Showing posts with label The historic path of Sirocco Winds and Saharan Heat in Europe. The heatweaves of 19th Century. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The historic path of Sirocco Winds and Saharan Heat in Europe. The heatweaves of 19th Century. Show all posts

June 25, 2026

Mediterranean heatwaves hava a long Sahara-based history, long before 2024


Super quick Summer Solstice Note, in response to certain media personnel hyping up the June 21, 22, 23 temperatures in Europe, claiming them to be record highs, when the truth is that there were higher temps in Europe's history ...

... as well as devastating droughts, European coastline-destroying storms that even occurred in the 14th Century, and the evaporation of rivers in Central Europe and France ... literally ... all when the CO2 level was really really low:

The days surrounding the Summer Solstice are the ones which commonly were amongst the hottest days of any year, in Europe.  Thus, the June 21, 22, 23 temperatures were part of a predictable pattern, thereby showing that there is no climate change.  It's Climate Consistency which is occurring, instead.  

It's Climate Unchange that you are experiencing.  In fact, it's Climate Deja Vu.  This is because it has all happened previously, time after time after time after time.  So, be aware of the present-day media Climate Con Artistry.

★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

At this point, a thesis statement needs to be made, concerning you believers in manmade global warming:

Instead of placing your focus on CO2 which only occupies less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the atmosphere and which has a much lower radiative forcing rate than previously advertised ... 

... instead of placing your focus on methane which only exists at 1.9 parts per million in the atmosphere and which has a negligible radiative forcing ... and instead of focusing on nitrous oxide which only exists at 1/3 of one part per million in the atmosphere and which has a negligible radiative forcing ...

... concentrate of CFCs.  And definitely concentrate on SF6 which I already explained in another post.

Chloroflourocarbons need to be harnessed.  SF6 must be banned asap ... with maybe with a few heavily monitored exceptions.  But, it must be extremely monitored.  Period.

The only problem with CO2 today is that India & China are now unleashing inordinate amounts of it, through their coal-fired power plants.  So, high tech filtration there is in order ... is needed. 


Yet, CO2 is NOT a toxin, and healthy people will have no problem with it at 2,000 ppm or less.  Symptoms won't actually start until 3,500 ppm, and those are neurological symptoms.  In fact, the OSHA Permissible Level for CO2 is 5,000 ppm.  That's a 1/2 percent concentration.

However, at 80,000 ppm ... 8% ... after an hour of exposure, death comes to your doorstep.  At 10% concentration ... 100,000 ppm ... death is guaranteed.  

Plus, 40,000, 20,000, and 10,000 ppm is not healthy.  But, at present, Planet Earth's outdoor CO2 level isn't even at 1/10th of 1%.  

None the less, concerning the many coal fired power plants of China and India, severe filtration monitoring by honest people in the World Community is needed.  Maybe someone can reinvent the wheel, here.  You don't sit back and ignore it.
 
And of course, the present environmental duty of today is that of ending the gluttony of synthetic chemicals that flood modern society.  

This is due to those chemicals' ability to be hormone distruptors and to be clastogens (meaning that they cut chromosome chains).  The need to end the glut of synthetic chemicals is also due to those chemicals' ability to be ~respiratory allergens, ~respiratory irritants, and ~dermal allergens, as well as being ~carcinogens ... and other unfavorable things, like the trigger of ~urticaria (hives).   

The glut of unbridled synthetic chemicals is the environmental scandal of today.  It's assault & battery on certain types of asthma and Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome patients, as well as dermatitis patients, urticaria patients, patients having hormone-related ills, and people who don't want their chromosomes severed by chemicals.  

It's also an affront on those who really don't want to eventually develop cancer.  The corralling of the glut of synthetic chemicals is a present-tense duty.

                    ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆

Now to the original beginning of this revised post:

Without including any name, rank, or serial number, someone wrote an insult to the intelligence of every history student in-the-know.  It came in an article whose title was printed in exaggeratively big letters.  Yet, just because you put a lie in really big letters, it doesn't automatically turn it into the truth.

The writer's thesis statement was that there could not have been the 2024 Mediterranean heatwave without there having been the present amount of anthropogenic greenhouse gases and this vague thing called "anthropogenic climate change."  

The bottom line here is that the author made it sound as if there were no heatwaves of substance in Southern European & the Mediterranean Coastline until the 2010s or 2020s, and that they only came because of a rise in the atmospheric CO2 level.

Now, I can line-itemize a sample of the Mediterranean heatwaves beginning with the 1852 Italian heatwave ... or even the 1881 Mediterranean heatwave ... when the atmospheric CO2 level was below 290 ppm.  But, without posting evidentiary support, an Al Gore follower will simply resolve in his/her mind that the line-itemized text is a lie ... a fiction ... a pro-oil-company piece of propaganda.  

In this instance, newspaper article copies of the heatwaves of 1852, 1881, 1896, 1901, 1906, 1911, 1914, 1921, 1922, etc, are far more important than any lesson typewritten in 2026.

Okay then, after the mention of one blatant observation, let's let the newspaper articles do the talking, proverbially speaking.

Ye Observation of the hour:

Q:  What would be the predominate source of all of the heat which is ever-so-ready to provide high temperatures to Southern Europe, depending on the direction of the wind?

ANS:  The Sahara and the desert nations of Northern Africa.  Concerning this, Egypt IS 95% desert.  Algeria IS 80% desert.  Libya is 90% desert, and Morocco is 80% desert.  In fact, Tunisia is 75% desert, and those winds which carry Sahara heat into Southern Europe are known as SIROCCO WINDS.


The Sirocco Winds from a desert the size of the United States is the source of Southern Europe's intense summertime heat.  It is NOT CO2.  In as much, heatwaves in Southern Europe are NOT new editions arriving with the rise in CO2.  Southern European heatwaves are as old as the Sahara Desert, itself.



Let us begin with proof that heat-related deaths, by the dozen ... in small geographic pockets ... were being reported as far back as the 1850s, when the CO2 level was approximately 142 parts per million LESS than today's CO2 level of 432 ppm.  The report below is of 40 adults dying from the heat of St. Louis, on July 24, 1878:


Now remember, the Little Ice Age which began around 1274 ended around 1850, resulting in the start of the Modern Warm Period.  Well, by 1852, there was the reporting of a critical heatwave.  Then came the Civil War Drought which began in mid-1850s and affected the American Central Plains and West.  Next came heat in the 1870s, accompanied by wildfire, the largest of which occurred in Peshtigo Wisconsin, in October of 1871.

       On the exact same day, the Great Chicago Fire occurred.

Then came the heatwaves of 1878, even during Australian Summer.  And remember, the Great Global Famine which killed 50 to 60 million humans occurred from 1876 to 1878.  And this was followed by an 1881 heatwave ... when the CO2 level was as low as it was 285 ppm.  Today, it's 431 ppm, and during the French Revolution, it was 282 ppm.

Below:  This is of the Australian Summer, 1878, to show that heat went global  during that year, when the CO2 level and other greenhouse gas levels ... except for water vapor ... were very low.

Below:  Minneapolis had no winter weather during Winter of 1878

Below:  Onward to Europe, in 1878, when the CO2 level was very very low, proving that Al Gore's declarative statement about CO2 being the cause of natural disasters is one big lie.

This was followed by heatwaves of 1881 and 1896, as well as other ones.  In as much welcome to the Modern Warm Period which brought heat to Planet Earth's atmosphere, even when the outdoor CO2 Count was below 310, 300, and 290 parts per million.

Once again, media entities are trying to paint the picture of the world finally being overcome by deadly "greenhouse gases," where mankind must begin a Climate Dictatorship, where cattle must literally be sacrificed.  



Even at that, the present ... and not predicted ... radiative forcing of co2, as of 2019, was only 2.17 watts per meter squared.  The 3.7 w/m2 value is the prediction for co2, based upon its doubling of volume since the pre-industrial era.  At the start of the Industrial Era, CO2's atmospheric level was 273 parts per million.


That is to say, 3.7 watts per meter squared is only the prediction for the future event when co2 finally reaches twice the level of CO2 than it was in 1750.  In 1750, the CO2 level was 273, and of course, 273 times 2 = 546 ppm.

Today's co2 exists in the atmosphere at 431 or 432 ppm.  So, there is about 114 ppm to go, for CO2 to finally double its 1750 volume.  

If the CO2 volume rises 2 ppm per year, it would take 57 years it to have doubled since its pre-industrial level of 273 ppm.  If co2's presence in the atmosphere rises at a rate of 4 ppm per year, then it would take no more than 28 years for CO2's atmospheric level to reach 546 ppm.  In light of the coal-fired power plants being built in India and China, the idea of a rise of 4 ppm per year for CO2 is not science fiction.

In light of this, is it ever possible for the radiative forcing of a molecular compound which has been in the atmosphere since the Dinosaur era to rise 70% in radiative forcing, in merely 28 years?  Remember, there was an ice age when the CO2 level was 9 times MORE than today.  That was a rise in CO2 without a catastrophic inferno ensuing.  

Concerning the w/m2 prediction for CO2, one can now suspect yet another error from a computer model prediction.  One can now toss that computer-generated prediction into the bin with the predictions of  ~the Maldives going underwater by 2018 ... ~and the glaciers at Glacier National disappearing by 2020 ... ~and England turning into a Siberia by 2018 ... ~and the Arctic Oceans becoming ice-free during August, starting in 2014 ... ~ and worldwide crops failures w/ global famine.  None of those things happened, except for one of them.

Concerning a Global Famine due to widespread crop failure ... uhhhm ... that already happened between 1876 and 1878, when approximately 50 million people died, due to famine.  Meanwhile, the CO2 level at the time was only 275 ppm.  Natural disasters have been accompanied by low CO2 levels, history teaches us.


1878's CO2 Count amounts to 156 ppm LOWER than today's CO2 level, and today is an era of mostly successful crop yields ... with occasional local exceptions, such as the low Italian wine grape yields of 2023 and 2024 which ended up being followed by a record high yield in the same land of my Italian ancestors ... okay, my Italian cousins.

Ironically & hypocritically, the most abundant greenhouse gas is WATER VAPOR which leaves behind NO CARBON FOOTPRINT.

Heat Dome Science

Now, it was just reported that, in June of 2026, 18 people in France died during a 2026 heatwave.  Well, it was actually during a HEAT DOME which is NOT directly attached to CO2.  Such a thing is attached to a high pressure blocking system which traps air into a state of stagnation.


Moreover, France is 211,000 square miles in size.  Thus, during the heat dome which is provenly NOT caused by CO2 injecting any extra heat into France, there was one death in France for every 11,722 square miles.   

The amount of space covered by 11,700 sq mi is equivalent to you driving 108 miles and making a left for another 108 miles, and then another left for another 108 miles, and a final left for the final 108 miles.

Beware of Skewed Numerical Propaganda

Skewing numbers to convince mankind into submitting to your dictates is an element of fraudulent misrepresentation.  

None the less, all heat deaths deserve a measure of compassion and respectfulness.  The problem today is that the Climate Propagandists show disrespect for the recently dead and presently dying, by howling out propaganda which concludes that the Al Gore & the Michael Mann & the John Kerry People must now rule Planet Earth, and that we all must comply, as if the Ottoman Empire 2.0 returned to enslave & torment humanity all the more.

Now remember, intense Southern European heat, and high pressure blocking system heat has been documented in Southern Europe's media since 1881, when the CO2 level was almost the same as it was during the Italian Renaissance and French Revolution.

Now, there were the reports of ITALY undergoing an intense heatwave in 1852, according to Copernicus.eu.  Yet, 1852 was a time of limited news.  None the less, heatwaves are regarded by the honest as having been a part of the Mediterranean climate, all along ... and not a new occurrence, due to the rise in CO2.


Then came 1881.  Now, the 1896 heatwave was an American experience.  In 1901 and 1906, Europe was visted by heatwaves.  Below is a 1901 news report of the New York Times.

★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

Do you get the point, yet?  Or are you irreparably brainwashed?  The Nazis and Julius Streicher had nothing over the Climate Propagandists of today.  It's merely the same ole same ole.  Only the names of the aspiring dictators change.