada.  See for yourself and see how much of a liar Kamala was, during the campaign.



The Expanse of Republican Red throughout the Election Landscape

[2b]  The undisputed electoral vote count for 2024 was 312 for Trump and 226 for Harris.  Now, according to basal & linear thinking, neither the Electoral College Count nor the Popular Vote were landslides.  HOWEVER, the other election metrics (aka statistics) show that the election was a convincing & solid trend of voters drifting away from Democrat Party priorities to Republican ones.  

[2ci] It was a shellacking in that a coating of Republican Red was painted across the American election map, in the 2024 election.  Such a trend does constitute a Mandate of the People to undo everything that Biden, Harris, Mayorkas, and Company had done to America & Americans, in the past four years.  

[2cii]  The 2024 Vote was a vote to do a DO-OVER ... a do-over of an America which spent the past four years ::: ~ accommodating sexual perversity, ~ performing sexual mutilation, ~ prosecuting pro-life Roman Catholics, ~ turning the American court system into a kangaroo court against a demented president's political opponent, ~concealing the dementia of a thoroughly incompetent and inarticulate Joe Biden who sniffed more people than did his dog,  and also ...

~ calling an unarmed mob with zero military vehicles and zero military officers ordering their movements an insurrection,  ~ imposing draconian environmental measures that resulted in the highest level of atmospheric CO2 in human history, ~creating the conditions for Demand Pull Inflation and astronomical price hikes,  ~ using taxpayer dollars to fly illegal alienable criminals to their next scene of the crime, where the crimes were committed upon Americans,  and also ...

~ the governmental incompetence that caused entire California neighborhoods to become incinerated, ~ the governmental incompetence of spending $32 million per electric bus,  ~ the incompetence of having two astronauts stranded in space,  ~the incompetence of connecting high-speed internet to zero homes with Congressional funding.  ~ the planning to spy on Catholics who attend the tradition Latin Mass that European kings attending throughout the centuries,  ~ allowing floating and hovering vehicles thoroughfare throughout America,  ~ allowing Jews to be endangered on college campuses,  ~provoking Russia by having NATO encroach upon Russia, up to its border lines.  The list of outrages continue.   

[2d]  For those unaware, shellac was a predominant colorant used in varnishing.  So, the symbolic image of "a political shellacking" (in 2024) is meant to convey the painting of the color red over the color blue throughout many sections of the American election landscape.

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
Not Since 1932

[2ei]  A vivid statistical marker which shows that the 2024 election was a shellacking goes as follows:  
Kamala Harris is the first candidate in 92 years who did NOT FLIP a single county throughout the entire United States.  

[2eii] The last time this happened was in the Year 1932, during the Great Depression.  Thus, for such a thing to happen, the state of the United States must be pathetic.  And of course, Kamala provided the Senatorial Tie-Breaking vote TWICE which caused Demand-Pull Inflation, the acute rise in the Cost of Living, and a constant burden upon the Working Poor, as well as ridiculously jacked-up gasoline & diesel fuel prices. 
☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

[2f] Add to the pathetic state of America (1) the unvetted immigrant invasion, (2) a proxied war against Russia, with the Ukrainian People as the surrogate actor, (3) the renewed hatred of Jews, (4) the unchecked aerial spying upon America, (5) the prosecution of pro-life Roman Catholics, (6) the accommodation of sexual perversity and child castration, (7) the march toward Censorship of anyone who speaks out against Biden, Harris, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, etc, and (8) the turning of the Justice Dept into a Kangaroo Court ... only to name a few of the American evils proliferated under the Biden & Harris Administration.    

[2gi]  Whereas Kamala flipped ZERO COUNTIES, Donald Trump flipped 88 of them, in 2024.  
           Incidentally, in 2016 Trump flipped 217 counties, while Hillary flipped 30 of them.
            Furthermore, in 2020, Trump flipped 16 counties, and Biden flipped 66 of them.

In fact, according to the New York Times, as of Nov 6, 2024,  Mr Trump improved on his 2020 margin in 2,793 counties.  His margin decreased in only 319 counties.

[2gii] As far as went the 1932 Election, whereas Hoover flipped zero counties, FDR flipped 24 counties in the State of Pennsylvania, alone.  In fact, in 1932, FDR flipped 24 States.  In 1928, Hoover carried 40 States.  So, there were a lot of States needed to be flipped, in order for FDR to have won, in 1932.
 
[2hi]  Concerning the Swing State of Pennsylvania which Trump did flip in 2024, he won 58 of its counties, while Harris only won 9 of them.  Trump won 30 Pennsylvania counties by 40+ points each.  Moreover, Trump flipped six States in 2024, and predictably enough, they were all Swing States. 

[2hii]  Now, Trump won 2,630 counties, while Harris only won 427 of them.  However, 2,559 of the Trump counties were solidly Republican ones, while 421 of Kamala Harris' counties were solidly Democrat counties.  This means that whoever was to become the Republican nominee in 2024, he was going to win 2,559 counties.  Likewise, whoever was to become the Democrat nominee in 2024, she guaranteed to win 421 staunchly democrat party counties.  And those 421 democrat party counties comprised 48.1% of the national population.  Meanwhile, those 2,559 Republican counties comprised 40.1% of the US population.


[2hiii] All that Kamala needed to do was to win over to her side 0.75% to 1.5% more of the American voter, in addition to those among the 48.1% of American voters living in the 421 solidly democrat counties ... for Kamala to have won the popular vote.  

Kamala failed to gain a mere 0.75% to 1.5% extra votes.  Rather, those 421 counties were bleeding democrat party voters who ended up shifting to the Republican right.  In the end, Kamala would end up receiving 48.3% of the popular vote and losing the popular vote to Donald Trump's 49.8%.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, needed 10% more votes, in addition to the votes already guaranteed to him, in the large block of Republican terrain where lives 40.1% of the American population.  That is to say, Trump needed to win-over to his side at least 6 times more voters than Kamala needed to win-over.  He achieved this task, while CNN & MSNBC were defaming him 24/7.  His rally attendance statistics, alone, showed how much of a compelling personality he had, along with a compelling platform of campaign issues.  

https://www.cfr.org/article/2024-election-numbers  <==== Council on Foreign Relations Summary

[2hiv]  Moreover, Kamala Harris did NOT outperform Joe Biden in any State.  This means that she did NOT win any State in 2024, by a margin of 3% or larger than Joe Biden won in 2020.

[2i] Neither a red-shift nor a blue-shift is the automatic win of a county or a State.  One can get more votes in 2024 than he did in 2020 and still lose that county.  The bottom line here is that Kamala failed to flip a single county in 2024, and such a thing is a huge bio-maker, indicating an utterly collapsed campaign, from Coast to Coast and beginning to end.  The Harris Campaign was nothing more than a Campaign of Lies.


[2j]  If and only if CNN & MSNBC did not spend 24 hours a day, seven days a week, committing all sorts of defamation against Donald Trump ... and if the ABC & NBC commentators simply posted numerical charts, tables, and graphs of Trump's presidential accomplishments ... then the Election of 2024 would have resulted in a much larger margin of victory for Donald.  Plus, no one would have come an inch away from assassinating Trump, because there would have been no Inciting of Riots or Assassinations, on air ... or in print.

Review of Very Recent History; 2016 & 2020.

[3]  The 2020 electoral count was Biden 306 and Trump 232.  [4b] The 2016 electoral count was 304 for Trump, 227 for Hillary, 3 for Colin Powell, 1 for Bernie Sanders, 1 for the female Native American, Spotted Eagle, 1 for Ron Paul, and 1 for John Kasich.  The 2016 election results should have been 306 for Trump and 232 for Hillary. 

The November 2024 Presidential Election

[4a]  Trump won all seven of the 2024 Swing States.  [5b] He then won 31 States in all, along with Nebraska's 1st & 3rd districts.  Meanwhile, Kamala won 19 States and D.C., as well as Maine's 1st district and Nebraska's 2nd district.   

[4b]   In addition, Trump flipped TEN California counties in 2024, taking them into the Red Side and out of the Dark Side.  In fact, Trump received 1,909,639 more California votes in 2024 than he did in 2020. 

[5a]  Of the 31 States won by Trump in 2024, he won TWO States by a margin of 40+ points.  He won SIX States by a margin of 30-39 points.   Trump won SIX other States by a margin of 20-29 points.  Plus, Trump won TEN States by a margin of 10-19 points each.  

[5b]  President Elect Trump won each of the SEVEN SWING STATES by ::: (1) 0.86% in WI (by a 29,397 vote margin) ::: (2) 1.41% in MI (by a 80,103 vote margin ::: (3) 1.71% in PA (by a 120,266 vote margin) :::  (4) 2.18% in GA (by a 115,100 vote margin) ::: (5) 3.10% in NV (by a 46,008 vote margin) ::: (6) 3.21% in NC (by a 183,048 vote margin) ::: (7) 5.51% in AZ (by a 187,382 vote margin).


[6a]  As of Dec 16, 2024, Trump won 197 pivot counties by an average margin of 18.4% each.  Meanwhile, Harris only won nine of them, by an average of only 2.5% each.   

[6b]  A Pivot County is a "swinging door county that alternates presidential party candidates per election year."  Today, it's regarded as a county which voted in majority for Obama in 2008 & 2012, along with voting predominately for Trump in 2016.  There are 206 such counties, at present.


[7]  Trump red-shifted ALL 50 STATES, including New York State, by 6.43%,  [7b] ... New Jersey, by 4.92%,  [7c] ... California, by 4.61%,  [7d] ... Massachusetts, by 4.38%,  and [7e] ... Illinois, by 4.26%.  

[8]  Donald Trump also received 11.4 to 12.3 million more votes in 2024 than Hillary did in 2016.  In fact, Donald the Trumpmeister received 14.3 to 15.1 million more votes in 2024 than he did in 2016.  For the record, the 2016 popular vote results were as follows:  Hillary 65,853,514 and Trump 62,984,828.
 
[9a]  In 2024, Donald Trump even shifted Florida more to the Red than it already was, to the tune of 4.88 points.  In fact, Trump flipped Miami-Dade County, and no Republican had won that county since 1988.  The Democrat presidential candidate won Miami-Dade in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004,  2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020 ... but not in 2024.  

[9b]  Trump also flipped St. Petersburg’s Pinellas County and Jacksonville’s Duval County.  

[10a]  Speaking of Atlantic Coastline cities, even though Donald Trump did not flip New York City to Republican Red, he did see it shift to the right by 7.76%, from the 2020 election.   Observe:  

[10b]  In 2016, Hillary received 78.95% of the NYC VOTE, while Donald received 18.03% of it.  In 2020, the NYC election score was Biden's 76.19% to Trump's 22.69%.  

[10c]  Finally, in the 2024 presidential election, Harris received 67.70% of the NYC vote, while Donald Trump received 30.45%, of it.  It was a shift to the Republican right of 7.76%.  After all, 30.45% minus 22.69% = 7.76%.  Moreover, the 2020 Democrat Vote 76.19% minus the 2024 Democrat Vote 67.70% = a 8.49% shrinkage ... aka retreat ... from the democrat party stronghold in NYC.

[10d]  Moreover, in 2024 Trump won 124,000 MORE VOTES in the Bronx than he did in 2020.  He won 133,000 MORE VOTES in Brooklyn than he did in 2020.  Plus, he beat Harris by 29 points in Staten Island.


More whites voted for Kamala than did blacks, yet racism was blamed on Kamala's loss

[11a] Concerning the white racism claim, the opposite evidence exists.  After all, tens of millions of white people voted for Kamala Harris.  Concerning white women, that voting block comprised 40% of the American electorate.  Well, 46% of the white females voters voted for Kamala.  That would be approximately 28 million votes.  Moreover, 42% of all white voters in general voted for Kamala, in 2024.  That amounts to 48 million whites.

Far more white people voted for Kamala than did black people.  The actual statistic was that 15.2 million blacks voted in the 2024 election.  12.6 million blacks voted for Kamala, while 2.4 million of them voted for Trump.  Therefore, almost four-times more whites voted for Kamala than did blacks, to the tune of 48 million to 12.6 million   Thus, a bankrupting class action DEFAMATION lawsuit is in order against that annoying pro-black-racist hag recently let go by MSNBC.  


Defamation against Trump, via the Madison Square Garden Rally

[11b]  Next came the claim that Trump was a Nazi, because he held a rally at Madison Square Garden.  This defamatory accusation was due to a 1939 Nazi Rally, held in an older edition of Madison Square Garden.  Thus, if you hold a rally at Madison Square Garden, it's because you're a Nazi racist.  Well, do you know who held a rally at Madison Square Garden 18 years after the 1939 Nazi rally?

ANS:  ~DR MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR, with the world-famous Rev Billy Graham, on July 18, 1957.  Now, according MSNBC & CNN, Dr. King & Billy Graham were Nazis, carrying on the Nazi Tradition.  

Do you know who else appeared on stage at Madison Square Garden throughout the decades?  ANS:

 ~the Jewish Billy Joel who performed at the MSG 123 times,  ~the very Jewish Neil Diamond,  ~the doubly Jewish Simon & Garfunkel,  ~the female Ashkenazi Jew & Brooklyn native, Barbara Streisand,  ~the equally female Ashkenazi Jew & Manhattan native, Carol King,  ~the Hawaiian-born Ashkenazi Jew, Bette Middler,  ~the Jewish Bob Dylan, aka Robert Allen Zimmerman,  ~the black & Jewish Lenny Kravitz,  and ~the Israeli singer, Ishay Ribo in 2024 ... plus ...  

~the black icon, Count Basie,   ~the multiply black singing group, Little Anthony & the Imperials,   ~the black icon Little Richard,  ~the black icon, Chubby Checkers,   ~the black Father of Rock & Roll, Chuck Berry,    ~the black comedian, Richard Prior,   ~the black Harry Belafonte,  ~the black Tracy Chapman,  ~ the black Sly & the Family Stone,    ...and...

~the notably black Janet Jackson,  ~the black Gladys Knight, ~the black Tina Turner,  ~ the black Beyonce,  ~the black Luther Vandross, Jr,  ~the black Alicia Keys,   ~the half-black & half-white Booker T & the MG's,  ~the Irish & Venezuelan Mariah Carey,  ~the very albino Johnny Winters,   ~Bob Marley,  ~Parliament Funkadelic,  ~Rihanna,   ...and...

~ the partially black, partially white, and partially Shawnee Native American Jimi Hendrix,  ~the Doors,  ~Janis Joplin,  ~the very Puerto Rican Luis Miguel,  ~the Brazilian Ivete Sangalo,  ~the Japanese band, Laruka...and the most mainstream of acts, such as ...

~John Lennon,  ~Paul McCartney (15 sellouts),  ~the Rolling Stones,  ~Led Zeppelin,  ~Alice Cooper,  ~Elton John (62 appearances),  ~the rock group KISS,  ~Bruce Springsteen (18 sellouts),  ~Black Sabbath,  ~Bowie,  ~Lady Gaga,  and  ~the Taylor Swift who sold out her 2009 Madison Square Garden concert in 60 seconds.   Okay now.  Which one of the aforementioned people were Nazis, again?  I seem to have lost track of the Nazi Scorecard and Join-the-Nazi-Party Brochure. 

~In addition, the 1976 Democrat Party National Convention was held at Madison Square Garden.

Do you get the message, yet?   Madison Square Garden doesn't sound like a Nazi venue to me ... or to anyone else with common sense.  Are any of the aforementioned persons Nazi sympathizers?

Defamation against Trump, via Time Magazine's Person of the Year Award
  
[12]  Then comes the outrage of the mainstream media equating Trump with Hitler, simply because Trump became Time Magazine's Person of the Year, for a second time, in 2024.  Hitler was the Time Magazine Man of the Year in 1938.  In fact Joe Stalin was Man of the Year in 1939 & 1942.  

In the process, a well-known hate-filled TV show placed in the background of its set the 1938 Time cover of Hitler and one of the Time covers of Stalin, along with Putin's cover and that of Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran.  This was done to deceive people into thinking that  anyone who makes the cover of Time Magazine, as Man ... or "Person" ... of the Year is EVIL.
Got it?  One more time, for people who are very slow.  According to that hatred-spewing TV show, being Time's Person of the Year = being an evil Hitler Type who must be destroyed ... or a Putin Confrere ... or an Ayatollah Khomeini protégé.  Well, do you know who else was the Time Magazine Man of the Year, aka "Person" of the Year?  

ANS:  ~DR MARTIN LUTHER KING, in 1963!!!   ~President Dwight D Eisenhower twice, and he LITERALLY FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.   ~French legend, Charles de Gaulle, and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.   ~Winston Churchill twice, and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.   ~General George C Marshall twice, and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.  ~Franklin Delano Roosevelt THREE TIMES,  and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.

 Time Magazine Man (Person) of the Year also included:

~Barack Obama TWICE!!!   ~Kamala Harris in 2020, along with Joe Biden.  ~Taylor Swift.  ~Greta Thunberg.  ~Democrat Party favorite, BILL CLINTON twice.  ~Ted Turner, founder of CNN.  ~Pope John Paul II, in 1994.  ~Female Philippine President Corazon Aquino, in 1986.  ~Polish trade union voice, Lech Walesa.  ~Democrat Party President Jimmy Carter.  ~Apollo 8 Astronauts Borman, Anders, & Lovell, in 1968 .  ~Pope John XXIII, in 1962.  ~JFK, in 1961.  ~The Hungarian Freedom Fighters of 1956.  ~Harlow Curtice, president of General Motors.  ~Automobile icon, Walter Chrysler.  ~QUEEN ELIZABETH II, in 1953!!!   Okay now.  Which one of those Time Magazine people were Nazis, again?

Plus, there is Indian Cultural Icon & World Peace Advocate, Mahatma Gandhi as a Time Magazine Man of the Year.  He literally wrote two letters to Hitler and met Mussolini in person.

To the Left, the Time Magazine Cover of January 5th, 1931.
That photo is within the public domain, incidentally.

Do you finally see and perceive the hypocrisy and manipulative violence of MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, the NYT, etc?  What will is take to get you to finally wake up into reality, and not meander in a fake state that illiterate buffoons call "woke?"  Become awakened.  And become honest.   Learn about Life and protect Life.  Become a hero, especially when you have no other choice.

[13]  Another shift to the right ... a shift to the Red ... came from Latino voters, to the tune of 13%, according the NBC.  In the State of Pennsylvania ... which is being used as the example state in this discourse ... 4 out of 10 Latino voters chose Trump, whereas only 3 out of 10 chose Trump in 2020.  All in all, the Madison Square Garden "Puerto Rico Garbage Joke" did not have any effect, especially concerning anyone who knows of the garbage dump plight throughout Puerto Rico, neglected by the Biden Administration.  That was a joke mocking Joe Biden ... not Puerto Rico.


[14ai] Keep in mind that Kamala claimed that the 2024 election was going to be a pro-abortion mandate, where women throughout America would flock to the voting booths and cause Kamala to have a landslide victory over Donald Trump.  Well, white women voted 53% for Trump and only 46% for Kamala. 

[14aii]  Meanwhile, Harris kept contradicting herself, by saying that it was going to be a tight race ... a close race.  So, which is it, Kamala?  Is it going to be a landslide for you or is it going to be a squeaker, where you barely win?  

[14aiii] ANS:  It resulted in a shellacking, where enough American voters realized how dishonest and incompetent Kamala was and will be.  This includes the lie which defies mathematical proportionality.  That's the lie which defamatorily claims that Kamala lost due to racism.  

[14b]  Kamala lost, because she evaded all of the pertinent campaign questions, by "beating around the bush" in all of her responses, in what modern journalists call "word salad" responses.  Kamala insulting America's intelligence is why she lost, as well as knowledge of her bully past which happens to be an indication of one's future actions.

[14c]  The bottom line is that Kamala did NOT get a pro-abortion female army to swarm to the voting booths, taking-over the America mindset with a pro-abortion mandate.  The US population, as of 2020, was 331+ million.  It's estimated at 341 million, today.  Russia's was/is 144 million.  Therefore, Russia was the pro-abortion nation in the 1990s, evidenced by its low population.  America is perceived as generally a pro-life nation, evidenced by its rise in population throughout the decades.  


[14c]  Concerning Kamala as the known bully who loves the killing of babies who never get to see their mothers' faces, approximately 480 DNC campaign staffers were "suddenly dismissed" without any severance pay.  Kamala aborted them all from the DNC.   The $1.4 billion dollars given to the Harris Campaign was apparently not enough to pay staffers who worked for Kamala's election.  These workers ... or their union reps ... literally had to activate a Go-Fund-Me Account, simply for groceries, transportation  costs, and utilities.  Kamala didn't care about them.  Kamala doesn't care about you.  She simply wants to be in power, for the sake of power, so that she can arrogantly "lord it over you."  This is what happens when you enter the service of a narcissist.  In the end, you get hurt ... sometimes real badly, too.   

[14d]  Meanwhile, The Harris Campaign managers lied unashamedly to big ticket donors, claiming that the election was guaranteed for Kamala, especially in Iowa.  Kamala lost Iowa by 13.2 points.  This constitutes Theft by Deception.  Question:  In how many pockets did that $1.4 billion go?

The Shellacked Coat of Red Across the American Landscape

Below:  The 2024 Pres Election Map, per county.  There are 3,143 counties & "county equivalents" in the US.  Donald Trump won over 2,600 of them.  In fact, out of the 254 Texas counties, Kamala only won 12 of them.  She won ZERO of Oklahoma's 77 counties, and she won only 4 of Kansas' 105 counties.  

Next comes the State of Iowa which Ann Selzer predicted was to be won by Harris, by 3 pts.  Harris only won 5 out of Iowa's 99 counties.  This shows that the Year 2024 had external pollsters who were quite the liars, just like Kamala.  However, there were a few YouTube channel operators who predicted a 312 to 226 Trump win.  They were precisely correct.


Above:  'tis posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.  This is of 2024.  Now, compare it to 1984.
     Below:  1984 Pres Election Map, per county.  The greatest landslide election in American History.  
Above:  Do you get the message, yet?  The map above was posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.
Take note that both the 1984 & 2024 Democrat Party nominees SNUBBED the traditional Al Smith Roman Catholic Charity Dinner, in NYC.  Both nominees ever-so-coincidentally ended up facing an embarrassing form of defeat.  

Such a snubbing gets perceived by the voters as mean spirited and bigoted.  This sentiment gets reflected in the general election.   After all, it's the various Catholic Charities throughout Planet Earth who reach out to ... and even welcome ... those looking for proverbial life preservers.  Thus, to snub a worldwide charity organization is seen as something Orwellian, in the tyrannical sense thereof.  

Walter Mondale snubbed the Al Smith Dinner and underwent the worst numerical Electoral College defeat in US election history.  Harris suffered multiple layers of defeat, via multiple metrics of numerical accounting, along with having suffered the humiliation of being rendered an alleged TWENTY MILLION dollars in debt, after having SQUANDERED $1.4 BILLION in a mere 107 days.

Of course, the democrat party campaign debt part was publicly denied by the exact same people who claimed that Kamala was going to win Iowa and an electoral majority of all the other States.  None the less,  DNC employees were suddenly fired ... aka "dismissed" ... without severance pay, as a lot of money was wasted for frivolous things.  In as much, if you don't believe the irresponsibility and cronyism of the Democrat Party, then take a look at:  


All in all, the 1984 & 2024 Democrat Party candidates who snubbed Catholic charities showed that the Dems ... of 1984 & 2024 ... did NOT care about the poor and vulnerable.  And of course, during the Biden-Harris Years, paying the monthly Cost of Living became a Herculean effort for the working poor.   Meanwhile, a very uncaring Kamala giggled away, as if the suffering of others is a mere joke.  A political tree is known by its fruits and NOT by its speeches.

The Supreme Asininity of Kamala's Thesis Statement

Kamala sent a super repulsive & mocking video to the Al Smith Dinner managers, in which she spit in the face of the Roman Catholic Church.  Of course, when she did this, she automatically did the same to the Byzantine Catholic Church, the Maronite Catholic Church, the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, the Syro-Malankara Church, and all of the other rites in the Church, being that the Church is one.  In the video, Kamala said to not listen to what other people say you should be.  

That which Baby Killer Kamala doesn't understand is that a human being IS what a human being DOES.  It's not what you "are" that counts.  It's what you do that counts, and things that you DO NOT DO is kill babies who will never get to see sunlight or their mothers' faces ... lie to millions of people during a debate, all the while defaming your political opponent with false accusations .. allow males who pretend to be women into female locker rooms ... and allow males pretending to be women to punch in the face real females trying to win an Olympic medal in the women's division of a sport.  More importantly, what you are not supposed to do is give in to temptation so much so that you institutionalize in society as a virtuous undertaking.  

And you definitely don't allow young lads who are nowhere near the Age of Majority & Consent to get chemically castrated.  All in all, it's well understood that Kamala has a seething hatred for the Catholic Church so much so that she intended to force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, under penalty of law ... and to have Roman Catholics pay for abortions, via tax dollars.  Kamala had no intention of honoring a citizen's Right of Conscience ... or a religion's right of conscience.  That's evil.

Governorships

Elsewhere in the political landscape, there are to be 27 Republican State governors vs. 23 Democrat Party State governors.  

The Senate will be 53 Republicans and 46 Democrats + 1 Independent allied with the Dems.  It will comprise 31 Democrat Party men and 16 Democrat Party women.   It will also comprise 44 Republican men and 9 Republican women.  

The House will be 220 Republicans and 215 Democrats.  It will comprise 121 Democrat Party men and 94 Democrat Party women.  It will also comprise 31 Republican women and 189 Republican men.  End of preview.

Let us Review Anew:  America Dodged a Life-Ending Bullet ... a Nation-Ending Bullet

Kamala Harris was en route to becoming the sequel to George Orwell's 1984, in what was to become the People's Socialist Democratic Republic of San Francisco.  Censorship against men & women of conscience would have become the law of the land.  The Persecution of the Catholic Church would have commenced with Kamala confiscating church hospitals, for not performing the criminal act of genocide known as Abortion on Demand.  

In sequence, black racist women filled with seething hatred toward white men would have had their way with white men's destinies.  After all, Kamala Harris was known in California as the Queen of  Incarceration.  She fought to keep males in prison, so that they could perform super low-paid work for the State of California.  Of course, she used predictable theatrics, to do so.  She claimed that California would come to a fiery end ... literally ... if those males were not kept in prison.

Harris carries the stereotypical traits of a narcissist, according to all eye witness accounts of her conduct.  After all, 91% of her VP staffers resigned, and she was described as a "soul destroying bully."   

In fact, a male intern did aver that, when Kamala ... as AG of California ... walked in the office, all were required to stand and say, "Good morning, general."   

In contrast, when my dad was in aerial combat duty, for the US Strategic Air Forces, the first thing that a commanding officer would say, the first moment he entered any pre-flight missions room was, "At ease."  

Those officers expected the airmen to NOT stand up and to NOT waste their efforts saluting an officer.  The officers cut to the chase and immediately got into explaining the mission for the day.   In as much, Kamala Harris wanted people to NOT be at ease.  That's how a bully operates.

In addition, the young male intern said that he was instructed to never look at Kamala in the eyes.  Now, people with that type of Nero Caesar mental illness must not be allowed to be in office.  Kamala has been an officeholder for the past 20 years, and she was described as being a "soul destroying bully," even in recent years.  Where are psychiatrists when government complexes need them?

Guns and Money, Kamala Style

The Harris Economy would have quickly ended up in the image & likeness of Kamala's Campaign Finance Dept, where she participated in the irresponsible squandering of 1.4 billion campaign dollars, in a 107 day period.  In other Blue Marble Album posts, I covered the economic stats concerning the Biden-Harris Era, and they are NOT good.

None the less, Liz Cheney would have become the equivalent of a patron saint at the Pentagon ... with Dick Cheney becoming the equivalent of a Founding Father... as the US would have religiously become a dedicated arms dealer, making the Iranians look like boy scouts with newspaper routes, in comparison.  

Meanwhile, the price of a gallon of gas, a dozen eggs, and monthly heat under Kamala, would have constituted Grounds for Suicide.  In fact, a Kamala Harris Presidency, per se, would have constituted Grounds for Suicide.  But of course, I state this sarcastically ... satirically.  Don't commit suicide.  Kamala Harris is not worth it.  None the less, the flood waters of the Biden-Harris Inflation would not have subsided, and high prices would have remained a way of life.

Male children would have remained subjected to at least chemical castration, without their parents' knowledge.  Young ladies everywhere would have remained as vulnerable as was the tragic Laken Riley.  

In fact, all that is Sick & Twisted would have been declared the norm.  This included males using the ladies' rooms and female locker rooms, as well as males endowed with the XY Chromosome pretending to be women and punching authentic women in the face, during the Summer Olympics.  Meanwhile, the natural essence of life would have been declared oppression to which "we are not going back."

Like the Afghanistan Hearings, Victory was around the Corner

DNC leaders told potential donors late in the 2024 campaign that victory was assured, even in the State of Iowa.  This would cost a lot of high-ticket donors a lot of money.  In fact, Tim Walz stated on video that this era was now the beginning of the Democrats consolidating "power for the next forty years."   Then came the night of November 5th, 2024.   

Posted pursuant to 17 US 107.
Within a very short time, the electoral vote count was displayed on certain mainstream media TV screens as being 154 to 27, in favor of Donald Trump.  It would next shoot up to 162 vs 30.  Meanwhile, on ABC Network screens, it was 152 vs 59 ... with Kamala being the sound loser against a Donald Trump whose first presidential term was sabotaged by Comey, Clinton, CNN, MSNBC, Schumer, Schiff, and other less-than-honest political operatives.  

The closest Kamala came to Trump was 20 points ... 230 to 210 ... after she won Oregon, New Mexico, Virginia, Hawaii and one Nebraska district consecutively.  Then came the Georgia win, making the score 246 to 210, in favor of Trump.  Shortly thereafter came Trump's victory of Pennsylvania, and a 267 to 214 score.  

Trump's win in Wisconsin put him over the top, to the tune of 277 electoral votes to 224.   Kamala would win two Maine district votes, upon which she would come to the end of her line.  Meanwhile, Trump eventually was declared the winner of Michigan, then Alaska, followed by Nevada, and finally Arizona.

This is the Donald Trump who was repeatedly called the Second Coming of Hitler, by the Harris Campaign and the 2024 mainstream media.  This is also the Donald Trump whom Kamala Harris claimed to have become unhinged, as if she regularly spoke with him.  Yet, this was the Donald Trump who kept stabilized control of his campaign's spending in a very mature, strategic,  & victorious way ... with lots of dollars to spare.  This is the sign of someone "well hinged," "on target,"  and in touch with reality.  

In reality, it was the Harris Campaign people who went unhinged, paying for asinine vanities, such as celebrity appearances, while being unable or unwilling to pay the wages & salaries due to DNC campaign staffers.  And there certainly was no severance pay appropriated to them.  Squandering $1.4 billion in 107 days, as the Harris People recently did, is a definition of being unhinged and undependable.   And in providing zero severance pay shows how ruthless the pro-abortion & pro-cancellation Kamala is.  This is why she could be properly nicknamed, Killer Kamala, in a snide & sarcastic way, of course..  

This stroke of ruthlessness was followed by Kamala then showing herself to be even more unhinged, by appearing on a post-election video apparently drunk ... or drugged-up ... or under some less than noble intoxicating  influence.  The ruthlessness was accompanied by untold audacity, in Kamala still asking for money ... for a certifiable Losing Cause.

              Presidential Campaign Spending Thus Far Reported, 2024, according to the FEC
The Dems spent $2.627 BILLION vs Republican's $0.206 billion.  None the less, $1.167 Billion of the Dem money was attributed to the Biden Campaign.  Thus, Harris did not spend $2 billion.  She spent between $1.1 & $1.4 billion.  BTW, Ramaswamy spent $66 million, and RFK, Jr spent $64 million. 

The more exact & concise numbers are for another time or they are for someone who has time ... and even gets paid to write.  The hundreds of Blue Marble Album discourses and other posts were done entirely free of charge.   This included the long amounts of time in research and document-gathering.

The bottom line here is that the Democrats definitely had the advantage in the finances over Donald Trump.  Yet, the vast sums of money got irresponsibly squandered.  The lesson here is that, if you have a hideously inept & dishonest candidate, all the money in the world will not get that candidate elected.

It was Trump who was nominated for the Nobel Prize four times.   NOT Kamala the bully.

None the less, Harris called her election opponent a Nazi.  Yet, we are talking about a Donald Trump who has Jewish grandchildren whom he did NOT disown, as well as a daughter who practices Rabbinical Judaism.  This is the same Donald Trump whose senior advisor was a 36 year old American whose DNA is that of an Ashkenazi Jew.  

Moreover, this is the same Donald Trump who received FOUR nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize.  This doesn't sound very Adolph Hitleresque to me, and it certainly didn't seem to be very Hitleresque to 78 million American voters.   How about you?

On election night, Trump was sailing to a convincing & undoubted victory.  Of course, the Dems blamed this all on racism & gender phobia.  However, there were black males who refused to vote for Kamala Harris, and they actually looked African-American, endowed with the expected dose of naturally-occurring melanin which comes from having ancestors who lived in a continent that is within the Tropic of Cancer, the Equator, and the Tropic of Capricorn, as well as the 30th Parallel where the Sahara exists.  

There were many more Latin men and women who refused to vote for Kamala, also.  After all, Latina Women Voters shifted TEN PERCENT to the Republican Right.  Even when it came to Asian Americans in 2024, their voting shifted to the Republican Red by 5 percentage points.  

When it came to the Native American vote ... which has been a part of American Election Law since 1924 ... SEVENTEEN native American counties shifted to the Republican Red, by 10 to 14 points  each.   Moreover, two days after the election, in USA Today, from a female Detroit journalist came the following surmise:  

"In what many expected to be a nail-biter of an election, former President Donald Trump easily trounced Harris.  It’s because he was the better candidate and because he spoke directly to voters’ top concerns.  Period."   

One confirming piece of evidence ... otherwise known as Concurring Piece of Evidence ... was that, on Nov 5, 2024, California voters overwhelmingly voted in favor of the anti-crime bill, PROPOSITION 36, by a margin of 70.6% to a mere 29.4%.  Such a thing was a mandate conveyed to the very white & male governor of California, Gavin Newsom.  

This shows that the Nov 5th election was a referendum & a mandate of the People, based on the issues ... based on the People's top concerns ... based on the Common Needs of Life.  One such need is safety from violence.  There are millions of white male voters who regard white male Newsom as a total jerk.  I do.  


The other confirming piece of evidence concerns the landslide loss of the very white and very leftist DA of LA County, George Gascón.  He lost to the very centrist Independent, Nathan Hochman, by a margin of 61.4% to 38%.  California shifted toward the Red, in 2024.  It wasn't a matter of black vs white racial animosity.  It was a matter of Red vs Blue political aligning.  

It's very simple.  People like the idea of being able to walk down the street without getting mugged.  They like the idea of going for a jog in Georgia without getting brutally murdered.  They love the idea of being under governments that do not perform the hideous degree of DERELICTION OF DUTY that Kamala, Joe, and Mayorkas performed.


In as much, the Dems and the mainstream media should have been sued for hundreds of millions of dollars each, in a class action lawsuit, for False Light Defamation and other forms of defamation committed against whites in America.  

There are white candidates for whom white Americans would never vote.  That is to say, White Americans will not simply vote for a candidate, just because he's White.  World History gives accounts of numerous bloody wars which were a matter of White vs White.  Kamala Harris was a hideous candidate, per se.  Her presidency would have been the Nightmare of the Ages.  Her chaotic state of campaign finances was a precursor to the type of presidency she would have had.  Plus, many more young ladies would have met the fate of  Laken Riley, all due to Kamala's known dereliction of duty.  

And then, after the election and after a Hawaiian vacation, VICE PRESIDENT Harris was seen on video, appearing to be ... seeming to be ... definitively drunk.  She was seen this way, on video, a number of times in 2024.  This has never been known to have previously happened in American politics ... during an election year.  That's irresponsibility.  That's an unhinged person.  Donald Trump, incidentally, does not drink alcohol.  


Above:  All three "election night tabulation photos" are posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.  As you can see, the electoral college part of the election started out as a run-away for Trump, even though at no time was the general popular vote a national landslide.  HOWEVER ...

... there were statewide landslides for both candidates, comprising 20+ point margins of victory.  For Harris, it was  ~Maryland (28.6 pts),  ~Vermont (31.8 pts),  ~Washington DC (85.9 pts),  ~Massachusetts (24.8 pts),  ~Hawaii (23.1 pts), and California (20.2 pts).   Washington State was an 18.3% victory for Harris.  So, close enough.

As far as goes New York State, Harris received 831,254 LESS VOTES there in 2024 than Biden received in 2020.  Trump received 232,129 MORE New York State VOTES in 2024 than he did in 2020.   Harris UNDERPERFORMED BIDEN in every State in the Union.  

That's a remarkable accomplishment in reverse.  That is the mark of a Total Buffoon, in light of the 24/7 Lying Propaganda given to Harris by CNN & MSNBC, as well as the couple hours of daily propaganda given to Harris from other mainstream media outlets, not to mention legacy newspapers who betrayed mankind's trust and elected to publish lie after lie after lie after lie.  Of course, the network TV propaganda should be counted as IN-KIND DONATIONS to the Harris-Walz Campaign.

In going further within the statistical analysis, Biden's margin of victory over Trump in 2020 was 1,992,889 votes, concerning New York State.  Meanwhile, Harris' New York State margin of victory over Trump in 2024 was only 929,506 votes.  Biden beat Trump in New York State, by 23.13%, in 2020.  Harris only beat Trump in the Empire State, by 11.8%.  Now, 23.13 minus 11.8 equals 11.33.  Yet, the official stats marks Trump's shift to the Red in New York State as having been only 6.43.  Huh?

In 2020, Biden beat Trump in nearby New Jersey, by 15.94%.  Meanwhile, Harris only beat Trump in NJ ... in 2024 ... by 5.9%.   Biden received 390,326 MORE VOTES in 2020 (in New Jersey) than Kamala did in 2024. 

Thus, New York State can be called a Backslide Victory State, instead of a Landslide Victory State, for Harris.  In fact, all 50 States shifted to the "Red," in the 2024 presidential election. 

The Presence of Liz Cheney:  The sign that Kamala was desperate for votes

Even though Trump won 31 States, exactly half of the American States resulted in wide margin victories for Trump.   In one of those States, Trump won by a margin of 46.2 percentage points.  It happened to have been the State which rejected Liz Cheney in a 2022 primary election, to the tune of 37+ percentage points, in favor of Harriet Hageman.  

In as much, when Kamala started to parade around America with Liz Cheney by her side, as if to be a pint-sized version of Batman with Robin,  it was a sign that Kamala knew that she was going to lose, and that she was in a state of desperation.  HOWEVER, the large mainstream media networks and newspapers kept lying to us, about poll numbers.  As a result, the mainstream media has now lost its credibility amongst those not too lazy to search for answers beyond 15 second TV sound bytes and pseudo-intellectual hags who do nothing but incite seething hatred for Whites & Republicans.
 
Below:  Kamala then lost 75% of the value of her merchandise.  An antique dealer with more than two decades left in his work years might benefit by investing in what will become rare collector items.  Then again, they're not exactly the home run balls of famous world series MVPs.
The sign above describes Kamala Harris, because everything about her mindset is 75% off.
✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏
The Popular Vote

Already stated above, at the beginning of this presentation.
✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏

The 2024 California & Texas Count

Then comes California.  Even though it was a decisive 58.6% win for Kamala, to the tune of 9,213,074 votes, Trump did receive 6,016,110 there, with 99% of the vote having been counted.   Likewise, even though Texas was a decisive 56.3% win for Trump, to the tune of 6,375,376 votes, Harris still received 4,806,474 votes there, with 99% of the vote having been counted.

More pertinent is the fact that Donald Trump flipped TEN CALIFORNIA COUNTIES, in 2024.  The counties which turned red, in voting for Trump more than Kamala, included [1] Orange, [2] San Bernardino, [3] Fresno, [4] San Joaquin,  [5] Merced, [6] Butte, [7] Nevada, [8] Inyo, [9] Riverside, and [10] Stanislaus Counties.  
      
This is one of the reasons why DNC Mid-Atlantic Regional Chairholder, Lindy Li, said that the Election of 2024 was a "shellacking."  The California red shift flip is of paramount importance.  Of course, the Dems and the mainstream media will ignore and/or deny it.

More Election Statistics

As of noon, Thursday, Nov 26, 2024, Kamala received 5.55 million LESS VOTES in 2024 than Joe Biden did in 2020 [(Biden = 81,283,501)].  Yet, Kamala received 9.87 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than Hillary did in 2016 [(Hillary = 65,853,514)]. 

Donald Trump received 3.9 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than he did in 2020.  In fact, Trump received 15 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than he did in 2016.   Moreover, Trump received 12.3 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than Hillary did, in 2016  

In addition, Trump won all seven Swing States, in 2024.  This included the three Rust Belt States of PA, MI, and WI.  Trump won 12 of the 14 Sunbelt States, along with all of the Midwest, except for Illinois & Minnesota.  He won all of the Rocky Mountain States, except for Colorado and the Sunbelt State of New Mexico, where the Rockies literally end. 

More Numerical Stats

In 2016, Donald received 62.9 million votes, and Hillary won the popular vote that year, by 2,868,686 votes.  But, this 2016 popular vote victory was mostly due to California.   Hillary won there in 2016 by a score of 7,362,490 votes vs Donald Trump's 3,916,209; a difference of 3,446,281 votes.  That was a margin of victory comprising 28.8%.

Moreover, in 2016, Trump carried 30 states.  In 2024, he carried 31 of them.   In 2020, he carried 25.

In 2020, City Slicker Donald Trump received 74.2 million votes, while Joe the Laptop Denier received 81.3 million of them.  A 2021 poll showed that 6% of the people who voted for Biden in 2020 would not have done so, if they knew that the Hunter Laptop was authentic.   

Therefore, 51 former Intell Execs & Wolf Blitzer rigged the 2020 vote and committed Election Interference.  Trump would have won the 2020 election, to the tune of 79.3 million to 76.3 million.  Thus, it is 100% TRUE that the election of 2020 was rigged ... rigged by Wolf Blitzer, 51 former intell officials, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc.  That is to say, 4.87 million people who voted for Biden in 2020 would not have done so, if Wolf Blitzer and the rest of CNN didn't lie to all of America.  

The media and those 51 intell employees (officers) who should be forever stripped of their pensions interfered in the Election of 2020.  The election, with 100% certainty, was stolen from Trump, via Election Interference & Fraudulent Misrepresentation.  And, in judging by all the chaos and inflation that the Biden-Harris people gave America, all middle class Americans were cheated in 2020, as well.

Bellwether Counties

A bellwether county is one which picks the winner of each presidential election, over a time span of years.  Nineteen American counties voted for the winning presidential candidate in every election, from 1980 to 2016.  In 2020 Donald Trump won 18 of the 19 Bellwether counties, by an average of 13.7 points each.

Being that 18 of those counties chose the losing candidate in 2020, they are no longer bellwether states.  One remained.  It was Clallam County, Washington.  In 2024, it voted for the losing candidate, namely Kamala Harris.  There are no more bellwether counties in America.  None the less, this 2020 bellwether statistic is one of two very compelling reasons why even the vote count was believed to have been rigged in 2020.

24/7 TV Defamation against Trump

Moreover, you can reasonably conclude that, if CNN & MSNBC didn't defame Trump with the most ridiculous accusations 24 hours a day, then the 2024 presidential would have been a textbook landslide nationwide.  This is especially the case, if the media would have reported on the irresponsible spending being done by the 2024 Harris Campaign.  Even at the final week of the campaigning, Trump was being accused of being the second coming of Adolph Hitler, while Kamala's managers were spending large amounts of money vainly.

In fact, Kamala was so immature that she needed Tim Walz to be her babysitter, in her first televised interview, and such an immaturity was never known to have happened in American politics, either.  Kamala was completely unfit to be president.  This is why she never won a single State primary or even a single delegate in any primary election.

She is a Career Politician and NOT the new fab "page-turning newcomer"

Even when it came to her San Fran DA campaign, she only received 33% of the vote in the general election.  Her competitor only won 37% of the vote, so a run-off vote was obligatory.  Harris got 56% of the vote in the runoff.

As far as went her California AG campaign, she only won that election by 0.8% of the vote.  It took 3 weeks of vote counting to conclude that she ever-so-barely won that election.

As far as went the 2016 US Senator for California election, for the first time since 1913, there was no Republican candidate on the general election ballot.  There was only another Democrat, Loretta Sanchez, a member of the Blue Dog Coalition.   That was the Moderate-to-Conservative wing of the Democratic Party.  Kamala was in a leftist State.  For her, victory was guaranteed.  

None the less, Sanchez was the daughter of Mexican immigrants, and she had a sister who served in the US House of Reps at the same time when Loretta did.  The point to mentioning this is that the 2016 election was NOT a black-vs-white racial animosity election.  It was the typical Liberal vs Conservative election.  

Incidentally, Loretta did NOT speak English as a child.  However, she already served in the US House of Reps, before the 2016.  So, a language barrier wouldn't be a reason to not have voted for her.  None the less, Kamala has been a government officeholder for the past 20 years.  To claim that she was the new & young page-turner to a new form of governing system was a massive lie.  Everything about Kamala Harris has been a massive lie.  

Kamala ALLEGEDLY has a history of being a mean spirited witch.  Period.  This is why all of the news anchors and commentators of MSNBC and CNN (except for two of them) ... as well as a few other ones on other networks ... should be summarily fired.  Double Period.  All that they did was lie and create fear of Donald Trump and white MAGA hat owners.

The Fading Old Guard which paraded itself around as the modernized form of thought

There was the dire need to remove from power those who have been in power for the past 20, 30, and 40 years.  The presence of such politicians proves that the USA is NOT a democracy ... nor a republic.  It's an OLIGARCHY run by the corrupt good ole boy and girl network.  At the very least, it's run by the selfish who sit in power until the day they die or go brain-dead.

The greatest of liars, therefore, was the 20 year officeholder, Kamala Harris, who actually has been cashing government employee paychecks, as a local, then State, and then federal employee for the past 33 years.  She is another "Old Had" who absolutely needs to be out of power, for the sake of Americans everywhere.  We were suffering, while she enjoyed various types of pleasure ... at the taxpayers' expense.

The biggest deceit attached to Kamala is that she got her start in power politics by means of adultery ... sex.  Being paid "in-kind" for giving sex is prostitution.  Such a thing is unbecoming for a deputy DA in California.  Kamala Harris was literally ... and NOT figuratively ... a whore.  At the least, she was a concubine who received lasting political favors in return for her sexual favors given to a married man 30 years older than Kamala.  

For the record, when it's a matter of an eligible bachelor and an eligible bachelorette with a 30 year difference between them, it's a different story.  Age difference, per se, is not an impediment to a valid husband/wife relationship.  Such a thing has happened in the past, very successfully so, though only rarely so.  However, Harris was giving sex to the typical "womanizer," and such a thing is NOT the act of being a model to the youth of America.  She was ... in my private-citizen's-opinion ... giving sex for political power.  And she got the political power which included a Dianne Feinstein election endorsement.

Federal District Populations

As a quick note, the average congressional district population is required to be close to 761,000 people per district ... at least before the Kamala & Mayorkas Invasion of Unvetted Immigrants came a coming.  In fact, at the beginning of the United States' Constitutional Government, the average population per House of Rep district was 34,000.  This was in 1790.

Governorships

Now remember.  I'm an Independent.  With this having been stated, know that a Republican won the governorship for the liberal State of New Hampshire, and a Republican won the governor's race for the liberal State of Vermont.  Both were convincing victories.  Come 2025, the count will be 27 Republican governors and 23 governors belonging to the very undemocratic Democrat Party.

                     SEE:  https://decisiondeskhq.com/results/2024/General/Governor/

Trump = Hitler:  Very bad math.  Trump was nominated 4 times for the Nobel Peace Prize

The Trump-is-Hitler campaign tactic showed Harris to be non-diplomatic, hyper-theatrical, and out of touch with the inbuilt Balance of Powers of the US Constitution which prevents dictatorial Nazism from prevailing, in the first place.  Her claim that Trump would be an instant dictator was based on the CNN motto, "fear sells."   It was also based on an answer given by Donald jokingly.  And what people must understand is that Donald Trump has the personality of a New York City Slicker.

The irony is that it was under Harris when America literally was being invaded by millions of unvetted strangers who never helped America in any capacity, before their coming.  In Kamala's greed-stricken mind, those unvetted immigrants were her soldiers, to take over America for her, by means of registering with the very undemocratic democrat party and then voting for Harris.  Importing all of those unvetted immigrants was the same tactic as stuffing the ballot boxes of America.  Only dictators do such a thing.

Explain how it is that the 60 year old make-up-coated Kamala Harris is paraded around as the first "black woman" president, while she is actually paraded around in artificially done hair that is only naturally found on the heads of 25 year old white women?  Hello?  Is anybody home?  Have you noticed the White Supremist Straight Brunette Hair-Dyed Hairdo or not?

Even Kamala's hair is a lie.  60 years of age equals gray hair, and "black" equals frizzy hair.  Where are the gray hairs?  Where is the frizz?  And which member of the Nazi Party chose to have Kamala wear that particular color of pantsuit?  The photos posted directly above and below are posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.

None the less, concerning the 2024 Harris Campaign, the last time that the common American saw that degree of cosmetic coating on anyone's face, he/she was at funeral home, paying his/her respects to the dead.  Below are 2019 photos ... without the drastic cosmetic plastering done on Kamala's face, as was done in 2024.

                      Below:  The Face of Abortion, Kamala Harris; barf-bag-ugly.  2019 photos.

 
Above:  Keep in mind that the mainstream media said that Kamala Harris "IS BEAUTIFUL TOO."  Well, that was another lie.  Take away the air-brushing & photo-shopping, as well as the hair dye, the hair straightener, and that layer of make-up only suitable for an auto accident victim in a funeral home who hit a windshield at 70 mph, and you have yourself a repulsively ugly Kamala Harris.  

Now, you politely keep silent about such a thing, UNLESS the ugly person is being paraded around as the most beautiful & most sexually arousing woman in all of existence.  You have to speak-up, during deceitful ploys.  

And of course, the ploy was based on the advertising motto of the 1980s which said, "Sex sales."  So, someone wanted to construct a super fake Kamala, to sexually arouse men into voting for her.  This is the Lust Factor.  This is an airhead's idea for gaining votes.  All in all, Kamala is no less a farce than was the man behind the curtail, in the Wizard of Oz.   As a reminder, the photos above are posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.

The photo below is posted to show you that the media lies and lies and lies again and again.  For some reason, Kamala thought that damning white people for being white, while wearing the hairdo of a young white woman, was going to get her elected.  It appears that Kamala is ashamed of her black ancestry.  Democrats everywhere should be ashamed of her.  And concerning the donors who gave the irresponsible Kamala outrageously large sums of money, they should be ashamed of themselves.
For those of you who are incredibly stupid, know that the purpose of the photo above is NOT to show you how ugly Kamala is.  It's to show you how much the media lies to Americans everywhere.  Kamala was made out to be more beautiful than any movie star, fashion model, sex symbol, cover-girl, and centerfold who ever was.  And then, Kamala turns out to be barf-bag-ugly, under all that make-up, hair dye, hair straightener, photoshopping, and air brushing.  Everything about her campaign was a lie.
                   Harris' 2024 donors allegedly felt cheated by alleged Democrat Party lies

The thorough incompetency of Kamala Harris was proven in the Dems ending up $20 million in debt, despite having been given a billion dollars in donation money, in addition to $400 million.  The Trump Campaign succeeded with far less spending money.  This proves that the majority of voters knew ... after the election ... that Kamala Harris was going to be an economic disaster for America.  She is thoroughly incompetent ... or corrupt ... when it comes to money.  And remember, under Biden-Harris the US National Debt rose the highest in any four-year period.

 After two assassination attempts, she kept accusing Donald Trump of being another Hitler who must be cancelled, hoping that the next aspiring assassin would get a shot off and not miss.

[1di]  Concerning the Repeater's defamatory claim that Trump is another Hitler, know that Hitler NEVER won an election.  The closest that Adolph came was in a 1932, when he lost a "run-off" with Paul von Hindenburg.  Hindenburg won 53% of the vote to Adolph's 36.7%.  Communist Ernst Thalman received 10.16% of the vote in the same run-off election.  Moreover, in 1928 the Nazi Party received a grand total of 3% of the vote.  Then came 1929.  Next came the Great Depression.

[ldii]  Hitler was appointed chancellor by Hindenburg, in early 1933, as an act of appeasement.  The intent was to mute the violence of Hitler's followers in the streets and followers in the Reichstag.  After all, a few decades earlier saw a lot of violence in Germany, especially against Roman Catholics.  It was called the Kulturkampf.   Therefore, Germany ... which didn't exist as a sovereign nation until January 1871 ... had a lot of propensity toward violence and social unrest.

[1e] PLUS, Germans were deceived into believing that Hitler predicted the Great Depression.  Hitler simply said that, if England and Germany were not going to unite their social & economic efforts, due to the fact that they were of the same race, then the demise of society will occur.

[2ai]  Donald Trump, on the other hand, won elections, despite the defamatory statements told about Trump, during those election seasons, by CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, the New York Timesthe Washington Post, and several other media outlets.

[2aii]  And as I previously stated in other writings, Donald Trump was more likely to turn into another Hugh Hefner than another Adolph Hitler.

Then Comes the Chicken Little Syndrome, where the sky is said to be literally falling, as in ... 

CO2 Hysteria 

To start, in May of 2024, Planet Earth's atmosphere reached the highest level of CO2 in the history of mankind and prior.  The CO2 count continued to elevate all throughout the Biden-Harris years.  It's repeated immediately below, for the benefit of those who do not read well ... so that you will understand how much the Al Gore People have lied to you and me and everyone else.

The Biden-Harris Administration was obsessed with imposing upon Americans those Draconian measures designed to lower the atmospheric CO2 count which has only been a trace amount, as it is.  Well, during May of 2024, Planet Earth's atmosphere carried the highest level of CO2 in the history of mankind.  It rose to 426.9 ppm, and it is now back down to 424.37 parts per million.  

This means that only  0.0424% of that sky is CO2.  Meanwhile 78% of it is nitrogen.  21% of it is oxygen.  And 0.93% of it is argon.  This is the calculation minus water vapor.  In calculating water vapor into the atmospheric molecular count, the following is followed, compliments of the US NOAA:

Concerning CH4, aka Methane, it presently exists in the atmosphere at only 1.92 parts per million, as of the second half of the Year 2024.  This means that it exists in the air at 0.00019%.   In addition, the element, hydrogen, exists in the atmosphere @ a mere 0.55 parts per million.  Neon exists in the sky @ 18.18 parts per million. Carbon Monoxide exists there at 0.1 part per million.  And helium exists there @ 5.24 parts per million.  

The statistical facts ... provided by the US government ... is that Planet Earth's present atmosphere is no more than  0.0426% carbon.  [0.0424% (CO2)  + 0.00001% (Carbon Monoxide) + 0.000192% (Methane which is CH4).   Thus, the atmosphere of Planet Earth is presently 99.957% carbon-free.  

You have been snookered.  You have been conned.  The "Climate Crisis People" think that you are stupid.  The weather that transpired in the past four years has all been documented to have happened a number of times previously, ranging from the Year 1852 to 1871 to 1878 to 1896 to 1901 to 1905 to 1910 to 1922 to 1934 to 1936, with a few years in between left unwritten.  In fact, the US gov recently stated that the most drought-ridden year in the past 1,000 years was 1934, when the CO2 count was much lower than it is today.

And of course, historically disastrous weather was witnessed and logged into the history accounts, in the 14th to 19th centuries.  This was when the CO2 count in the sky was very low.   Those centuries comprised the Little Ice Age.  Thus, the destruction was due to the Atmospheric Law of Pressure Gradient Forcing, where cooling climates have the extreme atmospheric turbulence, and not the warm-weather climates.  I've already explained this in other discourses.  They are all free of charge, for you to see and read.

From 1940 to 1979, it was a cold-period.  Even the 1990s had cold trends.  Climate is cyclical.  For example, in 1979, the Poles reached the highest volume of ice.  Then, in the following year, Dallas had 42 consecutive days of 100+ Fahrenheit weather.  The CO2 count was the same in 1980 as it was in 1979.  CO2 didn't cause the Dallas Disaster. 

The only greenhouse grass which promises itself to be an existential threat to life on Earth is Sulfur Hexafluoride; SF6.  That chemical will last for 3,200 years.  It is heavily regulated in Norway, where it's used in switchgear technology.  Thus, it's a component in wind turbines, though not in the turbine, itself.

 As far as went the "presidential debate claim" that storms were getter more violent, it is a statistical fact that that assertion is totally false.  And I've explained this in other posts.  Since 1851 ... a period of  173 years ... there has been a grand total of FOUR and ONLY FOUR Cat 5 hurricanes that hit the Continental United States.  

That which there is more of, these days, are those low-grade cyclones, called Tropical Storms.  Such storms are lower in intensity than even a Cat 1 hurricane.  Since Al Gore's 2006 Scare-Tactic movie of much falsehood, there has been a grand total of only one Cat 5 hurricane to make landfall upon the Continental United States.   Storms and heatwaves, as well as floods were statistically MORE DEADLY in past decades and in  past centuries.  

Concerning the topic of Climate, there are 62+ discourses on the topic at the Blue Marble Album.  Government stat charts, tables, logs, and graphs are in those discourses, along with newspaper reports of decades past.  

At the least, links to such graphs, logs, charts, and newspaper articles are in those discourses.  Sometimes, the actual photo of those charts, graphs, and tables are posted.  You need to learn exactly how and how much "they lied to you" about our present climate.  It has been a grifter's con game.  This included the Biden-Harris People.  They are extreme liars in many subjects.

All of your sacrifice and suffering was for nothing, during the Biden-Harris Years

The price of gas was jacked-upward for a failed intention.  The intention was to lower the atmospheric CO2 count.  However, the atmosphere is already 99+% carbon-free.  I've already addressed this in previous posts.  And remember, there are over 62 detailed "climate-related" posts at the Blue Marble Album.  

A human being can easily endure 500, 1,000, and even 1,500 ppm of CO2.  Moreover, submarine crewmen work with complete functionality in airspaces comprising 3,500 ppm of CO2.  CO2 becomes deadly with an hour's exposure of it @ 84,000 parts per million.   As a reminder, today's CO2 count is around 424 parts per million.

In conclusion, there is a huge difference between 84,000 and 424.  All in all, it's understood that the common human doesn't become symptomatic to CO2 until it reaches 2,000 parts per million.  Thus, 1,600 ppm, 1,200 ppm, and 800 ppm are all tolerable levels.

PLUS, the Law of Pressure Gradient Forcing is such that, when the planet's undergoes warming, the atmosphere carries much more turbulence.  In fact, in order for a tornado to form, a cold front must first enter the scene.  It's when cooling periods preside, when turbulent storms prevail.  This included the Mini-Ice-Age which endured from 1284 to 1840.  Extreme storms and turbulent weather was well-documented during that era of time.

Plus, CO2 has three types of vibration.  Each type occurs one at a time.  Well, in one of the vibrations, called the "symmetric stretch," CO2 in incapable of retaining infrared heat.  There were occasions when ice ages occurred, while the CO2 count was 9 times higher than today.  This includes the Ordovician Ice Age.

And finally, being that Americans are easily deceived, you need to take a look at the table below which is a US NOAA product.  It's something taxpayer-funded, and it's something official, professional, and high tech.  In as  much, the percentage of the sky outside which is carbon is no more than 0.0424% during Harvest Season, and 0.0428% during Planting Season.  This means that the atmosphere of Planet Earth is 99.9572% to 99.9576% carbon-FREE.

You can easily see that, in the exaggerated harping over CO2 ... which presently has a radiative forcing of no more that 3.7 watts per meter squared ... it's obvious that United States politicians and United Nations politicians rule by lies.  You deserve better.

May 26, 2025

Bush in 2004 & Trump in 2016; nearly same vote count, meaning no collusion

Simple publicly-known stats prove that there was no foreign collusion of any kind during the 2016 election ... except for Hillary getting $12 million from Morocco and similar foreign donations addressed to the Clinton Name.  Let's start with the 2016 Presidential Election where accusations of "Russian Collusion" were on the airwaves for years.

The Year 2016

Let's review the Year 2016.  The accusation from the mainstream media was that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians, in order for Donald Trump to win more votes than Trump usually would have won, based on the prevailing Republican Party voter trend.  A pronounced change in the 2016 vote count ... from 2012, 2008, and 2004 ... would indicate Russian collusion.  

Likewise, if the number of votes received by each Republican Party candidate of each recent election were basically the same each election year, then that would be evidence that there was no collusion of any kind, coming from any nation.  This includes the election years of 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016

We need to compare the 2016 election to the elections of 2012, 2008, and 2004.  I need to show you, at the outset, that there most certainly was no Russian Collusion in 2016, as is evidenced by public statistics appropriated by the U.S. government.  We do this, by beginning with a question or two:

Q:  Prior to the 2016 election, who was the most recent Republican Party presidential nominee to win the presidential election?  ANS: George Bush II, in 2004.

Q:  How many votes did Bush receive in 2004?  ANS:  62,039,572


Twelve years later was the next time when the Republican nominee won the presidency.  The winner was Donald Trump, in 2016.

Q:  How many votes did Trump receive in 2016?  ANS: 62,985,153.  He received almost the same amount of votes as did Bush, in 2004.  This indicates the opposite of Russian Collusion.  This indicates a Republican voter trend by which voters in 2016 weren't swayed by anything or anyone other than their voter tradition.


Conclusion:  The Republican Party vote count between 2004 & 2016 thus far seems to be generally the same.  In fact, Hillary received as many votes in 2016 that Barack received in 2012.  The popular vote was very predictable.  Hillary was going to win it by 3 to 6 million votes.  She won it by 2.9 million.  The Electoral College vote was what the Dems neglected to gauge.

So, who won the election for Trump?  ANS:  It was NOT the Russians in the least.  It was MIKE PENCE who managed to convince millions of "born-again", "evangelical," "Pentecostal" Pro-life Protestants to get to the voting booths on time.  Abortion was the deciding issue, and Mike Pence was the major cause of Trump's victory.  Kelly Ann Conway was the mathematical navigator.  It was a matter of securing the electoral votes of the "fly-over states."

We now need to include the election results of 2008 & 2012, to see if there were a genuine trend during the years 2004, 2008, 2012, & 2016.  If there were a vote count trend ... and if there were no drastic & sudden change in the vote count in 2008 or 2012 or 2016 ... then there was absolutely no collusion from any nation, entity, or person, including Russia. 

Q:  What was the Republican Party vote count in the 2008 presidential election?

ANS:  59,950,323  Therefore, the Republican candidate's 2008 vote count was 95% of the 2016 Republican candidate vote count.  Incidentally, the Year 2012 Republican candidate's vote count was  96.6% of the 2016 vote count.  This means that the votes received by each Republican presidential candidate in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016 were basically the same; quite similar.  Below are the vote stats for 2008 and then 2012.


Q: Well, what actually was the Republican candidate's vote count in 2012?    ANS: 60,934,407.  That vote count is pretty much the same as in the Years 2004, 2008, and 2016.  Thus, in those four elections, there was nothing that drastically changed the vote count.


Let's review in numerical form:

Republican candidate's vote count

2004 ... 62,039,572
2008 ... 59,950,323
2012 ... 60,934,407
2016 ... 62,985,153

As you can see, there certainly was a Republican voter trend for the 12 year period, between 2004 and 2016.  This shows that there was no collusion of any kind involved with the 2016 election.  Hillary Clinton & Maxine Waters lied to you, as did all of their underlings and media allies.

Now, here is your question to pose to the dishonest folk in the mainstream media:

What actually is election collusion?  How is it done? And what actually did Russia do, to get Donald Trump illegally elected as president, in 2016?  Do you  have any evidence of specifics?

Then comes the follow-up question to the media and Comey:  Didn't you realize that you came off as being totally full of crap, in your very vague and non-explanatory accusations?  Didn't you realize how asinine you sounded to the common sensed citizen?
As you might now know, Phase 3 of the Russia Collusion accusation against Donald Trump has emerged.  And of course, the predictable propaganda is being spewed without any display of evidentiary support.  So, one immediately asks how much of the recent indictments amounted to trumped-up charges and malicious prosecution?  This is yet another deja vu.  This is yet another antic of the present democratic party who gave America the worse presidential candidate in living memory.

The new accusations are that right wing bloggers and podcasters are spreading the talking points given to them by Moscow, to influence the American voter to vote for Donald Trump.  This is claimed to be the case, despite the fact that Putin stated in front of a camera that he preferred Kamala Harris.  And of course, that's supposed to be some kind of a Russian trick, to get Americans to flock toward Trump.  

The present effort from the DOJ is to get right wing conservatives deleted from the Internet.  And of course, this is a frontal assault upon Freedom of Speech.  Even if the conservatives were actually spewing out all of Moscow's talking points, a reader (or a viewer) could give counterpoint to all of those Moscow talking points and sway the American voter away from Moscow's influence.   Thus, Freedom of Speech and of the Press prevails.

There used to be [1] Point, followed by [2] Counterpoint, followed by [3] Response to Counterpoint, and then [4] Rebuttal, where each debating entity had two opportunities to state his/her views.  Now, it's all a matter of the left wing liberals being the oppressors and censurers of speech ... and of the press.  

However, if you can employ free speech and then answer Moscow's propaganda with counterpoint, then it's no longer propaganda.  It's subject matter for a debate.  Propaganda and political influence only occurs where there is censorship.  It only occurs in a closed society.  When you can dialogue and debate, the propaganda element vanishes.  

And of course, the Biden Administration are the Censorship People who are trying hard to hide the fact that Kamala is a terrible candidate ... who never received a primary vote in 2024 ... and who only received 844 primary votes in 2020 ... and who happens to be the vice president with the lowest approval rating in the history of approval ratings.  The Dems are stilling trying to rig the election, as usual.

The only reason why there would be complete deletion of conservative writings in 2024 is if the writings contain truths that reveal any evil about the liberal left wing which will destroy their chances at an election victory, whatever be the election involved.

Apparently, the Democrats are trying hard to hide the fact that 1] 91% of Kamala's vice presidential staff resigned, 2] and that specific staffers stated that Kamala is very abusive toward workers, 3] and the Kamala doesn't know the first thing about basic economics, 4] and that Kamala sued the Obama administration, in the attempt to make fracking illegal, 5] and that the accumulative inflation rate throughout Kamala's VP tenure is thus far 19.2%, 

6] and that Kamala was vehemently against the Southern Border Wall, before she was suddenly all for it, 7] and that Laken Riley is still dead, along the other victims of violent illegal immigrants who were given free reign throughout the United States, 8} and that the National debt is now up to $35 trillion, when it was $27 trillion when Kamala was put into office ... and ... 9] in January of 2024, Joe Biden banned fracking in its tertiary stage, by placing "a temporary pause on the approval of Liquefied Natural Gas exports."  Such a suspension is a snake's way of banning fracking ... or of backing up the production line to the point of oppressing production  

The list goes on and on and on, including Kamala giving sex to a married man 30 years older than her, so that she could get a launch into politics.  It appears that the Biden Administration People are simply trying to hide Kamala's evils and incompetency, under the guise that not doing so is Russian Interference.  Well, to censure such information is election interference, just like it was in 2020, when 51 unconscionable former employees of the federal government claimed that the Hunter laptop showed all the signs of a Russian hoax.  

If those 51 didn't lie about the Hunter Laptop, Trump would have won the 2020 election, by a small margin.  And Laken Riley would still be alive.  Those 51 need to be criminally prosecuted, along with the persons who orchestrated the statement and who recruited the 51 persons who now are publicly known to be 51 liars.

May 25, 2025

January 2024: Biden-Harris BANNED the export of FRACKING'S PRODUCT, liquid natural gas. It was the same as banning fracking.

 Above:  An official United States government product.  The heatwaves were far worse in the 1930s.  This is explained in other discourses at the Blue Marble Album.  The search box is up top to the right.

The Biden-Harris Admin also uses sleight of hand deception, in addition to its many ways of lying to humanity.  Kamala kept telling humanity that neither she nor Joe .... nor Walz ... will ban fracking.  Well, in the Year 2024, the Biden-HARRIS Administration already did so, in a de facto way ... effectively so, by a sleight of hand administrative ploy.

 In January of 2024, the Biden-HARRIS Administration effectively BANNED fracking, by banning exportation permits for LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS.  Another way to describe it is that a freeze was put on the granting of exportation permits.  Technically, you can say that Biden-HARRIS sabotaged the fracking industry.  More specifically, on January 26, 2024, Biden-HARRIS 

 "announced a temporary pause on pending decisions for exports of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)."

The excuse was to take time to "evaluate the impacts of LNG exports on energy costs, America’s energy security, and climate change – the existential threat of our time."  The quote is taken from the White House, itself.  

In as much, LNG shipments were stranded in America.  A literal traffic jam of LNG shipments occurred at the docks.  The Biden/Harris People were nothing but lying con artists, all along.

And of course, the weather that the world has experienced in the past four years was NOT any worse than weather experienced for the past 150 years.  As an example, since 1851, there have only been FOUR Category 5 hurricanes that made landfall in the Continental United States.  And even in the 1700s, there were devastating hurricanes.  In fact, the 1300s had devastating storms.  

There are 60+ Climate discourses at the Blue Marble Album which addresses today's Climate Hysteria in extreme detail.  Go and look for yourself.  Below is a White House statement of the Biden-Harris Admin.  Of course, you know by now that both Joe and Kamala are serial liars.  Joe goes back to 1988, on camera.  Joe goes further back, off camera, with his lying.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/01/27/what-they-are-saying-leaders-praise-biden-harris-administration-pause-on-pending-decisions-of-liquefied-natural-gas-exports/

Now, in 2024, Kamala kept saying that she will not ban fracking.  In 2020, she said that Joe Biden will not ban fracking.  Well, Biden-HARRIS already banned fracking in a very sneaky, sleight-of-hand way.  Kamala was and is a liar.

Next came the Biden-HARRIS stonewalling.  February, March, April, May, and June passed.  No permits for exporting Liquefied Natural Gas were issued.  The expanding of fracking operations were put on hold.  Then, on the 1st of July, a federal judge in Louisiana struck-down the Biden-HARRIS ban.  

"In his ruling, Judge Cain said, “It appears that the DOE’s decision to halt the permit approval process for entities to export LNG to non-FTA countries is completely without reason or logic and is perhaps the epiphany of ideocracy."  DOE stands for Dept of Energy.

https://www.americanpress.com/2024/07/01/us-federal-judge-james-cain-jr-strikes-down-biden-administration-pause-on-new-lng-exports/

The aforementioned shows that Kamala Harris continues to be nothing but a liar.  All people of Pennsylvania, take note:  Kamala WILL do everything she can to annihilate the fracking industry.

The Roll Call of Kamala's Other Lies

Kamala falsely claimed that the Trump Tax Cut only lowered the tax rate of the wealthy:

The middle class ... the lower income bracket people ... had their income tax rates decreased also, in 2017, and this was made effective as of January 2018.  It was found that 80.4% of taxpaying Americans had their income tax rates lowered ... under Trump.  Kamala lied, yet again.

The ABC moderators committed dereliction of duty, in not correcting the lies of Kamala Harris.  She repeatedly lied throughout the debate, and the moderators repeatedly kept silent throughout her lying to the American People.  This made the ABC moderators co-liars.  They should be fired from ABC immediately.

The question at hand is if whether or not revenue will be generated more via raising taxes or lowering taxes.  This involves the Laffer Curve, Price Elasticity, and past tax revenue records.  Thus, that question is beyond the scope of this post.  So, we move onward.

The Lie where  Kamala Harris & her ABC allies denied that Harris supported the plan to spend taxpayer dollars on illegal alien prison inmates, for transgender surgery.

Below is the excerpt of a recent KFILE report.  It's here to show you that an assertion which was made by Trump, and then declared a lie by the two ABC moderators, turned out to have been TRUE

The belittling of Trump will continue until the next person gets so angry that he/she will try to fire a bullet into Trump's head.  And ABC will let this hatemongering happen.  Now, it already happened for a second time, as of Sept 15, 2024. 

Some law enforcement people somewhere need to file criminal charges on mainstream media personnel for defamation and the incitement to rioting, as well as the incitement of assassination.  Criminal courts have novel construction to the law, just as civil courts do.

Quick note:  In most states, Defamation is a civil court matter.  However, in some states defamation is a criminal offense.  And the way the mainstream media has been defaming Donald Trump has been a matter of inciting assassination ... or inciting a riot.
Also in 2019, Kamala supported the defunding of ICE.  For further affirmation ... aka "concurrence" ... of the above KFILE report, refer to the link directly below:


 ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓ ⚓

Her claim to have been friendly to fracking since 2020 proven to be a lie, as of Jan 2024.

Fracking was banned by the Biden-Harris administration in January 2024, in a predictable sleight of hand way.  It prevented the products of fracking from being exported.  More specifically, Biden & Company halted "temporarily" all export permits for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG.)  It was typical stonewalling.  This is why no one can trust Harris, the unchaste & mortally sinful WHORE of Willie Brown who is no model of virtue for young ladies ANYWHERE.

The freeze on permits was a great way to cost frackers a lot of business.  It caused a proverbial LNG traffic jam.  It required a federal judge's intervention, in July of 2024.  This proved Joe & Kamala to have been nothing more than lying sneaks.  Click on the link below and become enlightened ... and liberated from Hair Sniffing Joe and Kamala the Whore.

🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑🔑


🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓🔓

Housing Costs became too high, thanks to the Bidenomics which was praised by Harris

She admitted that current housing costs in America are too high.  Yet, she didn't admit that this rise in price occurred under her watch.  She acts likes the outsider, when she is actually the incumbent.  Likewise, she acted as if Trump is the incumbent, when he has no governmental post, at all.  

A detailed critique on Harris' economic platform, as well as details on Trump's economic policy during his presidency, is linked directly below.  It IS informative:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKlZe2SSgLk&list=TLPQMTIwOTIwMjQmaNXRv3F-Gg&index=13

🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍 🔍

Those particular ex-employees were the ones fired by Trump, and therefore, they were committing revenge with their mouths and/or emails

And by the way, the ex-employees of Trump who damned him with their mouths were people FIRED BY TRUMP.  Their defamation of Trump was their act of revenge.  They were also speaking out of pride, giving excuses for why they were fired by a Donald Trump made famous for saying, "You're fired."  Some of these were military personnel.

Kamala's denial about her disrespecting Israel

The most disgusting part of Kamala's conduct was when she would shake her head "no," while Trump would be speaking a known truth.  The most obvious example involves Israeli head of state, Benjamin Netanyahu.  

It is well known that Kamala refused to meet with him.  She refused to talk to Benjamin Netanyahu.  She went to a sorority get-together, instead.  It's a very well known fact.  None the less, Trump mentioned this undeniable fact, yet Kamala kept shaking her head, "no," while bearing a very arrogant expression, as if Trump is too stupid to know the truth.  

The Economics Term, Bleeding Money, as it applies to the auto industry, is what Trump meant

The Bloodbath comment was meant economically, as a derivative of an economics term, "bleeding money."  Trump spoke of an auto industry economic bloodbath ... aka financial rupture.  Trump did not threaten physical violence.  Kamala LIED about that.  Kamala has the maturity level of a twelve year old.  

Once again, when money is chronically being lost, one is bleeding money.   When it's a massive loss, it's an economic "bloodbath," figuratively speaking only.  Kamala already proved that she is a Economics Moron, evidenced by all the money you having been loosing during her tenure as vice president.  Trump proved that he knew something worthwhile about Economics, evidenced by the low gas prices and fuel independence enjoyed by Americans.  

That fuel-independence and those low gas prices were only lost under Kamala's watch.  A vote for Kamala the Adulteress is a vote for your poverty.  She lived in luxury, while numerous people suffered.  She lived in safety, while Laken Riley was being murdered.  A vote for Kamala is a vote for death.

Tax Deduction Pointless if you don't first get Start-up Money, for a small business

In her first solo interview, after the rigged debate, Kamala showed herself to be a complete airhead, talking about her neighborhood lawns, in a diversionary tactic.  Kamala had no idea how to answer the question of how she would reduce prices.  So, she literally changed the subject, thinking that you are too stupid to have noticed that she has no idea how to lower prices.

Kamala eventually said that she was going to give small business start-up entrepreneurs that which was needed for them to start a small business :::: a tax deduction.  Uhmmmmm, excuse me, but you first need something called Start-Up MONEY, to start business operations.  

A tax deduction only comes into play AFTER there has been an entire period of having been engaged in business.  In America, it's known as the quarterly tax return.  

Without start-up money, there is no business income.  Without business income, there is no small business income tax deduction.  Kamala was a completely airheaded moron, in her trying to talk about things-economic, in her solo interview.  She was a full-blown idiot.  Only an idiot would vote for her.  So, the question is, "How many registered idiots are in America?"  We will see on election day, taking into account the fact that some measure of modern-day ballot box stuffing will occur here and there. None the less, if you want to know how idiots live in America, wait for the November 2024 election results to be posted.

Concerning Economics, Donald Trump built an empire, comprising large physical infrastructures which required the services of architects, structural engineers, accomplished tradesmen, subcontractors, dedicated laborers, etc.  Kamala did no such thing in the past 21 years of her being an officeholder.

To speak to Putin's representatives is to speak to Putin

Kamala the Hateful wanted to ridicule Trump for having said, "when she went to Munich to talk to Putin..."  Well, to talk to a representative of Putin is to talk to Putin.  It's the act of talking through the chain of command ... or through the channels of command.  

When speaking to Putin's reps in 2022, Kamala was speaking to Putin.  Kamala tried to make Trump look like an idiot when he stated that she spoke with Putin.  She wasn't in Munich talking the Munich Motor Club.  She was talking to Putin, through representation.  Case Closed.  

The Insulin Thing

Oh, and concerning the "insulin price cap,"  that law does NOT go into effect, until 2026.  Kamala makes it sound as if it has been happening, already.  In fact, seniors have had a co-pay of only $9 dollars, relatively recently.  To have claimed that there was a Nevada grandmother showing bills of a thousand dollars a month for only insulin was ... to state it politely ... misrepresented and wildly misinterpreted.

That arrogant & snide face of Kamala shows how much of a creature of hate she is.  Those are the types of people who orchestrate malicious prosecutions, along with over-the-top raids, on Catholic families and political opponents during an election year.  Kamala Types are the people who start civil wars, by pushing a faction into a corner, and causing a self-defense response from the bullied faction.  

Someone as hateful as Kamala is no uniter.  She's a vicious little feisty runt who causes division.  After all, Tulsi was instantly placed on a Terror Watch List, as soon as Kamala became the UNELECTED & UNDESERVED democrat party presidential nominee.  Well, Tulsi was the one who ended Kamala's 2020 campaign.  Kamala was committing revenge.

In re:  Kamala's BLATANT LIE in claiming that she didn't promote the banning of guns

She is on video repeatedly advocating a "buy-back" program, by which, by law, Americans must give up their guns.  She is also on video for "defunding the police."  So remember, she is a pathological liar, in that she confidently speaks while she lies to millions of people.

And yes, I am a faithful subscriber of Devory Dawkins.  He is as sharp & impressive as Viv Ramaswamy, personality-wise.  Vance, too.  Well, below is a Devory Dawkins Video, addressing Kamala's stance on gunneries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLFEQmyvvyI

The Price Gouging Accusation against Big Oil and its insult to one's intelligence

Very simply, if operating costs go up, retail prices go up.  Now, two days before Trump left office, in January of 2021, the price of a barrel of  Brent Crude Oil was exactly $54.75.  Under Joe Biden & Kamala Harris, the price of Brent Crude sky-rocketed to $122.01, on June 6, 2022.  This should be enough to explain the cause of the rise in prices, during the Biden-Harris years.  

See for yourself:  https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/oil-price?op=1

If price gouging is the corporate way, and if Donald Trump is all buddy buddy with corporations, then why were they no notable price rises during the Trump years ... before COVID and the rise in construction material?  The Years 2017, 2018, and 2019 were solid years for the economy.  No ridiculous price hikes then, as there were under Biden & Harris.  No transportation hindrances then, as there were under Biden & Harris.  No shortages then, either,

Meanwhile, Mr Masculine, Tim Walz, keeps looking like the Pillsbury Doughboy.

BTW,  Tim Walz is a worse liar than Kamala.  And why?  It's because Tim Walz is smarter and more articulate than Kamala.  So, he uses his gifts from God to lie to the People.  Concerning this, remember:  Your talents are God's gift to you.  What you do with those talents is your gift to God ... or it's your refusal to give any gift to God.

May 24, 2025

The Great "London-is-burning" Lie of July 19, 2022 ... conjured by the media

The following was written in 2022.  But, it is far more pertinent today, in light of the continuing hoax which claims the world to be in a Climate Crisis.  There are over 60 climate-related discourses here, to prove the sky-is-falling claim to be an insult to a reasonable person's intelligence.  And they are supported with numerous pieces of evidence which, predictably enough, is known as "Evidentiary Support."  

In as much, if you don't at least look through the numerous pieces of evidence here, then you have zero right to speak on the subject.  Mentioning one biomarker ... one statistic taken out of context ... is the sign of someone easily persuaded and therefore easily duped.  Of course, the rise in CO2 is the sole marker cited in doomsday diatribes.  Yet, the amount still is a mere trace amount in the atmosphere which is 78% Nitrogen, 21% Oxygen, 9% Argon, and a mere 0.044% of CO2 which has three vibrational modes, one of which renders CO2 incapable of capturing Infrared Light.

Ironically enough, like a typical dictator, Al Gore refused to entertain conversations and debates about his doomsday climate claims.  This is because he knows that he will lose the debate ... the cross-examination.  In the words of Jackie Gleason (super famous TV host of the 1960s) "And away we go."

🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐

Let us begin with the various fire & incident frequency charts provided to the public by the London Fire Brigade.  Concerning Greater London's size, it encompasses an area of 610 square miles.  

Keep in mind that, during July of 2022, the media kept stating that the rise in atmospheric co2 was finally causing an out-of-control rise in Greater London fires.  Well, the opposite is true.

From the Year 2004 to the Year 2022, the annual number of London Area fires were cut in half, in comparison to the fire numbers ranging from 1969 to 2004. In fact, each individual year ... from 2004 to 2022 ... was 1/3 of what it was in 1976.  

Moreover, the year prior (2021) was the year of the least number of fires in the record-keeping history of Greater London.  Meanwhile, the Year 2022 had the fourth least number of fires in the Greater London area ... since the beginning of record-keeping there.  In fact, while the atmospheric co2 level was rising throughout the years 2004 to 2022, the number of Greater London fires continuously decreased.  Therefore, an elevation of co2 will NOT cause your city or town to dry-out & burn-up.  See for yourself.

In July of 2022, the media claimed that atmospheric co2 finally reached a tipping point.  In July of 2022, the same media began the countdown to the End of the World ... proverbially speaking.   On the 19th of that month, the London Area thermometers went above 100F.  In London, the official reading was 102F.  In a town located 11 miles west of London, the reading was 104F, for two hours only.

The claim was that co2 was saturating the atmosphere so badly that it was now causing London to dry-out and burn out-of-control.   The newscasters claimed that, on July 19th, the London Fire Brigade had its "most incidents" since the bombing of London, in WWII.  

The same media said that the London Area had the most fires in any one day, on July 19, 2022.  The truth is that July 19, 2022 wasn't anywhere close to that.  In comparison to any WWII air raid, the July 19th incidents was less than chump change.  Compared to the daily average of fires in 1976, the number of fires on July 19th was 52 fires LESS.  

Compared to the daily average of Greater London fires in 1970, 1975, 1979, 1983, 1984, 1989, 1990, 1994, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2003 and a few other years, the number of July 19th fires were 24 to 38 LESS.  At the very least, there were approximately 2,500 Greater London days that had more fires than did July 19th day.  Reporting July 19th as the worst day since a world war was like lighting a candle with one matchstick and claiming it to be a 5-alarm fire.

In the entire Year of 2022, there were 19,297 fires in the 607 sq mile area known as Greater London.  In 1976, there were over 60,000 fires in the exact same area. In 1989, 1990, 1995, and 2003 there were over 55,000 fires EACH YEAR, in the exact same Greater London region.   More important is the fact that, in every year from 1969 to 2005, there were at least 40,000 fires.  That amounts to 37 consecutive years when the yearly fire count was at least TWO TIMES MORE than it was in 2022.   This also amounts to an average of 164 fires per day during 1976 versus an average of 53 fires per day in 2022.

Now, July 19 was an average day in terms of "incidents."  The daily average for 2022 was 343 incidents per day.  In 2022, 47% of all Greater London incidents were false alarms; 59,415 of them.

On July 19, 2022, there were 362 incidents.   On that same day, there were 142 false alarms.  There were 112 fires on that day, and that number has an ironic twist to it.  This is because the daily averge of fires from 1970 to 2004 were at least 109.  Thus, July 19, 2022 was an average day, when looking at the big picture. 

A complete London Fire Brigade Incident Record for July 19 can be found directly below, via 7 photo-copies.  You can do the statistics yourself.

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2024/05/July2022-official-greater-london-fire-stats.html

Let's review this correctly, without any sleight of hand con artistry:

Between 1970 and 2004, the 610 square mile region known as Greater London had between 109 to 164 fires PER DAY.  This translates into 60,000+ fires per year and 40,000 fires per year.  Then, in the Year 2009, yearly London fires decreased below 30,000.  Then, in 2014, yearly fires decreased to 20,000 per year.  So, between 2015 and 2022, Greater London had an average of between 41 to 55 DAILY fires.  Thus, it was an unconscionable lie to have stated that Greater London's climate had gotten out of control.  The opposite was true.

The number of London fires were literally cut in half, while co2 increased significantly in the atmosphere.   Thus, a courtroom lawyer could actually tell a jury that the rise in co2 caused a decrease in London fires.  Yet, the truth is that co2 remains at such a small atmospheric level that it can't affect the air, either for good or for bad.  The only greenhouse gas which holds influence is water vapor.  In fact, Cirrus clouds retain infrared light more effectively than does co2.  

The atmosphere is humongous.  Acres of plants, trees, weeds, and blades of grass are all tiny, in comparison.  CO2 drives the biosphere; not the atmosphere.  The other greenhouse gases ... other than water vapor ... are too small in quantity to drive any air mass greater than a laboratory experiment chamber.

Ther article below is "truncated."  It's only part of the whole.  The entire article can be found by clicking here:

 

Back to 2022

The pronounced decrease in Greater London fires occurred while the population of the area increased by 1,300,000 people.  Now, an increase in population brings with it an increased probability of fires.  However, despite the simultaneous increase in the London Area population and in the atmospheric CO2 level, Greater London achieved an eighteen-year-long streak of consistently decreased fire event numbers.  Thus, CO2 is not as powerful as the media claims it to be, in killing-off society.   The asininity of demonizing CO2 is that, without CO2, life on Earth ceases.  After all, CO2 is the activator of photosynthesis. 

At this point, keep in mind that the media in July of 2022 showed houses or small buildings on fire, as if CO2 caused spontaneous combustion throughout London.  "Chart #17" below is from the London Fire Brigade, and it mentions that "House fires in Greater London have reduced drastically since 1981."  This decrease occurred while co2 levels were rising and while the population of Greater London was rising by an additional 1.3 million people.

This proves that in no way did the constant rise of atmospheric co2 cause an increase in Greater London fires.  Thus, the 2022 London news reports were all scams.  It was one big false alarm.   In as much, let's view additional evidentiary support provided by the London Fire Brigade:

Above:  The stats of 2021.  That's last year.  Last year was the year of the LEAST NUMBER OF FIRES in the London Area, in all of London's recorded history.  In as much, 14,929 is much less than 40,000.

Most important is that the co2 level of 2021 was the exact same co2 level of 2022, minus an insignificant one and a half parts per million.  The exact same co2 level gave the 610 square mile London Vicinity its LOWEST AMOUNT of fires-per-year, ever since record keeping began.  Thus, we have 100,000% proof that the co2 level of 2022 did NOT cause London to catch on fire, as the media very falsely claimed, to its future legal detriment. 

Above are the stats for the Year 2020.  This is the year with the second LOWEST number of fires.  17,409 is also much less than 40,000.

Directly below are the stats for the Year 2022, as of October of that year.  The Year 2022 will be one of the lowest incident & fire years on record.  In fact, it thus far is the year with the least number of incidents, depending on the November & December stats.  But as far as goes its final tally for fires, that is projected to be about 18,000 to 19,000, if this chart (posted in November) includes the October fire statistics.  If the chart below only includes the stats up to September, then the projected sum total is 20,000 to 21,000 for the year.  This also is much less than the typical 40,000+ yearly fires that occurred between 1968 and 2004.

This was "as of September 2022."
 
This was 2022 in its entirely; the fourth lowest number of fires in its record-keeping history.  Take note that there were 59,415 false alarms in the same year.
Below is the Year 2009.  It's posted here to show you that other years had many more fires than did the Year 2022, in addition to what the 2014 London Fire Brigade graph showed.  The 29,591 fires of 2009 are much more than the 14,929 fires of 2021 and the 19,297 fires of 2022.
 
 
Below is the Year 2010, posted to show the same.   The 27,462 fires of 2010 are a whole lot more than the 14,929 fires of 2021 ... and the 19,297 fires of 2022.  Thus, there was no co2 saturation burning-up Greater London.  It was all a lie.

 
And of course, in order to show that there is no cherry picking going-on here, the Year 2011 is included.  Its fire numbers are also much higher than those of 2022, as well as 2021.  Thus, 2022 was NOT the tipping point in any capacity.  It was merely another year where the media once again lied to the public.
 
 
Many other years had averaged many more calls (incidents) per day than 2022 ... and 2011.  In fact, the Year 2009 had an average of 370 "incidents" (fire calls) per day.  After all, it had 134,379 incidents.  There has always been a high number of fire-calls ("incidents") in Greater London, in any one day.   There were 350 "incidents" throughout Greater London, in 2022.  The average daily incidents for the entire year of 2022 was 348.  That was typically average ... not a record-breaking day.
 
UK's 2022 crop yields also prove the London-is-burning-due-to-co2 alarm to be a false one.

Now, when you see a fire occurring near green grass and green leafage, the fire is not fueled by dried-out grass and leafage.  Moreover, being that the media claimed England to have been the victim of drought and heatwaves in the Summer of 2022, one would logically conclude that the 2022 harvests of the UK would be dismal crop failures.  Well, they turned out to be very healthy crop yields, thereby showing the July 2022 media members to be a cabal of sophomoric liars.  Observe:

No downhill sliding board here.  Steady crop yield pattern, with increases, since the Year 2000.

In 2022, the UK enjoyed an 8 1/2% increase in cereal grains.  It was simply that there was an approximate 1% less and a 1 1/2 % less moisture content in the harvested grains than average.  So, where is the great co2 disaster in Britain, during 2022.  The agricultural industry didn't see one, at all. 

None the less, wheat was up 11% and barley was up 6%.  The UK's main oilseed harvest was up by 39%, but the crop yield increase was only 17%, being that the UK used more farmland for planting its main oilseed crop.  In fact, the UK used 13% less farmland for oats, and the oats yield for 2022 was surmised (estimated) to be 10% less than last year.  Technically, this translates into a humble 3% increase for UK oat farmers, per acre. 

Conclusion:  There is no man-made-co2 driven climate catastrophe occurring in Greater London.  

Concerning the commercial media networks' claim that mankind has to aggressively rid the atmosphere of the industrial "carbon footprint," you need to understand the following facts:  The atmosphere is made of [1] 78% carbon-free Nitrogen, [2] 21% carbon-free Oxygen, [3] 0.93% carbon-free Argon.  Thus, the Earth's atmosphere is already at least 99.93% carbon-free.  
 
Know that the concentration of co2 in the atmosphere is so low that, for every 2,398 molecules in the sky, only one of them is co2.  One more time:  Outside in the sky, there is 1 and only 1 co2 molecule for every 2,398 molecules out there.  Round it off to 1 co2 molecule for every 2,400 molecules in the atmosphere. 
 
China, India, & Indonesia are the present concerns:  Not London.
 
The only valid present concern is whether the construction of multiple Chinese, Indian, & Indonesia coal power plants will result in the aggressive rise in atmospheric co2, or will there be carbon capture technology provided with each new coal plant.  An aggressive rate of rise changes the picture, moderately for the present --- but significantly for the distance future, as in the next century.
 
At present, there's not an immediate hysteric concern.  No scientist publicly claimed that the world is coming to an end, due to "greenhouse gases" in twelves or in 112 years.  However, the recent history of Beijing does not give humanity much trust in the ruling political political of today's China, not to mention the ruling parties of India & Indonesia.  So, we cringe, wondering what will become of the atmosphere in the decades to come.  
 
This is why hoaxes like the London one have to be ejected from society's concerns.  China, India, & Indonesia are what count.  Not London and not healthy Australia ... and not the American Southwest which got its share of monsoon rains in recent years.  Moreover, there is the issue with Mercury and Sulfur Dioxide when it comes to coal use.  That must be addressed more so.  BTW, refusing to go to high school in Sweden isn't going to help, at all. 
 
 
Qualifying Note:  The Sulfur Hexaflouride issue is the other important concern at present.  That one can still be proverbially nipped at the bud, though.  However, you don't jag around with something like Sulfur Hexaflouride.  You cut to the chase and get the task done.  The task is finding its substitute.   It's all too tempting for industry not to do so.

We proceed to 1901, 121 years before the July 2022 day placed under amplified attention by the media.  July 19, 2022 was presented as the unprecedented beginning of the End of the World.  The media claimed that it was a day unprecedented in the history of England.  They lied.  The truth is the climate is CYCLICAL --- unless something.   In as much, the Year 2022 was little more than the Year of the Great Deja Vu ... of 1922.  Enough newspaper photocopies on that year are already posted at thr Blue Mrble Album.  We'll go back further, to 1901, so that you can see that "this" has all been seen and experienced before, time after time.


Let's sail over to Italy, to see how it was doing in August of 1901.

It is often stated that "history repeats itself."  Well, that is the historically proven case, concerning Climate History.  And remember, in 1901 the co2 level was a mere 296 parts per million.  The co2 count was 121 ppm LESS than today.  It was 29% LOWER than today.  Yet, sweltering heat & much more dry drought-inducing heat occurred and reoccurred throughout the first four decades of the 20th Century than today.  This was when the co2 level was much lower than today.  

 In 2014, NASA declared that the worst drought year in the past 1,000 years was 1934.  The co2 level at he time was 309 ppm.  That's 108 ppm LOWER than today.  Yet, according to the Al Gore theory, 2020, 2021, and 2022 should have been the worst drought years.  Well, contrary to what the media claimed, Arizona & Nevada have been getting yearly monsoon rains.  This neglect of reporting the truth is the result of media's managers wanting to deceive you into thinking that we are trapped in a deadly circle of Dante's Inferno.  The truth is that we are doing nothing more than repeating history in a cyclical fashion.

In caveman days, the co2 level was 260 ppm.   And during recent heated eras, such as the Roman Warm Period & the Medieval Warm Period, co2 was only 280 ppm.  Today, atmospheric co2 is 421 ppm, and today's heat is quit  only a repeat performance of the past.  The two 1901 articles above are a small sample of the hundreds of pieces of documentary evidence which show that a rise in temperature is not dependent upon a rise in co2.  Rather, according to ice core analysis, a rise in temperature historically came first, resulting in added evaporation of ocean water and the simultaneous emission of additional co2 into the atmosphere.

Climate is a pattern --- not a week-long event or even a month-long event.  July 18th & 19th were the the result of a dry air mass from Northern Africa.   And yes, there were a couple weeks of no rain --- in July, when such a thing is likely to happen.  However, after July 19th, everything instantly went back to normal.  The "back-to-normal" part is the climate.  

To call July 2022 "unprecedented" makes knowledgeable people roll their eyes and say, "Give me a break, and cut it out with the theatrics."  After all, there was such a thing as the Great Fire of London in 1666, along with ~the Great Fire of Tooley Street, 1861, ~the Burning of the Parliament, aka the Palace of Westminster (which was a complex of buildings), 1834, ~the Whitehall Palace Fire, 1698, ~the London Bridge Area Fire, 1633, the first London Bridge Fire, 1135, ~the Southwark Fire of 1212, ~the Great Fire of 1087, ~the Great Fire of Aldgate which burned all the way to Ludgate and which included St. Paul's Cathedral, 961, ~the Fire of 120 AD, when the Romans ruled.  

And of course, there were the fires caused by Boudicca's rage.  Those were not atmospheric science issues.  In fact, the Great Fire of 120 AD could have been an act of war, as well.  None the less, calling the July 2022 London fires unprecedented invalidates a journalist, as much as does calling July 2022 a co2 cataclysm.  After all, the rise in co2 for the last 19 years was accompanied by a major decrease in London fires.

Now, Planet Earth has had atmospheric co2 at  levels 9 times and even 16 times HIGHER than today.  In fact, during the height of atmospheric co2, the Cambrian Explosion occurred, resulting in the emergence of multi-celled sea life.  And later in history, when atmospheric co2 was 9 times higher than today, the Ordovician Ice Age was in progress.  This assertion, of course, is all a matter of "ice-core proxy evidence," inter alia. --- (Inter alia means, "and other things.")  Incidentally, the "inter alia" included the stoma-count of fossilized leaves.  Stoma are openings in the leaves, where co2 is absorbed.
 
 Anyway, London had two back-to-back heat days, one week apart.  The first week comprised two 87 degree Fahrenheit days.  One week later, there was a 99 degree Fahrenheit day, followed by a 103 degree Fahrenheit day.  After the 103 Fahrenheit day of July 19, the temps immediately went back to normal.  But, the propaganda machines had a field day with Britain's sole 100+  Fahrenheit day.  Oh, it was Armageddon 3.0, the Apocalypse 4.0, and the End of the World, squared & cubed.

Needless to say,  it was everybody's fault, for riding in motor vehicles and keeping warm in the Wintertime, as well as using evil evil air conditioners in the Summertime. 

Below is the London Temperature Calendar, for July 2022.  Here's the London that was presented by the media as an overly heated inferno.  Show me where this super oppressive, long-term, human-body-killing heat is, in the London Summer of 2022.  Yes, there are a couple of weeks of temperature anomalies, in London.  But, there was nothing that resulted in the death phrases "may have caused" and "likely to have caused."  This was followed by a ridiculous number Paris experienced in 1976 & 2003.

And of course, there was so much misinformative hype about Paris in July of 2022 that it insults the intelligence.  Those news articles use the phrases, "likely to have caused" and "may have caused" a certain number of deaths that equaled the deaths suffered by Britain, during the first day of the Battle of the Somme.  None the less, deadly heatwaves, deadly droughts, deadly storms, deadly floods, deadly pestilence, deadly algae blooms, hurricanes, blizzards, cold snaps, Yellow Sky days, ice stacking, glacier growths, glacier meltdowns, etc, etc, etc.  It all happened throughout the past 700 years.  

The sophomorically trained and sophomorically educated journalists look for that one tipping point moment.   Climate is an habitual trend ... NOT a one-day, two-day or even two-week event.  Here, see the temperatures of July 2022 yourself.

In Celsius:

In Fahrenheit: