January 4, 2025

Reagan: Hollywood Commando with a 1932 bookkeeper's aptitude.

Humanity needs much more than a trickle of the money supply.
Ronald Reagan was nothing more than a Class B actor and a ticker-tape sports an-
nouncer.  He was neither a scholar nor a decorated combat veteran.  In fact, he only
graduated with a C average in 1932, from Eureka College.  He majored in Sociolo-
gy and Economics, beginning in 1928.  This means that he began his college studies
during the Roaring 20's, when it looked as if prosperity has going to continue into the
1930's.  Then came the Great Depression, when no one was wise enough to know
that it was en route to America.  Thus, Reagan studies during the years when no one
had the answer to the cause of America's worst economic crisis.

Accounting courses during that era was little more than bookkeeping classs, whereas
during the Space Age, ratios, the delineation of costs, formulas, marginal utility curves
comprised accounting.  Incidentally, if you majored in Econ, you were required to pass
a couple accounting courses.  In as much, America and California elected to executive
posts a man who had the economic prowess of a bookkeeper ... literally.

                              The General Scorecard on Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan is the president who I] tripled the national debt, II] saw the national
unemployment rate rocket to 10.8% after having signed the first of two major income
tax rate decreases for the wealthiest Americans,  III] was granted 18 national debt ceil-
ing increases by the US Congress,  IV] signed into law various types of tax increases,
including an elimination of a major COBRA tax deduction.   V] froze the minimum
wage throughout his entire presidency.
                                                                    &
VI} Reagan caused the creation of the two-income family and the lonely phenomenon
of the latch key kid, due to the financial burden that Reagan let be imposed upon any-
one not counted among the rich.  VII] Plus, he funneled weapons to Iran & Nicaragua, 
VIII} set the Savings & Loan Crisis into motion by eliminating a major tax deduction
upon which real estate investors depended,  IX] opened the door to the Maoist sweat-
shop dictatorship in 1986, only for it, to end up owning over a trillion dollars worth of
U.S. Treasury bonds by the Year 2011.

X] In addition, Reagan signed into law the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act
of  1982 —TEFRA—the largest tax increase in the history of the United States, when
combined with 1984 legislation, which was designed  to raise $214.1 billion through-
out a 5 year period, reminiscent, in a way, of one of Stalin's Five Year Plans. 

XI] Year prior, Reagan signed into California law (as governor) the largest tax increase
in the history of any American state, up to that  time.  XII] As president, Reagan froze
the minimum wage throughout his entire presidency.
                                                                      &
XIII] Reagan, in the spirit of his generation's racism, vetoed the Comprehensive Anti-
Apartheid ActXIV] In the spirit of Frick, Carnegie, and the union busters of America,
he let the Pittsburgh steel industry go into nonexistence, despite the fact that it was the
Steel Capitol of the World the day Reagan took office.  XV]  Reagan simultaneously in-
creased the size of the federal government, even though he promised to reduce it, in ele-
vating the number of legislative and executive branch federal employees from 2,860,000
in 1981 to 3,113,000 in 1988.  XVI] Under Ronald Reagan, there actually was a decline
in government revenue as a ratio of national income, compared to Jimmy Carter's final
year in office. 
                                                                  &
XVII] One of the most poignant hypocrisies of Reagan was that he declined to defend
the right of Christians to not be required to desecrate their time-honored Sabbath with
performing unnecessary work under penalty of being fired or not hired, despite the fact
that Reagan presented to the Christian world as the pope of the "Moral Majority."
                                                                 &
XVIII] In 1985, for the first time since 1914, the United States became a debtor na-
tion.  In fact, it became the top debtor nation in the world, despite the fact that, when
Reagan enter office in 1981, the United States was the top creditor nation on earth.
XIX] Vetoed the Fairness in Broadcasting Act.

http://www.nytimes.com/1985/09/17/business/us-turns-into-debtor-nation.html

http://articles.latimes.com/1986-06-24/news/mn-21190_1_foreign-investments

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1291&dat=19860319&id=VwtUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=kowDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6642,6797126

XIX] Under Reagan, from 1981 to 1983, the number of Americans living below the
poverty line went from 31,822,000 to 35,303,000.   As Reagan left office, there would
be more people living below the poverty line in America than when he entered office.
However, he was hailed as having taken millions out of poverty, when the fact is that
he was the one who originally lodged them there, after his 1981 income tax cut to the
rich ... and the income tax deduct was to the rich only.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104525.html 

XX]  Under Reagan, on October 19, 1987, the Stock Markets in America and else-
where crashed, having lost 22.6% of its value in one day.  It was called Black Mon-
day at the time.  The event was officially identified as the Stock Market Crash, by
the Federal Reserve Board and it is involved both the Dow and the S&P 500 index,
as well as the futures market and options market.

This worldwide historic event proves that the right wing conservative Republicans
lied each time in claiming that there was a recovery under Reagan.  Keep in mind
that there was also a Savings & Loan Crisis which began under Reagan's watch.

Black Monday: 25th anniversary of 1987 stock market crash; ABCNews, 2012

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/national_world&id=8852839

Reagan's Leadership, Too, Was Questioned After 1987 Stock Market Drop;
NPR News, 2011

http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/08/09/139237597/reagans-leadership-too-was-questioned-after-1987-market-drop

A Brief History of the 1987 Stock Market Crash with a Discussion of the Federal
Reserve Response;  issued by the Federal Reserve Board, 2006

http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2007/200713/200713pap.pdf

Concerning what was called the Reagan Recovery, the University of Virginia's Miller
Center reported how it was dispersed.  The rise in personal income did NOT benefit
Americans equally.  The report was that the income of the rich rose 9%, the income
of the middle class rose only 1%, and the income of African Americans decreased
8% ... so said the Miller Ctr of the Univ of VA.  The Reagan Recovery was merely
the phenomenon of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. 

   One study revealed that while annual income for American families grew 
   by 3.5 percent during Reagan's first term, middle-class families saw only 
   a 1-percent gain, compared to affluent Americans (those in the top quin-
   tile of the income bracket) who saw their incomes rise by 9 percent.  

   In contrast, American families with incomes in the bottom quintile saw 
   their average incomes decline by 8 percent; black families and house-
   holds headed by women were particularly hard hit by declining incomes.  
  Finally, child poverty increased to levels exceeding those of the mid-1960s. 
  Miller Center, Univ of Virginia, Charlottesville.

The list of grievances go on and on, including the fact that 138 members of Reagan's
administration were officially investigated, some of whom were indicted, some of
whom were convicted, included those who were pardoned.  In fact, in having placed
James Watts as the head of the Department of the Interior, Reagan assigned a fox to
guard a chicken coup. 

Reagan's Economic Priority

Reagan's economic priority was that of erasing Taxflation.  This is the phenomenon
of inflation eventually resulting in a higher salary, and therefore, a higher income
bracket which erases some of the increased income through tax liability.  It's also
referred to a 'tax creep,' as in creeping up the tax brackets.  Of course, Reagan's
folly was in disregarding tax deductions, tax credits, and tax incentives which
can erase a person's income tax liability in part or whole.

None the less, in order to prevent taxflation, Reagan lobbied Congress to limit the
income tax brackets to two of them ... one at 28% and one at 15%.  The next prior-
ity was that of decreasing inflation which occurred through low interest rates.  The
book-keeping on the inflation rate was changed by changing the computation of the
Consumer Price Index.  This change made the inflation look like it was steadily
dropping at an impressive rate.  The former way of computing the CPI made in-
flation rates look erratic.  The former way counted home rental prices, but not
home mortgaging, being that a mortgage is a fixed contract that doesn't change
every quarter.

None the less, under Reagan, the price of gasoline decreased throughout his entire
presidency, when measuring year-by-year and not month-by-month.   Of course, they
price was previously far to high and OPEC was retaliating against the Ford and Cart-
er administrations, severely.  However, even though the price of gasoline fell during
the Reagan years, the purchasing power of the individual American citizen decreased
during the same Reagan years, thereby causing the same effect as inflation. 

Plus, Reagan agreed to items in congressional bills that are considered as
anathema by today's Republican propagandists

This part of Reagan's scorecard is significant in that it shows today's right wing con-
servative Republican mouthpiece to be a complete, and not even partial liar:

To start, in 1975, Democratic senator Russel Long, of Louisiana, succeeded in hav-
ing the Earned Income Tax Credit enacted into law.  In was a law fading away, in
terms of impact.  Then, Reagan agreed to have it expanded in the 1986 tax reform
bill.  Yes, the EITC condemned by the party of greed and sweatshop profiteering
found new life in the Reagan years.

In addition, Reagan signed into law the highest corporate tax increase in American
history.  Corporate tax loopholes were closed to the tune of $300 billion 1980 dollars,
while corporate tax liabilities were raised by $120 billion 1980 dollar, for a five year
period.  Thus, Reagan saw to the lowered of the tax rates of the individual wealthy.
This means that Reagan lowered his own tax rate.  Reagan showed that he didn't
care about America ... only his re-election campaign funds and his own bank ac-
counts.  In attacking inflation as he did, he showed that he merely wanted to make
sure that the money he had sitting in financial accounts wouldn't dwindle in value. 

Let's do the Apocalypso

If the aforementioned bibliographical references aren't enough for you, the follow-
ing provides firsthand, close-up, expert assessment of Reaganomics, being that it
was written by Reagan's own budget director, David Stockman.  David spoke of the
Reagan Reformation as the Deformation.  Needless to say, he resigned from the Rea-
gan administration.  His main reason was that Reagan was lying to himself, in insist-
ing to adhere to his unfounded Reaganomic beliefs which were deceptively camou-
flaged behind Milton Friedman's Supply Side doctrine.   Therefore, Mr. Stockman's
2010 New York Times op-ed (opposing editorial) is titled Four Deformations of the 
Apocalypse.  The title is a play on the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?ref=opinion

To fill in the empty spaces that an op-ed, in its short length creates, the following is
1988 article is in order, and it's brought to you by the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

This is important to note, because Rand Paul, the eye doctor who is NOT a scholar
in economics is heralded as a follower of the Austrian School of Economics, as if
he found a new and improved way to deal with an economy.  It's that the Austrian
school omits from its books measurements presented as essential elements of stan-
dardized economic science.

The point to mentioning this is that Rand is now presented as a Reaganomics guru
in the name of the Austrian school of economics.  Yet, that school sponsored the
full scale condemnation of Ronald Reagan's legacy.  Rand Paul's propagandists
state that Rand studied Austrian economics.  But where?  He was an eye doctor.
So, where were the Austrian Economics course held?

Anyway, the Ludwig von Mises article about Reagan, written at the end of Reagan's
presidency is titled, The Sad Legacy of Ronald Reagan.

                    http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=488

January 3, 2025

CIA Report: Reagan was complicit in Iraq's chemical attacks against Iran.

Plus, he saw no evil during the Kurdish genocide campaign.  Add the Argentine Dirty War, Pinochet's Chile, & S. African Apartheid.  Quit praising him as God.  He was
a mere C student and only had the prowess of a 1930s book-keeper.

A ranking  member of the United States Congress went on a FoxNews broadcast and
boldly proclaimed that Ronald Reagan would have never tolerated the Assad regime
gassing its own people.  She made it sound as if Reagan would have pounded his gold-
en fist on a table and magically sent forth a myriad of heavily armed John Waynes, to
avenge the citizens of Syria.

Bill O'Reilly did the same thing and then proceeded to belittle the rapidly graying
President Obama.  O'Reilly made it look as if  Reagan were a superhero walking
onto a battlefield, crushing chemical warfare canisters with his hands.  Well, the
truth is that Ronald Reagan tolerated Saddam Hussein's gassing of Iranians and
Kurds, as a matter of course ... habitually so.  Thus, if Reagan were here today,
he would be looking the other way, ignoring the entire scenario.

The ranking congressional member, incidentally, was Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman
of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East.  This is an example of
American taxpayer dollars in action.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/08/new-docs-show-us-involvement-saddams-nerve-gas-attacks/68698/

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/09/05/odonnell-reagan-let-saddam-buy-and-use-chemical-weapons/

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/08/25/secret_cia_files_prove_america_helped_saddam_as_he_gassed_iran

In addition, weapon's grade anthrax was sent to Iraq during the Reagan years, via the
U.S. Dept of Commerce ... under the Reagan-appointed supervision of none other than
Donald Rumsfeld.  In fact, Iraq purchased eight strands of anthrax from the U.S.A, dur-
ing Reagan years, specifically during the time when the Iran/Contra pea & shell game
was transpiring.

Let us not forget that the Argentine Dirty War transpired during the Reagan years, with
Reagan doing nothing about the genocide committed against the Argentinian people.
Thus, Reagan's track record shows that he would have looked the other way, as soon
as Assad unleashed his chemical ordnance upon his own people.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-534798.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-153210/Rumsfeld-helped-Iraq-chemical-weapons.html

http://hnn.us/article/1283

The Reagan administration provided Hussein with intelligence disclosures, as to the
Iranians' battlefield locations, during the long Iran/Iraq War.  In the process, Reagan
served the function hypocrite, in having his personnel condemn Hussein publicly, all
the while accommodating him privately with the gassing of Iranian positions.

http://rt.com/news/chemical-weapons-iran-iraq-980/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2402174/CIA-helped-Saddam-Hussein-make-chemical-weapons-attack-Iran-1988-Ronald-Reagan.html

http://theweek.com/article/index/248745/how-the-us-helped-saddam-hussein-use-chemical-weapons-against-iran

The United States and the nation of Iraq were signatories of the 1925 Geneva Protocol.
This is a treaty which banned the use of asphyxiating chemicals in warfare.  So, Ronald
Reagan, liar that he was, hid the fact that, without the technology of the United States,
Saddam Hussein wouldn't have been successful at gassing the Iranians.  This assistance
constituted Reagan bieng an accomplice in violating the Geneva Protocol.

Now, when a nation signs a treaty, it becomes law.  The signing nation is bound to the
treaty, by law.  So, Reagan violated United States law in the case of Saddam Hussein.

In addition, the Republicans made Reagan look like a mighty lion who would not re-
treat from anywhere or back down to anyone.  Well, Reagan pulled the U.S. marines
out of Lebanon, after having put them there to serve the function of scarecrows.  The
problem is that they were sitting ducks, 241 of whom died at the hands of merely one
terrorist act.  In as much, Reagan's track record shows that he would NOT have stood
up to Assad in any capacity.  After all, the Syrians weren't white enough for Reagan's
concern, in the first place.

Proof that the previous statement was true, and not merely sarcastic snideness, Ronald
'Racist' Reagan vetoed the Comprehensive Apartheid Act.  In addition, while campaign-
ing for the governorship of California, he defended 'the right' of white home owners to
refuse to sell their homes to African-American buyers.  In the 1960's, there were places
called "Restricted Neighborhoods."  It meant "White Only."  Reagan defended racism
in the 1960s.

Back to Reagan's complicity in the violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol:

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2013/09/06/wrong-again-republican-claims-reagan-would-not-ignore-chemical-weapons-attack-but-he-did/

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/08/cia-files-us-aided-iraq-with-iran-gas-attacks.html

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/05/house-republican-claims-reagan-would-never-do-exactly-what-he-did-on-chemical-weapons/

The tactics of Iran's notorious Ayatollah Khomeini were not foreseen by the authors
of the Geneva Protocol, because no one would have expected the rise of a ruthless
dictator who would have the youth of his nation walk unarmed into land mines and
enemy machine gun fire.  This tactic was referred to as the Human Wave Tactic.

Yes, thousands of Iranian citizens would literally be recruited to be sacrificial lambs
and walk into Iraqi machine gun fire, as well as in mine fields.  The tactic would re-
suIt in Iraqi machine guns overheating, buckling, and locking.  Therefore, the only
way to stop a human wave, concluded the Iraqis, was by chemical ordnance.  Of
course, a B-52 air raid could have decimated the wave, but that tactic was for the
world powers who could afford strategic bombing techniques.

Keep in mind that the human wave of Iranians constituted a threat to the lives and
safety of Iraqi soldiers.  They became belligerent soldiers, themselves.  Thus, it was
permitted to fire upon them.  It's just that the 1925 Geneva Protocol did NOT antici-
pate someone as lawless as the Iranian dictator who, in the name of religion, sent
unarmed civilians to certain death.  HOWEVER, Hussein dedicated himself to the
annihilation of the Kurds in the north of Iraq.   This is where the line was drawn,
ethically speaking.  This policy cannot be defended in any court of public opinion.

This extermination campaign against the Kurds endured from 1986 to 1989.  It con-
sisted in sending Kurdish males to "detention camps," such as the one in Kirkuk.  It
was very intense times that didn't get detailed press in the West.  None the less, the
Iranian ayatollah of the 1980s manipulated the assassination of Egyptian president,
Anwar Sadat.  He targeted Sadat for assassination, simply because Sadat called him
a mad man on commercial television ... CBS newsman Mike Wallace who ended up
being treated for severe depression, allegedly because Vietnam chief of staff, Gen-
eral Westmoreland sued Mike for liable.  However, Mike Wallace triggered the
words which got Sadat killed.

During Ronald Reagan's final year as president, on the eve of Saint Patrick's Day,
the Iraqis committed chemical genocide upon a region that fell out of the hands
of the Iraqi government two days prior.  It started on March, 16, 1988, in Halabja,
northern Iraq.  There were 10,000 to 15,000 casualties, 3,000 to 5,0000 of whom
were fatalities.  Lingering illness resulted.  Even ten years after the attack, there
were about 700 people who remained ill.

The United Kingdom expressly stated that punitive actions against Iraq would have
a detrimental effect.  The policy was to continue to have dialogue and interaction
with Hussein.  Of course, the United States previously helped England during the
Falkland Island War.  So, no one was going to expect England to have a policy con-
trary to Reagan's policy.  Of course, Margaret Thatcher, the British prime minister
infamous for siding with dictators was in power at the time.

Documents dating as far back as 1983 show that the United States government was
well aware that Hussein was using chemical weaponry.  In fact, the genocide cam-
paign against the Kurds began two calendar years before the Halabja chemical at-
tack.  Yet, Reagan didn't intervene.  He basically gave Hussein a proverbial blank
check ... a get out of jail free card.  Thus, if Reagan would have put his first down,
concerning Saddan Hussein, we would never have been the two Iraq wars.  This
is because Hussein was emboldened by Reagan's negligence and complicity.

Reagan most certainly set up the world for the first Iraq War, but only in combina-
tion with the fact that George Bush I told the Hussein regime that its dispute with
Kuwait was not the Americans' concern.  Hussein took that message to be a green
light for invasion.  After all, Hussein used chemical weaponry repeatedly, with no
objection from the United States government.  Thus, Reagan's complicity with
Hussein is what created a middle eastern Frankenstein ... a pit bull unleashed
again Iran. 

As Argentina goes, so goes the world ... spoken in the early 20th Century

Let us not forget that the Argentinian Dirty War transpired during the Reagan years,
with Reagan doing nothing about it ... about the genocide committed against the Ar-
gentinian people.  Thus, Reagan's track record shows that he would have looked the
other way, as soon as Assad unleashed his chemical ordnance upon his own people.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-dirty-war-and-argentinas-military-dictators-women-killers-and-baby-thieves/5326828

http://globalresearch.ca/reagan-backed-ex-dictator-jorge-videla-and-argentinas-dirty-war/5335781

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2011/020611.html 

Reagan's support of the Pinochet dictatorship, in obstructing 
any justice to be administrated upon the Chilean tyrant.

During Reagan's first year in office, he abrogated ... rescinded ... made null and void
the sanctions that the Carter administration imposed upon Pinochet's Chile.  Reagan's
excuse for supporting dictators who committed crimes against humanity was that he
was fighting the injustices of Soviet Russian expansionism.  Thus, in the name of
justice, Reagan allowed criminal injustices.

http://articles.latimes.com/1987-01-02/local/me-1475_1_human-rights

http://books.google.com/books?id=VYOfGRZAWCwC&pg=PA416&lpg=PA416&dq=reagan++pinochet&source=bl&ots=I4wLcnLnjr&sig=NZp2K9T4A6_dB2ydE5p099pBsBo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UeAsUr_kLI-p4AOH4oDYCQ&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=reagan%20%20pinochet&f=false
_____________________

http://books.google.com/books?id=bJxQIK4WHMkC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=reagan++pinochet&source=bl&ots=2m1Rl1SFwL&sig=HI6FHfMGN5HvP3nb21zAh8OZgNw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-d0sUryuDYTl4APC_YC4CQ&ved=0CGkQ6AEwCw#v=onepage&q=reagan%20%20pinochet&f=false

Reagan became another George Wallace, Strom Thurmond, and Jefferson Davis in
vetoing the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986.  In fact, he became the
trio of racism a month earlier, in a vehement speech condemning the congression-
al act.  The act officially included the US Congress calling for the release of polit-
ical prisoner, Nelson Mandela.  Thus, Reagan had no problem with the idea of
Nelson Mandela being a prisoner perpetually.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/52029/the-surprising-republican-civil-war-that-erupted-over-nelson-mandela-and-apartheid

America, you need to stop worshiping the buffoon and coward, Ronald Reagan, be-
cause collective psychosis turns nations into mutations of Nazi Germany.

In conclusion, FoxNews once again aired a person who lied about Reagan, making
that pathetically remedial actor look like the Messiah of humanity.  Reagan did on-
ly a few good things ... most of which were done at the prompting of Tip O'Neill.

None the less, by his actions one could tell that Reagan despised equality.  He did
did what it took to bring back a robber baron class to the States, solely out of his
apparent disrespect for the working man ... including the workers who built air
ports, docks, bridges, and skyscrapers ... who farmed the fields and maintained
the orchards ... who kept automobiles from being death traps ... who delivered
material to stores, hospitals, and construction sites ... who kept society from
turning into a mass of chaos.  All that Reagan did was create a rust belt.

January 2, 2025

Kamala in 2025: Arrogant bully and now a pushy leech via post-election credit card charges of "recurring donors."

The DNC 2024 Convention was held in Chicago.

Kamala Harris:  Economics Moron who literally lied about everything throughout her 2024 campaign.  She also made a 180 degree turn on most of her platform issues.  In fact,  91% of her VP staffers resigned, because she is a hate-filled bully.  

Add to the Kamala Harris list of qualities NARCISSIST who simply wanted to be president, so that she could be number 1 over everyone and lord it over you ... as well as everyone else. 

As an example of Kamala as liar, she said that for the first time in decades ... as of 2024 ... not a single US military man or woman was stationed in a combat zone.  Yet, in 2024, the US Navy had its greatest battles & unleashing of naval firepower since WWII, off the coast of Yemen.  There were other military operations involving Americans firing weaponry and killing the enemy in 2024, also.  And of course, I already disclosed lie after lie after lied told by Kamala, during her narcissistic campaign.

The fact that Kamala was obsessed with being president, merely for the sake of being president, was discovered in her California AG campaign.  Her staff said that the Calif AG post was merely "a stepping stone to the White House."  The same was said when she ran for US senator.  She didn't care to serve.  She only wanted to be a figure head and to be praised.

As of 2025, Kamala gets to have the tag, "thief" or "leech" attached to her name and reputation.  This is because, after New Years Day 2025, recurring donors of her 2024 campaign found that they were still getting charged by Kamala & the DNC, through their credit cards.  It was regarded as "Zombie Fundraising."  

It would be a good idea for each one of those donors to cancel the credit card that Kamala kept using, even after the election and the vote-counting had ended.  And remember, I warned the People that Kamala is and was, by far, the worst.  I already went into detail about this conclusion and about her.

So, the correct headline should be "Kamala and the DNC continue to be dishonest leeches."  

Extra, extra! Read all about it.  Sharon Stone & Alec Baldwin prove themselves to be terrible judges of character, squared & cubed.  They choose liars and thieves for president:

https://headlineusa.com/harris-quietly-charges-donors-to-settle-campaign-debt/\

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-fund-still-grabbing-154843271.html

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/11/kamala-harris-victory-fund-recurring-donations-00197685

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-donors-furious-to-find-she-s-still-charging-their-cards-for-campaign-donations-in-2025/ar-BB1ro5zs

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2025/01/11/kamala-harris-zombie-fundraising-00197681

https://21stcenturywire.com/2025/01/13/kamala-still-charging-donors-credit-cards-amid-campaign-debt-rumors/

January 1, 2025

It's INVALID when a criminal president pardons his criminal accomplices.


 Above is a reminder that, on Nov 5, 2024, the American People spoke clearly.  The reminder above consists in the fact that the 2024 presidential election was the first time in 92 years when a major party candidate ... namely Kamala Harris ... failed to flip a single county in the entire United States.

Donald J Trump, on the other hand, reportedly flipped 54 counties, in 2024.  In fact, Trump definitively flipped ten counties in the allegedly "ultra-liberal" State of California.  The formerly blue California counties that were turned red in 2024 included:   1] Orange,  2] Fresno,  3] Merced,  4] San Bernardino,  5] Joaquin,   6] Riverside,   7] Butte,   8] Inyo,   9] Stanislaus,  and  10] Nevada County.

To Donald J Trump:

Please listen to the People ... who either voted for you or who voted against the liar Kamala

If anyone out there has the power to do so ... whoever you are ... make sure that the following thesis statement is conveyed to Pam Bondi and her staff, as well as to Kash Patel and his staff ... along with the White House cabinet members, the staff members of JD Vance, and Mark Rubio himself:

 šŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒšŸ“ƒ

Whenever a criminal president pardons his criminal accomplices, every such pardon is invalid.        Such an act consists in the president giving his accomplices the permission to commit crime.            Such an act is the president rewarding his accomplices for helping him get away with crime.

     šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–šŸ“–

Any criminal president's accomplices have no such immunity to legal accountability, when given a pardon by the criminal president.  And of course, when Biden pardoned his own family members, during his final hour as president, it was yet another give-away that Biden was no more than the Influence-Peddler-in-Chief & an all-around-bribe-taker for years.  

The multiple LLC's and shell companies recently published show that the Bidens were Money Launderers, all along.  Biden pardoned too many family members at the last hour, for his actions to go unnoticed ... and for his actions to have been valid.

In comparison, when Donald Trump was impeached over a mere phone call made to the Ukrainian Head of State ... in Trump's request that a corruption investigation be conducted in the Ukraine ... it was yet another give-away that Biden was to be protected for his career of influence-peddling.  The first impeachment of Trump was to protect both Hunter and Joe Biden.  

That 2020 impeachment had the pettiest & the most insignificant grounds for impeachment, ever.  It was an insult to any honest citizen's intelligence.  In fact, those who knew of Biden's life of Bribe-taking should be investigated, for Negligence, Deliberate Indifference, and the Withholding of Evidence.

Of course, the thesis statement above has to become a Declarative Judgment in the federal judiciary. 

Moreover, even after a pardon, a pardoned person can still be subpoenaed by the House and/or the Senate, to testify on whatever topic the Congressional members present to him.  Such a person will be immune to punishment for past actions.  But, the person must tell the truth to the Congressional members who question him.   And of course, such pardoned persons are only immune to crimes committed up to the day of the pardon.  Any crimes committed after that day are not pardoned.

Moreover, Secretary Rubio needs to take the above thesis statement to heart, because he's one of the people who need to find out which nations were bribing Biden into rigging American law.  Such rigged laws MUST be repealed.

The American People have the right to know how evil the Biden Crime Family actually was and is.  The American People have the right to know which nations bribed Biden.  

The People also have the right to know details about the 26 "FBI assets" present at the Capitol grounds on Jan 6, 2021.  The People have the right to know about the Chinese spy balloon, and how it is that the Chinese were buying land near US military bases without Biden's objections.

          The Other Insult to the Common Citizen's Intelligence --- the "unarmed insurrection."

Repeat after me, boys and gargoyles:  

                      When there are no guns amongst the protestors, there is no insurrection.

If a crowd is demonstrating in protest of something ... and if no one in that crowd is carrying a single gun ... then it is NOT an insurrection that the protestors are performing.  If the protest gets out of hand, it's a riot.  

Moreover, if a president offers to send 10,000 or even less national guard troops to the Capitol grounds, for the day of the protest, then that president is NOT staging any type of insurrection.

For there to be an insurrection, there must be:  Military officers involved with a venue as the headquarters or rebel capital, as well as rebel military bases.  Those officers must give the orders to attack and/or invade and/or occupy.   There then becomes an established front, aka battle line.  If successful at the occupation, then the rebel officers order to install a new form of government.

Haphazard & unarmed anger is NOT an insurrection.  There also is need of a manifesto .. aka constitution aka charter ... for there to be an insurrection.  Insurrectionists also need supply depots, stockpiles of ordnance, and military vehicles, along with administration offices or tents.

More importantly, when there is an insurrection, people don't go home at 5 or 6 pm, to various places hundreds and thousands of miles away.  They instead hold the ground that they attacked, for an indefinite amount of time ... if not permanently.   In Washington DC, it gets dark early in January ... around 5:02 pm or so.  

Perhaps you noticed that, on Jan 6, 2021, people departed before it got dark.  Well, insurrections are not merely daylight events that last a quarter of a day.  Insurrections go into the night.  Thus, on Jan 6, 2021, there was no insurrection.  But, there was rioting and multiple acts of assault and battery which were really really stupid to have done.   The lesson is that, if you invite stupid people to a protest, it will turn violent.

There were also people merely walking around the Capitol non-violently ... without guidance or even purpose for their walking.  And only two people died on that January 6, 2021.  Both were pro-Trump civilian females.

Peacefully & Patriotically

Trump did say, "Peacefully & Patriotically."  It's interesting how CNN spent years never showing the video where Trump said "peacefully."  CNN must be stripped of all licensing in US territory.  In fact, CNN management needs to be prosecuted for inciting a riot, as well as inciting assassination.  

Even in 2025, CNN, MSNBC, etc still damn everything about Donald Trump that they can conjure.  How about replace CNN's lying propaganda machine with people who simply report news of varying topics ... instead of spending 24/7 subliminally saying, "kill-Donald-Trump."  In response to the daily Trump Lynching on corporate networks, 77.3 MILLION adults said that they were tired of it all, when November 5th came.

Newscasters, politicians, and activists who publicly state that Donald Trump conducted an insurrection on January 6, 2021 should be either 1] sued for a bankrupting amount of compensatory & punitive damages, due to defamation or 2] they should be court-ordered into psychiatric evaluation, for psychosis.  

But in all honesty, such people are merely liars who think that the vast majority of Americans are the stupidest people in the world.  Such people believe that Americans will fall for anything stated in a TV studio.  Such people assume that whoever speaks in front of TV cameras is the voice of God, instead of the voice of a con artist seeking to gain all political power available.

And remember, it was finally admitted that there were 26 "FBI assets" at the capitol, on Jan 6, with four of them actually going into the building.  Concerning this, there is such a thing as "inciting a riot."  So, the question is:  Who planned to incite rioting on Jan 6 and then blame it all on Trump?

I can go further into the details of Jan 6.  But, not right now.

Second Request:

If anyone reading this does have the power to do so, then see to it that the statement below is presented to Kash Patel and Pam Bondi and to their staff members:

Fifty-one American intelligence officers rigged the 2020 election for Biden, when they signed their names to the statement which claimed that the Hunter Biden Laptop showed all the signs of being a Russian Hoax.  They must be prosecuted for rigging the election, as much as ballot box "stuffers" would be prosecuted.   If not, then at least, all security clearance levels must be revoked of them.  At the very least, they're out of the circle of intell.

If and only if those 51 intelligence officers did not sign that fraudulent statement, then enough voters would have avoided voting for Biden, so that Trump could win his second election.  Working Americans throughout America would have been spared of the nightmare of the Biden Shadow Presidency.  Many Americans who are no longer with us would still be alive.

Those "glamorous" celebrities can be quite ruthless & heartless ... and arrogant

Those wealthy celebrities who endorsed Biden and/or Kamala Harris were living nice, easy, and pampered lives.  The skyrocketing prices didn't grieve them to the marrows of their bones.  Such rich persons showed that they did NOT feel your pain ... or my pain.  

Such rich persons are mercilessly brutal.  They pushed for an abusive vice president who saw 91% of her original VP staff members resign from their posts.  In as much, if you can't even get votes from your former employees, you are noy going to win any fair national election.   

But of course, as the election map above shows, the American People were not at all at peace with Biden, Harris, and the major players of the Biden Shadow Presidency.  The American People have spoken.  For the first time in a long time, please let the American People be actually heard.

It was due to getting up at 7:00 am and making it to class and then to work: NOT white privilege

Many an employment position did NOT come from white privilege.  Such things came from people repeatedly getting up at 7:00 am and then making it to an 8 or 9 am class, time and time again.  This was followed by waking up at 6, 7, or 8 am, and then making it to 7, 8, or 9am work ... or to nightshift duty, etc.

The concept of "white privilege" negates itself into nothingness, in the observation that cronyism, nepotism, and favoritism victimized whites as much as any other race.  Instead having gone on an all-out, anti-white campaign, certain politicians should have included an entire subclass of whites as equal victims to whatever other class of people were omitted from beneficial work positions.  

Yet, affirmative action countered this.  Affirmative Action cost $22 trillion, and its purpose was known.  Its purpose was to "LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD."  This resulted in whites with higher test scores, higher grade point averages, and more experience being overlooked and left out of the promotion, the job post, the scholarship, etc.  But, the present political activists never admit this.  And they certainly do not admit that many white men in blue died, so that blacks could be free ... at least free in the Yankee States of America and in the former Spanish Empire colony states such as California.

The concept of scholarships for the disadvantaged was well known and accepted by society.  For example, there was/is a scholarship solely for lads who grew up without fathers.   Very much understandable.

And once again, Good-ole-boy networks, nepotism, and cronyism victimized many whites, too.  After all, there were/are white ethnic groups who hate other white ethnic groups with a passion.  As an example, there were/are batches of white Anglo-Saxon Protestants who utterly despised Irish Catholics, and they did violence to the white Irish Catholics.  

In fact, Hitler went to war against other white nations, such as England, France, and Russia, as well as Czech/Bohemia and Poland.  He ordered a mech division into Austria, with enough infantry troops to start a war there.  Austria surrendered instantly.  Austrians are very white people. 

Even whites oppose the concept of white supremacy.  Even in White Supremacy itself, there is a totem pole of lesser whites and greater whites.  This means that there will be whites fighting other whites, for higher levels of supremacy.  White Supremacy already happened.  White Supremacy imploded on itself.

In addition, the American whites of Northern States such as Maine were not slave owners.  Those persons wore blue uniforms in the mid-1860s, and many of them died during the Civil War.  They were the ones called Yankees.   And it was at Gettysburg where white men from Maine saved the Union.

The early 20th-Century Ellis Island immigrants were NOT slave owners, either.  In fact, they were equivalent to slaves in their home nations.  So, millions in America do not owe slave reparations for anything that happened in the 18th, 19th, and early 20th Century.

Race Card Carriers  

Inciting a race war will backfire on the ones constantly playing the race card.  I'm being polite and am not mentioning names.  I  can go into detail about how many times whites were victimized by other whites.  Maybe some other time or in some other venue.  None the less, the American working man is tired of hearing on television "racist this" and "racist that."  This is because the American working man comes home tired and needs a break from those who cause stress, tension, and animosity.  

The ones obsessively inciting a race war are the ones who don't get up at 6 am or 7 am, to make it to work, day after day, in a skilled field and/or in a field that requires physical exertion and discipline.  They have very pampered lives and need to get into reality.  However, it requires a measure of humility to perceive reality.  Narcissists don't embrace humility.  The field of politics, as well as television broadcasting and the movie industry, attracts narcissists.

Alec Baldwin has no room to talk about anyone else

Of course, the recent award winner of the Narcissistic Arrogance Award was none other than Alec Baldwin.  He was too unobservant to keep Halyna Hutchinson from being killed by him.  But, he is the all-knowing sage who can condemn all Trump Voters as stupid.  

Hey, the Trump Voters aren't the ones killing cinematographers without even trying to do so.  The only person more stupid than Alec Baldwin is the person who actually listens to Alec Baldwin.  He's a guy who does nothing but plays make-believe.  That's called "acting."  

When you idiotically kill someone, it would behoove you to be humble enough to keep your mouth shut in public.  This is because you already proved that you don't know what you're doing.

Concerning the great condemning judge, Sharon Stone, what is she most famous for doing?  ANS:  She's most known for spreading her legs in front of a movie camera or two.  So, she is supposed to be the great judge of morality who knows that all Trump voters are mentally incompetent? 

ANS #1:  I don't think so.   ANS #2:  You've got to be kidding.    ANS #3:  I don't get the joke.

The working man/woman voted for Trump, because the working man is tired of CNN's bull crap, MSNBC's bull crap, ABC's bull crap, Sharon Stone's bull crap, and Alec Baldwin's bull crap.  The working man/woman actually does real work, and then comes home tired.  

The last thing a working man wants to hear when he comes home is Alec Baldwin, Sharon Stone, the View, MSNBC, CNN, etc, and their strife-inducing diatribes.  The working man doesn't sit at desks and tables, in the most pampered settings, spewing out whatever BS can be conjured, for air-headed Americans who watch daytime TV.

The Americans' Right to Know

The People of the United States have the right to know how evil the Biden Crime Family and the Biden Shadow Presidency really was, in specificity.   This includes knowledge of all of Joe Biden's accomplices ... including those in Congress.  

The People have the right to know who in the Biden Shadow Presidency orchestrated the indictments and lawsuits against Donald Trump that were filed during Biden's final year-and-a-half ... during re-election time.

Remember, where there is no justice, there is no peace.  Likewise, where there is no kindness, there is no truth.  You must admit that the Biden People ... including those on network television ... were very unkind ... and extremely dishonest.   So, let a new age truly dawn, for the first time in a long time.

December 28, 2024

Rigging the Media at a Discount Price of only $165+ MILLION (American). It's the Bill Gates Gold Nugget Bargain Bonanza !!!!!Yaaaaaaaaaay!!!!!

That Bill Gates.  He's a regular kidder.   He's one wild & crazy guy.  Well, at least the crazy part.  Through the recent years, he funded the Guardian to the accumulative tune of $12.9 million American.  That's 12.9 million GWs (George Washingtons).  12.9 million Federal Reserve flower petals.  12.9 million inspirational post-it notes.  12.9 million Dollar Store sales slip items.  12.9 million green flags a waving.

This is why you see increasingly audacious claims in their article titles & thesis statements which claim that Climate Change due to the burning of fossil fuels is absolutely, positively, assuredly, and certainly here, bringing to mankind the Doom of the Ages.  One big problem, though.  They forgot to mention that this end-of-the-world Climate Change thing is so ... because Bill Gates said it was so ... and because the same Bill Gates paid the Guardian a sizable amount of money to say it was so.

The Guardian is one of the designated propaganda units of Bill Gates.  It was hired to proclaim everything that Bill Gates wants you to hear ... or read.  The Guardian became one of 'the stages' where the Bill Gates chorus lines are read ... or heard.   In fact, the Guardian wasn't the only media entity to receive Gates' funding. The list goes as follows:

         $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 

The Gates Foundation also donated millions to educational funds.  This includes scholarship funds.  There were special interest funds as well which received Gates Funding.  But, as far as goes money straight to the operative media, the list above suffices.

In direct contrast to the less-than-stellar writers of the Guardian is history.  This includes captains' logs, monastery ledgers, chronicles, newspaper articles, magazine articles, almanacs, and textbook material, as well as proxy evidence such as leaf stoma (which can show co2 levels at the lifetime of each leaf being studied.)  The evidence shows that worse storms, longer droughts, more severe heat waves transpired long before today, in recent decades & in recent centuries, over and over again.

Example 1:  The Roman Warm Period average temperature was 2 degrees Celsius HIGHER than today, while the CO2 level was two-thirds of what it is today.  

Now, concerning the denial of the existence of the Medieval Warm Period by the less-than-factual & less-than-articulate Michael Mann, there are records of grape harvesting during that time span at places which were unable to grow grapes throughout the Renaissance Era & Enlightenment Era Little Ice Age.  In as much, evidence to undo Michael Mann's lies is out there, and has been found, over and over, again.  The problem was getting the evidence on mainstream media screens and pages.

Example 2: NASA long since defined the Year 1934 as the worse drought year in the past 1,000 years.  Meanwhile, the CO2 level of 1934 was three-fourth (three-quarters) of what it is today (309 ppm vs today's 416 ppm.)

Example 3:   The Eemian Interglacial Period ... Interglacial means "between ice ages."  Such a thing is a warming period, and science marks the Eemian Period as having been a 15,000 year warming trend.  The Eemian Period was 130,000 or so to 115,000 or so years ago (or uniform time units ago).  During that time, its coolest period was 3 Degrees Celsius WARMER than today.  And 4 degrees C was ascertained to have also occurred during that long time span.  Sea level at the time was 18 to 24 to 30 feet HIGHER than today.  

In fact, the Eemian Sea superimposed itself over the Baltic Sea between Sweden & Finland.  In other words, the Baltic Sea was much larger at the time, and it is called the Eeemian Sea in the textbook.  In like fashion, Scandinavia's landmass was smaller.  And all of this occurred when the co2 level was close to 280 to 285 parts per million.  That amounts to 132 to 137 parts per million LOWER than today. 

Example 4: The highest wind-speed cyclone in known history was Typhoon Nancy, in September 1961, when the co2 level was only 3/4 (75% -- three-quarters) of what it is today.  That is 100 parts per million lower than today; 316 ppm vs 416 ppm.  Yet, Typhoon Nancy's wind-speed rose as fast as 213 miles per hour.   Meanwhile, it's pressure was a remarkably low 882 millibars.  Al Gore predicted in 2006 that this type of cyclone would be common and more numerous.  He was 100% wrong.

There are a number of similar examples to high-velocity cyclones occurring when co2 levels were much lower than  today.  An additional example is 1958's Typhoon Ida.  It rose to a speed of 200 miles per hour, while operating in a pressure as low as 877 millibars.  

The stats of such cyclones are already posted at the Blue Marble Album.  They all testify to the fact that the claim of increased cyclone intensity under increased atmospheric co2 levels is a complete falsehood.  This is especially the case pursuant to the law of Baroclinic Instability & Pressure Gradient Forcing, as well as Barotropic Instability.   This is also explained elsewhere at the Blue Marble Album.'

© Patrick Anthony Pontillo --- Australia East.  Michael Mann completely lied about Australia.

All in all, Al Gore failed in his 2006 prediction that hurricanes would be of an intensity equal to a Typhoon Nancy or a Typhoon Ida.  In fact, ever since Gore's first climate hysteria movie, there has been a grand total of one Category Five hurricane to make landfall upon the Continental United States.  It was Hurricane Michael, in October of 2018.  

Hurricane Michael hit the Florida Panhandle and killed 16 people.  Hurricane Ian was close.  So, you can say that there were "2 high intensity hurricanes" since Al Gore's failed hurricane prediction.  However, Hurricane Andrew, in 1992, snapped off the large-sized palm trees.  Ian did not do that.  Therefore, Andrew was more powerful than Ian, with a power that remains rare today.  Despite the rise in atmospheric co2, there has been no storm as intense as Hurricane Andrew ... or Typhoon Nancy.

Moreover, the recent stats show that there has been a recent increase in - - - - lower-speed, not-even-category-one sub-hurricane tropical storms --- the kinds that leave the palm trees standing, along with everything else except umbrellas. As a reminded, a tropical storm's travels at a max wind speed of 39 to 73 miles per hour.  Anything slower than 39 mph is known as a tropical depression.  

None the less, the power of a cyclone is in its barometric pressure.  On a normal day, sea level air pressure is 1013.2 millibars.  When a storm reaches the mid-900s, you go on alert.  If the pressure goes lower, then you are in for a ride, or you should exist the area immediately.  Below 900 millibars is a storm for the record book charts and front-page news.

NASA's Infrared Look at Hurricane Michael
Hurricane Michael in Radar, 2018.







The "perfectly legal" behind-the-scenes-Bill-Gates-dollar-delivery-system is evidence of the ill-intended con game being played with your head and everyone else's.  This is how an unconscionable human can get his propaganda disseminated throughout the media in such a way that the public will be deceived into believing that his orchestrated propaganda is "the science."  Well, Bill's bull is not the science of the textbooks.  Nor is it the findings set forth in newspaper archives.  Nor does it correlate with the conclusion of proxy evidence.  It's merely bull crap, just like the geologists and 25-year outdoor skilled labor tradesmen said. 

This Gates Donation Tree is equivalent to paying jury members money to vote for your desired verdict.  This is how you buy the media.   It's no different than censorship, when it involves forbidding counterpoint, forbidding debate, and forbidding textbook material from being made known to the public via the commercial media.  This is a return to the Nazi German Third Reich, the Soviet Russian regimes, the Hussein Regime, and all other dictatorships that censored counterpoint, textbook material, and historic fact.

Now remember, due to the large sums of money that Bill Gates appropriated to numerous media outlets, those particular media outlets have a financial conflict of interest, and therefore, you cannot but expect slanted, prejudicial, and non-factual reporting to come from those entities.  This conflict of interest invalidates them all.  After all, it is a form of bribery.  It's stacking the deck.  It's loading the dice.  Nothing more than that.  

In review:  The entities who financially benefited from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were reported as  having included: {1} CNN, {2} NBC Universal Media, {3} the BBC, {4} NPR, {5} PBS, {6} Gannett (owner of USA Today), {7} The Atlantic, {8} Al Jazeera, {9} Financial Times (founded in 1888), {10} The Daily Telegraph (founded in 1855), {11} Le Monde, {12} Der Spiegel (The Mirror, founded in 1947), {13} Univision (and its 23 stations), {14} Public Radio International, {15} WETA (of Washington DC), and the many more entities, all listed above.

 Poker

Of course, Gates has a lot of deck-stacking to do, because the working man and woman ... who work outdoors ... know that the man-made-induced climate change assertion is total bull crap.  The same working man and woman know that climate is cyclical, because they witnessed the cycles throughout their decades of outdoor work.

Bill Gates cannot change the mind of experience.

  He can only influence the mind of the inexperienced.  Those inexperienced persons are called school children & high school students, as well as anyone who lived a sheltered life.

In the alternate, as a less damning form of identification, you can regard all of the Gates Foundation donations as advertising expenses, in payment for the Gates narrative to be reported by payed media outlets, as if they were presenting an infomercial.

Then again, you can describe the Gates' outlay of dollars as Bill Gates buying the media.  Same effect, whatever you call it.  You don't get your say.  The true experts don't get their say.  

Whatever be the way in which you define Gates' financial outlays of cash to media entities, you cannot say that the recipient entities are on the 'up-up' in their reporting ... or are clear and to the point in their news articles ... or ever welcome counterpoint ... or are fair in their reporting ... or are even honest. 

No matter how you define it ... be it bribery or de-facto advertising costs or the monopolizing of an industry ... it's a sick joke ... a stacked deck ... a rigged roulette wheel ... a pair of loaded dice ... not honest ... and definitely not educational.

Added Example:  The Finest News Reporting that Money Can Buy

In a number of articles (posts) published by a certain Gates-funded media outlet, the authors' claim of present-tense drought is passed-off by posting photos of POST-HARVEST cornfields.  Actually, each of the photos show that a successful harvest had just been finished.  The proof exists in the fact that those photo contain zero stalks of dried corn, shriveled corn, or discolored corn.  In those photos, the corn is all gone, because it was harvested.   Yet, the authors are trying to deceive the public into thinking that it's viewing a drought-ridden crop that never advanced past a stage of dying brittle dryness.  The reality is that those cornfields were very colorful at harvest time.


It's incredible that these writers assume that humanity is a population of brain-dead morons, easy to deceive ... with little effort done, in the process of trying to deceive all of humanity.  This includes showing videos of a yearly monsoon season, and passing it off as proof of climate change caused by the burning of fossil fuels ... in claiming that those monsoon rains never happened before co2 levels rose past 400 ppm.  Well, monsoon season is a phenomenon that has been occurring on a regular basis, throughout the centuries, just like brown post-harvest cornfields.  The monsoons prove that the Earth is round, as they are based on the Coriolis Effect.  This is also mentioned elsewhere in the Blue Marble Album.

Mr. Microbe

And remember, Bill Gates is the guy who wants you to eat mold.  Specifically, he promotes the eating of "microbes."  In as much, can you take someone like that seriously?  Forget about having a chef salad.   NO more stuffed grape leaves in America ... or even peanut butter and jelly sandwiches there.  Oh nooooooo.  Bill Gates has been appointed God, and you can now have a healthy & hearty bowl of microbes.  Hey, how about black mold on a shingle of old drywall, with sawdust topping, for dessert?  Add a side order of cockroaches, and you have it made in the shade.   Just like your grandmother used to make ... according to Bill Gates.  

However, in all seriousness, look at photo below.  Who in his/her right mind would eat this, as a regular diet staple?  ...as a holiday treat?  ...as a delicacy?  ...as an athletic training table meal?  ...as anything other than a sign of severe mental illness?  Well, this is what Bill Gates wants you to eat.  Those are "microbes" on those two walls. 

Black Mold
Black Mold, by Satemkemet. 

The reality is that the average reasonable person sees himself/herself as only one person, facing more than one Goliath.   It's a matter of, "I'm only one person.  What can I do about it?"  It's not that they're stupid.  It's that they're powerless.  It's like being in the middle of the road, during a stampede.

Below are the alleged (reported) Gates financial appropriations to media entities.  And remember, this is NOT charity.  It's the act of manipulating the public and taking away its freedom to think ... to weigh the evidence ... to test assertions for cracks ... to review ... and to judge for themselves.  

None the less, do the math on the following dollar amounts, so that you can see for yourself that Bill Gates spent over $165+ MILLION to rig the media.  And quite frankly, that was basically done at a discount price.  That was a pretty cheap price tag, to control America's every thought.  The problem is that the working man does not follow the rules set by the commercial media or nerd-boy public radio.  The working man finds out things on his own, due to the information made available to him through his work.