CO2 emissions: In decline in Europe & the US, since 1984, 1987, 1991

New England in the Summer of 2023.  Now, does this look like a Climate Crisis to you?

Social Hypnotism 

The Concept of leaving your "Carbon Footprint" in the sky shows that Climate Propagandists do NOT realize how asinine they come-off to the adult working class, especially in light of the fact that CO2 takes-up only 0.042% of the sky outside.  Meanwhile, Methane exists in the same atmosphere at only 2 parts per million.  Wings, clouds, kites, parasails, and birds of varying type are what people see in the sky; not hooves and not footprints.   

Of course, if the Climate Propaganda Machine is trying to convey the concept of you leaving a trail of carbon behind you wherever you go, then such carbon is known as particulates, and particulates always fall to the ground ... eventually ... due to something called gravity. 

The alternative concept is that of you carrying carbon around, wherever you go.  Well, you are carbon.  Of course, in having demonized carbon, the Climate Propaganda Machine demonized you personally.  They declared you the enemy of Planet Earth ... or at least a great nuisance to the planet.  Well, do you know what else is carbon ... pure carbon?  ANS:  Diamonds.  

The Atmosphere is already 99.9% Carbon-free.

None the less, in light of the fact that the Earth's atmosphere is already more than 99.9% carbon-free, the endless harping of the "carbon footprint" is merely another form of empty propaganda, much like the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction campaign.  

The repetitive use of one-liners is the sign of a brain-washing con artist at work.  It's a form of hypnotism, where the speaker does not wish to inform, but only to persuade ... or even to force all others into some type of submission.  The submission consists in lots of money going into the pockets of the speaker.  In as much, the mainstream media cannot report anything contrary to the prevailing campaign bumper sticker slogan which, today, involves your "carbon footprint."  .

Accredited Scientists use a totally different approach, in selling to the public a belief in "global warming" only ... and not "climate change" per se.  

These individuals accentuate the concept of "Positive Feedbacks," in the search to catalogue the "feedbacks" which increase something called, Radiative Forcing.  The concentration of (the level of) CO2 in the atmosphere is far too small to drive any temperature grid.  So, the scientists added water vapor into the conversation, claiming that a rise in CO2 will rise the radiative forcing of water vapor 4 and 5 times over.  Of course, this never came close to happening.

None the less, the concept of Radiative Transfer is included in the debate package, along with TSI.  The inclusion of TSI into the debate also includes consideration of the Milankovitch Cycles (very long-term sunspot activity), as well as the 11 year Sunspot Cycle.  .

TSI is Total Solar Irradiance, and it is not to be confused with Solar Insolation.  At present, its average flow into & through Earth's atmosphere is defined as 1,361 watts per meter squared, on average throughout the year, depending on the season.  Solar Irradiance is an instantaneous measurement, while Solar Insolation is a cumulative measurement over a period of time.

Thus far, all that came to be was temperatures close to the heated temperatures of 1895-96, 1901, 1905, 1910-11, 1913, 1921-22, and 1934-1936.  So, you can't be assured of any of the new climate model formulas recently submitted, to support the claim that CO2's rise in the atmosphere caused a positive feedback mechanism which elevated the Earth's average/mean surface temperature.  

There were very contradictory cold spans too, during the rise in CO2

This is especially the case, during the cold record-breaking winter of 2025, the notable winter of 2023, the other record-breaking winter of 2021 in the Southern Hemisphere, and the multiply record breaking winter of 2014, both in the Northern & Southern Hemispheres.  This include 2009-2010 Christmas holiday season, when the average temperature anomaly was minus 5F.  

Those weather events were the opposite of a rise in the Earth's mean temperature.  Even in 2008, the anomaly average hovered around minus 2F.  In fact, 1993 to 1995 were cold times, as were 1985 and 1986, when speaking in terms of temp anomaly.

The three vibrational modes of CO2 makes a huge difference, depending on the prevailing mode

The biggest and most invalidating feature of the pro-Global Warmer climate models is that the models did not differentiate between CO2's radiative forcing capacity while in its three different vibrational modes.  Not all CO2 molecules are alike.

All three vibrational modes of CO2 causes a different radiative capacity.  In fact, when CO2 is in its Symmetric Stretch Mode, it is incapable of absorbing any infrared radiation/heat beyond a half a watt per sq meter.   There is also the asymmetric stretch mode, as well as the bending mode which looks like a bird flapping its wings.  Thus, CO2 cannot be regarded as a fungible good of the same likeness, in any climate model.

NOAA said 130 years.  Someone did a tree ring report and said 2,000 years

And concerning the claim that 2023 was the hottest year in the past 2,000 years, this came from one scientist's tree ring assessment.  NASA had long since stated that 1934 was the worse drought year, in the past 1,000 years.  And during the very dishonest Biden Presidency ... where lying to humanity was the de facto policy ... NOAA stated that 2023 was the hottest year in the past 130 years, and NOT in the past 2,000 years.  

None the less, there were years of super brutal and tragic heat in the early 20th and late 19th Century.  And the decisive feature to this is that, according to the Michael Mann Theory of surface temperature, there should have not been any years of extreme heat in the early 20th and late 19th Century.  In as much, the prevailing thesis statement here is that:::  It has all happened before ... when the outdoor CO2 count was much lower than today.  Period.

Now, there are a number of posts at the Blue Marble Album which show that the hyper-exaggerated temperature and weather reports were nothing more than dishonest hyper-exaggerations ... in detail.  So too is this the case with 2022, such as the July 2022 Heat Wave hyper-exaggeration of London.  As far as goes the Year 2023, look for other signs which indicate a truly heated year.  If no such sign is there, then the recently reported "tree ring assessment" is yet another fraud.  In as much . . .

1a]  Did the Elbe River dry-up anywhere in Germany or the Czech Republic?   1b] In other words, were the engravings on the Elbe River Hunger Stones above the river's water level?  2] Were there an untold number of heat-related deaths in Paris, as there were in 2003, 1976, and in the very tragic Year of 1911?  

3]  As far as went the Tigris and Euphrates strife, that problem has been ongoing for consecutive years, and it traces back to dams that Turkey built by which water is kept away from the Euphrates.  The dams themselves are low on water.  BUT, it was NOT a 2023-only problem.

And of course, as a reminder, NOAA stated that the Year 2023 was the warmest year in the past 130 years ... NOT in the past 2,000 years.  And what was occurred in or around 130 years ago?  ANS:  The dreaded heatwave years of 1895-96.  

Quite frankly, 2023 wasn't hotter than 1911 ... and definitely not hotter than 1905, when it was so hot that the summertime waters of the Mediterranean was too hot for any human to enter without extreme discomfort.  

In as much, what you need to understand, in realizing the non-reliability of these claims of the "hottest-year-in-so-many-years" is that there was very little weather-monitoring stations throughout the world in the early 20th Century, the 19th Century, the 18th Century, etc.  So, how does mankind know what the temps were in many areas of Planet Earth without gathering "proxy evidence" from the natural terrain in those places?  This is why basing a hockey stick graph on the YAD-061 set is entirely insufficient for any truth to be conveyed.  

All valid scientific claims must match the Weather News History

HOWEVER, the one thing that is absolutely for sure is the Weather News Report History of the past 85, 105, and 135 years, as well as ship log entries, almanacs, and chronicles of centuries past.  Factual history doesn't change, until people as dishonest as the Biden Shadow Presidency changes it.

In as much, it was the factual weather history which showed us that "this has all happened before," concerning the weather events of the past 5 years.  This changes the face of the "Climate Change" Assertions, because the historic facts show us that there has not been much of a change in climate for over a 180 years . . . since the completion of the Little Ice Age, in 1840.  There has only been a repetitive trend, where climate is like a roller coaster.

Of course, administrations as vicious and as dishonest as the Biden Administration will seek to change history books and records. The Biden People did this display of dishonesty with the US Wildfire Graph.

All in all, you must admit that ... if you were following ... the Biden Administration literally lied about everything ... when the Biden People weren't hiding facts outright.  After all, everything that the Biden People did turned into a disaster of one degree or another.  Meanwhile, Joe spent his presidency at the beach.

Now, numerous photo-copies of news reports and agency stats are posted on multiple posts, in this Blue Marble Album.  As far as goes this particular post, everything is focused on national CO2 emission stats.  And we begin:

Enter the decline of carbon emissions in the skies of first-world & high tech nations

The present Climate Hysteria propaganda is that the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Hungary, Japan, etc must decrease their carbon dioxide emissions, as if they haven't been doing so for years.  They mention the objective of reducing greenhouse gases. 

Well, 90% of all of Planet Earth's greenhouse gases, by volume, is water vapor.  Water vapor contains zero carbon in it.  

Now, 70.8% of Planet Earth's surface is covered by water, and 96.5% of all of Planet Earth's water is in its oceans.  Plus, the quantity of ocean water on Earth is 352 QUINTILLION gallons. 

As far as goes all of the water on Earth, in Earth, and above Earth, it's alleged to be 332.5 million cubic miles. One cubic mile of water holds 1.1 trillion gallons of water.   So, in order to truly decrease the Earth's greenhouse gases, you have to drain some ocean somewhere.  And to where would the ocean water go?

None the less, the emission of greenhouse gases that are not water vapor have been on the decrease for years in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, and even in Syria.  So, how much more does the modern alliance of America, England, and continental Europe have to do?  

As of May 2024, Planet Earth's atmosphere reached its highest level of CO2 in human history.  It even exceeded the CO2 levels of long before the beginning of human history.  Yet, under the Joe Biden Shadow Presidency, draconian measures were imposed upon the mass populations of what used to be called the Free World.  All of the regulations ... all of the impositions ... failed to achieve the Biden/Harris objective.  

The objective was to render a trace amount of a molecular compound into even a smaller trace amount in the sky.  And keep in mind that, at present, the sky outside comprises 0.0425% carbon dioxide.  99.9575% of the same sky does not ... contain CO2.

Of course, there is not enough co2 in the atmosphere to drive the climate, in the first place.  The climate is driven by the Sun & the Coriolis Effect, as well as the juxtaposition of air pressure systems & the variable types of surface area of Planet Earth.  So, the lesson here is that the media repeatedly hid encouraging truths from humanity once again.  CO2 emissions have been on the decrease in specific nations.  Yet, the people of those nations got no credit from the mainstream media and the Biden Shadow Presidency.

********************************************************************************

Let's start with the good ole USA.  Per capita co2 emissions there reached their peak in 1973.  Then, in 2004, the United States began its pronounced & consistent decline of per capita CO2 emissions, until 2020.  

Then, in the Year 2023 ... when it was time for the Biden Shadow Presidency to think in terms of a re-election campaign ... the USA resumed its per capita CO2 emissions decline/decrease.  Meanwhile, China's CO2 emissions sky rocketed into the sky, and no one objected to it happening.   Such a thing is known as hypocrisy.

Keep in mind that the chart below is of the United States;  NOT China.

         ***************************************************************************

Below:  The USA's aggregate (total) annual co2 emissions have been on the decline since 2007.  In sixteen years, until and including 2023, annual co2 emissions went from 6.13 billion tonnes per year to 4.91 billion tonnes.

*********************************************************************************

Below:  The very historic nation of Greece has also been decreasing its CO2 Emission since 2007, and more so than the United States.

***********************************************************************************Below:  Neighboring Bulgaria ... a neighbor of northern Greece.  It reached its height of CO2 emissions in 1987, when  the CO2 output there was 91.27 million tonnes.   At the end of 1992, Bulgaria's CO2 emissions were down to 57.46 million tonnes.  Then, in 2023, Bulgaria's yearly CO2 emissions count dropped down to 36.09 million tonnes.  Did CNN, MSNBC, the UN, or John Kerry ever report this?

******************************************************************************

Below:  The total annual co2 emissions of the UK have been on a steady decline since 2004.

*********************************************************************************

Below: Per Capita co2 emissions for the UK have been on the decline since 1971.  This means that the UK has long since cut its per capita co2 emissions in half.  Has CNN or MSNBC ever reported this?

********************************************************************************

Below:  Per Capita CO2 emissions in North America reached their height in 1973 and then went on the decline.  CO2 emissions there have been on a more pronounced & constant decline since 2005.

*****************************************************************************

Below:  The total annual co2 emissions in North America  have been on a steady decline since 2007, when the yearly co2 emissions there were 7.36 billion tonnes.  By 2023, emissions dropped to 6.12 billion tonnes.

*********************************************************************************

Below: Total annual co2 emissions in France went on a sharp decline in 1979.  It leveled out and later went on a steady decline in 2005.  In 1979, the yearly French co2 emissions count was 533.25 million tonnes.  In 2023, co2 emissions dropped to 272.48 million tonnes.   This has been a significant decline.  Did CNN & MSNBC report this to the public?

**********************************************************************************

Below:  Next comes  neighboring Germany ... a neighbor of France, that is.  Its consistent decline in annual CO2 emissions started in 1979, at 1.12 BILLION tonnes.  In 2023, CO2 emissions from Germany dropped to 596.15 MILLION tonnes.   This was an annual average decrease of 47%.  Germany came close to cutting its co2 emissions in half.

**********************************************************************************

Below: Al Gore claimed that climate refugees were coming out of Syria in droves.  No, they were War Refugees.  Syria's annual co2 emissions have been on the significant decline since 2008.

                ******************************************************************

Below:  Italy's annual co2 emissions have been on a significant decline since 2005.  See for yourself.

***********************************************************************************

Below: Nearby Spain ... near Italy, that is ... had a more pronounced drop in annual CO2 emissions.  It reached its height in 2005, with an output of 368.34 million tonnes.  By the end of 2023, Spain's yearly CO2 emissions dropped to 221.62 million tonnes. 

              *********************************************************************

Below:  As far as goes the European Union, it began its steady decline of CO2 emissions in 2006, with an output of 4.32 billion tonnes.  By the end of 2023, the EU's CO2 output dropped to 2.82 billion tonnes.  China's CO2 output did NOT drop.  It performed the opposite of the EU, the USA, the Netherlands, etc.

          

              *********************************************************************

Below:  The annual co2 emissions of oil-rich Venezuela has dropped significantly since 2013.  Did CNN or MSNBC let you know about this?

***********************************************************************************

Below:  Japan started its annual co2 emissions decrease in 2013.  

***********************************************************************************

Below:  Hungary reached its co2 emissions peak in 1984, before the dissolution of the Berlin Wall.  The annual emissions of co2 in Hungary steadily declined to the point where Hungary's 2013 emissions were half of its 1984 emissions.  This translates into a significant decline.  But, did CNN, MSNBC, the Guardian, or DemocracyNow let the public know this?

**********************************************************************************

Below:  The Netherlands began its consistent decline in annual CO2 emissions in 2010.

*****************************************************************************

Below:  Sweden's annual CO2 emissions decrease began in 1979, to the numerical tune of 84.87 million tonnes.  The annual emissions had been reduced to 36.56 million tonnes, in 2023.  This was a significant reduction.  Where was CNN & MSNBC, when it came time to report this?

*****************************************************************************

Below:  The continent of Europe started its annual CO2 emissions decline in 1990.  Annual European CO2 emissions went from 8.04 billion tonnes in 1991 to 4.99 billion tonnes in 2023.  That was a significant reduction.  Did CNN or MSNBC ever report this to humanity?

=====================================================================

The nation that unleashed CO2

It's China.  In the Year 1993 China emitted 2.92 billion tonnes of CO2.  In the Year 2003, China's CO2 emissions were 4.84 billion tonnes.  In 2013, China's annual CO2 emissions were 9.96 BILLION tonnes.  Then, in the Year 2023, China's annual CO2 emissions were 11.90 billion tonnes.  

In contrast, the United States' annual CO2 emissions count was 4.91 billion tonnes in 2023.

In addition,  Russia's yearly CO2 emissions for 2023 was only  1.82 billion tonnes. 

     *****************************************************************************

     Below:  China's CO2 output in comparison to continental-sized territories on Planet Earth

       Do you get the message, yet?  John Kerry has been flying to the wrong airports.

     *********************************************************************************

At the Sky High Inn, there is a lot of room for Carbon Dioxide

Now, the Number 1 Proof which shows that co2 is NOT a pollutant is this:  If co2 were a pollutant, then every time you exhale, soot would be coming out of your mouth.  A human exhales 40,000 ppm of co2 every time he/she fully exhales.  CO2 only exists at 425 ppm in the sky outside.  This means that you exhale 95 times more co2 into your immediate air space than exists in any equally-sized sector of the sky.  

More specifically, a human usually inhales only 0.042% of co2 when outdoors.  But, he/she exhales 4% of it, meaning that the human body makes co2.  

The fact that humans and cattle do NOT exhale soot is the sign that Climate Hysteria is founded upon a fraudulent precept.  However, it took years and years of endless brain-washing to make America's school students disregard their natural observations of life and to live in terror for the rest of their lives.  They are told that climate doom awaits them, unless they give all their freedom to Al Gore, Michael Mann, Bill Nye, etc.

The big "however" is that the United States' Occupational Health & Safety Administration officially declared that exposure to 5,000 ppm of co2, for 8 consecutive hours, is the "permissible exposure limit."  That is a concentration of 11 to 12 times more co2 than exists outdoors today.  Yet, co2 is presented as the new demon and Michael Mann is promoted as the new prophet, while Al Gore is treated as the high priest of the new Climate Religion.    The straight-lined hockey stick graph is their Bible.

The problem here is that all the vegetation on Earth dies when the atmospheric co2 count goes below 150 ppm.  CO2 is the bringer of photosynthesis.  CO2 is the molecule of life.  Yet, it's treated as the Angel of Death, Doom, & Destruction by the mainstream media.  Without CO2, without chlorophyll, and without bees, we all die-off eventually.  That's known as extinction.

******************************************************************************

 ACGIH stands for American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

                                            Meanwhile, FSIS stands for Food Safety Inspection Service.                         

***********************************************************************************

Below:  The results of testing done on 36 qualified submarine crew members after exposure to either 600 ppm or 2,500 ppm or 15,000 ppm of co2, in a "subject-blinded" testing.      The conclusion is that people who are used to levels of co2 higher than outdoor concentrations do well, such as at the 5,000 ppm level.  Those not used to such levels of exposure will have trouble with decision making, but will  be able to  perform base-line functional tasks.  There's more, including other studies.  But, that is for another discourse.  The bottom line here is that co2 is NOT the hazardous poison Barrack Obama fraudulently made it out to be.                         

*********************************************************************************

So, let's review the molecular composition of Planet Earth's atmosphere  

The atmosphere of Planet Earth comprises:  [1] 78.08% Nitrogen, 780,800ppm   [2] 20.95% Oxygen, 209,500ppm  [3] 0.934% Argon, 9,340ppm  [4] 0.0425% Carbon Dioxide, 425ppm  [5] Neon at 0.001818%, 18.18ppm  [6] Helium at 0.000524%, 5.24ppm   [7] Methane at 0.00019%, 1.9ppm   [8] Krypton at 0.000114%, 1.14ppm    [9] Hydrogen at 0.00005%, 0.5ppm   and [10] Xenon at 0.0000087%, 0.087ppm . . . minus 0.2% to 4%, for Water Vapor.   Concerning this, the 0.2% is found in Antarctica and the high elevations of the Alpines, as well as in Chile's Atacama Desert.  The 4% is found in the Tropics.

At this point, do the math.  The sky outside is composed of 0.0425% (co2) + 0.0002% (ch4...methane) carbon molecular compounds.  This would mean that the Troposphere is 99.9578% CARBON-FREE.  

BTW, Sulfur Hexaflouride is the most potent greenhouse gas, and it contains no carbon.  However, it's presence in the atmosphere is 2.5 to 3 parts per TRILLION.  It's alleged to be 23,500 times more potent at capturing infrared heat than is co2.

Scorecard

Now, yearly co2 emissions due to human activity has reached the 35 to 37 billion tonne mark.  A certain writer whose name will politely be kept confidential stated that 40 billion tonnes of co2 per year would occupy 1,045,911 square miles of Planet Earth 9 yards high.  This translates into 5,348 cubic miles.  

Well, Planet Earth is 196.9 MILLION square miles in area, and the height of the Troposphere averages 7 miles.  196.9 million times 7 is 1,378,300,000 cubic miles of Tropospheric space.

Welcome to the Wide World of Mainstream Media's CONSTANT DISPROPORTIONALITY 

Now, a mile is 1,760 yards in length.  Seven miles is 12,320 yards in length.  Thus, 12,320 yards divided by the previously mentioned "9 yards high" translates into 1,368 layers (segments-of-9-yds-each) of Troposphere.

At this point, call to mind that the unnamed writer stated that 40 billion tonnes of co2 generated per year translates into 1,045,911 square miles outward & 9 yards upward being occupied by co2.  

Also call to mind that the 196.9 MILLION sq mile surface area of Planet Earth divided by the previously mentioned 1,045,911 sq mi = 188.35.  Thus, Planet Earth's Troposphere is 1,045,911 sq miles, 188.35 times over.  After all, 1,045,911 times 188.35  =  196,997,336 ... the square mileage of Planet Earth's surface area.

At this point multiply the 1,368 layers of Troposphere by the 188 sections of Planet Earth's surface area.  1,368 * 188 = 257,184.  In fact, the previously mentioned 1,378,300,000 cubic miles divided by the previously mentioned 5,348 yearly cubic miles = 257,722.   

At a yearly emission of 40 billion tonnes of co2, it will take approximately 250,000 YEARS for man-made co2 to saturate the Earth's Troposphere as much as co2 occupies the atmosphere of Venus.  

Moreover, to make the Troposphere of the Earth even reach the 0.1% mark in co2 concentration, 575 ppm needs to be added.  Thus, if the co2 count increased 2 to 3 ppm per year, it would take 193 to 290 years to accomplish this.  That's 1/10th of one percent and nothing more, in at least 193 years. 

Moreover, if the yearly increase in atmospheric CO2 rose to 4 ppm per year, then it would take 143 years for the CO2 level to reach a concentration of 1/10th of one percent.

10,000 parts per million = 1%.  1,000 ppm = 0.1%.  100 ppm = 0.01%.  425 ppm = 0.0425%.

In order to raise the co2 count to a mere 1% of the Earth's atmosphere, you would have to add 9,575 ppm of co2.  Thus, if you were to add 3 ppm of co2 per year, from January 2025 onward, it would take you 3,193 years to simply raise co2 to the one percent mark.  

If you were to add 4 ppm of co2 to the Earth's atmosphere yearly, it would take you 2,393 years to achieve the 1% mark.  Furthermore, if only 2 ppm of CO2 would be added to the atmosphere yearly, it would take 4,787 years to reach the one percent mark.   In the atmospheres of Venus and Mars, co2 stands at the 96% mark.  

The lesson here is that the Climate Hysteria propaganda teams scare schoolchildren with disproportionality.  The numbers used to scare children ... and to alarm their parents ... are low for a planet the size of Earth.  

Here's another example:  LIGHTNING:  According to the United States' CDC, lightning strikes Planet Earth an average of 8 MILLION times a day & 6,000 times every minute.  This could sound scary to a vulnerable schoolchild, if a propagandist is trying to frighten schoolchildren.  But, it's an amount of lightning that Planet Earth can easily handle.

https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/lightning/index.html  

https://weather.com/storms/severe/news/lightning-damage-trees-homes-buildings-ground-20130719

https://medium.com/@zippyfacts/how-many-times-does-lightning-strike-around-the-world-each-day-and-how-hot-is-a-bolt-of-lightning-89b653de1df8

One more example involves rainfall:  One inch of rainfall upon one square mile of the Earth's surface comprises 17.4 MILLION gallons of water, weighing 145 MILLION pounds. One gallon of water is 8.333 lbs.  It sounds like terrifyingly high numbers, but the Earth has been handling much wider and longer rainstorms throughout the millennia.  It's no problemo for the Earth.  Yet, a Climate Hysteria activist would try to twist the numbers into an End of the World scenario, frightening youth in the process.

Under Joe Biden & Kamala Harris, CO2 reached its highest level in all of human history

Now, atmospheric CO2 reached its highest level in the history of humanity, in May of 2024.  The reason for this is in a manufacturing and activation of the coal-fired power plants in China and India.  If you wiped all of the Americas and Europe off the face of the Earth, the CO2 rate would continue to rise, on account of the coal-fired power plants.  Being Draconian in America is pointless and worthless.  The Biden-Harris years of the dictatorial bullying of Americans accomplished nothing good.

The cause of the 2025 LA Fires that were nowhere near a record-breaking size

The Number 1 cause of the 2025 LA Fires was the "Blocking High Pressure System" ... aka "a high pressure ridge" ... in the Pacific Ocean, off of the California coastline.  Such a thing always comes with La Nina, along with a "variable Pacific Jet Stream" that does not travel through Southern California.

And of course, the Equatorial & Trade Wind ocean currents travel westward, during La Nina.   This results in a dry Arizona & Texas and a moist Indonesia & Australia.   In contrast, when El Nino is predominate, those ocean currents travel eastward, thereby making America warmer than usual.

High Pressure in atmospheric science always means "dry."  So, Southern California has been receiving perpetual dry air from the La Nina "high pressure ridge," amidst forests that were not cleared of their dead & dried timber.  Such timber is a very large matchbook, per timber piece.  Such timber, in large quantities, guarantees a tragic spread of fire.   Dry timber is fuel, and it ignited in January 2025, in the LA area.

Now, the Santa Ana Winds are also dry air winds.  They are the result of an air mass completing its "Orographic Lifting" up a "windward" mountain side.   This means that such an air mass cooled during its rise, and then created clouds, and finally rained throughout its rise up the mountain side.  

At the top of the mountain, only dry air remains in that air mass.  So, you get dry air from the Pacific Ocean's "high pressure ridge," along with very dry Santa Ana air, from the mountain tops of California.  This results in wildfires, if dry timber is in the path of the Santa Ana winds.  Incidentally, Chinook Winds, Foehn Winds, and Santa Ana Winds are the same thing.  

All in all, if you are going to be governed by clueless government officials who refuse to allow for the clearance of dead & dry wood, and if you are living between a Blocking High and the Santa Ana Winds, then expect everything flammable to go up into flames until the flames reach the shoreline.

The Hyped-up Exaggerations of LA 2025

Newscasts already used "record breaking" in the reports of the 2025 LA fires.  This was done to deceive you into thinking that this is a new phenomenon that never happened previously and which is a sign of a Climate Change Crisis by which you must surrender your freedom to Al Gore, Michael Mann, Bill Nye, and the mainstream media.  So, if you hear or read anyone claim that January 2025 had the "all-time" record breaking 1] wind and/or 2] burned acreage and/or 3] structures damaged and/or 4] financial costs during Biden Era Inflation, then respond with this:   

"Stop right here.  There were many worse fires long ago, when the atmospheric Co2 Count was much lower than today.   Plus, the satellite era is relatively new.  Therefore, there were hundreds of years of Western American fires not reported.   This means that no one has the data to know what the record is on anything involving Western wildfires."

So too is this the case with hurricanes.  Numerous hurricanes throughout hundreds of years of human civilization were not recorded.   There were no satellites available during those eras of time.  So, curb it when you get the urge to say "the all-time record."  You have no idea what the all-time record is, in any natural disaster category, when it comes to America.  America used to be called, the New World.

Numerous fires throughout history were far worse than the January 2025 LA Fires

The 2025 LA Fires consumed 41,000 acres of real estate.  The Peshtigo/Michigan Fires of 1871 incinerated 2.5 million acres.  The Great Fire of 1910 consumed 3 million acres in Montana, Idaho, and Washington State.  And the list of greater fires goes on ... and on ... and on some more.

a] The Peshtigo Fire of October 1871 consumed 1.2 MILLION acres of Wisconsin land.  b] At the same time, the Great Chicago Fire and the Great Michigan Fire burned 1.3 million acres.  Incidentally, the Great Chicago Fire only consumed 2,112 acres of land.  After all, there is a massive lake at Chicago's border.  

c] Canada's Great Fire of 1919 consumed 5 million acres in Alberta & Saskatchewan.  This fire was 122 times LARGER than the LA Fires of 2025.  d] Then, in 1950, the Chinchaga Fire of British Columbia & Alberta consumed 4.2 million acres of land and created a unique smoke pall that colored the Sun lavender and violet.

e] The 1825 Miramichi Fire in New Brunswick put 3 million Canadian acres out of commission.  The CO2 count at the time was a mere 284 ppm.  Well, according to the Al Gore Theory of Climate, no major fire eruption should have occurred during a time of low CO2.  Yet, the Miramichi Fire of 1825 was 73 times LARGER than were the 2025 LA Fires.  

f] In August of 1989, 1,147 wildfires ignited in Manitoba, burning 1.3 million acres.  g] Two years prior, in Daxing'anling  ... northeastern China ... 2.5 million acres were incinerated within one month's time.  It is known as the 1987 Black Dragon Fire.

h] The Siberian Taiga Fires of 2003 turned 55 million acres into charred remains.   i] The 1865 Silverton Fire of Oregon erased 1.5 million acres of forest.  j] The Adirondack Forest Fire of 1903 charred over 470,000 acres of New York vegetation within a six-week period.  

k] In 1889, 300,000 acres burned in California's Santiago County Fire.  l] Five years prior, in Minnesota, the Great Hinckley Fire burned 160,000 acres and took at least 418 lives, along with 12 towns.  

m] The Great Porcupine Fire of 1911 incinerated at least 500,000 acres, in Ontario.  n]  In 1916, there was the Great Matheson Fire that incinerated 490,000 acres of Canadian land.  o] Then, the Timiskaming District of Ontario saw 415,000 more acres of land incinerated, in 1922.  

p] Eventually came 1923, when the Giant Berkeley fire destroyed 50 city blocks, as well as 624 buildings, in California.  Deja Vu, America.  "It" already has happened before, in the San Francisco area, 101 years prior.  2025 was a Deja vu of 1923.

q] In 1933, the Tillamook Burn consumed 350,000 acres, in Oregon.  r] Eventually came April 1963, when 183,000 acres and 400 buildings were incinerated in New Jersey, during the Black Saturday Fire. 

s] And as far as goes the Black Friday Fire, it was actually the 1939 Black Friday Bushfire, in Southeastern Australia.  It consumed 5 million acres of drought-ridden land.   t] Eventually came 1970, when 175,425 acres were burned in San Diego County and the Laguna Mountains.   That 1970 fire was four times LARGER than the 2025 LA Fire.  Yet, the 1970 CO2 Count was only 327 ppm, compared to the 425 ppm of late 2024.

In addition, there were numerous major city fires throughout history, as well.  This brings us to a question:  What record was broken in the 2025 LA Fires?  Compared to the true record-breaking fires, the LA fires of 2025 are chump change.  Hello?  Has anyone been home, in government & in news reporting, for the past four years?  

You must stop marketing terror & fear, in claiming the existence of a never-before-seen Climate Crisis.  The past five years had no weather event worse than those that transpired previously, in decades and centuries past.  

Quit using the phrase "record breaking.'  After all, Climate involves average & typical weather.  NOT any once in a lifetime broken record.  

None the less, the LA Fires were not a once in a lifetime event.  They were a smaller version of what has been happening, since 1871.  The 2025 LA Fires were actually less tragic, less in intensity, and less in space-consumed than dozens and dozens of other fires.  Quit scaring school children and dimwitted middle-aged women who believe that CNN is the Voice of God.                  

Below:  It's information which was hidden by the Biden Administration.   It's the amount of acreage burned throughout the United States in wildfires, per year, starting with 1916.  

Remember one thing.  The reports of massive forest fires are in the newspapers of decades past.  Thus, you lie if you say that those massive & frequent fires never happened.  Moreover, mankind did NOT have the technology to put out the late 19th & early 20th Century wildfires.  Thus, such fires easily became massive ones, especially during the drought-ridden 1930s.  And concerning this, keep in mind that NASA officially stated that the greatest drought year in the past 1,000 years was 1934.  

Plus, the American West didn't have the population needed to do the fire-fighting work in the 1920s & '30s.  And as far as went the early 1940s, the American male population was literally fighting on THREE war fronts, while many women were providing logistical help and the production of battle ordnance.   Thus, in 1943, while WWII was at its height, the US launched the Smokey the Bear Campaign.  

The presence of the Smokey the Bear ads means that, even in the early 1940s, forest fires were a great problem in the United States.  Therefore, the newspapers and magazines of decades past show that the chart below is factual.  There was an outrageously large amount of timber and brush burned throughout America so much so that nothing today compares.  This includes the LA Fires which easily could have been prevented, if only Californians would vote for people of common sense & natural instinct. 

None the less, the graph below is a Pre-Biden United States government product.  It is NOT the product of MAGA hat-wearing gun-toters in Texas or Alabama.   Even at that, 77.3 million voters were not merely MAGA hat-wearing hillbillies from the boonies.  City Slickers & Suburbanites voted for Trump, too.  

More importantly, millions of American rural folk know how to read & write, as well as perform work requiring mechanical aptitude and the reading of technical manuals.  Those people have to know how to read gages/gauges, and those gauge readers are more valuable than arrogant Humanities Dept profs whose topics are mostly subjective or subjunctive.  

It's more important to master a CDL exam than a Shakespeare exam.  And this statement is coming from a guy who does have literature sitting on a Harvard University library bookshelf, a Northwestern Univ library bookshelf, etc, as well as having literature in anthologies which also contain the works of national book award winners, a Pulitzer Prize winner, a Walt Whitman Award winner, etc.

It's the network media personnel who have shown themselves to have the "lower-than-expected" intelligences.  After all, Wolf Blitzer made an embarrassment of himself on Celebrity Jeopardy.  And he wasn't the only newscaster to do so.

It was only natural that fires in "those days" and in the 19th Century were catastrophic.  The number of yearly fires since 1960 do not compare to the yearly number of fires which occurred from 1929 to 1950.  This is more evidence that there is no climate crisis.  Things were worse in the Past.  Politicians and activists looking for lots of money and power having been lying to humanity, all along.

Opposite Directions

We were traveling
 in the same car,
 when, all of a sudden,
 our minds crashed into each other.

We both got out and started to run
 fast away from each other.

One of us wanted to run away from lies,
while the other one wanted to run away from truth.
_________________________________________

In 2024, CO2 rose to a record high level, under Joe Biden & KAMALA.

© Patrick Anthony Pontillo 

 Kamala's Greatest Asininity, in terms of foolishness

🌎Kamala Harris' greatest asininity is that she and Joe imposed all sorts of Draconian "Climate" measures upon America, only for it all to result in the HIGHEST LEVEL OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 IN HUMAN HISTORY, as of May 2024.  

It reached 426.9 parts per million (ppm).  As of Oct 13th, 2024, the co2 count was down to 422.25 ppm.  When it's harvest season, the co2 count diminishes from Springtime planting season.  The difference between Planting-season CO2 and Harvest-season CO2 is about 4 parts per million.

It's granted that the human body can easily take four times the amount of CO2 found in today's atmosphere ... without any adverse reactions.  Adverse reactions are expected at 3,500 parts per million for anyone not a submarine crew member.  Some sources say that irritation symptoms start at 2,000 ppm.  Fair enough.  None the less, death will occur at 84,000 ppm, after an hour's exposure of CO2.   Thus, there's a huge difference between 84,000 ppm ... 3,500 ppm  ... 2,000 ppm ... and today's outdoor CO2, at 422 ppm.  

Therefore, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Michael Mann, and John Kerry are pretenders & failures who wasted tons of American taxpayer dollars, causing the price of fuel and food to sky-rocket.  The curtailing of the oil SUPPLY caused the sky-rocketing prices.

BTW, the atmospheric CO2 count on air-compressed Venus and on very cold Mars is over 900,000 ppm.  Moreover, the compressed air factor is what makes Venus hot; not CO2.  After all, the 900,000+ ppm of CO2 on Mars surely didn't make it hot.  So, do the math on this one.   The Russians have been on Venus, and provided some invaluable information, even though the Russian landing crafts and monitor systems didn't last very long on Venus.  Those vehicles got crushed, due to the compressed air at surface level ... literally.

Today's indoor CO2  on Planet Earth is said ... in the official readouts ... to be between 600 ppm and 1,000.  Okay.  But, 1,200, 1,400, and even 1,700 is fine.   Greenhouse operators purposely insert co2, being that it truly does make the world go green.  So, 1200 to 1600 ppm is to be expected in greenhouses.

Of course, there is the matter of C3 plants, C4 plants, and a substance called Rubisco, in relation to the atmospheric CO2.  The University of Illinois explained this well.  So, feel free to learn from the Univ of Illinois People.

       🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃

https://ripe.illinois.edu/blog/difference-between-c3-and-c4-plants

  🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃

Reducing CO2 will NOT make society "go green."  It will cause the opposite effect.  Instead of concentrating on CO2, society must address mercury, fly ash, lead, arsenic, beryllium, and the glut of synthetic chemicals that were allowed to flood humanity like a plague of locusts.  This is where Robert F Kennedy Jr enters the scene ... to champion the cause against flooding humanity with synthetic chemicals.

The first CO2 overload symptom that was clinically found was the inability to perform decision-making.  This was at 3,500 ppm.  The exceptions were the submarine crew men of the US Navy who did NOT have impaired thinking, at all.  I have nothing on Russian submarine crewmen, though.

In addition, it's furthermore granted that there was an Ice Age when the CO2 count was nine times higher than today, due to probability that "Symmetric Stretch" vibrational mode of CO2 took precedence at the time.  Of course, it is that particular vibrational mode that makes CO2 incapable of retaining infrared heat ... even today.  There are three vibrational modes of CO2, and they were already explained here, at the Blue Marble Album.  There's a search engine up top and to the right of this page.

Moreover, the CO2 level needs to be 199 times higher than today's outdoor level, for it to be deadly.  Now, as far as concerns today, there is the matter of China and India constructing a notable number of coal-burning power plants.  This, alone, is the cause of the drastic rise in CO2.  

Now, I can post the chartings which show that CO2 emissions have been lowered in America, Europe, and elsewhere in the past decade.  However, if you were to evaporate all of the Americas and Europe, the rise in CO2 would stay on pace, due to China & India, in their coal-fired power plants.  Kamala, Joe, Michael Mann, and John Kerry failed at being diplomats, when it came to convincing China and India to change over to an alternative energy source.

0.042% of Planet Earth's atmosphere is CO2.  78% Nitrogen.  21% Oxygen.  0.93% Argon.

Even though humans can easily tolerate four times the amount of CO2 in today's atmosphere, the Earth's outdoor co2 level still reached the highest point in human history ... as of 2024, three and a half years after Kamala & Joe Biden assured us all that being Draconian will reduce the CO2 count.  However, it's more important to deplete from the air mercury, cadmium, beryllium, lead, fly ash, and other less than healthy airborne molecular substances.  

CO2 is your friend.  Most of the other chemicals which emit from coal are not your friends.   This includes mercury.  In as much, the Number 1 objective for environmentalists is filtration, filtration, filtration.  As far as goes CO2, the only concern would be the rate of increase in its presence.  So, the Chinese and India coal-fired power plants require lots of diplomacy and incentive.  

🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠 Below:  In re:  CO2 levels

https://research.noaa.gov/2024/05/20/the-worlds-benchmark-climate-monitoring-station-passes-a-major-milestone/

🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙

https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/during-year-of-extremes-carbon-dioxide-levels-surge-faster-than-ever

🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠

The other asininity of Joe, Kamala, and the Mainstream media is that the recent weather events have previously happened 9, 12 and even 24 times before, in the past 150 years ... depending on the specific weather event.  There is nothing new, and there is no crisis outside of the glut of synthetic chemicals flooding the airspace and water supply used by Planet Earth's inhabitants. 

Some weather intervals are nice.  Some weather intervals are tragic.  And some other weathers events were caused by volcanoes, being that volcanoes cause the temperature to decrease in large affected geographic areas of Earth.  From volcanoes come sulfur dioxide.  Sulfur dioxide in the air is like tiny mirrors, reflecting sunlight back into outer space.  This causes cooling.  In the past, this has destroyed certain civilizations which then needed to rebuild.

When the CO2 Count was very low, the following natural disasters occurred, proving Michael Mann & the aged David Attenborough to have been long-term LIARS, in their claim that the weather was mild for a thousand years:

There was  -the 1034 & 1048 Yellow River Floods.  -the 1091 London Tornado.  -the All Saint's Day Flood of 1170.  -Kubla Khan's two 13th Century fleet disasters (at the beginning of the Little Ice Age).  -the St. Lucia Day Flood of 1287 (also at the beginning of the Little Ice Age).  

And then, when the Little Ice Age was well underway, as the CO2 level remained low in the atmosphere, the following disasters occurred ... and those disasters CANONT be attributed to the outdoor CO2 level of Planet Earth:

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

-the Great Famine of 1315-1322.  -the Black Monday Hail Storm that killed 1,000 British soldiers, in 1360.  -De Grote Mandrenke of 1362.  -Britain's Bitterly Cold Winter of 1407, when birds froze to death in flight.  -St. Elizabeth's Flood in 1421.  -the Great Tudor Drought of 1540-41.  -the Spanish Armada disaster of 1588.  -the Super Famines of the 1590s.  -the 1607 Bristol Channel Floods.  -the Great Frost of 1683-84.  -the Great Tempest of 1703.  -La Grand Hiver of 1709. and the list goes on.   Incidentally, the coldest winter in the past 500 years for Europe was 1708-09.  This was before the start of the Industrial Age.

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

This claim of one thousand years of mild weather was the most dishonest & asinine thing that was ever claimed by Michael Mann ... and by the non-factual David Attenborough.  This was especially the case with the depth of the Little Ice Age, when sunspot activity got to the point of being effectually dormant.  The years of the least amount of sunspot activity went from 1645 to 1710.  

The entire Little Ice Age, itself, went from 1284 to 1840.  It started with the Wolfe Minimum and ended shortly before the European Potato Famine which changed the destiny of Ireland.  Incidentally, the HERB-1 strain of the phytophthora infestans came out of Mexico, and when it became warm enough for it to survive in Northern Europe, it found its way into potatoes and even tomatoes there.  Instantly, potatoes were native to PERU, and not to Ireland.

Climate is like a cyclical roller coaster, when it's not being affected by volcano blasts.  As of recent, there has only been climate fraud in existence, done for the sake of deceiving the American taxpayer into not objecting to shelling-out an outrageously high amount of money to certain scientists, to certain NGOs, and to certain government agencies.

Example of the Bid Lie which states that the storm seasons have never been like the recent ones:

There are years in the distant past when there were as many cyclones on the North Atlantic Ocean as there were in 2023.  Plus, in recent years, it has only been a matter of more low-level cyclones, called Tropical Storms.  There is not any trend .... or any appearance ... of the Cat 6 hurricane out there.  In fact, only four Cat 5 hurricanes ever hit the US, since 1851.  There were uniquely powerful hurricanes in the past, such as in the early 1960s in the Pacific Ocean.  But, there has been no long-term repetitive trend.

Now, look at the two US government illustrations below.  One is of Hurricane Season 2023, and the other one is of Hurricane Season 1933.  The Year 1933 was 90 year prior to 2023, when the co2 count was 112 parts per million lower than today.  Both 2023 and 1933 had twenty storms.  1933 had 6 MAJOR hurricanes, and 2023 only had three.  The total deaths ... due to cyclones ... in 1933 was 651.  The number of cyclone-caused deaths in 2023 was only 21.

In addition, the only reason why there is more hurricane infrastructure damage today than in the 1920s, 1940s, and even 1960s is because there are far more buildings and homes situated along coastlines vulnerable to hurricanes.  Human population increased.  So too did human dwellings and places of business.   

You and the rest of America ... as well as Europe ... are being deceived hideously, by Kamala, Joe, the mainstream media, etc.  Playing Chicken Little and crying out, "the sky is falling," is very profitable.  Con artistry is profitable ... when there is no one to proverbially blow the whistle and toss a penalty flag in the air.  

The con artists' technique in shutting you down is done by calling you a denier.  But, the truth of the matter is in historical texts.  Some of those texts are called newspapers.  

Example: 1921 ands 1922 were reported at the time as the hottest years ever, next to 1911, 1905, 1901, and 1895.  Well, the hockey stick graph that Al Gore presented in his first movie marks 1921 & 1922 as the coldest years in hundreds of years.  Numerous newspaper articles and government records ... and ship records ... prove the hockey stick graph to be a fraud.

Here is your test

Can you tell which government illustration below is Hurricane Season 2023 and which one is Hurricane Season 1933 without cheating?   Once again, the 1933 Hurricane Season = 6 major hurricanes.  The 2023 Hurricane Season = 3 major hurricanes.  The 1933 Hurricane Season = 651 deaths.  The 2023 Hurricane Season =  21 deaths.  Have fun with your Reality Check.  

And remember, both years had 20 storms each.   In 1933, the co2 count was 309 parts per million.  In 2023, the atmospheric co2 count was 421 parts per million.  In 1933, the co2 count was 112 parts per million LESS THAN in 2023.  Yet, 1933 hosted as many North Atlantic Ocean cyclones as did the recent Year of 2023.  CO2, in itself, gives no significant changes.  CO2 gives only minor temp changes in a laboratory setting.

As I said long ago, and as RFK, Jr said via his litigation & courtroom experience, the great environmental crisis of today is the glut of synthetic chemicals that have flooded humanity's air space, water supply, construction material, lawn furniture, clothing,  AND FOOD.   Moreover, the true greenhouse gas to dread is Sulfur Hexaflouride.  If this becomes commonplace, then and only then, WILL Planet Earth's atmosphere be in trouble.

Concerning the wrecking of the American Economy in the name of lowering atmospheric CO2, Kamala couldn't even get that task correct.  Well, she did wreck the economy ... with Joe Biden ... but she did not lower atmospheric CO2 which only exists at much much less than 1/2 of one percent in the atmosphere, at 421 or so ppm.  That is an exceptionally low level, objectively speaking.  Thus, it was fraud to orchestrate the "Carbon Footprint Scare."  The atmosphere today is already 99+% carbon free. 

For illustrative purposes, know this:  Today CO2 comprises 1/2,369th of the atmosphere.  That is ONE over two thousand, three hundred, and sixty-ninth of the air outside.  That's also  0.042% of the atmosphere outdoors.  422 ppm is quite low, when compared to Nitrogen which is 780,000 part per million in the sky ... and Oxygen which is 210,000 part per million in the same sky.

And concerning the tragedy of Tennessee, Georgia, etc, as of Sept 2024, when people are unprepared ... and when people are stubborn ... death ensues.  And of course, a Tennessee employer refused to let its employees leave work early, in time to avoid the flooding rains.  Some of the employees died.  In the South, there is the motto, "I'm gonna do what I damn please," which is the motto of the Church of Satan.  Stubbornness kills.  Plus, Biden and Harris did not show-up soon enough with their agencies, etc.

One more thing:  Climate is average weather.  If something only happens once every 20, 40, and 60 years, it's not climate.  The media uses a lot of hype to get you to submit to their associated politicians.  The mainstream media lies for certain politicians. 

None the less, there are 63 or so Climate Discourses at the Blue Marble Album.  Those people who are absolutely certain that we are in a Climate Crisis only read trickles of literature.  Concerning this, only after you read all 63 or so of the Climate Discourses here, then you can talk to me ... if you have no conflict of interest.  A conflict of interest exists if you make outrageously large sums of money selling the Climate Crisis Hysteria.    Samples of Blue Marble Work include:

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2022/11/london-fire-statistics.html     🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2024/06/extreme-cold-antarctica-2023.html 🌐🌐🌐🌐

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2022/09/great-barrier-reef.html     🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2022/12/hurricane-history-1.html       🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2024/05/1960s-nimbus-satellite-technology.html 🌐🌐🌐

Or or or, you let me first give you ... in front of a camera ... a simple 15 question oral exam on simple Weather Theory, to prove if whether or not you are a fraud who knows nothing about Atmospheric Physics and/or Weather Theory.    

If you fail, the video goes on YouTube, for the world to see what a fraud you are.  In as much, is Kamala willing to do this?  Tim Walz?  Numerous mainstream media news anchors? 

A completely different person can ask her the questions.  But, it must be an oral exam with zero cheat sheets and NO teleprompter.  Or is it that Kamala fears that the world will see that she a complete fraud in yet another subject?  Oh, in reality she is a total fraud in that particular subject, and I can easily prove it, if given the opportunity.    

Kamala speaks of Opportunity Economics.  She does not speak of Opportunity Climate Science ... or Opportunity Talking-things-out.  It's obvious that she's hiding the apparent observation that she doesn't know anything about anything outside of her professional trade.   

Concern her cliche, "Opportunity Economy," as if it's new idea:

For decades on commercial television, at the end of many commercial, there would be the following statement: So-and-so is an equal opportunity employer.  Every school and company was required to be an equal opportunity employer.  That statement was redundant. None the less,  Kamala was already caught committing plagiarism over two dozen times, in one book alone.  Well, her "Opportunity Economy" is a plagiaristic rip-off of 1970s television.

When it comes to explaining bonding in Criminal Procedural Law, she sounds like she knows what she's talking about.  When it comes to her talking about anything else, she's clueless and only pretends to be concurrent with the subject at hand.   She basically knows one trade well.  She needn't act like a memory of any High IQ society.  She is very fake, and she lies.

And she continues to tell blatant lies.  Example:  She very falsely said that Trump has no plan.  Super Big Lie.  Donald Trump already was a very successful president in three of his four years as president.  He had a plan as president, and it did succeed.  Millions witnessed it.

Kamala is nothing more than a liar, and she is clueless in every subject except her own professional trade.  There is nothing remarkable about her that she should even be a senator or House rep or governor.  I already went into detail about her, and I can go further into detail.  But, I have to go and fix something ten miles away that just broke.  Later maybe.   Even at that, why do I have to waste my time on her.  She is utterly worthless at best, and she's a living nightmare at worst.  Trace her recent history.

Concerning history, observe the most powerful hurricane seasons.  Now, one would expect all of them to have occurred when the CO2 level rose above 400.  Not at all..  Amongst the most powerful hurricane seasons were ones that ruled the Autumn Atlantic in 1933, 1893, 1926, 1950, and 1961 ... when the atmospheric CO2 level was quite low.  This alone proves that CO2 is NOT the driver of climate.

Above:  Take note that this list includes low co2 years, along with high co2 years.  Thus, there is no correlation between co2 levels and hurricane energy forces.  ACE means Accumulated Cyclone Energy.

Concerning high energy years                                                  The low energy years were

The Low co2 years included  1893, 1926, 1933.                2015, 2014, 2013, 2009, 2007, 2006,        Mid-level co2 years included 1950, 1961, 1995, 1998.           2002, 1997, 1994, 1993, 1991, 1987,          The high co2 years included  2004,  2005, 2017.                     1986,  1983, 1982, 1978, 1977, 1973,

                                                                                                  1972,  1970, 1968, 1962, 1956, 1946, etc. 

The Year 2010 receives an Honorable Mention as powerful hurricane year, at 165.  And as far as concerns 2024, Beryl was a monster, carrying an Accumulated cyclone Energy measurement of 35.1  Milton was powerful, but nowhere near Beryl, at 23.5.  Helene, on the other hand was relatively low in energy, at 7.1.  Its nightmare existed in the fact that a precursor rain was in the Asheville area, before Helene passed through.  None the less, six of the thirteen 2024 cyclones has an A.C.E under 5.  Some where under 2.  So, the claim of Al Gore, in asserting that future hurricanes would be a series of Car 6 cyclones was a false prophecy ... false scientific prediction ... far away from reality. 

See for yourself:   https://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/Realtime/index.php?loc=northatlantic

None the less, this happened previously to Asheville, in 1916.  The French Broad River crested at 17 feet above flood stage, and the width of at river expanded to 1,300 feet.  It was normally at 380.  Eighty people died.  Thus, history repeats itself and climate is cyclical.  In fact, cyclones are cyclical, always rotating counter-clockwise when in the Northern Hemisphere, due to the Coriolis Effect.  

Moreover, there were apocalyptic weather disasters in the early 20th Century, the 19th, 18th 18th, and even 14th century.  For example, England lost one-third of its Imperial Navy in the Great Storm of 1703.  This was before the Industrial Revolution even began.   

View the cyclones of the 1600s which were recorded ... logged.  And remember, this was before the industrial revolution, when the CO2 count was  lower than it was in the Year 1000, at 275 ppm.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atlantic_hurricanes_in_the_17th_century

Anyone who says that the storms today are stronger than in centuries past is completely full of crap and is an egregious liar ... like Tim Walz ... like the plump and not-at-all macho Tim Walz.  

BTW, the guy looks like the Pillsbury Doughboy.  Yet, the media is full of male-haters who are intimidated by real men.  So, they showcase as the quintessential males of masculine excellence two totally dweebo, nerdo, geeko jokes.  And you know who they are. 

As far as goes Asheville and Vicinity in 2024, here are the rain stats:

Busick --------------- 30.78 inches      The FEMA response has been a vicious form of an SNL skit.

Spruce Pine ---------- 24.12 inches       Vice President Kamala Harris is a vicious form of SNL skit.

Hendersonville ------- 21.96 inches         Existence does not end with MSNBC, ABC, CNN, & CBS.

Davidson River ------- 18.02 inches          There's more out there, such as truth and reality. 

Mountain Home ------- 17.09 inches           It's all there, for the listening and for the reading.

Candler -------- ----- ----16.18 inches           Go view & go read, before censorship rules your life

Grandfather Mountain - 15.42 inches

Highlands ---------------- 14.86 inches         Kamala & Mayorkas must be held criminally liable for

Mount Mitchell ---------- 11.22 inches       the rapes & murders of Americans caused by unvetted

Waynesville --------------- 11.14 inches     & illegal immigrants they allowed into this country.

Jimmy Carter and NOT John Paul II saved Poland from invasion. (According to a former US intelligence analyst & declassified info.)

  Below:  Colonel Ryszard Kuklinski

 If you recognize this face, then you had a security clearance during the Carter administration.  I was in college at the time.  So, don't look at me.  None the less, the event surrounding that Soviet gentleman was literally Jimmy's last hurrah.

In December of 1980, the Soviet Union was poised to invade all of Poland, under the guise of a military training exercise with East Germany and Czechoslavkia.  John Paul II did NOTHING to stop that which Jimmy Carter succeeded at getting accomplished, through his diplomatic channels AND optical technology.  The false praise given to that cleric who allowed altar-boy molestation to run rampant is always unacceptable.  None the less, an intelligence analyst and I sat down one afternoon and talked and talked.  The near-invasion of Poland came up in the conversation.  So . . .

None the less,  Carter did mention that time in his memoirs:   

”I sent Brezhnev a direct message warning of the serious consequences of a Soviet move into Poland, and let him know more indirectly that we would move to transfer advanced weaponry to China. I asked Prime Minister [Indira] Gandhi to pressure Brezhnev (who was about to visit New Delhi), and warned the opposition leaders in Poland so that they would not be taken by surprise. I and other administration officials also made public statements about the growing threat to European stability”.                                 

 Introduction

On May 1, 2011, an act of cronyism was used in canonization process.  John
Paul II was beatified, and for the first time in church history a pope beatified
his immediate successor.  This amounted to the pope beatifying his former
boss.  This amounted to conflict of Interest.  None the less, the beatification
was construed to have been a diversionary tactic, intended to deflect attention
and away from John Paul II's sins of accessory in the long-term sex abuse out-
rage of the Vatican II Church.  It came to be discovered that John Paul II was
very much current on the topic, fully aware of the sex abuse epidemic.

If he weren't beatified, it would perhaps arouse the suspicions of law enforce-
ment authorities as to John Paul's culpability ... and therefore the cupability of
John Paul's employees, such as Ratzinger, Bertone, and Sodano.

Concerning John Paul, Benedict XVI should have recused himself from the
case and left the decision to approve or deny beatification to a successor, sole-
ly on the grounds of conflict of interest and cronyism.   Before approving the
beatification, the Vatican should have interviewed at least two dozen sex abuse
victims and three dozen retaliation victims.  Even as recently as April 30, 2012,
a witness to modern church corruption feared coming forth, and this individual
was a nun.

Now that the canonization process for John Paul is complete, will he be made
the patron saint of altar boys or the priests who molested them?  He did far
more for the molesters than the molested.

The insult of the beatification would result in 20,000 pages of documentary evi-
dence and an official petition being filed at the Hague's international criminal
court, during the same year.  In fact, this filing occurred on April 11, weeks be-
fore the scheduled beatification.  It meant nothing to the modern Vatican.  In
fact, according to Ireland's Prime Minister your pain means nothing to the nar-
cissists who hijacked the Vatican.  Moreover, during the same year when John
Paul was beatified, Ireland's prime minister sent a mandate to the Vatican, on
account of the crimes of clergy members in Ireland which were repeatedly ig-
nored by John Paul II.

Those who were the principle accomplices of the crimes of the modern church
are still in power at the very Vatican where they engaged in the crimes.  None
the less, the praise of John Paul constituted teenie bopper idolatry.  He was
credited with having crushed Communism, despite the fact that Communist
China now owns over $1.4 trillion worth of America's debt, and despite the
fact that the same Maoist dictatorship became an oppressive economic world
power during John Paul's reign.  The present regimes of China, Cuba, Vietnam,
North Korea, and Laos show that over a billion people are still locked in Com-
munist tyranny.

Add to this all of the other sweatshop nations which equally constitute dictator-
ships which rob people of their civil rights.  Don't forget the military junta na-
tions, such as Burma (Myanmar), and nations in chaos.  Plus, keep in mind
that many dictatorships falsely title themselves the people's republic of this,
that, and the other thing.  In addition, the Russian election of 2011 resulted
in the Communist Party taking possession of 92 seats in the Duma (Russian
Parliament.)

John Paul did little more than make vain stage appearances and curtain calls.
He succeeded in crushing the spirits of devout Catholics more effectively than
Soviet tanks crushed the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the Czech Revolu-
tion of 1968.

Concerning John Paul II, the bottom line is that he did not make his world a better
place as did Saint Patrick in Ireland and St. Francis in Assisi Italy.  Yet, in the pre-
dictable Orwellian con game, we were being told for years, was that the world was
now a better place.  It was a far worse place.  The economic crisis of 2008 and all
that was uncovered during it proved otherwise.  The wave of terrorism since 2001
also prove otherwise, and economic conditions which resulted in the worldwide
OWS Movement proved the same.  Yet, John Paul was praised as a one-man lib-
erator of Poland.  In as much, the truth concerning Poland needs to be made known,
simply to take people out of their hypnotic trance, concerning the media marketing
campaign of John Paul II:

Jimmy Carter is the one who Saved Poland from Invasion

It was Jimmy Carter who ordered the tactic that prevented Poland from being invaded
by Russian armored units, and it was the citizens of Moscow, along with Russian mili-
tary personnel, in their refusal to fire on their own Russian people, who brought Soviet
satellite statesmanship to an end.  Proof of this exists in what happened the very year
Carter left office.

For those unfamiliar, Russia almost rolled into Poland in 1979 and 1980, but were
deterred by one simple Jimmy Carter tactic.  Carter then left office in 1981.

Reagan's first year in office: 

Jaruzelski suddenly declared martial law, in December of 1981.  This shows that he
saw Reagan as enough of a bumbler and a paper tiger that he would test Reagan.
Therefore, it was former military officer James Earl Carter who was the one hold-
ing the Communists at bay. 

The Source for the Following:

The confirmation source of the following information is a former Washington D.C.
intelligence analyst.  For the record, nothing below is classified.

Background

In 1968, the Soviets were already halfway into Czechoslovakia before anyone knew
they invaded.   Therefore, the Soviet crackdown on Czechoslovakia was guaranteed.
However, during the John Paul years, American technology kept the West current on
Soviet troop movement.   This included the movement of Soviet armored and infantry
divisions during the near-invasion of Poland.

The Polish Crisis During the Carter Years

Being that American technology had Russia's number, President James Earl Carter
kept declassifying intelligence on current Russia troop movements and released it to
the public.  Jimmy was telling the Russians that NATO knew where they were in re-
lation to Poland's topography.  The Russians, in turn, knew that they didn't have the
benefit of stealth, as they were forced to entertain the possibility that NATO would
be their welcoming party, if they decided to roll into Poland.  It's that simple.

There is another logical reason for Russia to have declined to invade Poland.  Russia
was already in Afghanistan, as of Christmas season 1979.  It had enough on its plate.
In as much, there was no type of religious conversion going on with the Soviets in the
Year 1980.  Their consciences weren't being enlightened and their hearts weren't be-
ing moved.  They would have invaded Poland if they knew they could get away with
doing so.  Jimmy Carter made sure that they wouldn't risk invading Poland.  Thus, no
speech of John Paul had any effect on the Russians. 

The Following is Standard History:

The Iran hostage crisis was in progress, and Russia was waiting to see if it would have
an excuse to roll into Iran.  If America rolled in, Russia would have followed.  So, do
not be deceived into thinking that the Russians would have cowered so close to their
own terrain.

For those not taught well in school, know this:  Russia's greatest quest was long since
understood by Western analysts to be the acquisition of a warm weather port.  Invad-
ing Iran would have given the Russians the opportunity to achieve that goal.  Invading
Poland wouldn't have given them any warm water port.  Therefore, the Russians elect-
ed to forgo Poland out of logistics ... not by moral conversion.  Oil-producing Iran was
more valuable than non-petroleum Poland.  After all, Russia still had a hold on White
Russia, aka Belarus.  Therefore, Poland was expendable.

                                The Way Jimmy Carter Really Was

The following anecdote about Carter came via the Pentagon:  Shortly before Jimmy
was to be sworn-in, he was being given a detailed tour of the Department of Defense.
There came the point when he was being told that a helicopter would always be on a
pad, ready to take him to command headquarters within 15 minutes, in the event of a
military emergency.  Jimmy asked, "Is this true?"  His tour guide: "Yes sir.  Within 
15 minutes."  Jimmy then looked at his wrist watch and said, "Okay.  Go!"  "Sir?"
While looking at his wrist watch Jimmy once again said, "Go!"  He wanted to test the
procedure on the spot.  Such was former navy officer Jimmy Carter.

Incidentally, Jimmy Carter was the first military officer in history to head the clean-
up of a nuclear power plant leak.  Chernobyl wasn't the first one in history and Three
Mile Island wasn't the first nuclear crisis in the Western Hemisphere  The Chalk River
Plant in Canada was.  It occurred on December 12, 1952.  Twenty-seven years later,
Jimmy saved Poland from its pending crisis.  Who gives him the credit for having done
so?  This is ingratitude for you.
________________________________________________________________