July 8, 2025

Kamala Harris got shellacked in multiple facets of election statistics.

Posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.  At the outset of election night, it was Trump 154 to Harris 027.
This was updated in April of 2025   
The gift to all Americans of good will is the uncontroverted & undisputed defeat of Death Cult Kamala.

Above:  The 2024 presidential election results map for America's counties.  Red stands for Donald Trump.  Blue stands for Kamala.  The 
In the 2024 election, Donald Trump ::: 

[1a] ... won the popular vote by 2.43 million votes, according to the Economist ... a similar 2.42 million votes, according to Reuters ... 2.29 million votes, according to Bloomberg ... and a similar 2,284,952 votes, according to the Council of Foreign Relations.

[1b]  Therefore, the Economist, Bloomberg, and Reuters reported that 152 to 154 million people cast votes in the 2024 presidential election.  Meanwhile, the Council of Foreign Relations reported that 156,302,318 people voted in the presidential election of 2024, with 77,284,118 of those people voting for Trump and 74,999,116 of those people voting for Kamala "the Repeater" Harris.  

[1c]  Of course, "Repeater" refers to "32 days. 32 days. 32 days." ... as well as "the significance of the passage of time" ... and other imitations of a scratched vinyl LP, such as "I was raised in the middle class," which happened to have been a complete lie.  

The truth is that Kamala was raised in a very affluent & high-end region known as Westmount, Montreal.  It is one of the most posh places in Quebec, with its Greene Avenue boutiques.  At one time, Westmount was the richest place in all of Canada.  See for yourself and see how much of a liar Kamala was, during the campaign.



The Expanse of Republican Red throughout the Election Landscape

[2b]  The undisputed electoral vote count for 2024 was 312 for Trump and 226 for Harris.  Now, according to basal & linear thinking, neither the Electoral College Count nor the Popular Vote were landslides.  HOWEVER, the other election metrics (aka statistics) show that the election was a convincing & solid trend of voters drifting away from Democrat Party priorities to Republican ones.  

[2ci] It was a shellacking in that a coating of Republican Red was painted across the American election map, in the 2024 election.  Such a trend does constitute a Mandate of the People to undo everything that Biden, Harris, Mayorkas, and Company had done to America & Americans, in the past four years.  

[2cii]  The 2024 Vote was a vote to do a DO-OVER ... a do-over of an America which spent the past four years ::: ~ accommodating sexual perversity, ~ performing sexual mutilation, ~ prosecuting pro-life Roman Catholics, ~ turning the American court system into a kangaroo court against a demented president's political opponent, ~concealing the dementia of a thoroughly incompetent and inarticulate Joe Biden who sniffed more people than did his dog,  and also ...

~ calling an unarmed mob with zero military vehicles and zero military officers an insurrection,  ~ imposing draconian environmental measures that resulted in the highest level of atmospheric CO2 in human history up to that time, ~creating the conditions for Demand Pull Inflation and astronomical price hikes,  ~ using taxpayer dollars to fly illegal alienable criminals to their next scene of the crime, where the crimes were committed upon Americans,  and also ...

~ the governmental incompetence that caused entire California neighborhoods to become incinerated, ~ the governmental incompetence of spending $32 million per electric bus,  ~ the incompetence of having two astronauts stranded in space,  ~the incompetence of connecting high-speed internet to zero homes with Congressional funding.   Then there was . . .

~ the plan to spy on Roman Catholics who attend the tradition Latin Mass that European kings attended throughout the centuries,  ~ allowing floating and hovering vehicles thoroughfare throughout America without telling Americans who own them and why were the airborne,  ~ allowing Jews to be endangered on college campuses,  ~provoking Russia by having NATO encroach upon Russia, up to its border lines.  The list of outrages continues.   

[2d]  For those unaware, shellac was a predominant colorant used in varnishing.  So, the symbolic image of "a political shellacking" (in 2024) is meant to convey the painting of the color red over the color blue throughout many sections of the American election landscape.

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
Not Since 1932

[2ei]  A vivid statistical marker which shows that the 2024 election was a shellacking goes as follows:  
Kamala Harris is the first candidate in 92 years who did NOT FLIP a single county throughout the entire United States.  

[2eii] The last time this happened was in the Year 1932, during the Great Depression.  Thus, for such a thing to happen, the state of the United States must be pathetic.  And of course, Kamala provided the Senatorial Tie-Breaking vote TWICE which caused Demand-Pull Inflation, the acute rise in the Cost of Living, and a constant burden upon the Working Poor, as well as ridiculously jacked-up gasoline & diesel fuel prices. 
☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

[2f] Add to the pathetic state of America (1) the unvetted immigrant invasion, (2) a proxied war against Russia, with the Ukrainian People as the surrogate actor, (3) the renewed hatred of Jews, (4) the unchecked aerial spying upon America, (5) the prosecution of pro-life Roman Catholics, (6) the accommodation of sexual perversity and child castration, (7) the march toward Censorship of anyone who speaks out against Biden, Harris, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, etc, and (8) the turning of the Justice Dept into a Kangaroo Court ... only to name a few of the American evils proliferated under the Biden & Harris Administration.    

[2gi]  Whereas Kamala flipped ZERO COUNTIES, Donald Trump flipped 88 of them, in 2024.  
           Incidentally, in 2016 Trump flipped 217 counties, while Hillary flipped 30 of them.
            Furthermore, in 2020, Trump flipped 16 counties, and Biden flipped 66 of them.

In fact, according to the New York Times, as of Nov 6, 2024,  Mr Trump improved on his 2020 margin in 2,793 counties.  His margin decreased in only 319 counties.

[2gii] As far as went the 1932 Election, whereas Hoover flipped zero counties, FDR flipped 24 counties in the State of Pennsylvania, alone.  In fact, in 1932, FDR flipped 24 States.  In 1928, Hoover carried 40 States.  So, there were a lot of States needed to be flipped, in order for FDR to have won, in 1932.
 
[2hi]  Concerning the Swing State of Pennsylvania which Trump did flip in 2024, he won 58 of its counties, while Harris only won 9 of them.  Trump won 30 Pennsylvania counties by 40+ points each.  Moreover, Trump flipped six States in 2024, and predictably enough, they were all Swing States. 

[2hii]  Now, Trump won 2,630 counties, while Harris only won 427 of them.  However, 2,559 of the Trump counties were solidly Republican ones, while 421 of Kamala Harris' counties were solidly Democrat counties.  This means that whoever was to become the Republican nominee in 2024, he was going to win 2,559 counties.  Likewise, whoever was to become the Democrat nominee in 2024, she guaranteed to win 421 staunchly democrat party counties.  And those 421 democrat party counties comprised 48.1% of the national population.  Meanwhile, those 2,559 Republican counties comprised 40.1% of the US population.


[2hiii] All that Kamala needed to do was to win over to her side 0.75% to 1.5% more of the American voter, in addition to those among the 48.1% of American voters living in the 421 solidly democrat counties ... for Kamala to have won the popular vote.  

Kamala failed to gain a mere 0.75% to 1.5% extra votes.  Rather, those 421 counties were bleeding democrat party voters who ended up shifting to the Republican right.  In the end, Kamala would end up receiving 48.3% of the popular vote and losing the popular vote to Donald Trump's 49.8%.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, needed 10% more votes, in addition to the votes already guaranteed to him, in the large block of Republican terrain where lives 40.1% of the American population.  That is to say, Trump needed to win-over to his side at least 6 times more voters than Kamala needed to win-over.  He achieved this task, while CNN & MSNBC were defaming him 24/7.  His rally attendance statistics, alone, showed how much of a compelling personality he had, along with a compelling platform of campaign issues.  

https://www.cfr.org/article/2024-election-numbers  <==== Council on Foreign Relations Summary

[2hiv]  Moreover, Kamala Harris did NOT outperform Joe Biden in any State.  This means that she did NOT win any State in 2024, by a margin of 3% or larger than Joe Biden won in 2020.

[2i] Neither a red-shift nor a blue-shift is the automatic win of a county or a State.  One can get more votes in 2024 than he did in 2020 and still lose that county.  The bottom line here is that Kamala failed to flip a single county in 2024, and such a thing is a huge bio-maker, indicating an utterly collapsed campaign, from Coast to Coast and beginning to end.  The Harris Campaign was nothing more than a Campaign of Lies.


[2j]  If and only if CNN & MSNBC did not spend 24 hours a day, seven days a week, committing all sorts of defamation against Donald Trump ... and if the ABC & NBC commentators simply posted numerical charts, tables, and graphs of Trump's presidential accomplishments ... then the Election of 2024 would have resulted in a much larger margin of victory for Donald.  Plus, no one would have come an inch away from assassinating Trump, because there would have been no Inciting of Riots or Assassinations, on air ... or in print.

Review of Very Recent History; 2016 & 2020.

[3]  The 2020 electoral count was Biden 306 and Trump 232.  [4b] The 2016 electoral count was 304 for Trump, 227 for Hillary, 3 for Colin Powell, 1 for Bernie Sanders, 1 for the female Native American, Spotted Eagle, 1 for Ron Paul, and 1 for John Kasich.  The 2016 election results should have been 306 for Trump and 232 for Hillary. 

The November 2024 Presidential Election

[4a]  Trump won all seven of the 2024 Swing States.  [5b] He then won 31 States in all, along with Nebraska's 1st & 3rd districts.  Meanwhile, Kamala won 19 States and D.C., as well as Maine's 1st district and Nebraska's 2nd district.   

[4b]   In addition, Trump flipped TEN California counties in 2024, taking them into the Red Side and out of the Dark Side.  In fact, Trump received 1,909,639 more California votes in 2024 than he did in 2020. 

[5a]  Of the 31 States won by Trump in 2024, he won TWO States by a margin of 40+ points.  He won SIX States by a margin of 30-39 points.   Trump won SIX other States by a margin of 20-29 points.  Plus, Trump won TEN States by a margin of 10-19 points each.  

[5b]  President Elect Trump won each of the SEVEN SWING STATES by ::: (1) 0.86% in WI (by a 29,397 vote margin) ::: (2) 1.41% in MI (by a 80,103 vote margin ::: (3) 1.71% in PA (by a 120,266 vote margin) :::  (4) 2.18% in GA (by a 115,100 vote margin) ::: (5) 3.10% in NV (by a 46,008 vote margin) ::: (6) 3.21% in NC (by a 183,048 vote margin) ::: (7) 5.51% in AZ (by a 187,382 vote margin).


[6a]  As of Dec 16, 2024, Trump won 197 pivot counties by an average margin of 18.4% each.  Meanwhile, Harris only won nine of them, by an average of only 2.5% each.   

[6b]  A Pivot County is a "swinging door county that alternates presidential party candidates per election year."  Today, it's regarded as a county which voted in majority for Obama in 2008 & 2012, along with voting predominately for Trump in 2016.  There are 206 such counties, at present.


[7]  Trump red-shifted ALL 50 STATES, including New York State, by 6.43%,  [7b] ... New Jersey, by 4.92%,  [7c] ... California, by 4.61%,  [7d] ... Massachusetts, by 4.38%,  and [7e] ... Illinois, by 4.26%.  

[8]  Donald Trump also received 11.4 to 12.3 million more votes in 2024 than Hillary did in 2016.  In fact, Donald the Trumpmeister received 14.3 to 15.1 million more votes in 2024 than he did in 2016.  For the record, the 2016 popular vote results were as follows:  Hillary 65,853,514 and Trump 62,984,828.
 
[9a]  In 2024, Donald Trump even shifted Florida more to the Red than it already was, to the tune of 4.88 points.  In fact, Trump flipped Miami-Dade County, and no Republican had won that county since 1988.  The Democrat presidential candidate won Miami-Dade in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004,  2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020 ... but not in 2024.  

[9b]  Trump also flipped St. Petersburg’s Pinellas County and Jacksonville’s Duval County.  

[10a]  Speaking of Atlantic Coastline cities, even though Donald Trump did not flip New York City to Republican Red, he did see it shift to the right by 7.76%, from the 2020 election.   Observe:  

[10b]  In 2016, Hillary received 78.95% of the NYC VOTE, while Donald received 18.03% of it.  In 2020, the NYC election score was Biden's 76.19% to Trump's 22.69%.  

[10c]  Finally, in the 2024 presidential election, Harris received 67.70% of the NYC vote, while Donald Trump received 30.45%, of it.  It was a shift to the Republican right of 7.76%.  After all, 30.45% minus 22.69% = 7.76%.  Moreover, the 2020 Democrat Vote 76.19% minus the 2024 Democrat Vote 67.70% = a 8.49% shrinkage ... aka retreat ... from the democrat party stronghold in NYC.

[10d]  Moreover, in 2024 Trump won 124,000 MORE VOTES in the Bronx than he did in 2020.  He won 133,000 MORE VOTES in Brooklyn than he did in 2020.  Plus, he beat Harris by 29 points in Staten Island.


More whites voted for Kamala than did blacks, yet racism was blamed on Kamala's loss

[11a] Concerning the white racism claim, the opposite evidence exists.  After all, tens of millions of white people voted for Kamala Harris.  Concerning white women, that voting block comprised 40% of the American electorate.  Well, 46% of the white females voters voted for Kamala.  That would be approximately 28 million votes.  Moreover, 42% of all white voters in general voted for Kamala, in 2024.  That amounts to 48 million whites.

Far more white people voted for Kamala than did black people.  The actual statistic was that 15.2 million blacks voted in the 2024 election.  12.6 million blacks voted for Kamala, while 2.4 million of them voted for Trump.  Therefore, almost four-times more whites voted for Kamala than did blacks, to the tune of 48 million to 12.6 million   Thus, a bankrupting class action DEFAMATION lawsuit is in order against that annoying pro-black-racist hag recently let go by MSNBC.  


Defamation against Trump, via the Madison Square Garden Rally

[11b]  Next came the claim that Trump was a Nazi, because he held a rally at Madison Square Garden.  This defamatory accusation was due to a 1939 Nazi Rally, held in an older edition of Madison Square Garden.  Thus, if you hold a rally at Madison Square Garden, it's because you're a Nazi racist.  Well, do you know who held a rally at Madison Square Garden 18 years after the 1939 Nazi rally?

ANS:  ~DR MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR, with the world-famous Rev Billy Graham, on July 18, 1957.  Now, according MSNBC & CNN, Dr. King & Billy Graham were Nazis, carrying on the Nazi Tradition.  

Do you know who else appeared on stage at Madison Square Garden throughout the decades?  ANS:

 ~the Jewish Billy Joel who performed at the MSG 123 times,  ~the very Jewish Neil Diamond,  ~the doubly Jewish Simon & Garfunkel,  ~the female Ashkenazi Jew & Brooklyn native, Barbara Streisand,  ~the equally female Ashkenazi Jew & Manhattan native, Carol King,  ~the Hawaiian-born Ashkenazi Jew, Bette Middler,  ~the Jewish Bob Dylan, aka Robert Allen Zimmerman,  ~the black & Jewish Lenny Kravitz,  and ~the Israeli singer, Ishay Ribo in 2024 ... plus ...  

~the black icon, Count Basie,   ~the multiply black singing group, Little Anthony & the Imperials,   ~the black icon Little Richard,  ~the black icon, Chubby Checkers,   ~the black Father of Rock & Roll, Chuck Berry,    ~the black comedian, Richard Prior,   ~the black Harry Belafonte,  ~the black Tracy Chapman,  ~ the black Sly & the Family Stone,    ...and...

~the notably black Janet Jackson,  ~the black Gladys Knight, ~the black Tina Turner,  ~ the black Beyonce,  ~the black Luther Vandross, Jr,  ~the black Alicia Keys,   ~the half-black & half-white Booker T & the MG's,  ~the Irish & Venezuelan Mariah Carey,  ~the very albino Johnny Winters,   ~Bob Marley,  ~Parliament Funkadelic,  ~Rihanna,   ...and...

~ the partially black, partially white, and partially Shawnee Native American Jimi Hendrix,  ~the Doors,  ~Janis Joplin,  ~the very Puerto Rican Luis Miguel,  ~the Brazilian Ivete Sangalo,  ~the Japanese band, Laruka...and the most mainstream of acts, such as ...

~John Lennon,  ~Paul McCartney (15 sellouts),  ~the Rolling Stones,  ~Led Zeppelin,  ~Alice Cooper,  ~Elton John (62 appearances),  ~the rock group KISS,  ~Bruce Springsteen (18 sellouts),  ~Black Sabbath,  ~Bowie,  ~Lady Gaga,  and  ~the Taylor Swift who sold out her 2009 Madison Square Garden concert in 60 seconds.   Okay now.  Which one of the aforementioned people were Nazis, again?  I seem to have lost track of the Nazi Scorecard and Join-the-Nazi-Party Brochure. 

~In addition, the 1976 Democrat Party National Convention was held at Madison Square Garden.

Do you get the message, yet?   Madison Square Garden doesn't sound like a Nazi venue to me ... or to anyone else with common sense.  Are any of the aforementioned persons Nazi sympathizers?

Defamation against Trump, via Time Magazine's Person of the Year Award
  
[12]  Then comes the outrage of the mainstream media equating Trump with Hitler, simply because Trump became Time Magazine's Person of the Year, for a second time, in 2024.  Hitler was the Time Magazine Man of the Year in 1938.  In fact Joe Stalin was Man of the Year in 1939 & 1942.  

In the process, a well-known hate-filled TV show placed in the background of its set the 1938 Time cover of Hitler and one of the Time covers of Stalin, along with Putin's cover and that of Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran.  This was done to deceive people into thinking that  anyone who makes the cover of Time Magazine, as Man ... or "Person" ... of the Year is EVIL.
Got it?  One more time, for people who are very slow.  According to that hatred-spewing TV show, being Time's Person of the Year = being an evil Hitler Type who must be destroyed ... or a Putin Confrere ... or an Ayatollah Khomeini protégé.  Well, do you know who else was the Time Magazine Man of the Year, aka "Person" of the Year?  

ANS:  ~DR MARTIN LUTHER KING, in 1963!!!   ~President Dwight D Eisenhower twice, and he LITERALLY FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.   ~French legend, Charles de Gaulle, and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.   ~Winston Churchill twice, and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.   ~General George C Marshall twice, and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.  ~Franklin Delano Roosevelt THREE TIMES,  and he literally FOUGHT AGAINST HITLER.

 Time Magazine Man (Person) of the Year also included:

~Barack Obama TWICE!!!   ~Kamala Harris in 2020, along with Joe Biden.  ~Taylor Swift.  ~Greta Thunberg.  ~Democrat Party favorite, BILL CLINTON twice.  ~Ted Turner, founder of CNN.  ~Pope John Paul II, in 1994.  ~Female Philippine President Corazon Aquino, in 1986.  ~Polish trade union voice, Lech Walesa.  ~Democrat Party President Jimmy Carter.  ~Apollo 8 Astronauts Borman, Anders, & Lovell, in 1968 .  ~Pope John XXIII, in 1962.  ~JFK, in 1961.  ~The Hungarian Freedom Fighters of 1956.  ~Harlow Curtice, president of General Motors.  ~Automobile icon, Walter Chrysler.  ~QUEEN ELIZABETH II, in 1953!!!   Okay now.  Which one of those Time Magazine people were Nazis, again?

Plus, there is Indian Cultural Icon & World Peace Advocate, Mahatma Gandhi as a Time Magazine Man of the Year.  He literally wrote two letters to Hitler and met Mussolini in person.

To the Left, the Time Magazine Cover of January 5th, 1931.
That photo is within the public domain, incidentally.

Do you finally see and perceive the hypocrisy and manipulative violence of MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, the NYT, etc?  What will is take to get you to finally wake up into reality, and not meander in a fake state that illiterate buffoons call "woke?"  Become awakened.  And become honest.   Learn about Life and protect Life.  Become a hero, especially when you have no other choice.

[13]  Another shift to the right ... a shift to the Red ... came from Latino voters, to the tune of 13%, according the NBC.  In the State of Pennsylvania ... which is being used as the example state in this discourse ... 4 out of 10 Latino voters chose Trump, whereas only 3 out of 10 chose Trump in 2020.  All in all, the Madison Square Garden "Puerto Rico Garbage Joke" did not have any effect, especially concerning anyone who knows of the garbage dump plight throughout Puerto Rico, neglected by the Biden Administration.  That was a joke mocking Joe Biden ... not Puerto Rico.


[14ai] Keep in mind that Kamala claimed that the 2024 election was going to be a pro-abortion mandate, where women throughout America would flock to the voting booths and cause Kamala to have a landslide victory over Donald Trump.  Well, white women voted 53% for Trump and only 46% for Kamala. 

[14aii]  Meanwhile, Harris kept contradicting herself, by saying that it was going to be a tight race ... a close race.  So, which is it, Kamala?  Is it going to be a landslide for you or is it going to be a squeaker, where you barely win?  

[14aiii] ANS:  It resulted in a shellacking, where enough American voters realized how dishonest and incompetent Kamala was and will be.  This includes the lie which defies mathematical proportionality.  That's the lie which defamatorily claims that Kamala lost due to racism.  

[14b]  Kamala lost, because she evaded all of the pertinent campaign questions, by "beating around the bush" in all of her responses, in what modern journalists call "word salad" responses.  Kamala insulting America's intelligence is why she lost, as well as knowledge of her bully past which happens to be an indication of one's future actions.

[14c]  The bottom line is that Kamala did NOT get a pro-abortion female army to swarm to the voting booths, taking-over the America mindset with a pro-abortion mandate.  The US population, as of 2020, was 331+ million.  It's estimated at 341 million, today.  Russia's was/is 144 million.  Therefore, Russia was the pro-abortion nation in the 1990s, evidenced by its low population.  America is perceived as generally a pro-life nation, evidenced by its rise in population throughout the decades.  


[14c]  Concerning Kamala as the known bully who loves the killing of babies who never get to see their mothers' faces, approximately 480 DNC campaign staffers were "suddenly dismissed" without any severance pay.  Kamala aborted them all from the DNC.   The $1.4 billion dollars given to the Harris Campaign was apparently not enough to pay staffers who worked for Kamala's election.  These workers ... or their union reps ... literally had to activate a Go-Fund-Me Account, simply for groceries, transportation  costs, and utilities.  Kamala didn't care about them.  Kamala doesn't care about you.  She simply wants to be in power, for the sake of power, so that she can arrogantly "lord it over you."  This is what happens when you enter the service of a narcissist.  In the end, you get hurt ... sometimes real badly, too.   

[14d]  Meanwhile, The Harris Campaign managers lied unashamedly to big ticket donors, claiming that the election was guaranteed for Kamala, especially in Iowa.  Kamala lost Iowa by 13.2 points.  This constitutes Theft by Deception.  Question:  In how many pockets did that $1.4 billion go?

The Shellacked Coat of Red Across the American Landscape

Below:  The 2024 Pres Election Map, per county.  There are 3,143 counties & "county equivalents" in the US.  Donald Trump won over 2,600 of them.  In fact, out of the 254 Texas counties, Kamala only won 12 of them.  She won ZERO of Oklahoma's 77 counties, and she won only 4 of Kansas' 105 counties.  

Next comes the State of Iowa which Ann Selzer predicted was to be won by Harris, by 3 pts.  Harris only won 5 out of Iowa's 99 counties.  This shows that the Year 2024 had external pollsters who were quite the liars, just like Kamala.  However, there were a few YouTube channel operators who predicted a 312 to 226 Trump win.  They were precisely correct.


Above:  'tis posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.  This is of 2024.  Now, compare it to 1984.
     Below:  1984 Pres Election Map, per county.  The greatest landslide election in American History.  
Above:  Do you get the message, yet?  The map above was posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.
Take note that both the 1984 & 2024 Democrat Party nominees SNUBBED the traditional Al Smith Roman Catholic Charity Dinner, in NYC.  Both nominees ever-so-coincidentally ended up facing an embarrassing form of defeat.  

Such a snubbing gets perceived by the voters as mean spirited and bigoted.  This sentiment gets reflected in the general election.   After all, it's the various Catholic Charities throughout Planet Earth who reach out to ... and even welcome ... those looking for proverbial life preservers.  Thus, to snub a worldwide charity organization is seen as something Orwellian, in the tyrannical sense thereof.  

Walter Mondale snubbed the Al Smith Dinner and underwent the worst numerical Electoral College defeat in US election history.  Harris suffered multiple layers of defeat, via multiple metrics of numerical accounting, along with having suffered the humiliation of being rendered an alleged TWENTY MILLION dollars in debt, after having SQUANDERED $1.4 BILLION in a mere 107 days.

Of course, the democrat party campaign debt part was publicly denied by the exact same people who claimed that Kamala was going to win Iowa and an electoral majority of all the other States.  None the less,  DNC employees were suddenly fired ... aka "dismissed" ... without severance pay, as a lot of money was wasted for frivolous things.  In as much, if you don't believe the irresponsibility and cronyism of the Democrat Party, then take a look at:  


All in all, the 1984 & 2024 Democrat Party candidates who snubbed Catholic charities showed that the Dems ... of 1984 & 2024 ... did NOT care about the poor and vulnerable.  And of course, during the Biden-Harris Years, paying the monthly Cost of Living became a Herculean effort for the working poor.   Meanwhile, a very uncaring Kamala giggled away, as if the suffering of others is a mere joke.  A political tree is known by its fruits and NOT by its speeches.

The Supreme Asininity of Kamala's Thesis Statement

Kamala sent a super repulsive & mocking video to the Al Smith Dinner managers, in which she spit in the face of the Roman Catholic Church.  Of course, when she did this, she automatically did the same to the Byzantine Catholic Church, the Maronite Catholic Church, the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, the Syro-Malankara Church, and all of the other rites in the Church, being that the Church is one.  In the video, Kamala said to not listen to what other people say you should be.  

That which Baby Killer Kamala doesn't understand is that a human being IS what a human being DOES.  It's not what you "are" that counts.  It's what you do that counts, and things that you DO NOT DO is kill babies who will never get to see sunlight or their mothers' faces ... lie to millions of people during a debate, all the while defaming your political opponent with false accusations .. allow males who pretend to be women into female locker rooms ... and allow males pretending to be women to punch in the face real females trying to win an Olympic medal in the women's division of a sport.  More importantly, what you are not supposed to do is give in to temptation so much so that you institutionalize in society as a virtuous undertaking.  

And you definitely don't allow young lads who are nowhere near the Age of Majority & Consent to get chemically castrated.  All in all, it's well understood that Kamala has a seething hatred for the Catholic Church so much so that she intended to force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, under penalty of law ... and to have Roman Catholics pay for abortions, via tax dollars.  Kamala had no intention of honoring a citizen's Right of Conscience ... or a religion's right of conscience.  That's evil.

Governorships

Elsewhere in the political landscape, there are to be 27 Republican State governors vs. 23 Democrat Party State governors.  

The Senate will be 53 Republicans and 46 Democrats + 1 Independent allied with the Dems.  It will comprise 31 Democrat Party men and 16 Democrat Party women.   It will also comprise 44 Republican men and 9 Republican women.  

The House will be 220 Republicans and 215 Democrats.  It will comprise 121 Democrat Party men and 94 Democrat Party women.  It will also comprise 31 Republican women and 189 Republican men.  End of preview.

Let us Review Anew:  America Dodged a Life-Ending Bullet ... a Nation-Ending Bullet

Kamala Harris was en route to becoming the sequel to George Orwell's 1984, in what was to become the People's Socialist Democratic Republic of San Francisco.  Censorship against men & women of conscience would have become the law of the land.  The Persecution of the Catholic Church would have commenced with Kamala confiscating church hospitals, for not performing the criminal act of genocide known as Abortion on Demand.  

In sequence, black racist women filled with seething hatred toward white men would have had their way with white men's destinies.  After all, Kamala Harris was known in California as the Queen of  Incarceration.  She fought to keep males in prison, so that they could perform super low-paid work for the State of California.  Of course, she used predictable theatrics, to do so.  She claimed that California would come to a fiery end ... literally ... if those males were not kept in prison.

Harris carries the stereotypical traits of a narcissist, according to all eye witness accounts of her conduct.  After all, 91% of her VP staffers resigned, and she was described as a "soul destroying bully."   

In fact, a male intern did aver that, when Kamala ... as AG of California ... walked in the office, all were required to stand and say, "Good morning, general."   

In contrast, when my dad was in aerial combat duty, for the US Strategic Air Forces, the first thing that a commanding officer would say, the first moment he entered any pre-flight missions room was, "At ease."  

Those officers expected the airmen to NOT stand up and to NOT waste their efforts saluting an officer.  The officers cut to the chase and immediately got into explaining the mission for the day.   In as much, Kamala Harris wanted people to NOT be at ease.  That's how a bully operates.

In addition, the young male intern said that he was instructed to never look at Kamala in the eyes.  Now, people with that type of Nero Caesar mental illness must not be allowed to be in office.  Kamala has been an officeholder for the past 20 years, and she was described as being a "soul destroying bully," even in recent years.  Where are psychiatrists when government complexes need them?

Guns and Money, Kamala Style

The Harris Economy would have quickly ended up in the image & likeness of Kamala's Campaign Finance Dept, where she participated in the irresponsible squandering of 1.4 billion campaign dollars, in a 107 day period.  In other Blue Marble Album posts, I covered the economic stats concerning the Biden-Harris Era, and they are NOT good.

None the less, Liz Cheney would have become the equivalent of a patron saint at the Pentagon ... with Dick Cheney becoming the equivalent of a Founding Father... as the US would have religiously become a dedicated arms dealer, making the Iranians look like boy scouts with newspaper routes, in comparison.  

Meanwhile, the price of a gallon of gas, a dozen eggs, and monthly heat under Kamala, would have constituted Grounds for Suicide.  In fact, a Kamala Harris Presidency, per se, would have constituted Grounds for Suicide.  But of course, I state this sarcastically ... satirically.  Don't commit suicide.  Kamala Harris is not worth it.  None the less, the flood waters of the Biden-Harris Inflation would not have subsided, and high prices would have remained a way of life.

Male children would have remained subjected to at least chemical castration, without their parents' knowledge.  Young ladies everywhere would have remained as vulnerable as was the tragic Laken Riley.  

In fact, all that is Sick & Twisted would have been declared the norm.  This included males using the ladies' rooms and female locker rooms, as well as males endowed with the XY Chromosome pretending to be women and punching authentic women in the face, during the Summer Olympics.  Meanwhile, the natural essence of life would have been declared oppression to which "we are not going back."

Like the Afghanistan Hearings, Victory was around the Corner

DNC leaders told potential donors late in the 2024 campaign that victory was assured, even in the State of Iowa.  This would cost a lot of high-ticket donors a lot of money.  In fact, Tim Walz stated on video that this era was now the beginning of the Democrats consolidating "power for the next forty years."   Then came the night of November 5th, 2024.   

Posted pursuant to 17 US 107.
Within a very short time, the electoral vote count was displayed on certain mainstream media TV screens as being 154 to 27, in favor of Donald Trump.  It would next shoot up to 162 vs 30.  Meanwhile, on ABC Network screens, it was 152 vs 59 ... with Kamala being the sound loser against a Donald Trump whose first presidential term was sabotaged by Comey, Clinton, CNN, MSNBC, Schumer, Schiff, and other less-than-honest political operatives.  

The closest Kamala came to Trump was 20 points ... 230 to 210 ... after she won Oregon, New Mexico, Virginia, Hawaii and one Nebraska district consecutively.  Then came the Georgia win, making the score 246 to 210, in favor of Trump.  Shortly thereafter came Trump's victory of Pennsylvania, and a 267 to 214 score.  

Trump's win in Wisconsin put him over the top, to the tune of 277 electoral votes to 224.   Kamala would win two Maine district votes, upon which she would come to the end of her line.  Meanwhile, Trump eventually was declared the winner of Michigan, then Alaska, followed by Nevada, and finally Arizona.

This is the Donald Trump who was repeatedly called the Second Coming of Hitler, by the Harris Campaign and the 2024 mainstream media.  This is also the Donald Trump whom Kamala Harris claimed to have become unhinged, as if she regularly spoke with him.  Yet, this was the Donald Trump who kept stabilized control of his campaign's spending in a very mature, strategic,  & victorious way ... with lots of dollars to spare.  This is the sign of someone "well hinged," "on target,"  and in touch with reality.  

In reality, it was the Harris Campaign people who went unhinged, paying for asinine vanities, such as celebrity appearances, while being unable or unwilling to pay the wages & salaries due to DNC campaign staffers.  And there certainly was no severance pay appropriated to them.  Squandering $1.4 billion in 107 days, as the Harris People recently did, is a definition of being unhinged and undependable.   And in providing zero severance pay shows how ruthless the pro-abortion & pro-cancellation Kamala is.  This is why she could be properly nicknamed, Killer Kamala, in a snide & sarcastic way, of course..  

This stroke of ruthlessness was followed by Kamala then showing herself to be even more unhinged, by appearing on a post-election video apparently drunk ... or drugged-up ... or under some less than noble intoxicating  influence.  The ruthlessness was accompanied by untold audacity, in Kamala still asking for money ... for a certifiable Losing Cause.

              Presidential Campaign Spending Thus Far Reported, 2024, according to the FEC
The Dems spent $2.627 BILLION vs Republican's $0.206 billion.  None the less, $1.167 Billion of the Dem money was attributed to the Biden Campaign.  Thus, Harris did not spend $2 billion.  She spent between $1.1 & $1.4 billion.  BTW, Ramaswamy spent $66 million, and RFK, Jr spent $64 million. 

The more exact & concise numbers are for another time or they are for someone who has time ... and even gets paid to write.  The hundreds of Blue Marble Album discourses and other posts were done entirely free of charge.   This included the long amounts of time in research and document-gathering.

The bottom line here is that the Democrats definitely had the advantage in the finances over Donald Trump.  Yet, the vast sums of money got irresponsibly squandered.  The lesson here is that, if you have a hideously inept & dishonest candidate, all the money in the world will not get that candidate elected.

It was Trump who was nominated for the Nobel Prize four times.   NOT Kamala the bully.

None the less, Harris called her election opponent a Nazi.  Yet, we are talking about a Donald Trump who has Jewish grandchildren whom he did NOT disown, as well as a daughter who practices Rabbinical Judaism.  This is the same Donald Trump whose senior advisor was a 36 year old American whose DNA is that of an Ashkenazi Jew.  

Moreover, this is the same Donald Trump who received FOUR nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize.  This doesn't sound very Adolph Hitleresque to me, and it certainly didn't seem to be very Hitleresque to 78 million American voters.   How about you?

On election night, Trump was sailing to a convincing & undoubted victory.  Of course, the Dems blamed this all on racism & gender phobia.  However, there were black males who refused to vote for Kamala Harris, and they actually looked African-American, endowed with the expected dose of naturally-occurring melanin which comes from having ancestors who lived in a continent that is within the Tropic of Cancer, the Equator, and the Tropic of Capricorn, as well as the 30th Parallel where the Sahara exists.  

There were many more Latin men and women who refused to vote for Kamala, also.  After all, Latina Women Voters shifted TEN PERCENT to the Republican Right.  Even when it came to Asian Americans in 2024, their voting shifted to the Republican Red by 5 percentage points.  

When it came to the Native American vote ... which has been a part of American Election Law since 1924 ... SEVENTEEN native American counties shifted to the Republican Red, by 10 to 14 points  each.   Moreover, two days after the election, in USA Today, from a female Detroit journalist came the following surmise:  

"In what many expected to be a nail-biter of an election, former President Donald Trump easily trounced Harris.  It’s because he was the better candidate and because he spoke directly to voters’ top concerns.  Period."   

One confirming piece of evidence ... otherwise known as Concurring Piece of Evidence ... was that, on Nov 5, 2024, California voters overwhelmingly voted in favor of the anti-crime bill, PROPOSITION 36, by a margin of 70.6% to a mere 29.4%.  Such a thing was a mandate conveyed to the very white & male governor of California, Gavin Newsom.  

This shows that the Nov 5th election was a referendum & a mandate of the People, based on the issues ... based on the People's top concerns ... based on the Common Needs of Life.  One such need is safety from violence.  There are millions of white male voters who regard white male Newsom as a total jerk.  I do.  


The other confirming piece of evidence concerns the landslide loss of the very white and very leftist DA of LA County, George Gascón.  He lost to the very centrist Independent, Nathan Hochman, by a margin of 61.4% to 38%.  California shifted toward the Red, in 2024.  It wasn't a matter of black vs white racial animosity.  It was a matter of Red vs Blue political aligning.  

It's very simple.  People like the idea of being able to walk down the street without getting mugged.  They like the idea of going for a jog in Georgia without getting brutally murdered.  They love the idea of being under governments that do not perform the hideous degree of DERELICTION OF DUTY that Kamala, Joe, and Mayorkas performed.


In as much, the Dems and the mainstream media should have been sued for hundreds of millions of dollars each, in a class action lawsuit, for False Light Defamation and other forms of defamation committed against whites in America.  

There are white candidates for whom white Americans would never vote.  That is to say, White Americans will not simply vote for a candidate, just because he's White.  World History gives accounts of numerous bloody wars which were a matter of White vs White.  Kamala Harris was a hideous candidate, per se.  Her presidency would have been the Nightmare of the Ages.  Her chaotic state of campaign finances was a precursor to the type of presidency she would have had.  Plus, many more young ladies would have met the fate of  Laken Riley, all due to Kamala's known dereliction of duty.  

And then, after the election and after a Hawaiian vacation, VICE PRESIDENT Harris was seen on video, appearing to be ... seeming to be ... definitively drunk.  She was seen this way, on video, a number of times in 2024.  This has never been known to have previously happened in American politics ... during an election year.  That's irresponsibility.  That's an unhinged person.  Donald Trump, incidentally, does not drink alcohol.  


Above:  All three "election night tabulation photos" are posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.  As you can see, the electoral college part of the election started out as a run-away for Trump, even though at no time was the general popular vote a national landslide.  HOWEVER ...

... there were statewide landslides for both candidates, comprising 20+ point margins of victory.  For Harris, it was  ~Maryland (28.6 pts),  ~Vermont (31.8 pts),  ~Washington DC (85.9 pts),  ~Massachusetts (24.8 pts),  ~Hawaii (23.1 pts), and California (20.2 pts).   Washington State was an 18.3% victory for Harris.  So, close enough.

As far as goes New York State, Harris received 831,254 LESS VOTES there in 2024 than Biden received in 2020.  Trump received 232,129 MORE New York State VOTES in 2024 than he did in 2020.   Harris UNDERPERFORMED BIDEN in every State in the Union.  

That's a remarkable accomplishment in reverse.  That is the mark of a Total Buffoon, in light of the 24/7 Lying Propaganda given to Harris by CNN & MSNBC, as well as the couple hours of daily propaganda given to Harris from other mainstream media outlets, not to mention legacy newspapers who betrayed mankind's trust and elected to publish lie after lie after lie after lie.  Of course, the network TV propaganda should be counted as IN-KIND DONATIONS to the Harris-Walz Campaign.

In going further within the statistical analysis, Biden's margin of victory over Trump in 2020 was 1,992,889 votes, concerning New York State.  Meanwhile, Harris' New York State margin of victory over Trump in 2024 was only 929,506 votes.  Biden beat Trump in New York State, by 23.13%, in 2020.  Harris only beat Trump in the Empire State, by 11.8%.  Now, 23.13 minus 11.8 equals 11.33.  Yet, the official stats marks Trump's shift to the Red in New York State as having been only 6.43.  Huh?

In 2020, Biden beat Trump in nearby New Jersey, by 15.94%.  Meanwhile, Harris only beat Trump in NJ ... in 2024 ... by 5.9%.   Biden received 390,326 MORE VOTES in 2020 (in New Jersey) than Kamala did in 2024. 

Thus, New York State can be called a Backslide Victory State, instead of a Landslide Victory State, for Harris.  In fact, all 50 States shifted to the "Red," in the 2024 presidential election. 

The Presence of Liz Cheney:  The sign that Kamala was desperate for votes

Even though Trump won 31 States, exactly half of the American States resulted in wide margin victories for Trump.   In one of those States, Trump won by a margin of 46.2 percentage points.  It happened to have been the State which rejected Liz Cheney in a 2022 primary election, to the tune of 37+ percentage points, in favor of Harriet Hageman.  

In as much, when Kamala started to parade around America with Liz Cheney by her side, as if to be a pint-sized version of Batman with Robin,  it was a sign that Kamala knew that she was going to lose, and that she was in a state of desperation.  HOWEVER, the large mainstream media networks and newspapers kept lying to us, about poll numbers.  As a result, the mainstream media has now lost its credibility amongst those not too lazy to search for answers beyond 15 second TV sound bytes and pseudo-intellectual hags who do nothing but incite seething hatred for Whites & Republicans.
 
Below:  Kamala then lost 75% of the value of her merchandise.  An antique dealer with more than two decades left in his work years might benefit by investing in what will become rare collector items.  Then again, they're not exactly the home run balls of famous world series MVPs.
The sign above describes Kamala Harris, because everything about her mindset is 75% off.
✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏
The Popular Vote

Already stated above, at the beginning of this presentation.
✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏

The 2024 California & Texas Count

Then comes California.  Even though it was a decisive 58.6% win for Kamala, to the tune of 9,213,074 votes, Trump did receive 6,016,110 there, with 99% of the vote having been counted.   Likewise, even though Texas was a decisive 56.3% win for Trump, to the tune of 6,375,376 votes, Harris still received 4,806,474 votes there, with 99% of the vote having been counted.

More pertinent is the fact that Donald Trump flipped TEN CALIFORNIA COUNTIES, in 2024.  The counties which turned red, in voting for Trump more than Kamala, included [1] Orange, [2] San Bernardino, [3] Fresno, [4] San Joaquin,  [5] Merced, [6] Butte, [7] Nevada, [8] Inyo, [9] Riverside, and [10] Stanislaus Counties.  
      
This is one of the reasons why DNC Mid-Atlantic Regional Chairholder, Lindy Li, said that the Election of 2024 was a "shellacking."  The California red shift flip is of paramount importance.  Of course, the Dems and the mainstream media will ignore and/or deny it.

More Election Statistics

As of noon, Thursday, Nov 26, 2024, Kamala received 5.55 million LESS VOTES in 2024 than Joe Biden did in 2020 [(Biden = 81,283,501)].  Yet, Kamala received 9.87 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than Hillary did in 2016 [(Hillary = 65,853,514)]. 

Donald Trump received 3.9 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than he did in 2020.  In fact, Trump received 15 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than he did in 2016.   Moreover, Trump received 12.3 million MORE VOTES in 2024 than Hillary did, in 2016  

In addition, Trump won all seven Swing States, in 2024.  This included the three Rust Belt States of PA, MI, and WI.  Trump won 12 of the 14 Sunbelt States, along with all of the Midwest, except for Illinois & Minnesota.  He won all of the Rocky Mountain States, except for Colorado and the Sunbelt State of New Mexico, where the Rockies literally end. 

More Numerical Stats

In 2016, Donald received 62.9 million votes, and Hillary won the popular vote that year, by 2,868,686 votes.  But, this 2016 popular vote victory was mostly due to California.   Hillary won there in 2016 by a score of 7,362,490 votes vs Donald Trump's 3,916,209; a difference of 3,446,281 votes.  That was a margin of victory comprising 28.8%.

Moreover, in 2016, Trump carried 30 states.  In 2024, he carried 31 of them.   In 2020, he carried 25.

In 2020, City Slicker Donald Trump received 74.2 million votes, while Joe the Laptop Denier received 81.3 million of them.  A 2021 poll showed that 6% of the people who voted for Biden in 2020 would not have done so, if they knew that the Hunter Laptop was authentic.   

Therefore, 51 former Intell Execs & Wolf Blitzer rigged the 2020 vote and committed Election Interference.  Trump would have won the 2020 election, to the tune of 79.3 million to 76.3 million.  Thus, it is 100% TRUE that the election of 2020 was rigged ... rigged by Wolf Blitzer, 51 former intell officials, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc.  That is to say, 4.87 million people who voted for Biden in 2020 would not have done so, if Wolf Blitzer and the rest of CNN didn't lie to all of America.  

The media and those 51 intell employees (officers) who should be forever stripped of their pensions interfered in the Election of 2020.  The election, with 100% certainty, was stolen from Trump, via Election Interference & Fraudulent Misrepresentation.  And, in judging by all the chaos and inflation that the Biden-Harris people gave America, all middle class Americans were cheated in 2020, as well.

Bellwether Counties

A bellwether county is one which picks the winner of each presidential election, over a time span of years.  Nineteen American counties voted for the winning presidential candidate in every election, from 1980 to 2016.  In 2020 Donald Trump won 18 of the 19 Bellwether counties, by an average of 13.7 points each.

Being that 18 of those counties chose the losing candidate in 2020, they are no longer bellwether states.  One remained.  It was Clallam County, Washington.  In 2024, it voted for the losing candidate, namely Kamala Harris.  There are no more bellwether counties in America.  None the less, this 2020 bellwether statistic is one of two very compelling reasons why even the vote count was believed to have been rigged in 2020.

24/7 TV Defamation against Trump

Moreover, you can reasonably conclude that, if CNN & MSNBC didn't defame Trump with the most ridiculous accusations 24 hours a day, then the 2024 presidential would have been a textbook landslide nationwide.  This is especially the case, if the media would have reported on the irresponsible spending being done by the 2024 Harris Campaign.  Even at the final week of the campaigning, Trump was being accused of being the second coming of Adolph Hitler, while Kamala's managers were spending large amounts of money vainly.

In fact, Kamala was so immature that she needed Tim Walz to be her babysitter, in her first televised interview, and such an immaturity was never known to have happened in American politics, either.  Kamala was completely unfit to be president.  This is why she never won a single State primary or even a single delegate in any primary election.

She is a Career Politician and NOT the new fab "page-turning newcomer"

Even when it came to her San Fran DA campaign, she only received 33% of the vote in the general election.  Her competitor only won 37% of the vote, so a run-off vote was obligatory.  Harris got 56% of the vote in the runoff.

As far as went her California AG campaign, she only won that election by 0.8% of the vote.  It took 3 weeks of vote counting to conclude that she ever-so-barely won that election.

As far as went the 2016 US Senator for California election, for the first time since 1913, there was no Republican candidate on the general election ballot.  There was only another Democrat, Loretta Sanchez, a member of the Blue Dog Coalition.   That was the Moderate-to-Conservative wing of the Democratic Party.  Kamala was in a leftist State.  For her, victory was guaranteed.  

None the less, Sanchez was the daughter of Mexican immigrants, and she had a sister who served in the US House of Reps at the same time when Loretta did.  The point to mentioning this is that the 2016 election was NOT a black-vs-white racial animosity election.  It was the typical Liberal vs Conservative election.  

Incidentally, Loretta did NOT speak English as a child.  However, she already served in the US House of Reps, before the 2016.  So, a language barrier wouldn't be a reason to not have voted for her.  None the less, Kamala has been a government officeholder for the past 20 years.  To claim that she was the new & young page-turner to a new form of governing system was a massive lie.  Everything about Kamala Harris has been a massive lie.  

Kamala ALLEGEDLY has a history of being a mean spirited witch.  Period.  This is why all of the news anchors and commentators of MSNBC and CNN (except for two of them) ... as well as a few other ones on other networks ... should be summarily fired.  Double Period.  All that they did was lie and create fear of Donald Trump and white MAGA hat owners.

The Fading Old Guard which paraded itself around as the modernized form of thought

There was the dire need to remove from power those who have been in power for the past 20, 30, and 40 years.  The presence of such politicians proves that the USA is NOT a democracy ... nor a republic.  It's an OLIGARCHY run by the corrupt good ole boy and girl network.  At the very least, it's run by the selfish who sit in power until the day they die or go brain-dead.

The greatest of liars, therefore, was the 20 year officeholder, Kamala Harris, who actually has been cashing government employee paychecks, as a local, then State, and then federal employee for the past 33 years.  She is another "Old Had" who absolutely needs to be out of power, for the sake of Americans everywhere.  We were suffering, while she enjoyed various types of pleasure ... at the taxpayers' expense.

The biggest deceit attached to Kamala is that she got her start in power politics by means of adultery ... sex.  Being paid "in-kind" for giving sex is prostitution.  Such a thing is unbecoming for a deputy DA in California.  Kamala Harris was literally ... and NOT figuratively ... a whore.  At the least, she was a concubine who received lasting political favors in return for her sexual favors given to a married man 30 years older than Kamala.  

For the record, when it's a matter of an eligible bachelor and an eligible bachelorette with a 30 year difference between them, it's a different story.  Age difference, per se, is not an impediment to a valid husband/wife relationship.  Such a thing has happened in the past, very successfully so, though only rarely so.  However, Harris was giving sex to the typical "womanizer," and such a thing is NOT the act of being a model to the youth of America.  She was ... in my private-citizen's-opinion ... giving sex for political power.  And she got the political power which included a Dianne Feinstein election endorsement.

Federal District Populations

As a quick note, the average congressional district population is required to be close to 761,000 people per district ... at least before the Kamala & Mayorkas Invasion of Unvetted Immigrants came a coming.  In fact, at the beginning of the United States' Constitutional Government, the average population per House of Rep district was 34,000.  This was in 1790.

Governorships

Now remember.  I'm an Independent.  With this having been stated, know that a Republican won the governorship for the liberal State of New Hampshire, and a Republican won the governor's race for the liberal State of Vermont.  Both were convincing victories.  Come 2025, the count will be 27 Republican governors and 23 governors belonging to the very undemocratic Democrat Party.

                     SEE:  https://decisiondeskhq.com/results/2024/General/Governor/

Trump = Hitler:  Very bad math.  Trump was nominated 4 times for the Nobel Peace Prize

The Trump-is-Hitler campaign tactic showed Harris to be non-diplomatic, hyper-theatrical, and out of touch with the inbuilt Balance of Powers of the US Constitution which prevents dictatorial Nazism from prevailing, in the first place.  Her claim that Trump would be an instant dictator was based on the CNN motto, "fear sells."   It was also based on an answer given by Donald jokingly.  And what people must understand is that Donald Trump has the personality of a New York City Slicker.

The irony is that it was under Harris when America literally was being invaded by millions of unvetted strangers who never helped America in any capacity, before their coming.  In Kamala's greed-stricken mind, those unvetted immigrants were her soldiers, to take over America for her, by means of registering with the very undemocratic democrat party and then voting for Harris.  Importing all of those unvetted immigrants was the same tactic as stuffing the ballot boxes of America.  Only dictators do such a thing.

Explain how it is that the 60 year old make-up-coated Kamala Harris is paraded around as the first "black woman" president, while she is actually paraded around in artificially done hair that is only naturally found on the heads of 25 year old white women?  Hello?  Is anybody home?  Have you noticed the White Supremist Straight Brunette Hair-Dyed Hairdo or not?

Even Kamala's hair is a lie.  60 years of age equals gray hair, and "black" equals frizzy hair.  Where are the gray hairs?  Where is the frizz?  And which member of the Nazi Party chose to have Kamala wear that particular color of pantsuit?  The photos posted directly above and below are posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.

None the less, concerning the 2024 Harris Campaign, the last time that the common American saw that degree of cosmetic coating on anyone's face, he/she was at funeral home, paying his/her respects to the dead.  Below are 2019 photos ... without the drastic cosmetic plastering done on Kamala's face, as was done in 2024.

                      Below:  The Face of Abortion, Kamala Harris; barf-bag-ugly.  2019 photos.

 
Above:  Keep in mind that the mainstream media said that Kamala Harris "IS BEAUTIFUL TOO."  Well, that was another lie.  Take away the air-brushing & photo-shopping, as well as the hair dye, the hair straightener, and that layer of make-up only suitable for an auto accident victim in a funeral home who hit a windshield at 70 mph, and you have yourself a repulsively ugly Kamala Harris.  

Now, you politely keep silent about such a thing, UNLESS the ugly person is being paraded around as the most beautiful & most sexually arousing woman in all of existence.  You have to speak-up, during deceitful ploys.  

And of course, the ploy was based on the advertising motto of the 1980s which said, "Sex sales."  So, someone wanted to construct a super fake Kamala, to sexually arouse men into voting for her.  This is the Lust Factor.  This is an airhead's idea for gaining votes.  All in all, Kamala is no less a farce than was the man behind the curtail, in the Wizard of Oz.   As a reminder, the photos above are posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.

The photo below is posted to show you that the media lies and lies and lies again and again.  For some reason, Kamala thought that damning white people for being white, while wearing the hairdo of a young white woman, was going to get her elected.  It appears that Kamala is ashamed of her black ancestry.  Democrats everywhere should be ashamed of her.  And concerning the donors who gave the irresponsible Kamala outrageously large sums of money, they should be ashamed of themselves.
For those of you who are incredibly stupid, know that the purpose of the photo above is NOT to show you how ugly Kamala is.  It's to show you how much the media lies to Americans everywhere.  Kamala was made out to be more beautiful than any movie star, fashion model, sex symbol, cover-girl, and centerfold who ever was.  And then, Kamala turns out to be barf-bag-ugly, under all that make-up, hair dye, hair straightener, photoshopping, and air brushing.  Everything about her campaign was a lie.
                   Harris' 2024 donors allegedly felt cheated by alleged Democrat Party lies

The thorough incompetency of Kamala Harris was proven in the Dems ending up $20 million in debt, despite having been given a billion dollars in donation money, in addition to $400 million.  The Trump Campaign succeeded with far less spending money.  This proves that the majority of voters knew ... after the election ... that Kamala Harris was going to be an economic disaster for America.  She is thoroughly incompetent ... or corrupt ... when it comes to money.  And remember, under Biden-Harris the US National Debt rose the highest in any four-year period.

 After two assassination attempts, she kept accusing Donald Trump of being another Hitler who must be cancelled, hoping that the next aspiring assassin would get a shot off and not miss.

[1di]  Concerning the Repeater's defamatory claim that Trump is another Hitler, know that Hitler NEVER won an election.  The closest that Adolph came was in a 1932, when he lost a "run-off" with Paul von Hindenburg.  Hindenburg won 53% of the vote to Adolph's 36.7%.  Communist Ernst Thalman received 10.16% of the vote in the same run-off election.  Moreover, in 1928 the Nazi Party received a grand total of 3% of the vote.  Then came 1929.  Next came the Great Depression.

[ldii]  Hitler was appointed chancellor by Hindenburg, in early 1933, as an act of appeasement.  The intent was to mute the violence of Hitler's followers in the streets and followers in the Reichstag.  After all, a few decades earlier saw a lot of violence in Germany, especially against Roman Catholics.  It was called the Kulturkampf.   Therefore, Germany ... which didn't exist as a sovereign nation until January 1871 ... had a lot of propensity toward violence and social unrest.

[1e] PLUS, Germans were deceived into believing that Hitler predicted the Great Depression.  Hitler simply said that, if England and Germany were not going to unite their social & economic efforts, due to the fact that they were of the same race, then the demise of society will occur.

[2ai]  Donald Trump, on the other hand, won elections, despite the defamatory statements told about Trump, during those election seasons, by CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, the New York Timesthe Washington Post, and several other media outlets.

[2aii]  And as I previously stated in other writings, Donald Trump was more likely to turn into another Hugh Hefner than another Adolph Hitler.

Then Comes the Chicken Little Syndrome, where the sky is said to be literally falling, as in ... 

CO2 Hysteria 

To start, in May of 2024, Planet Earth's atmosphere reached the highest level of CO2 in the history of mankind and prior.  The CO2 count continued to elevate all throughout the Biden-Harris years.  It's repeated immediately below, for the benefit of those who do not read well ... so that you will understand how much the Al Gore People have lied to you and me and everyone else.

The Biden-Harris Administration was obsessed with imposing upon Americans those Draconian measures designed to lower the atmospheric CO2 count which has only been a trace amount, as it is.  Well, during May of 2024, Planet Earth's atmosphere carried the highest level of CO2 in the history of mankind.  It rose to 426.9 ppm, and it is now back down to 424.37 parts per million.  

This means that only  0.0424% of that sky is CO2.  Meanwhile 78% of it is nitrogen.  21% of it is oxygen.  And 0.93% of it is argon.  This is the calculation minus water vapor.  In calculating water vapor into the atmospheric molecular count, the following is followed, compliments of the US NOAA:

Concerning CH4, aka Methane, it presently exists in the atmosphere at only 1.92 parts per million, as of the second half of the Year 2024.  This means that it exists in the air at 0.00019%.   In addition, the element, hydrogen, exists in the atmosphere @ a mere 0.55 parts per million.  Neon exists in the sky @ 18.18 parts per million. Carbon Monoxide exists there at 0.1 part per million.  And helium exists there @ 5.24 parts per million.  

The statistical facts ... provided by the US government ... is that Planet Earth's present atmosphere is no more than  0.0426% carbon.  [0.0424% (CO2)  + 0.00001% (Carbon Monoxide) + 0.000192% (Methane which is CH4).   Thus, the atmosphere of Planet Earth is presently 99.957% carbon-free.  

You have been snookered.  You have been conned.  The "Climate Crisis People" think that you are stupid.  The weather that transpired in the past four years has all been documented to have happened a number of times previously, ranging from the Year 1852 to 1871 to 1878 to 1896 to 1901 to 1905 to 1910 to 1922 to 1934 to 1936, with a few years in between left unwritten.  In fact, the US gov recently stated that the most drought-ridden year in the past 1,000 years was 1934, when the CO2 count was much lower than it is today.

And of course, historically disastrous weather was witnessed and logged into the history accounts, in the 14th to 19th centuries.  This was when the CO2 count in the sky was very low.   Those centuries comprised the Little Ice Age.  Thus, the destruction was due to the Atmospheric Law of Pressure Gradient Forcing, where cooling climates have the extreme atmospheric turbulence, and not the warm-weather climates.  I've already explained this in other discourses.  They are all free of charge, for you to see and read.

From 1940 to 1979, it was a cold-period.  Even the 1990s had cold trends.  Climate is cyclical.  For example, in 1979, the Poles reached the highest volume of ice.  Then, in the following year, Dallas had 42 consecutive days of 100+ Fahrenheit weather.  The CO2 count was the same in 1980 as it was in 1979.  CO2 didn't cause the Dallas Disaster. 

The only greenhouse grass which promises itself to be an existential threat to life on Earth is Sulfur Hexafluoride; SF6.  That chemical will last for 3,200 years.  It is heavily regulated in Norway, where it's used in switchgear technology.  Thus, it's a component in wind turbines, though not in the turbine, itself.

 As far as went the "presidential debate claim" that storms were getter more violent, it is a statistical fact that that assertion is totally false.  And I've explained this in other posts.  Since 1851 ... a period of  173 years ... there has been a grand total of FOUR and ONLY FOUR Cat 5 hurricanes that hit the Continental United States.  

That which there is more of, these days, are those low-grade cyclones, called Tropical Storms.  Such storms are lower in intensity than even a Cat 1 hurricane.  Since Al Gore's 2006 Scare-Tactic movie of much falsehood, there has been a grand total of only one Cat 5 hurricane to make landfall upon the Continental United States.   Storms and heatwaves, as well as floods were statistically MORE DEADLY in past decades and in  past centuries.  

Concerning the topic of Climate, there are 62+ discourses on the topic at the Blue Marble Album.  Government stat charts, tables, logs, and graphs are in those discourses, along with newspaper reports of decades past.  

At the least, links to such graphs, logs, charts, and newspaper articles are in those discourses.  Sometimes, the actual photo of those charts, graphs, and tables are posted.  You need to learn exactly how and how much "they lied to you" about our present climate.  It has been a grifter's con game.  This included the Biden-Harris People.  They are extreme liars in many subjects.

All of your sacrifice and suffering was for nothing, during the Biden-Harris Years

The price of gas was jacked-upward for a failed intention.  The intention was to lower the atmospheric CO2 count.  However, the atmosphere is already 99+% carbon-free.  I've already addressed this in previous posts.  And remember, there are over 62 detailed "climate-related" posts at the Blue Marble Album.  

A human being can easily endure 500, 1,000, and even 1,500 ppm of CO2.  Moreover, submarine crewmen work with complete functionality in airspaces comprising 3,500 ppm of CO2.  CO2 becomes deadly with an hour's exposure of it @ 84,000 parts per million.   As a reminder, today's CO2 count is around 424 parts per million.

In conclusion, there is a huge difference between 84,000 and 424.  All in all, it's understood that the common human doesn't become symptomatic to CO2 until it reaches 2,000 parts per million.  Thus, 1,600 ppm, 1,200 ppm, and 800 ppm are all tolerable levels.

PLUS, the Law of Pressure Gradient Forcing is such that, when the planet's undergoes warming, the atmosphere carries much more turbulence.  In fact, in order for a tornado to form, a cold front must first enter the scene.  It's when cooling periods preside, when turbulent storms prevail.  This included the Mini-Ice-Age which endured from 1284 to 1840.  Extreme storms and turbulent weather was well-documented during that era of time.

Plus, CO2 has three types of vibration.  Each type occurs one at a time.  Well, in one of the vibrations, called the "symmetric stretch," CO2 in incapable of retaining infrared heat.  There were occasions when ice ages occurred, while the CO2 count was 9 times higher than today.  This includes the Ordovician Ice Age.

And finally, being that Americans are easily deceived, you need to take a look at the table below which is a US NOAA product.  It's something taxpayer-funded, and it's something official, professional, and high tech.  In as  much, the percentage of the sky outside which is carbon is no more than 0.0424% during Harvest Season, and 0.0428% during Planting Season.  This means that the atmosphere of Planet Earth is 99.9572% to 99.9576% carbon-FREE.

You can easily see that, in the exaggerated harping over CO2 ... which presently has a radiative forcing of no more that 3.7 watts per meter squared ... it's obvious that United States politicians and United Nations politicians rule by lies.  You deserve better.

July 7, 2025

1966 ... NOT 2023 ... had the lowest Antarctic Wintertime Sea Ice "Extent" ... according to NASA satellite evidence & 2014 US government officials.

It was claimed by less than honest people that the Antarctic Winter of 2023 was accompanied by the greatest amount of sea ice loss in 7.5 million years.  This was said to be the tipping point of human history.  This was now the time to hand over mankind's steering wheel to Al Gore, John Kerry, and the hockey stick graph maker, Michael Mann.  

This is the era when the sky is now full of carbon.  This is the era when the sky is now full of soot, and as a result, New York City and the Statue of Liberty will soon be underwater.  This is the time when the Category 6 hurricane will rule the high seas, racing onto shorelines and cracking in half every palm tree in the pathway.  This is a redundant horror story, entirely full of crap.  

For the record, the amount of carbon in the sky outside is no more than 0.042% of CO2 + 0.0001% of CO + 0.0002% of methane = 0.0423%.  That statistical number is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1 percent.  That's all the carbon that's in the sky.   

As far back as 2018, Greta told everyone that she had a sole-scientist-source who told her that the world will come to its end in 2023, if mankind didn't radically change its entire way of life.  As you can see, that was total bull crapolla, too.  

Moreover, the less than honest media networks reported that it was 99 degrees Fahrenheit in the middle of winter, in Vicuna, Coquimbe, Chile, on August 2nd, 2023.  It was no higher than 63F there, on that day. 

The same hot hot hot temps were reported by the mainstream media as having been occurring in  Santiago, in  July and August of 2023.  The media stated that the temperature hovered near 100F there.  The truth is that it was only 72F in Santiago on August 2nd, 2023.  Therefore, the ultimate truth is that the mainstream media unconscionably lies to humanity.  In conclusion, the world didn't come to its end in 2023, as Greta Thunberg asininely proclaimed it would do.

Concerning the claim that Antarctica had its greatest sea ice loss in 2023, the reality is that this scenario is nowhere near reality.  The Year 1966 was the year of the least amount of Antarctic wintertime sea ice extent ever recorded, and Planet Earth survived 1966 quite well.  So, last year only had the least amount of sea ice extent in the past 57 years only.

All in all, the Climate Hysteria People are always lying to humanity, all the while insulting the intelligences of those who studied atmospheric physics and/or pre-Holocene archeology and/or oceanography and/or weather history and/or maritime history.  

Needless to say, today's "journalists" and "activists" are nothing more than human waste, wasting our lives away with worthless projects.  These people are the Waste Deposits of Humanity.  So, let us become true revolutionary radicals by doing something called, "beginning with the actual truth, for a change."  Sounds scary, doesn't it?  Well, if you are brave enough to face the truth, then let's go to it:

                 🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭      🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭

The Satellite Era began in 1960, with the CORONA, ARGON, & LANYARD systems, followed by the Nimbus Series in 1964 ... not in 1979, as the makers of misleading climate graphs claim.

Preview:  [1] In 2014, the US government admitted to the existence of at least 250,000 satellite images photographed between 1964 to 1978.  The images were retrieved from the government warehouses in Maryland and N. Carolina.  They were then digitized and made available to researchers, historians, and the such.   Therefore, when certain propaganda-minded operatives exclaim that there is no way of proving in what condition the Polar Caps were before 1979, the person is either lying ... or is uninformed. ... or is misinformed.

[2a] The official US government's reason for calling 1979 the beginning of the Satellite Era is that the continuous monitoring & record-keeping of Polar sea ice in both Hemispheres began in October 1978.  The monitoring consisted in every-other-day observation sessions.  Thus, 1979 was the first full year of continuous Polar sea ice record-keeping.

[2b]  HOWEVER, the benefit of the Climate Misrepresentatives claiming 1979 to be the first year of satellite coverage is that, in 1979, the Arctic contained its highest amount ... its most voluminous amount of the Arctic Sea Ice in recorded history.  The falsely claim that the satellite era only began in 1979 is to hide from humanity the fact that several individual years prior to 1979 had much less sea ice extent in the Northern Polar Cap.  

[2c] When you make it falsely appear that 1979 was an average year ... instead of the year of the most sea ice covering of them all ... you make it appear that, all of a sudden, CO2 started its meltdown of the Arctic.   But, there were years when there was much less Arctic sea ice than in 1979, meaning that climate is cyclical and NOT driven by CO2 which happens to only exist at 0.042% of the Earth's atmosphere.  

[2d] CO2 only exists at 422 or so parts per million, at present.  This is less than 1% of the gaseous that comprise the sky.  This is less than 1/2 of 1% of those gases.  This is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1% of the sky's volume.  And the radiative forcing of CO2 is presently 3.7 watts per meter squared.  This is less than an incandescent night light.

                     🌍      🌎      🌏

We are now addressing ANTARCTIC Ice.  Don't confuse it with Arctic Ice Cover

In August of 1966, according to Nimbus Satellite photo technology, Antarctica had its lowest amount of wintertime sea ice extent in recorded history, to the tune of:             

  This equals 6.16 million square miles.

In comparison, Antarctica's wintertime sea ice extent, on September 7, 2023 was officially marked at:

 This equals 6.54 million square miles of ice.

This means that the 1966 Antarctic sea ice extent was ONE MILLION square kilometers LESS THAN in 2023.  This also means that the mainstream corporate media lies to humanity on a regular basis.

In review:  the UN reps, the US congressional reps, and the corporate media claimed that 2023 had the least amount of Antarctic wintertime sea ice extent in the past 7.5 million years.  The truth is that, in 2023, Antarctica had its LOWEST wintertime sea ice extent in the past 57 years only.  The mainstream media was only off by 7 million, 499 thousand, 943 years.  A lot of "journalists," "reporters," and "editors," needed to have been fired last year.

The notable feature here is that Nimbus Satellite technology revealed that Antarctica had it HIGHEST amount of wintertime sea ice extent in August of 1964, to the tune of:              This equals 7.6 million square miles

Significance:  There was a massive change in Antarctica in merely two years.  The 1966 Antarctic wintertime sea ice report marked it as the lowest amount in recorded history, and the 1966 record has never been broken.  The 1964 wintertime sea ice report marked it as the highest amount in history up to that time, and the 1964 record high would stand until September of 2014, when it reached:

                      20.11 million square kilometers.      This amounts to 7.76 million sq miles.

            🗽        🗽        🗽        🗽        🗽        🗽         🗽        🗽        🗽         🗽        🗽

Oh waiter.  Reality check, please.  Sure thing ma'am ... or sir.

The Antarctic wintertime near low of 2023 ... which was paraded around by Climate Scaremongers & the media as the definitive sign of the End of the World ... was 84.3% of the sea ice of the record high year of 2014.  Those are NOT end of the World numbers, because:

The 1966 Antarctic wintertime sea ice low was 79% of 2014, and the world kept functioning very well, with mankind entering into the Space Age & ultramodern culture, accompanied by Beatles music and the Cold War.  Therefore, Antarctica's 1966 sea ice square mileage area was 5.3% LOWER than the so-called "End of the World" & "Climate Crisis" sea ice low of 2023. 

Above is one of many examples of fraud on the part of the Climate Profiteer crowd who never told any of us about the 1964 & 1966 ice count.  These people have been appropriated outrageously large sums of American taxpayer dollars, in the name of a Climate Crisis which hasn't been any worse than was the weather of:

             1936, 1934, 1922, 1921, 1913, 1911, 1910, 1905, 1901, 1896, 1895, 1878, 1871 ...

... and even during the Summer of 1980, when Dallas received 69 days of 100+ degree Fahrenheit heat ... or the Summer of 1954, when  Dallas received 50 days of 100F+ heat ... or even 1909, when Dallas received 57 days of 100+ Fahrenheit heat.  All in all, it was the 1930s which had the deadly Dust Bowl.  Not the 2020s.

In addition, the Antarctic wintertime sea ice square mileage during the record low year of 1966 was 20% less than was the wintertime sea ice area, during the record high year of 1964.   In two short years the sea ice volume changed drastically.  Yet, the co2 count only changed slightly, as well as any other "greenhouse gas."  The notable loss in Antarctic sea ice in 1966 did NOT parallel the slight rise in co2.  

The 1964 co2 count was 321 ppm.  The 1966 co2 count was 323 ppm.   That's an integer difference of 0.00619.  That's a percentage difference of  0.619%.  So compare difference: In terms of sea ice area, it's a 20.000% change.  In terms of atmospheric co2, it's a 00.619% change.

Also concerning the 1960s & the Nimbus Satellite revelations is the discovery that 1969 was the year when the wintertime Antarctic maximum sea ice extent arrived at its earliest ... in the calendar year.   

The OTHER Significant Factor of 1979 Repeated, for the sake of memory retention

The Year 1979 is the year in which the Arctic sea ice covered the most area in known history.  And of course, the Climate Scaremonger Faction wants all graph-making & statistical charting of the Arctic's ice cover to begin at its highest numerical year.  In this way, every year to follow 1979 will have a lower square mileage area number attached to it, and this will make it appear that atmospheric CO2 has been melting the North Pole region for the past 45 years.  Such a thing is a very predictable trick; sophomoric at best. 

The Climate Scaremonger Crowd wants humanity to believe that every year previous to 1979 was a year of equally plentiful sea ice --- that 1979 was just an average & ordinary year when it came to polar sea ice volume, in comparison to 1973, 1974, 1975, and 1976 which had much less Arctic sea ice than did the Year 1979.  In fact, 1976 was a tragically hot Summer in France.  It was outright hot in Southern England, but not as tragic as in Paris.  In the Arctic, there was not as much sea ice as during 1979. 

According to the Al Gore & Jim Hansen Theory, no extremely cold and ice-ridden year should ever follow three warm years of less sea ice.  But, such a thing happened in the 1970s.  In fact, after the ice-ridden year of 1979, 1980 hosted a Summer of true record heat.

Climate Doomsayers want mankind to believe that the atmospheric CO2 level of Planet Earth reached a tipping point in 1979, causing the Arctic sea ice sheet to begin its  GRADUAL decline in ice-cover in 1980.  In this way, the Climate Corps could easily deceive the People of the Earth into believing in the Al Gore & Michael Mann Theory of Climate.  And of course, that theory asserts that CO2 principally drives Planet Earth and determines the surface temperatures of every square kilometer of a very divergent Planet Earth ... and that it happens gradually, in proportion to the amount of CO2 in the sky. 

 As a result, the Climate Alarm Propagandists assured mankind that the Satellite Era did not begin until 1979, and therefore, when it comes to viewing the condition of the Arctic regions during the previous nine years of the 1970s and during all of the 1960s, "there's nothing to see here, folks.  Just move on."  Propagandists do not tell the whole story.  They present their cases in a false light.

The problem is that there were a number of years preceding 1979, when the sea ice content of the Arctic and the Antarctic was notably lower than usual.  This invalidated Al Gore's Climate Theory of CO2 as Driver of the Earth's Climate.  This is because there should NOT have been a sudden rise in sea ice in 1979 and in other years of the 20th Century.  

This finding is in keeping with true atmospheric science, because 90% of all greenhouse gases, by volume, is WATER VAPOR, making co2 extremely subservient to water vapor.  If anything, water drives the climate.  But, NASA long since proclaimed that the driver of the Earth's climate is the Sun.

Let us review, for the benefit of those who have trouble reading and need to review the basics

The atmospheric co2 level was on a constant rise in the 1960s & 1970s.  But, polar sea ice was NOT on a constant decrease.  Therefore, if the Al Gore Climate Theory is true, then there should have been a constant decrease in Polar sea ice throughout the '60s & '70s.  The Polar sea ice decline needed to have been equal to the rise in atmospheric co2.  Well,  this did NOT happen.  The atmospheric co2 count steadily rose, like a department store's escalator, en route to the store's 2nd floor.  But, polar ice extent did NOT decline in proportion to the rise in CO2.

Meanwhile, the Polar sea ice area of the 1960s, when graphed by honest scientists, looked like a roller coaster's track, going up and then going down, etc, etc.  Thus, the atmospheric co2 graph and the polar sea ice graphs were NOT parallel.  They should have been a mirror image of each other.  They were not.  

Shortly After the True Satellite Era Arrived ...

Take note of the following abstract.  It was written shortly BEFORE the record breaking Antarctic sea ice high of 2014 was measured.  None the less, the finding of & the rescuing of 250,000 pieces of satellite evidence in 2014 helped to prove the present Climate Crisis narrative to be a con game.  It helps to show how non-factual the Al Gore & Michael Mann School of Climate is, in its claim that the Earth's surface temperature proceeds parallel to the atmosphere's co2 count, in present time.  

There was a lot less co2 in 1966 than in 2021, as in 320 ppm for 1966 and 411 ppm for 2021.  So, 2021 should have had the record low sea ice and 1966 should have had the coldest Antarctic winter in recorded history.  Well, the opposite occurred.  This is evidence that the Al Gore CO2 Climate Driver Theory is not true.

In as much, if you hear anyone preaching about climate, without acknowledging the existence of the Nimbus I, Nimbus II, and Nimbus III satellites of the 1960s & 1970s, then you are hearing a lying con artist who doesn't want anyone to analyze the 250,000 Nimbus satellite images ... or else you are hearing one of the many useful idiots of today who don't even know about the existence of the Nimbus satellite series.


                 📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡

                                                      ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

See:  https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/articles/new-data-from-old-satellites-a-nimbus-success-story

★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

In the shaded pink is what the more recent Climate Profiteers try to hide from you and me.  Yes, they are still trying to ... "hide the decline."  This is in reference to the 2009 Climategate emails.
🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐
Another feature of the polar oceans that is needed to be known:  Super Cooled Water 

The Southern Ocean & the Arctic Ocean have super cooled water within their perimeters.  After all, you're dealing with salt water, and salt melts the ice on your wintertime sidewalk.  None the less, my understanding was that the polar waters get no cooler than 29.7 degrees FAHRENHEIT.  

Then, came a recent 2023 paper, by Icelandic scientists who found that 28.7F Arctic Ocean water also exists.  Thus, it's expected to find Arctic salt water that is at least 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit COLDER than the standard freezing point of water.  And some of the salty Arctic water might even be 3.2 degrees Fahrenheit lower than the typical freezing point of water.  

Super cooled water is water that does NOT melt at the usual temperature of 32F.  It remains liquid even around the 29F & 30F vicinity.  This knowledge is essential for novices to understand, due to the endless false-light propaganda which the commercial media and pushy politicians harp, concerning the Polar Caps not having the major ice age conditions of 25,000 years prior.  

If the super cooled water in the Arctic were not super cooled, then the Arctic would have had a larger white cap in recent years.  Yet, there remains an outrageously large sum of ice at both polar caps, anyway.  

A former F-4 fighter pilot whose sole job it was to shoot down cold-war Russian bombers invading America from the Arctic told me that his time of flying over the Arctic Ocean (as a passenger on a military transport plane) ... aka the Polar Route ... made him feel as if he were on another planet.  He described it as having flown over vast, desolate distances of white.   Needless to say, the F-4 didn't last too long, in the America inventory.  It wasn't needed.

That gentleman pilot is no longer with us.  He departed this realm of existence in late May of 2024.  The great irony is that his son ... as a very successful academic American ... became fluent in Russian.  Go figure.

August 18, 1960 was the actual Start of the Satellite Era

On August 18, 1960, the CIA's CORONA Satellite system successfully produced more photographic coverage of the Soviet Union in one mission than did all previous U-2 flight missions combined.  This was the turning point.  This was the start of the Satellite Era, 19 years prior to 1979.  And we have the Russian Commies to thank for this.  After all, they are the ones who inspired the Americans to develop satellite imaging during the more intense phase of the 44-year-long Cold War.

Then, in April of 1961, Yuri  Gagarin became the first man launched into Space.  In May of 1961, Alan Shepard become the second man to be so.  Then, in 1962, John Glenn orbited Planet Earth three times, becoming a national hero.  Finally, man landed on the Moon in 1969.

A Reality Check on Common Sense

You could not have had the advanced technology to land on the Moon without first having had standard Satellite Technology already accomplished.  That technology for the United States began in 1958, with the launch of Explorer 1.  It did NOT take an additional 21 years to finally arrive at the satellite era.

That is to say, you don't employ the scientific know-how to land on the Moon, and then have to wait an additional ten years, to finally get the technological know-how to launch a satellite and get it to orbit around Planet Earth, while performing the function of data collector & photographer.

Then came Pioneer 10, in 1972.  It traveled outside of the Solar System, and scientists kept track of it until 2003, when its distance of travel reached the 7.5 billion mile mark.  That was excellence in aerospace technology seven years before 1979.  Thus, 1979 was NOT the start of any technological era. The Year 1979 was the first full year of constant satellite monitoring of the polar sea ice in both hemispheres, as was previously mentioned.

Next comes the Skylab series of Space Station missions which began in May of 1973.  You don't have successful Skylab missions without having had prior success with satellite technology.  There were FOUR skylab missions done in the 1970s, all before 1979. 

Then came Voyager I and Voyager II, both launched in 1977.  Those missions and the hardware attached to the missions were such expert productions that both Space explorers are in operation today.  Voyager 1 has thus far travelled more than 15 billion miles, and Voyager 2 has thus far travelled more than  12 billion miles.  Do you still have the audacity to claim that the Satellite Era did NOT begin until 1979?

Hundred of newspaper articles, captain's ship logs, almanacs, and magazine articles proved that CO2 and the Earth's temperature trends do NOT equate with each other.  This has been repeatedly shown at the Blue Marble Album and elsewhere on the Internet.   

The atmospheric textbook chapter involving PRESSURE GRADIENT FORCING is and was the settled science long before Al Gore's movie which was made.  When the difference in temperature between the Poles and the Equator increase ... when the temperature difference between the two areas get further away from each other ... as during a cold period ... then the atmosphere gets MORE TURBULENT.  

When the difference in temperature between the Poles and the Equator decreases ... when temperatures get closer to each other ... then Earth's atmosphere gets LESS TURBULENT.  Thus, there are more turbulence-related natural disasters during cold periods and during warm periods.

Let's repeat:  When the Poles start getting colder, but the Equator stays the same temperature, the atmosphere gets MORE TURBULENT.   When the Poles get warmer, but the Equator stays the same, the atmosphere gets LESS TURBULENT.  This is why there were disastrous storms during the Little Ice Age which ranged from 1284 to 1840.  Once again:  Cooling Trend = more turbulent.  Warming Trend = less turbulent.

One picture is worth a thousand words

Below:  North Central Antarctica, on Oct 9, 2023, after it was reported in September of 2023 that Antarctica had a once-in-a-7.5-million-year significant absence of ice during its recent winter.  There were 22 hours of daylight on Oct 9, resulting in the satellite image below.  Now, you show me where this "massive, once-in-a-7.5-million-year" critical ice loss is located.  

Anyway, look and see how much ice was there, while the Climate Scaremongers were claiming that there was catastrophic ice loss at Antarctica, during its wintertime.  They kept calling it a "7 sigma event."   By the way, a 5 sigma event is one that happens every 3.5 million years.  None the less, 2023 was a once-in-a-57-year event.  It wasn't even a "once-in-a-century" event.  

Incidentally, from April 10 to September 2nd, the Sun was "down all day" everyday, at the inner continental recesses of Antarctica.  Thus, there are no daylight photos of inner-Antarctica during winter time.  

In the photo above, at the top, you will see intervals of thick & tapered black lines.  Those are Nadir Gaps, where the satellite was designed to not photograph those thin areas.  They're like grid lines, for measuring purposes ... for surveying purposes.  In fact, any nadir is a line below a certain point that travels straight to the ground and creates a 90 degree angle when touching the ground.

The 2023 Antarctic Deception

When it's a matter of record low wintertime sea ice maximums in either of the two polar caps, it is NOT a matter of ice melting during the season when -20F, -40F, & -60F temperatures dominate.  It's a matter of not as much ice forming after Summer ends at the polar cap in focus, concerning as much ice as was formed in other years.  

Let it be repeated once again, so that the realization will sink inward

If you could prove that there were years before 1979 when polar sea ice was as low or lower than today ... and simultaneously much lower than in 1979 ... then the Al Gore Climate Theory of CO2 as Temperature Driver gets automatically invalidated.   And of course, 1973, 1974, 1975 were significantly lower in sea ice area.  In other years, the sea ice was moderately lower than 1979, concerning the Northern Hemisphere's Arctic Ocean.

The realization of a unconscionable swindle of taxpayer dollars will come when it's made commonly known that 90% of all of Planet Earth's greenhouse gases --- by volume --- is WATER VAPOR.  The realization will come when the media announces the scientific fact that the amount of space that atmospheric CO2 takes-up in the Earth's atmosphere is 0.042%.  This is LESS THAN 1/2 of 1%.  This is almost 1/2 of 1/10 of 1%.  

In other words, for every 2,358 molecules that were in the sky in the Northern Hemisphere's Winter of 2023, only one was CO2.  This is based on a 424 ppm count.  That's 1 in 2,358 molecules.  That's a score of 2,358 to 1.  There is NO WAY in which co2 drives such a climate.

Incidentally, for every 10 molecules in the Earth's sky, 2.1 are the O2 oxygen molecule.  In addition, for every 5.2 molecules out there in the sky, 4 of them are nitrogen molecules (N2.)  As far as goes Argon, for every 21 and a half molecules in the sky, 2 of them are Argon.  So, we visualize the molecular content of the atmosphere:  

  CO2 ... 1 in 2,358       Argon ... 1 in 10.7       Oxygen ... 1 in 4.7       Nitrogen ... 1 in 1.28

There is Infrared Inactive CO2 and then there is Infrared Active CO2:  Not all co2's are alike.

A deeper understanding of the long-term climate con game will seep inward, when it's made commonly known that co2 exists in three modes of vibration known as dipole moments, and in one of those vibrational modes, co2 is incapable of capturing infrared heat.  

This easily explains why an ice age, such as the Ordovician Ice Age, was able to transpire, while the atmospheric co2 level was more than NINE TIMES HIGHER than today.  CO2's three vibrations have already been explained at the Blue Marble Album, at Youtube, and elsewhere on the internet.  However, at this point, take into account CO2's radiative forcing.

Today, IR Active CO2 operates at 3.7 watts per meter squared (w/2).  In 1890 or so, active CO2's radiative forcing was measured at 1.88 watts per meter squared. (That's 1 POINT 88 watts only.)  As a result, it was declared that the radiative forcing of CO2 doubled since 1890.  Time out here.  Here comes the question ... eventually:  

The vibrational mode of CO2 comes in three modes, but only  one mode at a time.  They are 1} Symmetric  Stretching  2} Asymmetric Stretching   3} Bending Motion, like the flapping wings of a bird in flight.  

Well, when a CO2 molecule is in the Symmetric Stretching Mode, it is infrared inactive (IR inactive.)  It does NOT create "a dipole moment."  It does NOT show up on the IR Spectrum.   It is incapable of retaining infrared heat ... It is incapable of causing global warming.  In fact, it can cause Ice Ages.  This is why an Ice Age can occur when the CO2 count is NINE TIMES HIGHER than today. 

So, here is the question:  Where is there a chart, table, or a graph that marks CO2's watt-per-meter-squared radiative forcing, according to its three different vibrational modes, aka dipole moments?   In other words ...

.[1] At what amount of watts per meter squared does CO2 exist, during its asymmetric stretching mode?   [2] At what amount of watts per meter squared does CO2 exist, during its bending mode?  

Needless to say, CO2 radiative forcing is ZERO watts per meter squared, whenever co2 is in its Symmetrical Stretching Mode.  An atmosphere of symmetrically stretching CO2 can cause an Ice Age.

One more thing about CO2.  While it's claimed to be the cause of Global Boiling as a greenhouse gas, when CO2 is in its solid form, it's a refrigerant.  It's a block of ice called Dry Ice.  Ironic ... sort of.  What it actually does is become a medium ... a go-between for ... heat transference (which see.)  We return to the topic at hand, though:

The lesson here is that Atmospheric Science is exceptionally involved and is NOT driven by only one variable -- one input number.  Atmospheric Science is NOT the simpleton version presented by the Al Gore People, in 2006.  Therefore, to use as your spokesperson a Swedish high school drop-out who does NOT know the first thing about 1] Atmospheric Science,  2] Weather History,  3] Meteorology,  4] pre-Holocene Paleontology, and/or 5] Oceanography is to use one of the most Useful Idiots a political faction can ever use to advance its agenda ... and to keep humanity dumbed-down with emotion-inducing diversionary tactics.  

Such a thing is not clever.  It's predictable for any faction that keeps losing the statistics and proxy evidence war, thereby necessitating that faction to hide such scientific & historic facts from humanity.  Thus, you use an emotionally unstable teenager and give her false statistics.  You tell her the opposite of the fact that the natural disaster death rate declined super significantly since the 1920s, the 1930s, and the 1940s.  

You also tell her the opposite of the fact that American yearly forest fires (wildfires) dropped super significiantly since the late 1920s and the entire 1930s, when the western population was so low that there wasn't the manpower nor the technology to put out the massive fires, during the worst drought in the previous 1,000 years.       

You then hide from this misinformed teenager knowledge of the existence of the Nimbus Satellite Series of the 1960s & 1970s.  You finally tell her in 2018 that the World is going to end in 2023.  You also make sure that your false information is channeled through the official channels of an organization controlled by 2nd World & 3rd World political operatives.  

Minus 94 Fahrenheit, in May of 2024

The time of this writing is the Memorial Day Weekend, 2024.  The place of this writing is the United States, specifically near the Three River Confluence of Pittsburgh which is located at 40 latitude & 80 longitude.

There have been constant claims that the Earth is in a state of global boiling and that there have been heat waves in Antarctica, in addition to the provenly bogus claim that Antarctica is suffering from a catastrophic amount of ice absence ... or even ice melt.  Okay then, below is the most recent temperature report from the Amundsen-Scott Base, in Antarctica.  This Accuweather report is placed here as a reality check, for those who actually believe the Antarctica is melting:

We keep being told that Antarctic ice is melting.  Of course, those who get Congressional funding, NGO funding, and other types of funding are the ones who keep saying this, over and over again.  Well, for ice to have melted at Amundsen-Scott in May of 2024, the temperature needed to have risen 126 degrees Fahrenheit.  The report above is that of May 27, 2024.
During the same May week of 2024, the famous Vostok Station dipped to MINUS 99 degrees Fahrenheit.  In order for ice to have started melting there, the temperature needed to rise 131 degrees Fahrenheit.  
During the same May week in 2024, it dipped to MINUS 96F, at the famous South Pole Station.
The Concordia Research Station is well known to the knowledgeable.  During the same May week of 2024, the temperature there dipped to MINUS 99 Fahrenheit, as it did at Vostok.  So, what justifies a person heavily compensated by various "climate funding sources" to tell humanity that Anarctica is melting and that the Statue of Liberty is in the process of going underwater? 

ABOVE:  During the same month of May 2024, Springtime America received record snowfall, at Lake Tahoe.  But, we keep being told that the sea level will rise 200 feet.  Yet, from 1880 to 2020, the sea level only rose 8 to 9 inches.  

Then,  it was recently claimed by well-funded scientists that the sea level rose 4 inches in the past 30 years.  That would amount to 0.1333 inches per year ... or 13 & 1/3 inches per century ... or 16 inches per every 120 years.  This amounts to a sea level rise equal to the width of two pennies per year.  

At today's "reported" rate of sea level rise, it will take 17,158 to 18,000 years to elevate the sea level 200 feet.  Do you have just cause to believe the heavily funded "scientist" who claimed on stage, in front of a video camera lens, that the sea level will rise 200 feet?  He's on video, sounding all so confident ... and in-your-face pushy, like a salesman.

Welcome to the CO2 Gazette:

In 1966, the atmospheric co2 level was 322 ppm.  The Climate Hysteria propaganda teams of today assert that atmospheric co2 levels below 330 ppm are quite safe and do not trigger severe ice melt or weather disasters of note.  This would mean that, in no way would there have been any time in which Polar sea ice would have reached a record low, while co2 stayed below 330 ppm.  And in no way, according to the same assertion, would hurricanes be a menace to any part of Planet Earth.  

Well, those two assertions were proven wrong, simply through reading centuries of weather history.  The 1960s saw a few years of significantly less than usual polar sea ice, and in the early 1960s, there were a couple of world-ending Pacific Cyclones.  Their pressure systems within were the lowest of the low.  They proved the 330 ppm ceiling limit theory to have been worthlessly false, as did any catastrophic cyclone that emerged before the Year 1974.   This included those that date as far back as the day after Christmas, in 838 CE.  

There is a long list of cyclones and major storm tides which transpired when the co2 count was below 300 ppm and which killed thousands upon thousands of people, as well as having rearranged the coastline of the Netherlands ... and even put cities into the history books, such as was the case with the Danish city of Rungholt, in 1362.  

The many natural disasters which occurred from 838 CE to the start of the Industrial Revolution proved Al Gore, David Attenborough, and Michael Mann to have been extremely non-factual.  It is a complete lie to claim that the weather was mild for a thousand years, until the start of the Industrial Revolution in 1760.  There have been horrendous weather events all throughout the Medieval Era, the Renaissance Era, and the Baroque Era.  This included the Age of Exploration ... and Colonization.  This included the reign of Kubla Khan.

The co2/temperature Causation Assertion was long since proven wrong, via the searing heat of 1936, 1934, 1922, 1921, 1913, 1911, 1905, 1901, 1895, 1878, and 1871.  These heated years all transpired when when the co2 count ranged from a very low 295 ppm to a low-enough 310 ppm.   

This same climate assertion was proven wrong in 1966, when the Antarctic wintertime sea ice plummeted.  In 1966, the co2 count was 318 ppm.  That's 12 points below 330 ppm threshold theory.  Yet, co2 didn't follow the rule that the Global Warming People set for it.  Meanwhile, the 500,000 year long Ordovician Ice Age proceeded while the co2 level was at 4,000 ppm.  

The details of that particular ice age is beyond the scope of this discourse.  However, shortly after the Climategate emails were revealed, someone presented a theory for that ice age, by citing the low Carbon-13 count at the beginning of that half million year ice age which came in two major pulses.  Well, it was recently found that a rise in co2 is accompanied by a decrease in carbon-13. This is called "an inverse relationship."  This was concluded through a study that involved the 1990s to the Year 2021.  

During ice ages, there is a much less supply of water vapor in the air, being that extremely cold air also equals dry air.  Being that water vapor is 90% of all greenhouse gases -- by volume -- any discussion of greenhouse gases -- in any era of climate history -- is automatically invalid, if water vapor is not included in the discussion.  

In as much, the mystery as to how a glaciation period can persist is easily solved.  Water Vapor becomes a rare commodity during ice ages.  However, there still remains the mystery as to what actually causes ice ages to commence, in the first place.  There is more to include, but not here, due to the budgeting of printing space.

Recent CO2 Scorecard

As far as goes 330 ppm, that level of atmospheric co2 arrived in 1974.  Then, in 1980, the co2 count rose to 339 ppm.  The 1990 co2 count was 355 ppm, and at the Turn of the Millennium, the co2 count was 370.  The 400 ppm marked occurred in the Year 2015.  And when the co2 count reached 418 ppm in 2021, Antarctica ended up having its coldest winter in known history.  Al Gore & Michael Mann are summarily proven wrong, yet again.  The 418 ppm level should have heated-up Antarctica, when the opposite occurred in the Southern Hemisphere.

As far as goes hurricanes, in the history of Planet Earth, voyagers and coastline inhabitants have witnessed coastline-destroying hurricanes throughout the centuries when the co2 count was below 300.  This included massive sea storms of the 1700s, 1500s, and very late 1200s.  Include the Pacific during the early 1960s, when charting the most extreme cyclones in history on a graph.  In 1962, when the Pacific Ocean delivered a handful of historically punishing typhoons/cyclones, the co2 count was 318 ppm. 

The aforementioned topics have already been detailed at the Blue Marble Album and elsewhere.  There's a search box at the top right-hand side of each of this site's pages.  Make good use of it.

Official Academic Atmospheric Science Teaching

When it comes to natural disasters and temperature, one must learn the science of Pressure Gradient Forcing, as well as Baroclinic stability vs instability.   It goes as follows:

Very simply, when the temperature difference between the Equator and the Poles gets closer to each other ... aka "diminishes" ... as when a phase of global warming occurs, then the atmosphere becomes less turbulent and there are less hurricanes and other types of turbulence-induced natural disasters on Planet Earth.  

On the contrary, when the temperature difference between the Equator and the Poles widens ... increases ... as during the Little Ice Age ... the atmospheric turbulence of Planet Earth increases, and this results in more hurricanes and other turbulence-induced natural disasters.  Once again, for clarity sake, it's the global cooling phases which result in more turbulence-related natural disasters.

As a result, there were tremendous sea storms, aka cyclones, during the Little Ice Age which occurred from 1284 C.E. and 1840 C.E.  This included the disaster of 1780, as well as Kubla Khan's naval invasion fleets being decimated on two different storm-ridden occasions.  There is a notable list of cyclones, coastline floods, and other natural disasters throughout the centuries --- long before the invention of the gasoline-powered engine.  

It was a complete lie to have claimed that the weather was mild for a 1,000 years, until the Industrial Revolution.  There were massive disasters supported by evidence and surviving witnesses which occurred when the atmospheric co2 count was very low.  In fact, numerous grave markers, the Elbe River Hunger Stone, chronicles, captain logs, and monuments of Europe prove Michael Mann and David Attenborough to have been the most egregious of liars, in their claiming that Planet Earth was a hedonist's pleasure palace that hosted no hurricanes, droughts, floods, epidemics, or famines, for a thousand years.

This pressure gradient force reflex is why jet streams only meander during wintertime.  It has nothing to do with CO2.  Plus, realizing that co2 is too small in quantity ... in the atmosphere ... to ever drive the climate, is not an element of cognitive dissonance.  It's an element of common sense.

World peace will be accompanied by the discarding and the disqualifying of many lies that line society today.  Incidentally, the TIROS-1 weather satellite dates back to 1960.  It's first photo was made on April 1 on that year.  Thus, the satellite era did NOT begin in 1979.  It began in 1960.  The full article related to the photo below ... and related to satellite technology of the 1960s ... is found at:

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/earliest-satellite-images-antarctica-reveal-highs-and-lows-sea-ice

Below:  Now remember, the article below involves the year with the HIGHEST (the most) wintertime Antarctic Sea Ice Extent.  It's also known as "Antarctica's Sea Ice Extent MAXIMUM."  And of course, it appears to be a relative tie between 1964 and 2014.  

Below is the same article text, provided at a larger size, for readability purposes.  All in all, when the Climate Hysteria People at the UN and in the present US White House administration claim that the Satellite Record did not begin until 1979, you can now tell them that it started in 1964.  You can also tell them that you know that they are a bunch of liars, making outrageously large sums of money, by means of lying to humanity and creating fear.  Knowledge ends fears. 
                                           ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆
 We now adjourn to 1852                
 
Oh, and then there was the Year 1852.  It was regarded as the year with no winter in the northern midwest of America, while it was the Winter of Hardship, in Oregon.  The co2 count back then was 285 ppm, and the lesson from 1852 is that, on a very round, yet slightly elliptical, Earth that travels at a 23.5 degree tilt, it's absolutely true that one man's drought is another man's flood, and one man's heatwave is another man's cold snap.  And of course, Ft. Snelling Minnesota recorded zero heavy snowfall, in 1852.  Newspapers published a commentary or two about this, in latter years.

Planet Earth does NOT have one climate.  It has many climates that end up definitively butting-up against each other and then interacting with each other, to an extent.  Such various climates are affected in different ways ... not solely by co2.  In fact, co2 interaction is good for a climate ... if you want to see beautiful forests of green ... or even golden maple trees ... or vast fields of lavender and other colorful vegetation.

Most importantly, the climate is NOT the moronic simpleton version taught by Al Gore through his 2006 propaganda film.  Climate & Weather is an exceptionally intricate science.  It has many factors and variables.  The more you learn about Atmospheric Science & Weather History, the more you realize how little anyone knows about anything.  And when it happens, you are actually at peace about it.  

Yet, the Climate Con Artists then show up on screen and on magazine covers, and all peace is robbed of humanity with hyper-exaggerations of recent weather events.  These are events shown in a false light.  The result is that the younger generations get terrorized.  The undereducated think that the end is near.  Yet, those events don't come close to the massive brutal weather events of centuries past.  

Such hyper-exaggerated modern weather events are covered at the Blue Marble Album, to show what extremes money-seeking propagandists will strive to attain, simply to takeover your mind and to take your tax dollars ... along with your donation money ... under the guise that the world is on the brink of destruction and only "they" can save you.   Those geeks.  Those dweebs.  Those wedgie boys.

It's amazing how the youngest generation fell for this con game.  The established tradesman (working man) and the outdoor woman know by instinct & experience that the Climate Doomsday Blueprint of Today is not factual.  Plus, China is the great contributor of new coal plants ... of airborne substances into the atmosphere ... meaning that America & Europe could vanish tomorrow, yet the co2 count will still rise consistently ... from the factories and plants of China ... and India.

In as much, Nuclear Winter is far worse than any phase of global warming could ever be.  None the less, the most dreadful determinant of sudden climate change in history has been none other than ... volcanoes.  The irony to this historic note is that volcanoes emit a lot of co2.  Yet, their eruptions never resulted in global warming.  

Volcanic after-effects always resulted in =====> much cooler surface temperatures on Planet Earth.  After all, an Indonesian volcanic eruption in April of 1815 resulted in 1816 being the Year Without a Summer.  Such a thing is due to the sulfur dioxide being released into the air, during the eruptions.  SO2 acts as tiny mirrors than cause sunlight to be reflected back into Space.  

All in all, Sulfur Dioxide is a killer.  Carbon MONOXIDE is a killer.  Carbon Dioxide is your friend.

A certain climate condition can end your personal world, but not the whole world.  A climate condition has simultaneously ended hundreds of thousands of personal worlds in India and China, in centuries past.  A Summertime climate condition in 1911 ended over 11,000 personal worlds in Paris, alone.  But, no climate condition can end all THE world, simultaneously.  And you cannot fool all the people all the time.  

Climate Crisis Con Artists realize that the Abraham Lincoln axiom is true.  So, these people punish the ones who constitute some of the people whom you cannot fool.  This is why the Climate Crisis People harass scientists and experienced people who know that the Al Gore Theory is an exaggeration that doesn't answer more than a small percentage of any climate question ... and is incapable of being used to predict any climate future.

If you can't deceive a person into doing your will, then you will try to physically, socially (as in defamation), and/or financially harm him ... if you are engaged in taking over worlds ... or making lots of money that you do NOT deserve.  

Al Gore & Company basically said that the world will soon come to an end, if mankind doesn't hand-over Planet Earth's money supply to him, Michael Mann, and others involved in the con game.   Yet, con artists give themselves away as the frauds they are.   For example, Gore was too uninformed to know the temperature of the center of the Earth, all the while pretending to be an expert on late night NBC television.   Plus, Gore's refusal to ever debate anyone is a dead give-away that he will be revealed as the charlatan he is, if he ever engages in an academic climate debate.  

An example of Michael Mann's con artistry is that his hockey stick graph states that 1921 & 1922 are amongst the coldest years in the past millennium.  Well, newspapers, almanacs, logs, and magazines all reported on the exceptional heat of those two years which were accompanied by notable Arctic ice loss.  Thus, printed historical accounts proved Michael Mann's hockey stick temperature graph to be a fraudulent invention.  And then comes the Climategate emails which revealed enough as it was.  

As time progressed, useful idiots thinking that they could cash-in with Al Gore and Michael Mann pretended to be experts who could prove that the Climategate emails were misinterpreted.  However, pivotal scientists refused to reveal their climate data base which resulted in their climate conclusions that have been proven contradictory to weather history.  In as much, there certainly was a decline ... of temperature ... from WWII to the late 1970s ... and Michael Mann was hiding it in his straight-lined hockey stick graph.  If the temperature decline were not hidden, then his graph would have looked like a soup ladle, instead.  

That hockey stick line is contrary to recent archeological discoveries and proxy evidence, as well as to historical weather reports.  The truth is that climate is cyclical, with alternating phases --- much like the phases of the Moon.

At this stage in the conversation, enter the Year 2023.  In the Year 2023, the atmospheric co2 count was 422 ppm.  Being that the 2023 co2 count far exceeded the 1966 co2 count, the Al Gore Climate Hysteria team would conclude that the square mileage of Antarctic sea ice extent in 1966 would have been much larger than it was in 2023, and that there would have been no massive reduction in sea ice from one year to the next, at any time in the 1960s.  But, this turned out to have NOT been the case.  

There was a massive amount of sea ice loss, when calculating from the winter of 1964 to the winter of 1966.  This was when the co2 count was literally 99 ppm LOWER than it was in 2023.  

In similar pattern, there was a difference of weather between 2021 and 2023.  The Year 2021 was the coldest recorded Antarctic winter in history.  In 2023, the least amount of wintertime sea ice occurred.  

Conditions changes suddenly in both instances.  This means that the co2 content was not the driver of the drastic change that occurred between 1964 and 1966, as well as the drastic change between 2021 and 2023.  As an added note, Antarctica does have dozens of volcanoes.  This, of course, is a topic of its own, for another discourse.  Volcanic Antarctica is beyond the scope of this discourse.

Being that the co2 count was entirely different in two eras of time which yielded the exact same weather results, those similar weather results did NOT come form the very dissimilar co2 content of the Earth's atmosphere.   There is a pattern here, independent of co2.  Case closed.  Gore once again is proven wrong, along with his often televised team mates.

None the less, the media and video channel creators claimed that 2023 was the year of the least sea ice extent in 7.5 million years.  And of course, they will usually show their viewers a graph.  However, you can distort the curve of a graph without changing any statistical numbers.  Simply have the y-axis of the graph carry a small number set, with fractional numbers included.  Meanwhile, have the gridline spacing further apart than it should be.  And then, make sure that the x-axis doesn't host a long range of numbers, either.  

For example, some y-axis numerals in temperature graphs are limited to two or three mere degrees Celsius, separated at vertical gridline intervals of one-half of a degree each.  In this way, the slightest change in temperature gets ridiculously pronounced when the graph line is drawn.  Therefore, a pronounced slant ... a pronounced decline ... a pronounced angle ... a significant curve will result, IF the x-axis numerals are not plentiful.  

The more numerous the x-axis timeline numbers, the more gradual will be the slant of the graph line.  With a small set of x-axis timeline numbers (such as years), a more pronounce angle - slant - incline - decline - curve results.  The resulting graph line gets very vertical quickly.  Thus, graphs can be very deceptive.  

Your response to such a rigged graph should be: "Show me the actual satellite photos of the 2023 Antarctic continent in wintertime."  Well, some video makers will then show the terrain of a coastline that has no snow or ice on it, deceiving you into assuming that the ice there recently melted.  The truth is that Antarctic is the driest desert on Earth, and in some coastline sections ... on the terrain itself ... there has been no snowing or ice accumulation there since you and everyone else presently on Earth were born.  

Antarctica is huge, at 5.5 million square miles in area.  Thus, it has a long coastline.  A minor portion of that coastline is ice-free & snow-free desert terrain.  It only looks big in itself, because Antarctica is so ridiculously huge.  But, the iceless sections of Antarctic are tiny in comparison to the continent.  Wide patches of iceless terrain has been that way in Antarctica, for thousands of years.

The Melted Ice Cube Effect:  There is no effect thereof.

Next will come the mention of ice melt-induced sea level rise.  Well, if all the sea ice on Earth suddenly melted ... including the entire Arctic Ocean Ice Sheet in wintertime ... the sea level rise would be ZERO.  It's the same effect as when all of the ice cubes melt in your large glass of iced tea.  The tea remains at the same height within the glass, whether its ice cubes are all melted or not.

Moreover, the existence of penguins show the need for some of Antarctica's terrain to be ice-free.  Penguins need ice-free terrain to bring forth their young.  Antarctica is 98% ice-covered; 2% ice-free.  Now, Antarctica is also 5.4 million square miles in area.  2% times 5.4 million sq miles = 108,000 ice-free square miles.  A con artist can play ruthless fraud games with that 2% terrain.  However, the reality is this:         Ice-covered Antarctica = 5,292,000 sq mi.                                                                                                                            Ice-free =    108,000 sq mi.   Big difference.                            

          Below:  September 23rd, 2023; a few weeks after it was asserted that Antarctica is suffering from missing ice like it never has done, in the past 7.5 million year.  Okay then, where is all of this Once-in-a-7.5-million-year End of the World Ice Melt?

CO2 does NOT drive the climate, and it is NOT causing any "Global Boiling."  Rather, it has been causing the greening of Planet Earth.  After all, if you want to go green, then increase the level of atmospheric co2 without adding any airborne pollutant in the process.  As far as goes coal burning plants, the coal MUST be filtered definitively.  Plus, science should start studying Tidal Power, Geothermal Power, etc.  

All in all, co2 is not the environmental disaster at hand.  It's the glut of synthetic chemicals spread throughout human societies which is.  The previous disaster was leaded gasoline, and addressing that problem was a much needed cause, in decades past.  In fact, in going back further in time, the great environmental disaster & challenge was none other than Small Pox, the great killer.  

Concerning 90% of all greenhouse gases by volume, being WATER VAPOR, you have probably heard the expression, "It's not the heat, it's the humidity."  Well, the humidity is the heat.  

Water Vapor is the Great Infrared Heat Retainer.  So too are Cirrus Clouds --- only because they are positioned at a high altitude.  The further away a cloud is from the surface of the Earth, the better its ability to capture IR light.  IR light and IR heat are synonymous.

The Sun drives the climate, in combination with air pressure, as well as the tilt of the Earth, the high pressure Convection Cells, and ye olde Coriolis Effect which has been explained at the Blue Marble Album and in every atmospheric science book known to mankind.  In fact, the Tilt of the Earth is the only reason why the seasons exist on Planet Earth.

Penguin Woodstock

At the end of Antarctica's Summer, there always is massive sea ice loss.  By the end of Antarctic winter, there is always a massive amount of sea & land ice ... larger than the landmass of Russia which is huge.  Russia is 6.6 MILLION square miles in size.  

Climate is Cyclical

That which has occurred in the climate realm on Planet Earth in the 2020s has happened previously.  For example, in 1977 it reached 118F in Athens, when the co2 count was 331 ppm.  There were 42 consecutive 100F+ days in Dallas, in 1980, when the co2 count was 338.  A number of deadly droughts occurred in India and China, when the co2 count was below 308 and even below 300.  America had its worst flood in 1927, when the co2 count was 306 ppm.

There is nothing new under the Sun.  Climate has thus far been proven to be a cyclical trend.  In fact, the last time when there actually was non-cyclical Climate Change was 6,000 years ago, when a lush & plush jungle that spanned throughout northern Africa started to become the Sahara, due to the emergence of a Convention Cell ... now called the Hadley Cell ... which now exists at the 30th Parallel in both hemispheres.   Hmmmm.

The Hadley Cell constantly sends downward to the Earth's surface high pressure dry air.  Incidentally, the Sahara is larger than the size of the   ... aka the contiguous ...United States, at 3.6 million sq miles.  (The contiguous US is 3.11 million sq mi.)  That's a massive desert.  Antarctica is a much larger desert ... at 5.4 million sq mi ... with high pressure dry air descending upon it, from the ceiling of the Troposphere.  Note:  "High Pressure" and "dry air" is redundant.

Every scientist ... and every journalist ... is morally obliged to also include into the Climate Conversation the polar sea ice records of the 1960s, as well as those of the first eight years of the 1970s.  The Polar Caps always have outrageously large areas of ice.  However, at least 85% of the wintertime Antarctic sea ice is gone at the end of Antarctic Summer.  This has already been illustrated at the Blue Marble Album, and there does exist a search box at the top right-hand corner of every page, for your convenience ... for the sake of evidence-supported truth finally being viewed.  

And remember, the author of this site works alone.  He has thus far ... as of 2024 ... never been funded by any corporation, any NGO, any 501C charity organization, or any private citizen, in his research, writings, weblogs, and websites which cover multiple topics.   This includes any oil company anywhere on Earth.  Zero dollars and zero cents have come from such entities.  And there has been no grassroots funding either.  Not a penny.  So, you can can it with the "climate racketeering claim" & "the oil company funding claim."

In as much, the end of your personal world will arrive a whole lot sooner than will the End of THE World.  This whole "Climate Crisis" thing is a money-making con game, being done at your expense, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars thus far.  In the end, you will get the bill, and you will NOT be able to pay it.