 |
| Adani Power Maharashtra Limited, Tirora; by Aman Bisen |
Instead of placing your focus on CO2 which occupies less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the atmosphere and which has a much lower radiative forcing rate than previously advertised, at 2.17 w/m2 ...
... and instead of placing your focus on methane which only exists at 1.9 parts per million in the atmosphere and which has a negligible radiative forcing ...
... and instead of focusing on nitrous oxide which only exists at 1/3 of one part per million in the atmosphere and which also has a negligible radiative forcing ...
... concentrate on CFCs, even though they only occupy the atmosphere at 4 parts per billion. They do not degrade ... dissolve ... for 55 to 140 years. Moreover, the following needs to be known:
Definitely concentrate on SF6 which won't disintegrate for 3,200 years. Meanwhile, do NOT waste your time on methane, because it's chump change, in terms of its very low radiative forcing, and low presence in the Earth's atmosphere.
Keep the cattle alive. Live and let live. They're not hurting you.
The Number 1 sign of a climate charlatan who knows little-to-nothing about Atmospheric Science is that of a person ranting and raving over having to get rid of methane from the atmosphere, even in encouraging parliamentary laws and/or executive orders to kill all the cattle on earth. Methane is hardly in the atmosphere, in the first place.
Chloroflourocarbons need to be kept on a leash. SF6 must be banned asap ... with maybe with a few heavily monitored exceptions. But, it must be extremely monitored. Period.
Now for the Irony of it all
Carbon Dioxide is presented all throughout society as the ultimate cause of Global WARMING. Yet, Carbon Dioxide is a REFRIGERANT. How ironic!!!
The ozone can easily be restored by something as simple as ultraviolet light. The problem is that Antarctica has to wait six months at a time, for the ultraviolet light to reach into the Stratosphere and eventually onto Earth's Surface.
The other problem is that ozone is a respiratory toxicant. It's place is in the Stratosphere. When too much of it descends to the Earth's surface, people start fighting to breathe. And of course, if you are not breathing, then you are dying.
CO2 ... not the monster Gore made it out to be ... HOWEVER ...
... when it comes to rates in increase in the atmosphere of any molecule there, intervention is needed. When it comes to coal, there is also the matter of Fly Ash and Sulfur Dioxide.
The only problem with CO2 today is that India & China are now unleashing inordinate amounts of it, through their coal-fired power plants. So, high tech filtration there is in order ... is needed. Quick note: Below, GW stands for Gigawatts.
Yet, CO2 is NOT a toxin, and healthy people will have no problem with it at 2,000 ppm or less. Symptoms won't actually start until 3,500 ppm, and those are neurological symptoms.
In fact, the OSHA Permissible Level for CO2 is 5,000 ppm ... for 8 hours of exposure. That's a 1/2 percent concentration in the airspace where the 5,000 ppm is. That is an airspace where 99.5% of it is NOT CO2.
Now, at 80,000 ppm ... 8% concentration ... after an hour of exposure, death comes to your doorstep. At a 10% concentration of CO2 ... at 100,000 ppm ... death is guaranteed.
Plus, 40,000, 20,000, 10,000, and 5,500 ppm is not healthy. But, at present, Planet Earth's outdoor CO2 level isn't even at 1/10th of 1%. It's 431 ppm, as of the Summer of 2026.
Equal to the emissions of 23 mid-sized volcanoes per day
 |
| Note: China has 1,161 coal-fired power plants, at present, in 2026 |
If the number of coal-fired power plants were not so high, then there would be no problem with co2 at present. But, too much of anything in a short period of time is guaranteed to be trouble ... to health or the environment. Yet, burning trees for warmth or power would be worse for Planet Earth and the life on it.
Does China and India use electrostatic precipitators? Is fly ash let to fly or it is under controls in Asia? Do they de-sulfurize the flue gas in Asia? Remember, COMMUNIST China was environmentally irresponsible in the 1990s and turn of the Millennium. It was most certainly a disregarder of environmental norms.
None the less, concerning the many coal fired power plants in China and India, monitored filtration by honest people in the World Community is needed. Maybe someone can reinvent the wheel, here. You don't simply sit back and ignore it.
You can be as Draconian as you please to industry in Europe & the USA, about greenhouse gases in North America, South America, Europe, and Africa. But, if you don't filter the emissions from those 1,446 recently built or re-established or ongoing coal-fired power plants in Asia, then the co2 level will reach runaway levels.
It's the rate, the rate, the rate of increase which necessitates intervention, at this point. The co2 release into the atmosphere is a little too rapid, as well as the release of poisonous sulfur dioxide into the same atmosphere which, ironically, can cause cooling, as well as a lot of asthma attacks. And then there is Fly Ash.
Synthetic Assault & Battery is very real to the human body ... as well as the emissions of all substances coming out of 1,446 coal-burning power plants in India and China:
Of course, aside from the 1,446 coal-burning plants in Asia, the present environmental duty of today is that of ending the gluttony of synthetic chemicals that flood modern society.
This is due to those chemicals' ability ~to be hormone distruptors and to be ~clastogens (meaning that they cut chromosome chains), ~respiratory allergens, ~respiratory irritants, and ~dermal allergens, as well as being ~carcinogens ... and as incitants of other unfavorable things, like ~urticaria (hives). Those synthet chems sabotage child development, also.
The glut of unbridled synthetic chemicals is the environmental scandal of today. It's assault & battery on certain types of asthma and Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome patients, as well as dermatitis patients, urticaria patients, patients having hormone-related ills, and people who don't want their chromosomes severed by chemicals.
It's also an affront on those who really don't want to eventually develop cancer. The corralling of the vast inventory of synthetic chemicals is a present-tense duty.
