Super quick Summer Solstice Note, in response to certain media personnel hyping up the June 21, 22, 23 temperatures in Europe, claiming them to be record highs, when the truth is that there were higher temps in Europe's history ...
... as well as devastating droughts, European coastline-destroying storms that even occurred in the 14th Century, and the evaporation of rivers in Central Europe and France ... literally ... all when the CO2 level was really really low:
The days surrounding the Summer Solstice are the ones which commonly were amongst the hottest days of any year, in Europe. Thus, the June 21, 22, 23 temperatures were part of a predictable pattern, thereby showing that there is no climate change. It's Climate Consistency which is occurring, instead.
It's Climate Unchange that you are experiencing. In fact, it's Climate Deja Vu. This is because it has all happened previously, time after time after time after time. So, be aware of the present-day media Climate Con Artistry.
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
At this point, a thesis statement needs to be made, concerning you believers in manmade global warming:
Instead of placing your focus on CO2 which only occupies less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the atmosphere and which has a much lower radiative forcing rate than previously advertised ...
... instead of placing your focus on methane which only exists at 1.9 parts per million in the atmosphere and which has a negligible radiative forcing ... and instead of focusing on nitrous oxide which only exists at 1/3 of one part per million in the atmosphere and which has a negligible radiative forcing ...
... concentrate of CFCs. And definitely concentrate on SF6 which I already explained in another post.
Chloroflourocarbons need to be harnessed. SF6 must be banned asap ... with maybe with a few heavily monitored exceptions. But, it must be extremely monitored. Period.
The only problem with CO2 today is that India & China are now unleashing inordinate amounts of it, through their coal-fired power plants. So, high tech filtration there is in order ... is needed.
Yet, CO2 is NOT a toxin, and healthy people will have no problem with it at 2,000 ppm or less. Symptoms won't actually start until 3,500 ppm, and those are neurological symptoms. In fact, the OSHA Permissible Level for CO2 is 5,000 ppm. That's a 1/2 percent concentration.
However, at 80,000 ppm ... 8% ... after an hour of exposure, death comes to your doorstep. At 10% concentration ... 100,000 ppm ... death is guaranteed.
Plus, 40,000, 20,000, and 10,000 ppm is not healthy. But, at present, Planet Earth's outdoor CO2 level isn't even at 1/10th of 1%.
None the less, concerning the many coal fired power plants of China and India, severe filtration monitoring by honest people in the World Community is needed. Maybe someone can reinvent the wheel, here. You don't sit back and ignore it.
And of course, the present environmental duty of today is that of ending the gluttony of synthetic chemicals that flood modern society.
This is due to those chemicals' ability to be hormone distruptors and to be clastogens (meaning that they cut chromosome chains). The need to end the glut of synthetic chemicals is also due to those chemicals' ability to be ~respiratory allergens, ~respiratory irritants, and ~dermal allergens, as well as being ~carcinogens ... and other unfavorable things, like the trigger of ~urticaria (hives).
The glut of unbridled synthetic chemicals is the environmental scandal of today. It's assault & battery on certain types of asthma and Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome patients, as well as dermatitis patients, urticaria patients, patients having hormone-related ills, and people who don't want their chromosomes severed by chemicals.
It's also an affront on those who really don't want to eventually develop cancer. The corralling of the glut of synthetic chemicals is a present-tense duty.
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆
Now to the original beginning of this revised post:
Without including any name, rank, or serial number, someone wrote an insult to the intelligence of every history student in-the-know. It came in an article whose title was printed in exaggeratively big letters. Yet, just because you put a lie in really big letters, it doesn't automatically turn it into the truth.