![]() |
| In the 1927 sub-headline above, Columbus refers to Columbus Kentucky. |
![]() |
| In 1927, the CO2 level was a very low 305 ppm. That's 124 ppm LOWER THAN TODAY. |
Today's Warfront of Good vs Evil ... the Battle between Heaven & Hell ... the Campaign of Deceit & the Mindset of the Deceivers are disclosed herein.
![]() |
| In the 1927 sub-headline above, Columbus refers to Columbus Kentucky. |
![]() |
| In 1927, the CO2 level was a very low 305 ppm. That's 124 ppm LOWER THAN TODAY. |
In the midst of the profitable End-of-the-World climate hysterics, there are FOUR well established points of atmospheric science which novices absolutely need to know, so as to not be duped by the Al Gore & John Kerry World:
1a} The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere comprises less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the sky outside. At present, co2 exists in the sky at 431 parts per million.
1b} If the Troposphere were the Ohio Stadium in Columbus, then CO2 molecules would sit in only 44 of the 102,000 seats. In contrast, Nitrogen molecules would sit in 79,500 of those seats minus atmospheric water vapor which is .02% to 4% of the Troposphere.
1c} Meanwhile, Oxygen would sit in 21,400 Rose Bowl seats minus 0.02% to 4%. Argon would sit in 948 of the 102,000 seats, minus a small percentage of water vapor.
2} CO2 has three vibrational modes attached to its motion. When co2 is in its SYMMETRIC MODE ... which looks like a bird flapping its wings in flight ... CO2 becomes incapable of capturing infrared radiation.
This is why an ice age occurred when the atmospheric co2 count was 9 and a half times higher than it is today. That was the Ordovician Ice Age.
Meanwhile, indoor CO2, in schools and office buildings, have been admitted to have recently existed at 1,500 pm to 2,000 pm. Another report stated that 1,200 ppm is the average indoor amount. To be more exact, from what I found, the average indoor CO2 level of recent years ranged from 1,300 to 1,700 ppm.
In order to instantly die from CO2 exposure, you need to be exposed to 100,000 ppm. Yet, 40,000 ppm is recognized as being immediately dangerous to human life.
Concerning healthy humans, the ill-effects of too much CO2 occur somewhere around 5,000 ppm.
Yet, at 3,500 ppm, only submarine crew members were able to do decision-making thinking. Meanwhile, other people only did the reactive linear-thought type of thinking. All in all, up to 2,000 ppm of CO2 is not an assault on human health. 3,000 ppm would be tolerable for those without frail health.
In comparison, Mars' atmospheric carbon dioxide is 950,000 parts per million. Yes, the Martian sky is 95% CO2. Yet, there is NO Greenhouse Effect taking place on Mars, being that the average temperature on the Red Planet is MINUS 80 degrees Fahrenheit.
| Literally the Middle of Antarctica, at 9,301 feet above sea level |
The reality is that there were global warming periods ... such as the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm Period. There were also global cold periods ... such as the Mini-Ice-Age of 1284 CE to 1840 CE, and the Late Antique Mini Ice Age of 536 C.E. to 660 C.E. Thus, Antarctic weather would be paralleled by warmth periods.
After all, they're telling you that the World is going to come to an end, unless you give these scientists lots and lots of taxpayer dollars. That's known as grifting.
That which they and Al Gore have been doing has repeatedly been proven to be acts of Theft by Deception. And it was done with the help of certain US congressional members and US senators. This is why there are over 63 or so Atmospheric Science & Weather HISTORY posts at the Blue Marble Album. They are literally a public service for the deceived.
Those posts are here ... with abundant pieces of evidentiary support ... to illustrate to you how unconscionably deceptive these scientists and Al Gore's associates have been. The 63+ posts equally show how incredibly dimwitted & easily deceived certain celebrities have been.
![]() |
| Above: Planet Earth, as seen from the Artemis Project's Orion CM-003 Integrity |
This is the era when the sky is now full of carbon, even though carbon inhabits less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the sky outside. This is the era when the sky is now full of soot, and as a result, New York City and the Statue of Liberty will soon be underwater.
This is the time when the Category 6 hurricane will rule the high seas, racing onto shorelines and cracking in half every palm tree in the pathway. This is a redundant horror story. This is fictional reading.
In reality, the sky outside is about 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and 0.93% argon, along with 0.07% of the other gases ... minus the water vapor percentage which varies throughout the Earth's atmosphere, ranging from 02.% in polar regions and 4% in the Tropics. CO2 is among the gases which comprise only 0.07% of the atmosphere.
As far back as 2018, Greta told everyone that she had a sole-scientist-source who told her that the world will come to its end in 2023, if mankind didn't radically change its entire way of life. As you can see, that was total science fiction, too.
Moreover, the less than honest media networks reported that it was 99 degrees Fahrenheit in the middle of winter, in Vicuna, Coquimbe, Chile, on August 2nd, 2023. It was no higher than 63F there, on that day.
The same hot hot hot temps were reported by the mainstream media as having been occurring in Santiago, in July and August of 2023. The media stated that the temperature hovered near 100F there. The truth is that it was only 72F in Santiago on August 2nd, 2023. Therefore, the ultimate truth is that the mainstream media unconscionably lies to humanity. In conclusion, the world didn't come to its end in 2023, as Greta Thunberg asininely proclaimed it would do.
Concerning the claim that Antarctica had its greatest sea ice loss in 2023, the reality is that this scenario is nowhere near reality. The Year 1966 was the year of the least amount of Antarctic wintertime sea ice extent ever recorded, and Planet Earth survived 1966 quite well. So, 2023 only had the least amount of sea ice extent in the past 57 years only.
All in all, the Climate Hysteria People are always lying to humanity, all the while insulting the intelligences of those who studied atmospheric physics and/or pre-Holocene archaeology and/or oceanography and/or weather history and/or maritime history.
Needless to say, today's "journalists" and "activists" are nothing more than human waste, wasting our lives away with worthless projects. These people are the Waste Deposits of Humanity. So, let us become true revolutionary radicals by doing something called, "beginning with the actual truth, for a change." Sounds scary, doesn't it? Well, if you are brave enough to face the truth, then let's go to it:
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠ðŸ”
The Satellite Era began in 1960 ... with the CORONA, ARGON, & LANYARD systems ... followed by the Nimbus Series in 1964 ... and NOT in 1979.
Preview: [1] In 2014, the US government admitted to the existence of at least 250,000 satellite images photographed between 1964 to 1978. The images were retrieved from the government warehouses in Maryland and N. Carolina. They were then digitized and made available to researchers, historians, and the such. Therefore, when certain propaganda-minded operatives exclaim that there is no way of proving in what condition the Polar Caps were before 1979, the person is either lying ... or is uninformed. ... or is misinformed.
[2a] The official US government's reason for calling 1979 the beginning of the Satellite Era is that the continuous monitoring & record-keeping of Polar sea ice in both Hemispheres began in October 1978. The monitoring consisted in every-other-day observation sessions. Thus, 1979 was the first full year of continuous Polar sea ice record-keeping.
[2b] HOWEVER, the benefit of the Climate Misrepresentatives claiming 1979 to be the first year of satellite coverage is that, in 1979, the Arctic contained its highest amount ... its most voluminous amount of the Arctic Sea Ice in recorded history. The falsely claim that the satellite era only began in 1979 is to hide from humanity the fact that several individual years prior to 1979 had much less sea ice extent in the Northern Polar Cap.
[2c] When you make it falsely appear that 1979 was an average year ... instead of the year of the most sea ice covering of them all ... you make it appear that, all of a sudden, CO2 started its meltdown of the Arctic. But, there were years when there was much less Arctic sea ice than in 1979, meaning that climate is cyclical and NOT driven by CO2 which happens to only exist at 0.043% of the Earth's atmosphere, at present.
[2d] Yes, CO2 only exists at 431 or so parts per million, at present. This is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1% of the sky's gases. In addition, the radiative forcing of CO2 is presently 3.7 watts per meter squared. This is less than an incandescent night light.
Let's do some very basic math that might be liberating to you, in light of the endless nagging about the atmosphere's "carbon footprint," "carbon footprint," caaaaarbon footprint.
Newsflash: The atmosphere today, as it was 4,000 years ago, is 99.93% carbon-free. Observe:
While omitting the 1% to 5% of Water Vapor which exists throughout the Earth's atmosphere, depending on the exact region of Planet Earth, it's atmosphere comprises:
78% carbon-free NITROGEN, 21% carbon-free OXYGEN, 0.93% carbon-free ARGON = 99.93% of the Earth's atmosphere.
Moreover, 90% of all greenhouse gases, by volume, is carbon-free WATER VAPOR. This is only logical, because the surface of Planet Earth is 71% carbon-free WATER. Plus, extremely small amounts of the following carbon-free substances are also in the atmosphere:
Neon (19ppm), Krypton (1.15ppm), Helium (5.35ppm), Hydrogen (0.53 ppm), Ozone (0.07 ppm), Xenon (0.09 ppm), and a few other things at low concentrations ... even trace concentrations. So, where's all the carbon, you climate crisis activists?
For the record, if you want to mathematically include water vapor into the equation, you subtract small portions of Nitrogen, Oxygen, & Argon as follows. Now remember, water vapor is in differing concentration in different skies of the Earth. It exists from 0.1% (deserts) to 4% (the Tropics). So, you adjust the math as follows: PS: That chart came from the United States government. NOAA.
Preliminary note with irony attached to it: In having been in construction as far back as 1992, (with respiratory allergy sabbaticals taken in-between --- along with one steel-beam-crush injury sabbatical) I have already met all forms of humanity. And on occasion, the subject of "Climate Change" did emerge instantaneously. The only ones who believed in the claim of fast-approaching Doomsday Climate Change were {1} recently graduated high school students who have very few years of life experience, and {2} people in local government who don't even know the percentage of CO2 in the outdoor air.
Everyone else said either "The whole thing is bull crap" or "It's not as bad as 'they' make it out to be." These people have had the experience of living in Earth's atmosphere decades longer than a newly graduated high school student. They speak from much longer experience. And of course, as far as goes small time politicians, they're just like big time politicians, in being mynah birds, video recorders, and/or robots, rattling off bumper sticker slogans and predictable clichés.
The reflex action to dispel Climate Doomsday Rhetoric is especially the case for geologists who do not receive taxpayer-funded paychecks. The same goes for any tradesman who worked outdoors for the past 20 to 25 to 30 years.
Now, this concerns the claim that today's trace amount of atmospheric CO2 is causing the End of the World. The typical geologist mentions the tremendous amount of CO2 which rockets out of the typical erupting volcano, followed by no Global Warming heatwave resulting from the sudden unleashing of CO2. Meanwhile, the typical 25-year tradesman simply says that "climate is cyclical." Therefore, the common citizen, and therefore the reasonable human, thinks that the alarm of a fast-approaching climate change extinction-event is senseless buffoonery.
In addition, the pertinent charts & graphs of the 1990s (which outline the temperature, sea level, and frequency of weather events of the prior 100 years, 500 years, and 1,000 years) have been decisively altered and do NOT sing in harmony with newspaper reports & chronicles of the same years, same decades, and same centuries represented in those graphs. This is known as Data Tampering, and the newspaper reports of old constitute the numerous pieces of evidence which prove the "newer" charts & graphs to be fraudulent.
Example: A "newer" NOAA graph claimed that 1920, 1921, and 1922 were among the coldest years of the 20th Century. Go and look through the newspaper archives for those years, and see for yourself. Those were heatwave years, marked my notable ice melt around the Arctic Circle regions ... those years were as heated as the 1930s, and they were the opposite of the basically frigid 1960s and 1970s. Look for yourself, so that you'll see that something does NOT match, concerning news reports of old and today's "new and improved" weather event charts and temperature graphs.
2nd Example: Today's wildfire frequency chart only begins at 1983, the year of the lowest amount of forest fires & wildfires. The REAL data goes back to 1916. There were motor vehicles that could track and measure burnt forest land very effectively. The Years 1926 to 1943 were the years of massive forest fire frequency. Today does NOT come close, in burnt acreage.
Now, that which is more interesting goes as follows:
Concerning the key players in the man-made-co2 "Climate Change" hysteria, everyone knows who Al Gore is. And everyone definitely knows who Bill Nye is. Well, NOBODY knows who Michael Mann is.
Now, he's the one whose horn gets tooted the most by the most "liberal" of media members. Yet, nobody amongst the common folk in America knows who he is. That is a major crash-and-burn for a self-centered narcissist such as Michael Mann. This also shows that the commercial media, the public TV media, and the various Bill-Gates-funded entities failed at their own propaganda ploy.
![]() |
| Above is the carbon footprint of CO2. CO2 happens to activate photosynthesis. |
The first indication that the CO2 Doomsday Narrative has been a lie from Day 1 consists in the fact that, if CO2 were the pollutant Al Gore said it was, then you would constantly be exhaling a very visible form of carbonized soot --- something equal to cigarette smoke or coal dust. Your breath would be a color ranging from gray to brown to black. You and everyone else would need to clean the soot off your shirt/blouse every evening. After all, pollution is ====> unburnt fuel. This is not to be confused with particulates which are produced during the unavoidable abrasion of machine parts ... or engine parts.
Moreover, all those photos of active smokestacks shown on-screen, while being presented as CO2 polluting the Earth, were false-light misrepresentations. The visible part of those smokestack emissions were gaseous compounds other than CO2. CO2 is odorless and colorless. It's also harmless when under 2,000 ppm. It's
not deadly unless you're exposed to 84,000 ppm for an hour. So compare: 416 ppm outdoors today vs 84,000 ppm in laboratory conditions.
Your breath is proof that CO2 is colorless. Look into a mirror. Are you a fire-breathing dragon? Are you a coal-dust-exhaling dragon? Well, the average human exhales 1.6 to 2.3 lbs of CO2 per day. Yet, each one's breath looks clear. That's enough of an indication that you've been conned by Al Gore & Michael "hockey sticks" Mann.
There are a number of observations in front of your face ... in historical logs ... in monastery ledgers ... in almanacs ... in newspaper articles dating back to the 1600s ... in maritime charts & reports ... and in "proxy evidence" ... which show that this Chicken Little Hysteria is a complete con game. You need to look around and test the "end-of-the-world" assertions for cracks. You will find many cracks.
Example #2: London Area fires decreased significantly since the 1980s & 1990s, even though co2 levels consistently increased.
This example concerns the very false claim that elevated co2 levels set London on Fire in 2022. The London Fire Brigade reported enthusiastically in 2014 that yearly fires throughout the 610 square mile region of the London vicinity had been reduced to approximately half of the number of yearly fires of the 1980s & 1990s. In fact, the Year 2021 was the record low year in London Area fires.
From the 1970s to 2003, yearly London area fires were over 40,000. In the mid-2010s, the yearly fire number went below 18,000. In 2021, the number went below 15,000, even though co2 levels had been rising with relative significance since the 1980s & 1990s. So, in 2022, you were told a lot of lies.
Dry heat from Africa caused the two days of a major British heat anomaly, in 2022. Not CO2. After all, the same co2 level caused the least number of fires in London's statistical history, the year prior. Look at the London Fire Brigade's own chart, to see that you were the recipient of multiple lies in 2022. Incidentally, London Statistical History began in 1966. That was the year when the London Fire Brigade started keeping score on its fires.
... didn't realize that she is totally in favor of the murderous regime of Iran having 11 nuclear missiles, from their 460 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium. Keeping weapons of indiscriminate destruction out of the hands of indiscriminate mass murderers is Necessity #1, for all of humanity.
After the first week of fighting in the Ukraine, as of March 2022, 5,937 Russians were reported as having been killed. After the first week of Operation Epic Fury, in 2026, only SIX United States service men were killed. Thus, for every 989 Russians who died in the first week of the Ukraine/Russian war, approximately one American died in Operation Epic Fury.
Each American death was due to the same one lucky drone strike upon Port Shuaiba, in Kuwait. Incidentally, on March 3rd, five USA service men were wounded in Kuwait, on account of another drone strike. None the less, the dictatorial Iranian regime endured massive damage and casualties in the same time span.
Moreover, ZERO Israeli service men died during the first week of Operation Epic Fury.
At present, the 2026 Iran War is now at its Sledgehammer phase, where the less expensive B-52s take center stage, high in the sky. You can call it the Pulverizing Phase.
Of course, the B-2 bombers will continue to bring in the penetrators, as in underground bunker penetration. The ballistic missile production facilities of Iran will be targeted. This is because they absolutely have to go, lest the murderous mindset of Khamenei 1979 will rise again and start rearming its new crew of killers, attacking all the more unarmed civilians.
1] Compared to a B-1b bomber, a B-52 bombing flight is half price.
2] Meanwhile, the B-52H can carry up to 70,000 lbs of munitions.
In retrospect, if you think that Kamala Harris is a politician for the People and with the People, think again. She has lived in luxury. No sacrificial suffering there. She did NOT suffer from the inflation which you endured, even though she is the one who caused it to happen, due to two specific tie-breaker votes of hers, in the US Senate.
Plus, Kamala has no known aesthetic talents or ascetic discipline, and thusly, no wisdom from her has been witnessed. Only abusive outlashing upon her employees has been observed, as well as her mocking those American Protestants who publicly announced, "Jesus is Lord."
Oh, and Kamala also spit in the face of the 2,000 year old Catholic Church known for its many charity organizations and who preserved the complete Biblical text, through the penmanship of its many European monks, throughout the centuries. I've already explained that aspect of her.
Also observed was Kamala being with Willie Brown in public, as if she were advertising herself, in order to gain prestige and future votes.
Kamala is merely 1] an airhead, 2] a political opportunist, and 3] a narcissist, in my private citizen's public opinion of her. Such a publicly-stated opinion is protected in the USA, under NY Times v Sullivan, 376 US 254 (1964.).
A private citizen's opinion of her is protected, because Kamala is a public figure. She was a career politician who held office for 20 consecutive years ... four specific offices, to be exact, namely 1] county DA, 2] state AG, 3] US senator, and 4] vice president.
In as much, she was severely lying in 2024, when she presented herself as the new face of politics, while presenting Businessman Donald Trump as a long-term, old-had politician who never held a political seat until 2016, far late in the proverbial game.
President Narco-Terrorist Defendant
Also in her great asininity was Kamala speaking out about the high tech capture of Maduro, where not a single American was killed. It was an expedition of meticulous detail and hard work, as well as great risk.
Then, after Americans did the near-impossible, Kamala simply said that we should send the publicly known criminal, Maduro, back to Venezuela ... after all that work.
The supreme asininity of this is that Maduro had an outstanding grand jury warrant for his arrest. Yet, former DA & AG Harris acted as if an arrest warrant is nothing. Everything she did as DA & AG was based on arrest warrants or immediate probable cause. Does she know what she's saying when she speaks? She's beyond an airhead.
The recent statement of Kamala is a blatant sign of Moral Incapacity which is a trait of narcissists. After all, Kamala was NOT speaking for the welfare of the overly oppressed & equally imperiled Venezuelan People. She simply wants Maduro to send even more illegal immigrants to the United States.
She wants illegal immigrants to be granted Instant Amnesty, by which they will all become registered Democrats, and then vote her into the White House, in 2028 or 2032. Narcissists don't give-up their strive for the highest position of power most available to them.
Kamala should be court-ordered to psychiatric observation, followed by psychiatric evaluation. If you promote her, you should be court-ordered to psychiatric observation, too.
Q: What is Joy? ANS: Joy is Kamala Not Being President
Now remember, a picture ... a photo ... is worth a thousand words, and as we can now see, KAMALA HARRIS IS AN ENEMY OF THE PERSIAN PEOPLE & THE VENEZUALEAN PEOPLE. Putting her in power makes her a danger to society.
Now think. If Kamala had won the 2024 presidential election, the photos below would not exist. But of course, Kamala was the first presidential nominee in 92 years who FAILED to flip a single county throughout the United States.
Plus, every single state in the Union shifted red, meaning that more votes for the Republican nominee were cast in 2024 than in 2020, in every state.
All in all, the looks of celebration and the signs expressing gratitude shown below were due to the managerial abilities of businessman Donald Trump. It turns out that it has been the career politicians who have been the existential threat to democracy, all along. They still are.
![]() |
| If Kamala Harris were president of the United States, this photo would not exist. |
![]() |
| If Kamala Harris were president of the United States, this photo would not exist. |
![]() |
| If Kamala Harris were president of the United States, this photo would not exist. |
![]() |
| If Kamala Harris were president of the United States, this photo would not exist. |
![]() |
| If Kamala Harris were president of the United States, this photo would not exist. |