1966 ... NOT 2023 ... had the lowest Antarctic Wintertime Sea Ice "Extent" ... according to NASA satellite evidence & 2014 US government officials.

Now remember, neither modern science nor history knows what the sea ice extent of Antarctica was in the 1800s, 1200s, or even 600s, as well as in 600 BCE or 900 BCE.  So, claiming the "highest" or "lowest"  Antarctic measurement isn't a correct thing of do, in light of the reality that there were global warming periods ... such as the Medieval Warm Period ... and cold periods ... such as the Mini-Ice-Age of 1284 CE to 1840 CE.  In fact, it's needed to take the Theatrics & Hysterics out of Modern Atmospheric Science and Weather Record-keeping Technology.

It was claimed by less than honest people that the Antarctic Winter of 2023 was accompanied by the greatest amount of sea ice loss in 7.5 million years.  This was said to be the tipping point of human history.  This was now the time to hand over mankind's steering wheel to Al Gore, John Kerry, and the hockey stick graph maker, Michael Mann.  

This is the era when the sky is now full of carbon.  This is the era when the sky is now full of soot, and as a result, New York City and the Statue of Liberty will soon be underwater.  This is the time when the Category 6 hurricane will rule the high seas, racing onto shorelines and cracking in half every palm tree in the pathway.  This is a redundant horror story, entirely full of crap.  

For the record, the amount of carbon in the sky outside is no more than 0.042% of CO2 + 0.0001% of CO + 0.0002% of methane = 0.0423%.  That statistical number is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1 percent.  That's all the carbon that's in the sky.   

As far back as 2018, Greta told everyone that she had a sole-scientist-source who told her that the world will come to its end in 2023, if mankind didn't radically change its entire way of life.  As you can see, that was total bull crapolla, too.  

Moreover, the less than honest media networks reported that it was 99 degrees Fahrenheit in the middle of winter, in Vicuna, Coquimbe, Chile, on August 2nd, 2023.  It was no higher than 63F there, on that day. 

The same hot hot hot temps were reported by the mainstream media as having been occurring in  Santiago, in  July and August of 2023.  The media stated that the temperature hovered near 100F there.  The truth is that it was only 72F in Santiago on August 2nd, 2023.  Therefore, the ultimate truth is that the mainstream media unconscionably lies to humanity.  In conclusion, the world didn't come to its end in 2023, as Greta Thunberg asininely proclaimed it would do.

Concerning the claim that Antarctica had its greatest sea ice loss in 2023, the reality is that this scenario is nowhere near reality.  The Year 1966 was the year of the least amount of Antarctic wintertime sea ice extent ever recorded, and Planet Earth survived 1966 quite well.  So, last year only had the least amount of sea ice extent in the past 57 years only.

All in all, the Climate Hysteria People are always lying to humanity, all the while insulting the intelligences of those who studied atmospheric physics and/or pre-Holocene archeology and/or oceanography and/or weather history and/or maritime history.  

Needless to say, today's "journalists" and "activists" are nothing more than human waste, wasting our lives away with worthless projects.  These people are the Waste Deposits of Humanity.  So, let us become true revolutionary radicals by doing something called, "beginning with the actual truth, for a change."  Sounds scary, doesn't it?  Well, if you are brave enough to face the truth, then let's go to it:

                 🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭      🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭

The Satellite Era began in 1960, with the CORONA, ARGON, & LANYARD systems, followed by the Nimbus Series in 1964 ... not in 1979, as the makers of misleading climate graphs claim.

Preview:  [1] In 2014, the US government admitted to the existence of at least 250,000 satellite images photographed between 1964 to 1978.  The images were retrieved from the government warehouses in Maryland and N. Carolina.  They were then digitized and made available to researchers, historians, and the such.   Therefore, when certain propaganda-minded operatives exclaim that there is no way of proving in what condition the Polar Caps were before 1979, the person is either lying ... or is uninformed. ... or is misinformed.

[2a] The official US government's reason for calling 1979 the beginning of the Satellite Era is that the continuous monitoring & record-keeping of Polar sea ice in both Hemispheres began in October 1978.  The monitoring consisted in every-other-day observation sessions.  Thus, 1979 was the first full year of continuous Polar sea ice record-keeping.

[2b]  HOWEVER, the benefit of the Climate Misrepresentatives claiming 1979 to be the first year of satellite coverage is that, in 1979, the Arctic contained its highest amount ... its most voluminous amount of the Arctic Sea Ice in recorded history.  The falsely claim that the satellite era only began in 1979 is to hide from humanity the fact that several individual years prior to 1979 had much less sea ice extent in the Northern Polar Cap.  

[2c] When you make it falsely appear that 1979 was an average year ... instead of the year of the most sea ice covering of them all ... you make it appear that, all of a sudden, CO2 started its meltdown of the Arctic.   But, there were years when there was much less Arctic sea ice than in 1979, meaning that climate is cyclical and NOT driven by CO2 which happens to only exist at 0.042% of the Earth's atmosphere.  

[2d] CO2 only exists at 422 or so parts per million, at present.  This is less than 1% of the gaseous that comprise the sky.  This is less than 1/2 of 1% of those gases.  This is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1% of the sky's volume.  And the radiative forcing of CO2 is presently 3.7 watts per meter squared.  This is less than an incandescent night light.

                     🌍      🌎      🌏

We are now addressing ANTARCTIC Ice.  Don't confuse it with Arctic Ice Cover

In August of 1966, according to Nimbus Satellite photo technology, Antarctica had its lowest amount of wintertime sea ice extent in recorded history, to the tune of:             

  This equals 6.16 million square miles.

In comparison, Antarctica's wintertime sea ice extent, on September 7, 2023 was officially marked at:

 This equals 6.54 million square miles of ice.

This means that the 1966 Antarctic sea ice extent was ONE MILLION square kilometers LESS THAN in 2023.  This also means that the mainstream corporate media lies to humanity on a regular basis.

In review:  the UN reps, the US congressional reps, and the corporate media claimed that 2023 had the least amount of Antarctic wintertime sea ice extent in the past 7.5 million years.  The truth is that, in 2023, Antarctica had its LOWEST wintertime sea ice extent in the past 57 years only.  The mainstream media was only off by 7 million, 499 thousand, 943 years.  A lot of "journalists," "reporters," and "editors," needed to have been fired last year.

The notable feature here is that Nimbus Satellite technology revealed that Antarctica had it HIGHEST amount of wintertime sea ice extent in August of 1964, to the tune of:              This equals 7.6 million square miles

Significance:  There was a massive change in Antarctica in merely two years.  The 1966 Antarctic wintertime sea ice report marked it as the lowest amount in recorded history, and the 1966 record has never been broken.  The 1964 wintertime sea ice report marked it as the highest amount in history up to that time, and the 1964 record high would stand until September of 2014, when it reached:

                      20.11 million square kilometers.      This amounts to 7.76 million sq miles.

            🗽        🗽        🗽        🗽        🗽        🗽         🗽        🗽        🗽         🗽        🗽

Oh waiter.  Reality check, please.  Sure thing ma'am ... or sir.

The Antarctic wintertime near low of 2023 ... which was paraded around by Climate Scaremongers & the media as the definitive sign of the End of the World ... was 84.3% of the sea ice of the record high year of 2014.  Those are NOT end of the World numbers, because:

The 1966 Antarctic wintertime sea ice low was 79% of 2014, and the world kept functioning very well, with mankind entering into the Space Age & ultramodern culture, accompanied by Beatles music and the Cold War.  Therefore, Antarctica's 1966 sea ice square mileage area was 5.3% LOWER than the so-called "End of the World" & "Climate Crisis" sea ice low of 2023. 

Above is one of many examples of fraud on the part of the Climate Profiteer crowd who never told any of us about the 1964 & 1966 ice count.  These people have been appropriated outrageously large sums of American taxpayer dollars, in the name of a Climate Crisis which hasn't been any worse than was the weather of:

             1936, 1934, 1922, 1921, 1913, 1911, 1910, 1905, 1901, 1896, 1895, 1878, 1871 ...

... and even during the Summer of 1980, when Dallas received 69 days of 100+ degree Fahrenheit heat ... or the Summer of 1954, when  Dallas received 50 days of 100F+ heat ... or even 1909, when Dallas received 57 days of 100+ Fahrenheit heat.  All in all, it was the 1930s which had the deadly Dust Bowl.  Not the 2020s.

In addition, the Antarctic wintertime sea ice square mileage during the record low year of 1966 was 20% less than was the wintertime sea ice area, during the record high year of 1964.   In two short years the sea ice volume changed drastically.  Yet, the co2 count only changed slightly, as well as any other "greenhouse gas."  The notable loss in Antarctic sea ice in 1966 did NOT parallel the slight rise in co2.  

The 1964 co2 count was 321 ppm.  The 1966 co2 count was 323 ppm.   That's an integer difference of 0.00619.  That's a percentage difference of  0.619%.  So compare difference: In terms of sea ice area, it's a 20.000% change.  In terms of atmospheric co2, it's a 00.619% change.

Also concerning the 1960s & the Nimbus Satellite revelations is the discovery that 1969 was the year when the wintertime Antarctic maximum sea ice extent arrived at its earliest ... in the calendar year.   

The OTHER Significant Factor of 1979 Repeated, for the sake of memory retention

The Year 1979 is the year in which the Arctic sea ice covered the most area in known history.  And of course, the Climate Scaremonger Faction wants all graph-making & statistical charting of the Arctic's ice cover to begin at its highest numerical year.  In this way, every year to follow 1979 will have a lower square mileage area number attached to it, and this will make it appear that atmospheric CO2 has been melting the North Pole region for the past 45 years.  Such a thing is a very predictable trick; sophomoric at best. 

The Climate Scaremonger Crowd wants humanity to believe that every year previous to 1979 was a year of equally plentiful sea ice --- that 1979 was just an average & ordinary year when it came to polar sea ice volume, in comparison to 1973, 1974, 1975, and 1976 which had much less Arctic sea ice than did the Year 1979.  In fact, 1976 was a tragically hot Summer in France.  It was outright hot in Southern England, but not as tragic as in Paris.  In the Arctic, there was not as much sea ice as during 1979. 

According to the Al Gore & Jim Hansen Theory, no extremely cold and ice-ridden year should ever follow three warm years of less sea ice.  But, such a thing happened in the 1970s.  In fact, after the ice-ridden year of 1979, 1980 hosted a Summer of true record heat.

Climate Doomsayers want mankind to believe that the atmospheric CO2 level of Planet Earth reached a tipping point in 1979, causing the Arctic sea ice sheet to begin its  GRADUAL decline in ice-cover in 1980.  In this way, the Climate Corps could easily deceive the People of the Earth into believing in the Al Gore & Michael Mann Theory of Climate.  And of course, that theory asserts that CO2 principally drives Planet Earth and determines the surface temperatures of every square kilometer of a very divergent Planet Earth ... and that it happens gradually, in proportion to the amount of CO2 in the sky. 

 As a result, the Climate Alarm Propagandists assured mankind that the Satellite Era did not begin until 1979, and therefore, when it comes to viewing the condition of the Arctic regions during the previous nine years of the 1970s and during all of the 1960s, "there's nothing to see here, folks.  Just move on."  Propagandists do not tell the whole story.  They present their cases in a false light.

The problem is that there were a number of years preceding 1979, when the sea ice content of the Arctic and the Antarctic was notably lower than usual.  This invalidated Al Gore's Climate Theory of CO2 as Driver of the Earth's Climate.  This is because there should NOT have been a sudden rise in sea ice in 1979 and in other years of the 20th Century.  

This finding is in keeping with true atmospheric science, because 90% of all greenhouse gases, by volume, is WATER VAPOR, making co2 extremely subservient to water vapor.  If anything, water drives the climate.  But, NASA long since proclaimed that the driver of the Earth's climate is the Sun.

Let us review, for the benefit of those who have trouble reading and need to review the basics

The atmospheric co2 level was on a constant rise in the 1960s & 1970s.  But, polar sea ice was NOT on a constant decrease.  Therefore, if the Al Gore Climate Theory is true, then there should have been a constant decrease in Polar sea ice throughout the '60s & '70s.  The Polar sea ice decline needed to have been equal to the rise in atmospheric co2.  Well,  this did NOT happen.  The atmospheric co2 count steadily rose, like a department store's escalator, en route to the store's 2nd floor.  But, polar ice extent did NOT decline in proportion to the rise in CO2.

Meanwhile, the Polar sea ice area of the 1960s, when graphed by honest scientists, looked like a roller coaster's track, going up and then going down, etc, etc.  Thus, the atmospheric co2 graph and the polar sea ice graphs were NOT parallel.  They should have been a mirror image of each other.  They were not.  

Shortly After the True Satellite Era Arrived ...

Take note of the following abstract.  It was written shortly BEFORE the record breaking Antarctic sea ice high of 2014 was measured.  None the less, the finding of & the rescuing of 250,000 pieces of satellite evidence in 2014 helped to prove the present Climate Crisis narrative to be a con game.  It helps to show how non-factual the Al Gore & Michael Mann School of Climate is, in its claim that the Earth's surface temperature proceeds parallel to the atmosphere's co2 count, in present time.  

There was a lot less co2 in 1966 than in 2021, as in 320 ppm for 1966 and 411 ppm for 2021.  So, 2021 should have had the record low sea ice and 1966 should have had the coldest Antarctic winter in recorded history.  Well, the opposite occurred.  This is evidence that the Al Gore CO2 Climate Driver Theory is not true.

In as much, if you hear anyone preaching about climate, without acknowledging the existence of the Nimbus I, Nimbus II, and Nimbus III satellites of the 1960s & 1970s, then you are hearing a lying con artist who doesn't want anyone to analyze the 250,000 Nimbus satellite images ... or else you are hearing one of the many useful idiots of today who don't even know about the existence of the Nimbus satellite series.

          See:   https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140017193/downloads/20140017193.pdf  

                 📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡

                                                      ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

See:  https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/articles/new-data-from-old-satellites-a-nimbus-success-story

★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

In the shaded pink is what the more recent Climate Profiteers try to hide from you and me.  Yes, they are still trying to ... "hide the decline."  This is in reference to the 2009 Climategate emails.

🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐

Another feature of the polar oceans that is needed to be known:  Super Cooled Water 

The Southern Ocean & the Arctic Ocean have super cooled water within their perimeters.  After all, you're dealing with salt water, and salt melts the ice on your wintertime sidewalk.  None the less, my understanding was that the polar waters get no cooler than 29.7 degrees FAHRENHEIT.  

Then, came a recent 2023 paper, by Icelandic scientists who found that 28.7F Arctic Ocean water also exists.  Thus, it's expected to find Arctic salt water that is at least 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit COLDER than the standard freezing point of water.  And some of the salty Arctic water might even be 3.2 degrees Fahrenheit lower than the typical freezing point of water.  

Super cooled water is water that does NOT melt at the usual temperature of 32F.  It remains liquid even around the 29F & 30F vicinity.  This knowledge is essential for novices to understand, due to the endless false-light propaganda which the commercial media and pushy politicians harp, concerning the Polar Caps not having the major ice age conditions of 25,000 years prior.  

If the super cooled water in the Arctic were not super cooled, then the Arctic would have had a larger white cap in recent years.  Yet, there remains an outrageously large sum of ice at both polar caps, anyway.  

A former F-4 fighter pilot whose sole job it was to shoot down cold-war Russian bombers invading America from the Arctic told me that his time of flying over the Arctic Ocean (as a passenger on a military transport plane) ... aka the Polar Route ... made him feel as if he were on another planet.  He described it as having flown over vast, desolate distances of white.   Needless to say, the F-4 didn't last too long, in the America inventory.  It wasn't needed.

That gentleman pilot is no longer with us.  He departed this realm of existence in late May of 2024.  The great irony is that his son ... as a very successful academic American ... became fluent in Russian.  Go figure.

August 18, 1960 was the actual Start of the Satellite Era

On August 18, 1960, the CIA's CORONA Satellite system successfully produced more photographic coverage of the Soviet Union in one mission than did all previous U-2 flight missions combined.  This was the turning point.  This was the start of the Satellite Era, 19 years prior to 1979.  And we have the Russian Commies to thank for this.  After all, they are the ones who inspired the Americans to develop satellite imaging during the more intense phase of the 44-year-long Cold War.

Then, in April of 1961, Yuri  Gagarin became the first man launched into Space.  In May of 1961, Alan Shepard become the second man to be so.  Then, in 1962, John Glenn orbited Planet Earth three times, becoming a national hero.  Finally, man landed on the Moon in 1969.

A Reality Check on Common Sense

You could not have had the advanced technology to land on the Moon without first having had standard Satellite Technology already accomplished.  That technology for the United States began in 1958, with the launch of Explorer 1.  It did NOT take an additional 21 years to finally arrive at the satellite era.

That is to say, you don't employ the scientific know-how to land on the Moon, and then have to wait an additional ten years, to finally get the technological know-how to launch a satellite and get it to orbit around Planet Earth, while performing the function of data collector & photographer.

Then came Pioneer 10, in 1972.  It traveled outside of the Solar System, and scientists kept track of it until 2003, when its distance of travel reached the 7.5 billion mile mark.  That was excellence in aerospace technology seven years before 1979.  Thus, 1979 was NOT the start of any technological era. The Year 1979 was the first full year of constant satellite monitoring of the polar sea ice in both hemispheres, as was previously mentioned.

Next comes the Skylab series of Space Station missions which began in May of 1973.  You don't have successful Skylab missions without having had prior success with satellite technology.  There were FOUR skylab missions done in the 1970s, all before 1979. 

Then came Voyager I and Voyager II, both launched in 1977.  Those missions and the hardware attached to the missions were such expert productions that both Space explorers are in operation today.  Voyager 1 has thus far travelled more than 15 billion miles, and Voyager 2 has thus far travelled more than  12 billion miles.  Do you still have the audacity to claim that the Satellite Era did NOT begin until 1979?

Hundred of newspaper articles, captain's ship logs, almanacs, and magazine articles proved that CO2 and the Earth's temperature trends do NOT equate with each other.  This has been repeatedly shown at the Blue Marble Album and elsewhere on the Internet.   

The atmospheric textbook chapter involving PRESSURE GRADIENT FORCING is and was the settled science long before Al Gore's movie which was made.  When the difference in temperature between the Poles and the Equator increase ... when the temperature difference between the two areas get further away from each other ... as during a cold period ... then the atmosphere gets MORE TURBULENT.  

When the difference in temperature between the Poles and the Equator decreases ... when temperatures get closer to each other ... then Earth's atmosphere gets LESS TURBULENT.  Thus, there are more turbulence-related natural disasters during cold periods and during warm periods.

Let's repeat:  When the Poles start getting colder, but the Equator stays the same temperature, the atmosphere gets MORE TURBULENT.   When the Poles get warmer, but the Equator stays the same, the atmosphere gets LESS TURBULENT.  This is why there were disastrous storms during the Little Ice Age which ranged from 1284 to 1840.  Once again:  Cooling Trend = more turbulent.  Warming Trend = less turbulent.

One picture is worth a thousand words

Below:  North Central Antarctica, on Oct 9, 2023, after it was reported in September of 2023 that Antarctica had a once-in-a-7.5-million-year significant absence of ice during its recent winter.  There were 22 hours of daylight on Oct 9, resulting in the satellite image below.  Now, you show me where this "massive, once-in-a-7.5-million-year" critical ice loss is located.  

Anyway, look and see how much ice was there, while the Climate Scaremongers were claiming that there was catastrophic ice loss at Antarctica, during its wintertime.  They kept calling it a "7 sigma event."   By the way, a 5 sigma event is one that happens every 3.5 million years.  None the less, 2023 was a once-in-a-57-year event.  It wasn't even a "once-in-a-century" event.  

Incidentally, from April 10 to September 2nd, the Sun was "down all day" everyday, at the inner continental recesses of Antarctica.  Thus, there are no daylight photos of inner-Antarctica during winter time.  

In the photo above, at the top, you will see intervals of thick & tapered black lines.  Those are Nadir Gaps, where the satellite was designed to not photograph those thin areas.  They're like grid lines, for measuring purposes ... for surveying purposes.  In fact, any nadir is a line below a certain point that travels straight to the ground and creates a 90 degree angle when touching the ground.

The 2023 Antarctic Deception

When it's a matter of record low wintertime sea ice maximums in either of the two polar caps, it is NOT a matter of ice melting during the season when -20F, -40F, & -60F temperatures dominate.  It's a matter of not as much ice forming after Summer ends at the polar cap in focus, concerning as much ice as was formed in other years.  

Let it be repeated once again, so that the realization will sink inward

If you could prove that there were years before 1979 when polar sea ice was as low or lower than today ... and simultaneously much lower than in 1979 ... then the Al Gore Climate Theory of CO2 as Temperature Driver gets automatically invalidated.   And of course, 1973, 1974, 1975 were significantly lower in sea ice area.  In other years, the sea ice was moderately lower than 1979, concerning the Northern Hemisphere's Arctic Ocean.

The realization of a unconscionable swindle of taxpayer dollars will come when it's made commonly known that 90% of all of Planet Earth's greenhouse gases --- by volume --- is WATER VAPOR.  The realization will come when the media announces the scientific fact that the amount of space that atmospheric CO2 takes-up in the Earth's atmosphere is 0.042%.  This is LESS THAN 1/2 of 1%.  This is almost 1/2 of 1/10 of 1%.  

In other words, for every 2,358 molecules that were in the sky in the Northern Hemisphere's Winter of 2023, only one was CO2.  This is based on a 424 ppm count.  That's 1 in 2,358 molecules.  That's a score of 2,358 to 1.  There is NO WAY in which co2 drives such a climate.

Incidentally, for every 10 molecules in the Earth's sky, 2.1 are the O2 oxygen molecule.  In addition, for every 5.2 molecules out there in the sky, 4 of them are nitrogen molecules (N2.)  As far as goes Argon, for every 21 and a half molecules in the sky, 2 of them are Argon.  So, we visualize the molecular content of the atmosphere:  

  CO2 ... 1 in 2,358       Argon ... 1 in 10.7       Oxygen ... 1 in 4.7       Nitrogen ... 1 in 1.28

There is Infrared Inactive CO2 and then there is Infrared Active CO2:  Not all co2's are alike.

A deeper understanding of the long-term climate con game will seep inward, when it's made commonly known that co2 exists in three modes of vibration known as dipole moments, and in one of those vibrational modes, co2 is incapable of capturing infrared heat.  

This easily explains why an ice age, such as the Ordovician Ice Age, was able to transpire, while the atmospheric co2 level was more than NINE TIMES HIGHER than today.  CO2's three vibrations have already been explained at the Blue Marble Album, at Youtube, and elsewhere on the internet.  However, at this point, take into account CO2's radiative forcing.

Today, IR Active CO2 operates at 3.7 watts per meter squared (w/2).  In 1890 or so, active CO2's radiative forcing was measured at 1.88 watts per meter squared. (That's 1 POINT 88 watts only.)  As a result, it was declared that the radiative forcing of CO2 doubled since 1890.  Time out here.  Here comes the question ... eventually:  

The vibrational mode of CO2 comes in three modes, but only  one mode at a time.  They are 1} Symmetric  Stretching  2} Asymmetric Stretching   3} Bending Motion, like the flapping wings of a bird in flight.  

Well, when a CO2 molecule is in the Symmetric Stretching Mode, it is infrared inactive (IR inactive.)  It does NOT create "a dipole moment."  It does NOT show up on the IR Spectrum.   It is incapable of retaining infrared heat ... It is incapable of causing global warming.  In fact, it can cause Ice Ages.  This is why an Ice Age can occur when the CO2 count is NINE TIMES HIGHER than today. 

So, here is the question:  Where is there a chart, table, or a graph that marks CO2's watt-per-meter-squared radiative forcing, according to its three different vibrational modes, aka dipole moments?   In other words ...

.[1] At what amount of watts per meter squared does CO2 exist, during its asymmetric stretching mode?   [2] At what amount of watts per meter squared does CO2 exist, during its bending mode?  

Needless to say, CO2 radiative forcing is ZERO watts per meter squared, whenever co2 is in its Symmetrical Stretching Mode.  An atmosphere of symmetrically stretching CO2 can cause an Ice Age.

One more thing about CO2.  While it's claimed to be the cause of Global Boiling as a greenhouse gas, when CO2 is in its solid form, it's a refrigerant.  It's a block of ice called Dry Ice.  Ironic ... sort of.  What it actually does is become a medium ... a go-between for ... heat transference (which see.)  We return to the topic at hand, though:

The lesson here is that Atmospheric Science is exceptionally involved and is NOT driven by only one variable -- one input number.  Atmospheric Science is NOT the simpleton version presented by the Al Gore People, in 2006.  Therefore, to use as your spokesperson a Swedish high school drop-out who does NOT know the first thing about 1] Atmospheric Science,  2] Weather History,  3] Meteorology,  4] pre-Holocene Paleontology, and/or 5] Oceanography is to use one of the most Useful Idiots a political faction can ever use to advance its agenda ... and to keep humanity dumbed-down with emotion-inducing diversionary tactics.  

Such a thing is not clever.  It's predictable for any faction that keeps losing the statistics and proxy evidence war, thereby necessitating that faction to hide such scientific & historic facts from humanity.  Thus, you use an emotionally unstable teenager and give her false statistics.  You tell her the opposite of the fact that the natural disaster death rate declined super significantly since the 1920s, the 1930s, and the 1940s.  

You also tell her the opposite of the fact that American yearly forest fires (wildfires) dropped super significiantly since the late 1920s and the entire 1930s, when the western population was so low that there wasn't the manpower nor the technology to put out the massive fires, during the worst drought in the previous 1,000 years.       

You then hide from this misinformed teenager knowledge of the existence of the Nimbus Satellite Series of the 1960s & 1970s.  You finally tell her in 2018 that the World is going to end in 2023.  You also make sure that your false information is channeled through the official channels of an organization controlled by 2nd World & 3rd World political operatives.  

Minus 94 Fahrenheit, in May of 2024

The time of this writing is the Memorial Day Weekend, 2024.  The place of this writing is the United States, specifically near the Three River Confluence of Pittsburgh which is located at 40 latitude & 80 longitude.

There have been constant claims that the Earth is in a state of global boiling and that there have been heat waves in Antarctica, in addition to the provenly bogus claim that Antarctica is suffering from a catastrophic amount of ice absence ... or even ice melt.  Okay then, below is the most recent temperature report from the Amundsen-Scott Base, in Antarctica.  This Accuweather report is placed here as a reality check, for those who actually believe the Antarctica is melting:

We keep being told that Antarctic ice is melting.  Of course, those who get Congressional funding, NGO funding, and other types of funding are the ones who keep saying this, over and over again.  Well, for ice to have melted at Amundsen-Scott in May of 2024, the temperature needed to have risen 126 degrees Fahrenheit.  The report above is that of May 27, 2024.

During the same May week of 2024, the famous Vostok Station dipped to MINUS 99 degrees Fahrenheit.  In order for ice to have started melting there, the temperature needed to rise 131 degrees Fahrenheit.  

During the same May week in 2024, it dipped to MINUS 96F, at the famous South Pole Station.

The Concordia Research Station is well known to the knowledgeable.  During the same May week of 2024, the temperature there dipped to MINUS 99 Fahrenheit, as it did at Vostok.  So, what justifies a person heavily compensated by various "climate funding sources" to tell humanity that Anarctica is melting and that the Statue of Liberty is in the process of going underwater? 

ABOVE:  During the same month of May 2024, Springtime America received record snowfall, at Lake Tahoe.  But, we keep being told that the sea level will rise 200 feet.  Yet, from 1880 to 2020, the sea level only rose 8 to 9 inches.  

Then,  it was recently claimed by well-funded scientists that the sea level rose 4 inches in the past 30 years.  That would amount to 0.1333 inches per year ... or 13 & 1/3 inches per century ... or 16 inches per every 120 years.  This amounts to a sea level rise equal to the width of two pennies per year.  

At today's "reported" rate of sea level rise, it will take 17,158 to 18,000 years to elevate the sea level 200 feet.  Do you have just cause to believe the heavily funded "scientist" who claimed on stage, in front of a video camera lens, that the sea level will rise 200 feet?  He's on video, sounding all so confident ... and in-your-face pushy, like a salesman.

Welcome to the CO2 Gazette:

In 1966, the atmospheric co2 level was 322 ppm.  The Climate Hysteria propaganda teams of today assert that atmospheric co2 levels below 330 ppm are quite safe and do not trigger severe ice melt or weather disasters of note.  This would mean that, in no way would there have been any time in which Polar sea ice would have reached a record low, while co2 stayed below 330 ppm.  And in no way, according to the same assertion, would hurricanes be a menace to any part of Planet Earth.  

Well, those two assertions were proven wrong, simply through reading centuries of weather history.  The 1960s saw a few years of significantly less than usual polar sea ice, and in the early 1960s, there were a couple of world-ending Pacific Cyclones.  Their pressure systems within were the lowest of the low.  They proved the 330 ppm ceiling limit theory to have been worthlessly false, as did any catastrophic cyclone that emerged before the Year 1974.   This included those that date as far back as the day after Christmas, in 838 CE.  

There is a long list of cyclones and major storm tides which transpired when the co2 count was below 300 ppm and which killed thousands upon thousands of people, as well as having rearranged the coastline of the Netherlands ... and even put cities into the history books, such as was the case with the Danish city of Rungholt, in 1362.  

The many natural disasters which occurred from 838 CE to the start of the Industrial Revolution proved Al Gore, David Attenborough, and Michael Mann to have been extremely non-factual.  It is a complete lie to claim that the weather was mild for a thousand years, until the start of the Industrial Revolution in 1760.  There have been horrendous weather events all throughout the Medieval Era, the Renaissance Era, and the Baroque Era.  This included the Age of Exploration ... and Colonization.  This included the reign of Kubla Khan.

The co2/temperature Causation Assertion was long since proven wrong, via the searing heat of 1936, 1934, 1922, 1921, 1913, 1911, 1905, 1901, 1895, 1878, and 1871.  These heated years all transpired when when the co2 count ranged from a very low 295 ppm to a low-enough 310 ppm.   

This same climate assertion was proven wrong in 1966, when the Antarctic wintertime sea ice plummeted.  In 1966, the co2 count was 318 ppm.  That's 12 points below 330 ppm threshold theory.  Yet, co2 didn't follow the rule that the Global Warming People set for it.  Meanwhile, the 500,000 year long Ordovician Ice Age proceeded while the co2 level was at 4,000 ppm.  

The details of that particular ice age is beyond the scope of this discourse.  However, shortly after the Climategate emails were revealed, someone presented a theory for that ice age, by citing the low Carbon-13 count at the beginning of that half million year ice age which came in two major pulses.  Well, it was recently found that a rise in co2 is accompanied by a decrease in carbon-13. This is called "an inverse relationship."  This was concluded through a study that involved the 1990s to the Year 2021.  

During ice ages, there is a much less supply of water vapor in the air, being that extremely cold air also equals dry air.  Being that water vapor is 90% of all greenhouse gases -- by volume -- any discussion of greenhouse gases -- in any era of climate history -- is automatically invalid, if water vapor is not included in the discussion.  

In as much, the mystery as to how a glaciation period can persist is easily solved.  Water Vapor becomes a rare commodity during ice ages.  However, there still remains the mystery as to what actually causes ice ages to commence, in the first place.  There is more to include, but not here, due to the budgeting of printing space.

Recent CO2 Scorecard

As far as goes 330 ppm, that level of atmospheric co2 arrived in 1974.  Then, in 1980, the co2 count rose to 339 ppm.  The 1990 co2 count was 355 ppm, and at the Turn of the Millennium, the co2 count was 370.  The 400 ppm marked occurred in the Year 2015.  And when the co2 count reached 418 ppm in 2021, Antarctica ended up having its coldest winter in known history.  Al Gore & Michael Mann are summarily proven wrong, yet again.  The 418 ppm level should have heated-up Antarctica, when the opposite occurred in the Southern Hemisphere.

As far as goes hurricanes, in the history of Planet Earth, voyagers and coastline inhabitants have witnessed coastline-destroying hurricanes throughout the centuries when the co2 count was below 300.  This included massive sea storms of the 1700s, 1500s, and very late 1200s.  Include the Pacific during the early 1960s, when charting the most extreme cyclones in history on a graph.  In 1962, when the Pacific Ocean delivered a handful of historically punishing typhoons/cyclones, the co2 count was 318 ppm. 

The aforementioned topics have already been detailed at the Blue Marble Album and elsewhere.  There's a search box at the top right-hand side of each of this site's pages.  Make good use of it.

Official Academic Atmospheric Science Teaching

When it comes to natural disasters and temperature, one must learn the science of Pressure Gradient Forcing, as well as Baroclinic stability vs instability.   It goes as follows:

Very simply, when the temperature difference between the Equator and the Poles gets closer to each other ... aka "diminishes" ... as when a phase of global warming occurs, then the atmosphere becomes less turbulent and there are less hurricanes and other types of turbulence-induced natural disasters on Planet Earth.  

On the contrary, when the temperature difference between the Equator and the Poles widens ... increases ... as during the Little Ice Age ... the atmospheric turbulence of Planet Earth increases, and this results in more hurricanes and other turbulence-induced natural disasters.  Once again, for clarity sake, it's the global cooling phases which result in more turbulence-related natural disasters.

As a result, there were tremendous sea storms, aka cyclones, during the Little Ice Age which occurred from 1284 C.E. and 1840 C.E.  This included the disaster of 1780, as well as Kubla Khan's naval invasion fleets being decimated on two different storm-ridden occasions.  There is a notable list of cyclones, coastline floods, and other natural disasters throughout the centuries --- long before the invention of the gasoline-powered engine.  

It was a complete lie to have claimed that the weather was mild for a 1,000 years, until the Industrial Revolution.  There were massive disasters supported by evidence and surviving witnesses which occurred when the atmospheric co2 count was very low.  In fact, numerous grave markers, the Elbe River Hunger Stone, chronicles, captain logs, and monuments of Europe prove Michael Mann and David Attenborough to have been the most egregious of liars, in their claiming that Planet Earth was a hedonist's pleasure palace that hosted no hurricanes, droughts, floods, epidemics, or famines, for a thousand years.

This pressure gradient force reflex is why jet streams only meander during wintertime.  It has nothing to do with CO2.  Plus, realizing that co2 is too small in quantity ... in the atmosphere ... to ever drive the climate, is not an element of cognitive dissonance.  It's an element of common sense.

World peace will be accompanied by the discarding and the disqualifying of many lies that line society today.  Incidentally, the TIROS-1 weather satellite dates back to 1960.  It's first photo was made on April 1 on that year.  Thus, the satellite era did NOT begin in 1979.  It began in 1960.  The full article related to the photo below ... and related to satellite technology of the 1960s ... is found at:

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/earliest-satellite-images-antarctica-reveal-highs-and-lows-sea-ice

Below:  Now remember, the article below involves the year with the HIGHEST (the most) wintertime Antarctic Sea Ice Extent.  It's also known as "Antarctica's Sea Ice Extent MAXIMUM."  And of course, it appears to be a relative tie between 1964 and 2014.  

Below is the same article text, provided at a larger size, for readability purposes.  All in all, when the Climate Hysteria People at the UN and in the present US White House administration claim that the Satellite Record did not begin until 1979, you can now tell them that it started in 1964.  You can also tell them that you know that they are a bunch of liars, making outrageously large sums of money, by means of lying to humanity and creating fear.  Knowledge ends fears. 

                                           ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆

 We now adjourn to 1852                

 

Oh, and then there was the Year 1852.  It was regarded as the year with no winter in the northern midwest of America, while it was the Winter of Hardship, in Oregon.  The co2 count back then was 285 ppm, and the lesson from 1852 is that, on a very round, yet slightly elliptical, Earth that travels at a 23.5 degree tilt, it's absolutely true that one man's drought is another man's flood, and one man's heatwave is another man's cold snap.  And of course, Ft. Snelling Minnesota recorded zero heavy snowfall, in 1852.  Newspapers published a commentary or two about this, in latter years.

Planet Earth does NOT have one climate.  It has many climates that end up definitively butting-up against each other and then interacting with each other, to an extent.  Such various climates are affected in different ways ... not solely by co2.  In fact, co2 interaction is good for a climate ... if you want to see beautiful forests of green ... or even golden maple trees ... or vast fields of lavender and other colorful vegetation.

Most importantly, the climate is NOT the moronic simpleton version taught by Al Gore through his 2006 propaganda film.  Climate & Weather is an exceptionally intricate science.  It has many factors and variables.  The more you learn about Atmospheric Science & Weather History, the more you realize how little anyone knows about anything.  And when it happens, you are actually at peace about it.  

Yet, the Climate Con Artists then show up on screen and on magazine covers, and all peace is robbed of humanity with hyper-exaggerations of recent weather events.  These are events shown in a false light.  The result is that the younger generations get terrorized.  The undereducated think that the end is near.  Yet, those events don't come close to the massive brutal weather events of centuries past.  

Such hyper-exaggerated modern weather events are covered at the Blue Marble Album, to show what extremes money-seeking propagandists will strive to attain, simply to takeover your mind and to take your tax dollars ... along with your donation money ... under the guise that the world is on the brink of destruction and only "they" can save you.   Those geeks.  Those dweebs.  Those wedgie boys.

It's amazing how the youngest generation fell for this con game.  The established tradesman (working man) and the outdoor woman know by instinct & experience that the Climate Doomsday Blueprint of Today is not factual.  Plus, China is the great contributor of new coal plants ... of airborne substances into the atmosphere ... meaning that America & Europe could vanish tomorrow, yet the co2 count will still rise consistently ... from the factories and plants of China ... and India.

In as much, Nuclear Winter is far worse than any phase of global warming could ever be.  None the less, the most dreadful determinant of sudden climate change in history has been none other than ... volcanoes.  The irony to this historic note is that volcanoes emit a lot of co2.  Yet, their eruptions never resulted in global warming.  

Volcanic after-effects always resulted in =====> much cooler surface temperatures on Planet Earth.  After all, an Indonesian volcanic eruption in April of 1815 resulted in 1816 being the Year Without a Summer.  Such a thing is due to the sulfur dioxide being released into the air, during the eruptions.  SO2 acts as tiny mirrors than cause sunlight to be reflected back into Space.  

All in all, Sulfur Dioxide is a killer.  Carbon MONOXIDE is a killer.  Carbon Dioxide is your friend.

A certain climate condition can end your personal world, but not the whole world.  A climate condition has simultaneously ended hundreds of thousands of personal worlds in India and China, in centuries past.  A Summertime climate condition in 1911 ended over 11,000 personal worlds in Paris, alone.  But, no climate condition can end all THE world, simultaneously.  And you cannot fool all the people all the time.  

Climate Crisis Con Artists realize that the Abraham Lincoln axiom is true.  So, these people punish the ones who constitute some of the people whom you cannot fool.  This is why the Climate Crisis People harass scientists and experienced people who know that the Al Gore Theory is an exaggeration that doesn't answer more than a small percentage of any climate question ... and is incapable of being used to predict any climate future.

If you can't deceive a person into doing your will, then you will try to physically, socially (as in defamation), and/or financially harm him ... if you are engaged in taking over worlds ... or making lots of money that you do NOT deserve.  

Al Gore & Company basically said that the world will soon come to an end, if mankind doesn't hand-over Planet Earth's money supply to him, Michael Mann, and others involved in the con game.   Yet, con artists give themselves away as the frauds they are.   For example, Gore was too uninformed to know the temperature of the center of the Earth, all the while pretending to be an expert on late night NBC television.   Plus, Gore's refusal to ever debate anyone is a dead give-away that he will be revealed as the charlatan he is, if he ever engages in an academic climate debate.  

An example of Michael Mann's con artistry is that his hockey stick graph states that 1921 & 1922 are amongst the coldest years in the past millennium.  Well, newspapers, almanacs, logs, and magazines all reported on the exceptional heat of those two years which were accompanied by notable Arctic ice loss.  Thus, printed historical accounts proved Michael Mann's hockey stick temperature graph to be a fraudulent invention.  And then comes the Climategate emails which revealed enough as it was.  

As time progressed, useful idiots thinking that they could cash-in with Al Gore and Michael Mann pretended to be experts who could prove that the Climategate emails were misinterpreted.  However, pivotal scientists refused to reveal their climate data base which resulted in their climate conclusions that have been proven contradictory to weather history.  In as much, there certainly was a decline ... of temperature ... from WWII to the late 1970s ... and Michael Mann was hiding it in his straight-lined hockey stick graph.  If the temperature decline were not hidden, then his graph would have looked like a soup ladle, instead.  

That hockey stick line is contrary to recent archeological discoveries and proxy evidence, as well as to historical weather reports.  The truth is that climate is cyclical, with alternating phases --- much like the phases of the Moon.

At this stage in the conversation, enter the Year 2023.  In the Year 2023, the atmospheric co2 count was 422 ppm.  Being that the 2023 co2 count far exceeded the 1966 co2 count, the Al Gore Climate Hysteria team would conclude that the square mileage of Antarctic sea ice extent in 1966 would have been much larger than it was in 2023, and that there would have been no massive reduction in sea ice from one year to the next, at any time in the 1960s.  But, this turned out to have NOT been the case.  

There was a massive amount of sea ice loss, when calculating from the winter of 1964 to the winter of 1966.  This was when the co2 count was literally 99 ppm LOWER than it was in 2023.  

In similar pattern, there was a difference of weather between 2021 and 2023.  The Year 2021 was the coldest recorded Antarctic winter in history.  In 2023, the least amount of wintertime sea ice occurred.  

Conditions changes suddenly in both instances.  This means that the co2 content was not the driver of the drastic change that occurred between 1964 and 1966, as well as the drastic change between 2021 and 2023.  As an added note, Antarctica does have dozens of volcanoes.  This, of course, is a topic of its own, for another discourse.  Volcanic Antarctica is beyond the scope of this discourse.

Being that the co2 count was entirely different in two eras of time which yielded the exact same weather results, those similar weather results did NOT come form the very dissimilar co2 content of the Earth's atmosphere.   There is a pattern here, independent of co2.  Case closed.  Gore once again is proven wrong, along with his often televised team mates.

None the less, the media and video channel creators claimed that 2023 was the year of the least sea ice extent in 7.5 million years.  And of course, they will usually show their viewers a graph.  However, you can distort the curve of a graph without changing any statistical numbers.  Simply have the y-axis of the graph carry a small number set, with fractional numbers included.  Meanwhile, have the gridline spacing further apart than it should be.  And then, make sure that the x-axis doesn't host a long range of numbers, either.  

For example, some y-axis numerals in temperature graphs are limited to two or three mere degrees Celsius, separated at vertical gridline intervals of one-half of a degree each.  In this way, the slightest change in temperature gets ridiculously pronounced when the graph line is drawn.  Therefore, a pronounced slant ... a pronounced decline ... a pronounced angle ... a significant curve will result, IF the x-axis numerals are not plentiful.  

The more numerous the x-axis timeline numbers, the more gradual will be the slant of the graph line.  With a small set of x-axis timeline numbers (such as years), a more pronounce angle - slant - incline - decline - curve results.  The resulting graph line gets very vertical quickly.  Thus, graphs can be very deceptive.  

Your response to such a rigged graph should be: "Show me the actual satellite photos of the 2023 Antarctic continent in wintertime."  Well, some video makers will then show the terrain of a coastline that has no snow or ice on it, deceiving you into assuming that the ice there recently melted.  The truth is that Antarctic is the driest desert on Earth, and in some coastline sections ... on the terrain itself ... there has been no snowing or ice accumulation there since you and everyone else presently on Earth were born.  

Antarctica is huge, at 5.5 million square miles in area.  Thus, it has a long coastline.  A minor portion of that coastline is ice-free & snow-free desert terrain.  It only looks big in itself, because Antarctica is so ridiculously huge.  But, the iceless sections of Antarctic are tiny in comparison to the continent.  Wide patches of iceless terrain has been that way in Antarctica, for thousands of years.

The Melted Ice Cube Effect:  There is no effect thereof.

Next will come the mention of ice melt-induced sea level rise.  Well, if all the sea ice on Earth suddenly melted ... including the entire Arctic Ocean Ice Sheet in wintertime ... the sea level rise would be ZERO.  It's the same effect as when all of the ice cubes melt in your large glass of iced tea.  The tea remains at the same height within the glass, whether its ice cubes are all melted or not.

Moreover, the existence of penguins show the need for some of Antarctica's terrain to be ice-free.  Penguins need ice-free terrain to bring forth their young.  Antarctica is 98% ice-covered; 2% ice-free.  Now, Antarctica is also 5.4 million square miles in area.  2% times 5.4 million sq miles = 108,000 ice-free square miles.  A con artist can play ruthless fraud games with that 2% terrain.  However, the reality is this:         Ice-covered Antarctica = 5,292,000 sq mi.                                                                                                                            Ice-free =    108,000 sq mi.   Big difference.                            

          Below:  September 23rd, 2023; a few weeks after it was asserted that Antarctica is suffering from missing ice like it never has done, in the past 7.5 million year.  Okay then, where is all of this Once-in-a-7.5-million-year End of the World Ice Melt?

CO2 does NOT drive the climate, and it is NOT causing any "Global Boiling."  Rather, it has been causing the greening of Planet Earth.  After all, if you want to go green, then increase the level of atmospheric co2 without adding any airborne pollutant in the process.  As far as goes coal burning plants, the coal MUST be filtered definitively.  Plus, science should start studying Tidal Power, Geothermal Power, etc.  

All in all, co2 is not the environmental disaster at hand.  It's the glut of synthetic chemicals spread throughout human societies which is.  The previous disaster was leaded gasoline, and addressing that problem was a much needed cause, in decades past.  In fact, in going back further in time, the great environmental disaster & challenge was none other than Small Pox, the great killer.  

Concerning 90% of all greenhouse gases by volume, being WATER VAPOR, you have probably heard the expression, "It's not the heat, it's the humidity."  Well, the humidity is the heat.  

Water Vapor is the Great Infrared Heat Retainer.  So too are Cirrus Clouds --- only because they are positioned at a high altitude.  The further away a cloud is from the surface of the Earth, the better its ability to capture IR light.  IR light and IR heat are synonymous.

The Sun drives the climate, in combination with air pressure, as well as the tilt of the Earth, the high pressure Convection Cells, and ye olde Coriolis Effect which has been explained at the Blue Marble Album and in every atmospheric science book known to mankind.  In fact, the Tilt of the Earth is the only reason why the seasons exist on Planet Earth.

Penguin Woodstock

At the end of Antarctica's Summer, there always is massive sea ice loss.  By the end of Antarctic winter, there is always a massive amount of sea & land ice ... larger than the landmass of Russia which is huge.  Russia is 6.6 MILLION square miles in size.  

Climate is Cyclical

That which has occurred in the climate realm on Planet Earth in the 2020s has happened previously.  For example, in 1977 it reached 118F in Athens, when the co2 count was 331 ppm.  There were 42 consecutive 100F+ days in Dallas, in 1980, when the co2 count was 338.  A number of deadly droughts occurred in India and China, when the co2 count was below 308 and even below 300.  America had its worst flood in 1927, when the co2 count was 306 ppm.

There is nothing new under the Sun.  Climate has thus far been proven to be a cyclical trend.  In fact, the last time when there actually was non-cyclical Climate Change was 6,000 years ago, when a lush & plush jungle that spanned throughout northern Africa started to become the Sahara, due to the emergence of a Convention Cell ... now called the Hadley Cell ... which now exists at the 30th Parallel in both hemispheres.   Hmmmm.

The Hadley Cell constantly sends downward to the Earth's surface high pressure dry air.  Incidentally, the Sahara is larger than the size of the   ... aka the contiguous ...United States, at 3.6 million sq miles.  (The contiguous US is 3.11 million sq mi.)  That's a massive desert.  Antarctica is a much larger desert ... at 5.4 million sq mi ... with high pressure dry air descending upon it, from the ceiling of the Troposphere.  Note:  "High Pressure" and "dry air" is redundant.

Every scientist ... and every journalist ... is morally obliged to also include into the Climate Conversation the polar sea ice records of the 1960s, as well as those of the first eight years of the 1970s.  The Polar Caps always have outrageously large areas of ice.  However, at least 85% of the wintertime Antarctic sea ice is gone at the end of Antarctic Summer.  This has already been illustrated at the Blue Marble Album, and there does exist a search box at the top right-hand corner of every page, for your convenience ... for the sake of evidence-supported truth finally being viewed.  

And remember, the author of this site works alone.  He has thus far ... as of 2024 ... never been funded by any corporation, any NGO, any 501C charity organization, or any private citizen, in his research, writings, weblogs, and websites which cover multiple topics.   This includes any oil company anywhere on Earth.  Zero dollars and zero cents have come from such entities.  And there has been no grassroots funding either.  Not a penny.  So, you can can it with the "climate racketeering claim" & "the oil company funding claim."

In as much, the end of your personal world will arrive a whole lot sooner than will the End of THE World.  This whole "Climate Crisis" thing is a money-making con game, being done at your expense, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars thus far.  In the end, you will get the bill, and you will NOT be able to pay it.

Newspaper & magazine archives of old = The original climate record.

© Patrick Anthony Pontillo 

Lesson #1:   No temperature rise in the middle of Troposphere means no global warming.  

From 1999 to 2016, there was NO temperature increase in the middle of Earth's Troposphere. 

Greenhouse Gases in Review

~4,000 Year Pattern:  The Earth's climate has changed naturally,  every 124 to 600 years.  

One of the most effective triggers of climate change, on occasion, has been ===> volcanoes.

-Wake-up Call:   WATER VAPOR comprises 90% of all greenhouse gases,  by volume.

-It's a Trace Gas:  CO2 only comprises 21/50,000th of the atmosphere.  That's 0.042%.  

 More specifically, CO2 exists at 1 part per 2,403.  Nitrogen exists at 1 part per 1.28.

-A Lesser Trace Gas:   Atmospheric Methane was only 1.886 ppm.  It's now 1.909 ppm.

-Even Less:  The N2O about which the UN ranted exists at 1 part per THREE million.

-The Ordovician Ice Age:  occurred when CO2 levels were 9+ times higher than today. 

-Reality Check:  Cirrus Clouds retain more atmospheric infrared light than does CO2.

-Infrared:  CO2 has three vibration modes.   In one mode, CO2 can't capture IR heat/light.

-CO2 Watts:  The radiative forcing of CO2 is 3.7 watts per meter squared; a night light.

-No CO2 means no life on Earth:  When CO2 is below 150 ppm, photosynthesis halts.

                         Conclusion:  CO2 is Plant Fertilizer . . . not incendiary Jet Fuel.

 Glacial Melt: 1892: CO2 was only 295 ppm. Yet, the Tête Rousse Glacier collapsed, killing 200.

The Jakobshavn Glacier (Greenland) gained ice from 2016 to 2019, while co2 was 402-410 ppm.

Lake Mead:  The population of  Nevada & Arizona increased 1,700% since Lake Mead's debut.  The demand for water increased accordingly.

In addition, 1.5 million acre-feet per annum goes from the Colorado River to the Morelos Dam, in Mexico.  Yet, the media wonders what happened to all the water in the West's man-made lakes.  BTW, an acre-foot is the amount of water needed to fill an acre basin, 12 inches.  It's 43,560 cubic feet.

US Forest Fires:  1926 to 1943: 650 million acres burned.   2004 to 2021:  133 million burned. 

40+ million acres burned yearly, from 1928-1934.  Since 1953, burn acreage never above 10.1.  And remember, so much acreage burned in the 1920s & 1930s so tremendously, because there was no one there, in pivotal places, to put the fires out.  

Therefore, to claim that not much burned in 1920s & 1930s is to prove yourself to be completely out of touch with history and demographics ... and reality.  The West was sparsely populated during that time span.

Roman Warm Period:  Scientific Reports marked it as warmer than today by 2 degrees Celsius. 

Methyl Chloride in Antarctic ice cores were highest in 900 - 1300; the Medieval Warm Period.

Monsoons:  A monsoon is an extensively sized sea breeze.  Wintertime means Dry Monsoons.

In the Summer of 2022, Arizona & Nevada had record high rain during their Monsoon season.

Surface Ocean PH:  In 1751, PH was an alkaline 8.25.  1996: PH was 8.14.  2022: PH is 8.07.

 There are fish that thrive in moderately acidic pH waters, such as discus, tetras, and angelfish.

The Al Gore CO2 Climate Theory:  The belief that the steering wheel moves the driver's hands.

Air temperature first rises, then evaporation slightly increases, causing added co2 in the sky.  The tremendously high amount of NEW coal burning plants in China is another cause of added co2 in the sky.  Thus, America could vanish, yet the co2 count in the atmosphere will continue its pronounce rise.  None the less, other pollutants in sky coming from unfiltered coal plants is what matters.  NASA already proved that the Earth has been "greening," while the co2 count in the sky rose.

The phrase"fossil fuels" is the most illogical, buffoonish, & asinine phrase thus far used to replace, "combustible fuels."  Think:  Liquid & Gaseous Fuels NEVER fossilize.  If they did, they would be crystallized calcite.  When you put fuel into a fuel tank, it combusts.  It doesn't fossilize.  The "going-green" people have no common sense.

Climate History

 -Panic-free climate.gov: "Sea level has risen 8 - 9 inches (21 - 24 cm) since 1880." 

 -U.S. satellites:  From 1992 - 2017, the aggregate sea level rise was only 2.8 inches.

-Hottest Year on Record:  The hottest year on record in U.S. history was *1934*.

-The worst drought in 1,000 years:  NASA announced that it occurred in *1934*. 

-The largest amount of Antarctic sea ice extent:   It occurred in the Year *2014*.

-Cold Start:  Record low N. American cold-wave continued into January *2018*.

-Coldest Finish:   The coldest cloud mass recorded was -168F on Dec 29, *2018*.

-Encore:  Worse N. Amer. cold-wave (4,700 cancelled flights in 2 days) in *2019*.

-Record Cold Numbers:  4,000+ record lows in U.S. from Oct 24 to Nov 1, *2019*.

-Depending on locale:  Coldest February since 1936 & 1989 was February *2021*.

-The Antarctic Winter:  The coldest Winter in  Antarctica's  history was in *2021*.

Responding to Global Warmists' predictions that there will be mostly failed crops:

-Agro Exports:  The record high year for U.S. Agricultural Exports was in *2021*.

-Record American Harvest: America's record high soy crop harvest was in *2021*.

-Record harvest:   Australian farmers harvested their largest wheat crop in  *2021*.

-Record Rice:  India's all-time record high rice production of 121 mt was in *2021*.

-Record high sugar cane crop:  For the State of Louisiana, it's #1 year was *2021.*

-Greenland Snow: Greenland's record 12 GIGATON snow gain was in May *2021*. 

-Cloud Altitude: Temp minus dew point ... divided by 4.4 ... times 1,000 = Cloud base.

As a general rule, the higher the cloud mass the more infrared heat it can retain.

Dew refers to the appearance of liquid water as temps decrease.  Dew appears when the air is saturated with water vapor.  Yet, water vapor is 90% of all greenhouse gases.  Thus, it's quantity on Earth is limited, because of the existence of the dew point.  It's can't rise to the point of over-heating the Earth.

Water Vapor cannot perform any type of "runaway feedback" that leads to the temps of Venus.  The other greenhouse gases, combined, are minor when compared to water vapor.  Yet, there is more to the heating equation, namely Albedo.  Albedo is the amount of sunlight reflected back into outer-space, as soon as it makes contact with something reflexive on Planet Earth.  

The color white has a high albedo.  Sunlight reflecting off of a mirror has 100% albedo.  Moreover, from the Parallel Latitude, 40 degrees, all the way to the Pole, more heat constantly leaves Planet Earth's atmosphere than enters into it.  This is the case in the northern and southern hemispheres.  

The least albedo on Earth occurs with black asphalt.  Asphalt is a great retainer of infrared heat.  Plus, Cirrus Clouds capture infrared heat far more effectively than does co2.          

Western Massachusetts in the Summer of 2024.  No Climate Crisis hear, folks.

            -The photographs directly above & below illustrate the actual carbon footprint of CO2.           

Water Vapor has ZERO carbon footprint, and it's 90% of all greenhouse gases, by volume.

Evidentiary support needed to prove false the many doomsday climate assertions: 

{1} A century & a half of newspaper & magazine articles.   {2} Old government records (which have NOT been "homogenized" with numerical alterations).   {3} Present-day observable sea levels in comparison to unaltered past records of the same.   {4} The present-day state of the Antarctic Ross Shelf, as video-recorded by New Zealand scientists, in 2017.  {5} a private pilot training program's Weather Theory textbook  {6} the failed doomsday predictions of none other than ... drum roll please ... Jim Hansen ... who is not to be confused with the Jim Henson who founded the Muppets.   {7} Add Al Gore's failed predictions, too.

Preliminary Note:  Climate misrepresentations are spread by /|\certain scientists, /|\media networks that subsist mostly on corporate advertising dollars, and /|\certain congressional members, in quest of {1} more NGO grant money, or {2} more Congressional funding, or {3} the enactment of the very fraudulent carbon tax, or {4} grass roots funding popularity, or {5} TV ratings, being that fear sells.  

The first task of the climate racketeer, in order to obtain large amounts of money, was to that the climate racketeer needed to become the primary influence of people, without allowing debate or counterpoint.  Thus, the first goal of the Climate Racketeer was to become a Climate Nazi.  No free speech.   

Next came attempts to make society feel a sense of urgency, followed by people demanding governments to fund the scientists ... or impose the carbon tax ... or something else manipulative & unconscionable.

Preliminary Summary:  During the Cambrian Explosion, when sea-life & shell-life came into being and proliferated throughout the oceans of the Earth, the co2 levels were approximately 16 times HIGHER than today.  

Yes, it was 16 times higher than at today's 421 ppm.  Yet, shell-fish thrived, instead of experiencing dissolving shells.  It would take centuries for the present 8.1 PH ocean to decrease to a neutral 7.0 PH.  In fact, at the end of the Pre-industrial Era, the average ocean PH was 8.2.    

Moreover, due to the oceans' currents, ocean PH is NOT uniform.  In addition, correctly measuring the PH in specific ocean areas can be difficult.  Firstly, the apparatus usually used is a "standard laboratory liquid junction glass electrode."  This tool has a membrane, and ocean particles attaching themselves to the membrane can become charged, negating the reading thereof.  There's more.  There is so much more to include, in this subject.

At this point, it's a reminder to state that certain government websites also present the ocean PH issue as another form of the end-of-the-world.  After all, for a politician to succeed during re-election time, he/she must make you think that the world will come to an end, if you don't vote for him/her.  

The Oceans' PH level topic is covered here:  The Oceans' Average PH Level

The London July 19, 2022 False Light Reports (pun intended)

The fraudulent, very false light reporting of the press, concerning the one July day when London was reported as having gone over 100F, is easy to prove a fraud via the official London Fire Brigade statistics dating back to 1966.  The fraud is NOT in the one-day temperature reading at Carlwood, Surrey.  The fraud is in the claim that fires were on the increase in the Greater London area, due to rising co2 levels.  The truth is that, by 2014, the number of Greater London fires fell almost 50% of the numbers that existed in 1966, when fire record keeping began.  Now, there was this hysteric claim that the month of July set off a number of fire so large that the fire brigade was being overwhelmed.  Here's the statistical truth: 

According to the London Fire Brigade's records department, at its very lowest amount of fires (2019), London averaged 49 FIRES A DAY, everyday in 2019.  During the year of the Greater London area's most fires, the daily average was 82 fires per day.

Now, concerning July 19, 2022, on social media reports I found a grand total of NINE fires reported in the Greater London area on that day.  That constitutes 40 less fires than the average day.  Well, recourse to the LFB records dept is a must, sometime in the future.

Let's review a bit more stats, concerning London's fire history, so that you will understand the widespread lying that occurred in response to that one Carlwood Surrey day when temps were PROVISIONALLY reported at 39.1C (102.4F):

~ the LEAST amount of fires that Greater London had in a year's time was 17,993, in 2019.  In that year, the London Fire Brigade also reported that London fires have been reduced by 34%.  It furthermore stated that "fires in the home" decreased by 23% since 2010.  

In fact, a statistical chart provided by the LFB shows that fires decreased steadily since 2001.  Moreover, the 2001 number was equal to late 1980s' number and mid-1990s, per year.  That same one report also stated that the Greater London Fires of 2010 numbered 27,462 (9,500 more than in 2019). 

OCTOBER 2022 UPDATE

As an update, it turns out that the Year 2021 was the one with the least number of fires, since record keeping began in 1966.  14,929 is the number.  The previous low year was 2020, with 17,409. 

As far as goes 2022, up to October 10, there have been 14,633, thus far.  This shows that, as the atmospheric CO2 level steadily increased, London area fires steadily DECREASED.  This proves that the commercial media lied to the public about co2 causing London to burn.  Its personnel should be fired and replaced with honest journalists.

See:   London Fire Brigade Incident records

           The chart above is the smoking gun that proves media dishonesty.  (For those in the American public school system, the pun is in the word, "smoking," as in the proven false claim that rising co2 levels set London on fire and caused smoke to rise, in 2022.")  For others, take note that, from 1968 to 2003, there were OVER 40,000 fires per year in the Greater London Area.  From that point onward, the yearly number of fires decreased to half or so.  Meanwhile co2 levels were rising, as London fires were DECREASING.   Conclusion:  The rise in co2 does NOT trigger more London Area fires.  It only triggers more journalists' lies.

Also see:  LFB reports 2019 as year with lowest fires since record keeping began in 1966.

Since record keeping began in 1966, the average fire per day in London was gone from 82 a day to 49 a day.  Case closed.  A lot of news reporters need to be fired, for lying about the cause of the fires ... pun NOT intended.

Back to the Dishonest July 19th Game

Of course, it was reported that July 19, 2022 was the height of an ongoing heat wave that resulted in 103F heat and burning houses.  The temperature was reported as the hottest England ever had experienced.   Well, it was a matter of one PROVISIONAL temperature report from Carlwood, Surrey, England, at 39.1C (aka 102.38F)  Carlwood and London get the same weather, incidentally.

Anyway, the day prior was a day reported as 99F (aka 37.2C), and the day prior to that was an 86F day which is non-spectacular for America and a lot of other places on Earth.  

Incidentally, the 99F day was amended to a lower temperature (94F in one chart and 96F in a different chart.)  None the less, official protocol is that, in order for a time span to be declared a heat-wave, the heat must continue consecutively for five days.

The 39.1C (102.4F) in Carlwood, Surrey, England was "amended" (officially revised) within 11 days, to the downward temperature of 99F (37.2C), by one reputable weather website.  And it was only reduced to 102F by a different reputable weather site.  So, which is the true amended temperature? 

By the way, photosynthesis comes in many colors.  This is a tulip fueled by CO2.

Concerning the media ratings hunt, Project Veritas has a visual & audio recording of one-time CNN technical director, Charlie Chester.  In it, he says that CNN's next campaign will be "Global Warming Awareness," without him having made any mention of the scientifically certified "Global Warming Pause of 1999 - 2016," & without him having mentioned the 1940-1975 temperature decline.  This means that CNN has predetermined what the breaking news is going to be months before breaking news occurs.

27 Gigaton Gain in Five Days.  12 Gigaton Gain in One Day.

Neither are you to expect to hear CNN mention the 27 gigaton snow gain in Greenland, from April 14-18, 2020, as well as similar Greenland snow gains.  Similar gains include the May 26, 2021 snow gain of 12 gigatons --- all in one day.   Concerning that one day:

Observe the blue graph line's vertical end.  It's a line of blue that shoots straight upward.  The chart attached to the blue signifies the "Surface Mass Balance" of Greenland, from Sept 2020 to August 2021.  Incidentally, the gully in the graph, where no snow gain occurred, is called Summertime.  The seasons are caused by the tilt (the obliquity) of the Earth; and not by co2.

Gigatons:  One-day gains also included 6 Gt (5 times), 7 Gt (2 times), & 10 Gt (once).

Of course, do NOT expect CNN to detail Antarctica's Winter of 2021.  It was the coldest Winter in its known history, and the timing of that coldest winter was a wooden stake directed straight into the heart of Global Warming Hysteria.  

Also forgot about hearing the details of the 2021 record high soy crop harvest in America and the 2021 record high wheat harvest of Australian farmers. Also add to the CNN Ignore List the record high agricultural exports from the United States which occurred in the same year of 2021. 

In like fashion, assume that there will be no attention given to the 21% gain in the 2021 American cotton crop, as well as America's professional success in its 2021 corn crop.  Add to the no-attention list India's record high rice production of approx 121 million metric tonnes which also occurred in the Year 2021.

These things are important to hide from you, because the recent harvest successes prove Al Gore completely wrong in his assertion that an elevated level of co2 will result in a disastrous fate for agriculture on Planet Earth.  Only crop failures will be reported by CNN; not crop triumphs.

See:  Greenland gained 27 gigatons of snow in five days, in 2020

Perhaps you noticed that CNN ratcheted-up the climate doomsday scenario as far back as August 2021, after the MASSIVE Greenland snow accumulation of May & June 2021.  It's explained further inside these written (as opposed to spoken) discourses.  

East Australia Joined in the Record Cold Club

For now, take note that the Australian East Coast, as recently as 2022, was undergoing record lengths in cold phases, while CNN was hyping-up the one July day, and one July day only, when one Carlwood Surrey thermometer read 102.38F (39.1C).  Canada had record cold in 2021 and this year (2022), too.   But, don't expect that to be mentioned by CNN very often, if ever at all.

See:  2022 Australian record cold

See also:  Australian regions coldest in 100 & 33 yrs.

And: Aussie "record long" cold spell during sole London 100+F day

Newsflash:  There was Global Cooling and Global Warming occurring on a Planet Earth during the same general time span, in 2022.  On a round planet, one man's flood is another man's drought, and one man's heatwave is another man's cold spell.

In as much, while CNN was screaming, "Global Warming, Global Warming," the Northeast of the United States experienced record breaking cold in the Winter of 2021/2022.  CNN will remain steadfast in the deliberate infliction of emotional distress upon school children with horror story after horror story of the life-giving photosynthesis molecule, co2.

See:  Record Cold in Northeast America, 2022

See also:  Record breaking cold visits the Northeast of America 

There will also be no expected mention of NASA having reported, with satellite samples, that the Arctic region of Planet Earth has become greener during the Summer.  Nor will there be mention of other geographic sectors of Planet Earth becoming greener. 

A conclusion nine years prior was that the biosphere in a given Arctic latitude is now as green as it was 430 miles more south, in 1982.  MSN News actually reported this in 2013.  Anyway, there are videos testifying to the greening of Arctic latitudes; ultimately testifying to the fact that more co2 is NOT doom.  More co2 simply means more photosynthesis on Planet Earth. 

Lookie see:   NASA affirms that the Arctic is now greener.

If you want to go green, you must increase the co2 level.

At this point, sea levels should be brought into focus.  Now, concerning the reported sea level rise of 2.8 inches in 25 years, it was assessed as such via the Topex-Poseidon Satellite and the Jason series (1, 2, and 3).  No polar bear is drowning in that 2.8 inches.

There was also the report that the average sea level rise since 1880 (to the Year 2020) was 8 to 9 inches.  Doomsayers claim it's ten inches ... in 142 years of time.  Do you see how unremarkable and non-apocalyptic these numbers are?

Plus, 1880 was shortly after the Mini Ice Age.  Some thawing was to be expected.  The present-day surmise is that the modern-day sea level elevation occurs at a rate of +3.6 mm every year.  At this point, take two pennies, stack them, and look at their sides ... look at their thickness.  The two pennies are 3.5 mm in thickness.  Is that anywhere near end-of-the-world quality sea level rise? 

Catastrophic Sea Level Rise?    Newsflash:  The Piers aren't underwater.

 

Let's also address the report that, during the 20 twenty year period of April 2002 to June 2021, Greenland lost approximately 4,471 gigatons of snow/ice.  Sounds like a devastatingly high amount which can put the eastern coastlines underwater, correct?  Well, it corresponds to a sea level increase of . . . no more than 1.2 centimeters.  That's one point two centimeters.  That's also .47 inches.   That's half an inch of sea rise ... in 20 years' time.  Excuse me, but where is the end-of-the-world doom in all of this?

Let's go through the numbers, to show how minuscule 4,471 gigatons are, in relation to the oceans of Planet Earth.

Greenland is three times the size of Texas.  It's one and a quarter times the size of Alaska --- and eight times larger than Colorado.  Massive allotments of ice are there.  Now, 4,471 gigatons of melted ice were reported as having entered the Atlantic Ocean, in a 20 year period.  The news reports acted as if we all were going to drown.  At this point, keep in mind that ALL oceans are connected to each other.  No walls separate them.

Firstly, a gigaton is a billion tonnes.  It's concisely 2,204,622,621,848 lbs.  4,471 gigatons = 9,856,867,742,282,408 lbs.  

The mass of the Earth's atmosphere is 5.5 MILLION gigatons.  That's 5,500,000 gigatons times 2,204,622,621,848 lbs = 12,125,424,420,200,000,000 lbs.

At present, we're speaking of ice melt in Greenland.  So, we need to calculate in terms of gallons of water.  A gallon is 8.333 American pounds (lbs.)  The 4,471 gigatons of melted Greenland ice translates into 9,856,867,742,282,408 divided by 8.333 = 1,182,871,443,931,646 quadrillon gallons of water.   

Now, the Earth's oceans hold circa 352 quintillon gallons of water (add 18 zeros). 

 Gallons of water in all oceans:              352,000,000,000,000,000,000

minus 4,471 gigatons melted Greenland snow  1,182,871,443,931,646 =

                                                                351,998,817,128,557,068,354 gallons

 In adding the melted 4,471 gigatons to existing ocean waters, one yields 352,001,182,871,443,931,646 gallons

Now for a percentage:   The percentage of the 1.182 quadrillon gallons of Greenland water, in comparison to the Earth's 352 quintillon gallon oceans   =    0.000335%

 Compared to the connected oceans of the Earth, 4,471 gigatons coming off the Greenland ice sheet --- in a 20 year period --- is insignificantly tiny.  It's an insult to the common citizen's intelligence, when the common citizen does basic mathematics on the issue.  The ice melt quantity could not yield any sea level elevation more than an equally insignificant 1.2 centimeters (aka .47 inches --- aka a half inch), in 20 years time. 

And this is supposed to be the end of the world.  It's con artistry that is easy to uncover as such.  "They" think that you're stupid and easy to intimidate.  It's the ongoing theft of the American taxpayer.

 Reference:  1.2 cm sea rise in 20 yrs of Greenland ice melt 

Record High Sea Level in 2020 ... a rise of mere inches

The National Centers for Environmental Information, a subsidiary of NOAA, reported the following:  

"In 2020, global sea level set a new record high---3.6 inches (91.3 millimeters) above 1993 levels, according to NOAA."  

That's all?  That is supposed to be Doomsday?  Well, don't go high-diving into 3.6 inches of water.  

The lesson here is that, when a government claims to have broken a climate record or an ocean record, the numbers involved are petty and insignificant.  A 3.6 inch sea level rise is not the end of the world.  Perceive the pettiness under the guise of earth-shattering, record breaking, we're-all-gonna-die, climate change news.

Of course, the response from the Global Warmists is that the fresh Greenland water will lesson the salinity of the Atlantic Ocean and cause an Ice Age in Western Europe.  

Well, the facts are that Spain (the land of some of my people), Sicily, mainland Italy (also a land of some of my people), and Greece (the land of some of my other people) reached temperatures in the 100F and even 110F department as recently as 2022, or even 2021, 2020, etc.   It's the Mediterranean.  That's what it does in the Summer, there.  The 90s are common for parts of Spain, Italy, Greece, etc.  So, where is this new Mini Ice Age caused by CO2's wanton melting off the Greenland ice sheet into the Atlantic Ocean?  

BTW, how can co2 melt Greenland's ice sheet when there is constant albedo deflection/reflection/refraction occurring at the massive ice sheet there?  For those in the American public school system, albedo is the "angle of deflection" when UV rays enter Earth's atmosphere, hit the color white, and literally jet back into space at the speed of light. All in all, where there happens to be no infrared light, there happens to be no heating power for CO2.  Even at that, CO2 action only happens to occur at 3.7 watts per meter squared, anyway.

CO2 is plant food ... not jet fuel.   The greenhouse gas which rules the world is Water Vapor.  In fact, CO2 is to Water Vapor what a pinch hitter is to the lead-off hitter of a baseball team.

The climate hysteria falsehoods that were spread are sleight-of-hand distortions more than they are outright lies, with one exception.  The exception was admitted to have been a common enough practice, according to the 2009 Climategate Emails.  The exception is that record high temperatures were reported in Africa where there were NO WEATHER MONITORING STATIONS.  Those officially stated temperatures have no empirical evidence, and therefore no foundation.

Mostly, however, the fraudulent misrepresentations were/are hyped-up exaggerations, always prodding those unfamiliar with basic atmospheric science to believe that the end is near.  This translates into the uninformed and the misinformed members of humanity believing that they have to submit to Draconian measures, even to the point of killing off a painfully significant percentage of the human population.  This is called Eugenics.  Eugenics includes sterilization, abortion, & "euthanasia."

The other technique in corporate media dishonesty is to omit reports about record cold and the replenishing of glaciers wherever ice re-accumulation is occurring.   Only the ice loss gets reported, as if it were permanent loss, and as if we're all going to die from it.  This is de facto censorship.  This is the act of hiding the truth.  

In a free society, there is Point/Counterpoint, and a second round of debate.  Today, there is only censorship by high tech tyrants and the now-dictatorial corporate advertisement media.  None the less, newspaper archives of decades past can expose false declarative statements spread by Climate Doomsday Racketeers.

For example, the Gore CO2 Doctrine is easily refuted by the 1970s newspaper & magazine articles that addressed the long-experienced cooling trend of the 20th Century.  The New York Times article below is one of many pieces of archival evidence. 

According to Al Gore and company, there should have been temperature increases during and after WWII, due to the tremendous amount of industrial manufacturing that took place at that time.  Ironically, the opposite happened.  The world entered into a 40 year cooling phase while the war was still in progress.  An example is the bitter cold endured during the Battle of the Bulge, aka the Siege of Bastogne.   

Above:  American B-24 crew stationed at an air base in East Anglia England.

There were brutally cold temperatures during the Korean war, also; 1950 to 1953.  American industrialization continued, none the less.  Yet, the temperature decline held its course for 35 or so years. 

                  See:    The depth of cold in the Korean War

A peace time example of the temperature decline was the Big Freeze of 1962.  Having begun in December 22, it did not subside until March of 1963.  It was the coldest winter in Central England since 1740, and 1740 was within the depths of the Mini Ice Age.

By the time 1978 arrived, the climate was already recognized as having gone through a "thirty year cooling trend," despite the industrialized uptick in co2 levels.  This dispels the Gore Doctrine.  This, alone, proves non-scientist Al Gore to be completely wrong.

Gore is as wrong at this atmospheric co2 assertion as he was when he went on the late night NBC show hosted by the extremely intelligent Conan O'Brien.  Gore claimed that the center of the Earth is millions of degrees.  Well, Brain Cells Gore didn't realize that the Earth would have vaporized long ago, if its core were millions of degrees.  The center of the Earth is 9,800F to 10,800F.  That's hot enough.

Yet another scientific finding that disproves Gore's doctrine

The 2017 crystallization of the bottom of the massive Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica dispelled it too, as did the regrowing of the Jakobshavn Glacier, along with the fact that the glaciers of Glacier National Park did not melt into non-existence, by the predicted year of 2020.

The Ultimate Reality Check for co2 doomsayers.  While co2 rose, Earth underwent a cooling trend.

Needless to say, the goal in all the climate exaggerations and in the censorship of Climate Whistleblowers is this:  To keep all of mankind convinced that a rise in the co2 level will automatically result in a rise in temperature and a rise in "weather disasters;" --- and to simultaneously have mankind believe that all of the weather disasters are caused by industrial factories and the operating of combustible engines, instead of decadal ocean oscillations and the Sun Spot Cycle (aka the Milankovitch Cycles) .

Even in mentioning coal, the media only mentions its emission of life-giving co2, while omitting from the conversation the true pollutant in coal --- namely, deadly airborne mercury.  Coal needs high tech filtration processes --- or coal needs a clever natural filtration process that only the common sensed can conjure.

The great outrage of obsessing over man-made co2, in a Troposphere that contains less than one half of one percent of co2, is that the true environmental enemies of mankind are ignored and neglected for the most part.  Today's great environmental enemy is ===>  

. . . the irresponsible distribution & use of synthetic chemicals, as well as the dissemination of any petrochemical that goes unfiltered or unregulated. Add to this the use of toxic construction material and furniture-making material.

~~~

A review of the contradictions of the corporate advertising media, in its collective climate doom predictions, includes the following:

{1} CO2 levels having been 9+ times higher during the Ordovician Ice Age than today.  {2} The graph presented by Al Gore at the start of his first movie having been narrated backwards, in that ice-cores showed that a rise in global temperatures came first, followed by relatively a small rise in the co2 level.  Plus ===>

{3} The atmospheric physics rule of pressure gradient forcing which means that warm periods do not have hurricanes and other low pressure storms in high numbers.   {4} The Year 2021 having been a year of record high crop harvesting and record high agricultural exportation for India, Australia, and the United States, thereby proving wrong Al Gore's predictions of crop disaster in any heightened co2 environment.

In fact, growers purposely add co2 to their greenhouse air.  Those growers proved that, if you want to go green, you must increase the co2.

Another great irony in co2 is that, in its liquid states, co2 is commercially used as ... a refrigerant.  

Zero major hurricanes made landfall in the U.S. between Wilma (2005) and Harvey (2017)

In fact, the great irony about the first Gore movie is this:  The year after the movie was released, the U.S. did NOT have a major hurricane making landfall on its shores for 12 consecutive years.  The opposite of what Gore predicted in that movie occurred.  It's now 18 years later, and there still has NEVER been a Category 6 hurricane.  Plus, NO hurricane ever rose to the speed of an EF4 or EF5 (T10+) tornado.  Hurricanes did NOT become more intense, in any capacity, as Gore's predicted. 

The hurricane record, alone, proved that Gore was and is a lying & thieving  charlatan.  None of his doomsday predictions ever came true. 

Failed doomsday predictions:::  1} The Maldives did NOT go underwater, but instead, became frequented by financially affluent Arabians who are apparently really really happy with the place.  

2} The Arctic Ocean has not even come close to an ice-free Summer.  The closest to Gore's prediction was 1.32 MILLION square miles of ice remaining intact at the end of the Drought Year of 2012.  That's the lowest. 

3} The previously mentioned "Category Six Hurricane" prediction & the general intensification of hurricanes prediction.   Include the previously mentioned fact that never in known history was there any hurricane equal to an F4, EF4, or an F5, EF5 tornado.

4} Gore predicted that lower Manhattan would go underwater.  Everyone in New York, New Jersey, and everywhere else knows that it didn't do so.

~~~

BTW, keep in mind the US Supreme Ct case law authority known as Times vs Sullivan.  It is lawful for a private citizen to make known his opinion of a public figure, where there is no malice.  Malice involves intentional deceit, and not the surmise of easy-to-proof factual information.  In my opinion, Al Gore is an unconscionable con artist who was repeatedly proven wrong in his predictions.

All in all, the trick has been to render you and all of society in a state of paralyzing fear, and then rob you.  If you were too smart to fall for their contradictions and false climate history assertions, they would resort to bullying you with bratty name calling.

If you didn't get intimidated by the name-calling, the climate racketeers ended up trying to terrorize your mind by seeking government coercion and the abuse of governmental power.  This included seeking laws that result in the arrest, prosecution, and imprisonment for climate whistleblowers of influence.  

Senator Robert Kennedy Jr already did this psychological ploy, in mentioning out loud (in front of a camera) that the climate whistleblowers should get their "cot & three meals" at the International Criminal Court prison in Scheveningen, Netherlands.  Well, he mentioned "the Hague."  But, close enough.

Above:  The true carbon footprint left behind by co2.  CO2 is the "going-green" molecule.

Now, there was the relatively recent change of data numbers of past charts, tables, and grafts related to climate and weather. They are now the amended charts & graphs, done in the name of "homogenization."   Thus, the record heat that was reported in hundreds of newspapers in the 1930s is now recorded by NOAA as not worth our attention.  And even though research scholars proved, via proxy evidence, that 1934 was the worst drought in one thousand years, it will no longer indicate this on certain adjusted government graphs of recent.

The De Facto Original Climate Record

Keep in mind that the newspapers of old (as in the weather disaster Years 1871, 1878, 1911, 1921, 1922, 1934, 1936, etc) additionally reported on the human pain experienced, as well as the heat deaths, the fire deaths, the crop losses, and the mass exodus from cities during heat waves; not just the temperature numbers.  Thus, the newspapers are the original climate record.  

This means that, if today's amended numbers in the charts, tables, and graphs of the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration fail to reflect the newspaper reports of the actual temperatures, the pain, and the loss reported at the time of the actual weather disasters, then you have yourself a case of massive fraud, with the motive being the predictable ploy for Congressional money, NGO money, publishing prestige, etc.  

Let us review a couple of these weather disaster allegations which either qualify as outright frauds or as gross misinterpretations of valid data or erroneous data --- and therefore they constitute artificially created media hype designed to capture higher ratings:

Sample #1 of the endless end-of-the-world climate hysteria being once again disproved is ===>

August 2021:  Media giant CNN & US government administrator NOAA reported with full certainty that July of 2021 was the hottest MONTH for the entire planet in our collective lifetime.  Now, this would infallibly translate into guaranteed crop failure in major proportions, by September or October of 2021, according to the Al Gore Pretend School of Atmospheric Physics.  This would have also guaranteed that there would be no positive record-breaking crop success anywhere in the same year.  

 Newsflash:  The 2021 American, Indian, and Australian harvests were the opposite of the type of harvest that results from disastrous heat.  NOAA's Rick Spinrad has a lot of 'splaining to do.

Undeniable Fact #1:  The United States Department of Agriculture officially reported that the soybean harvest of 2021 resulted in the United States' all-time record HIGH.  The same USDA reported that the corn harvest of 2021 was near the United States' all time record HIGH.  In fact, 2021 cotton production was up 21% from 2020.   Thus, there was no heat-related weather disaster in the American farmlands, in 2021 ... especially in July.

See: soy at record high, corn near record high, cotton up 21%.

Moreover:   In the Year 2021 . . . in the year that was reported to have had the hottest month of July ever, and which would have infallibly resulted in widespread crop disasters . . .

 The USDA furthermore reported that the United States of America's "AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS SHATTERED RECORDS IN 2021," "eclipsing the previous record, set in 2014, by 14.6%."

 See:  U.S. agricultural exports shatter records in 2021.

In re: India's record rice production 

See:  India's rice exports up 46% in 2021

See also: India's 2021 rice production, 121 million metric tonnes.

In re: Australian Agriculture

 See:  Australian farmers harvest record wheat crop

Antarctica had its Coldest Winter in Known history in 2021

Yes, the supreme asininity of NOAA's doomsday heat claim of July 2021 consisted in the fact that Antarctica ended up having its coldest Winter in recorded history in 2021.  July 2021 was during the coldest Antarctic Winter in history.  This negated everything that the NOAA asserted.

The reason why July 2021 was claimed as such by NOAA was this:  In May & June of 2021, Greenland underwent winter conditions which was the undoing of the co2 Global Warming theory.  Then, in July, Greenland's surface temperature went up significantly.  So, the NOAA used the July temperature record to hide the cold temperature record of the preceding months.  This is a form of deception.

~~~

We continue with the sham report (or else the heavily misinterpreted report) about July 2021.  Now, it was reported to have been the hottest month worldwide, in the lifetimes of everyone alive.  Well, observe the temperature reports of the entire month of July 2021, in the following sample of international cities.  So, where is all this man-made co2 driven temperature anomaly doom?

Ladies & gentlemen, I first present to you Mexico City, a place far south of the hot hot southern states of the United States.  Looking at its July temperature record instantly makes you ask, "Where are all the hideously high Summertime doom temperatures, during the hottest July of our lifetime?"   During July 2021, a person literally had to wear a light jacket at night, in Mexico City.

Let's now go to the capital city of the African Congo.  It's called Kinshasa, and it should have been exceptionally hot in that African town, during the hottest month in human memory.  Right?  Well, there was nothing to write home about.  All July 2021 days there were in the 80s Fahrenheit, except for three days in the low 90s.  Two days were at 90F and one day was at 91F.  This does NOT constitute the kind of weather disaster you would expect to witness during the hottest month known to living beings.   

]In all honesty, the hottest of the hot years were 1931, 1934, and 1936.  In fact, the hottest daily temperature ever recorded occurred during 1913.  Hottest months should be located within those years.

We now travel to the African capital of Kenya, Nairobi City.  It should have been super hot there, during the hottest month in human memory.  Right?  Not even close.  In July 2021, there was NOT a day over 75 degrees Fahrenheit.  So, where is all this Kenyan Global Warming doom that Al Gore mentioned in his 2006 movie?  It looks like someone was committing pretty intense fraud, in the making of that movie.

Let's take a look at Los Angeles, in July of 2021.  LA should be a high temperature place during the hottest month known to all the living.  Well, it wasn't.  It was average Summertime temperatures.  Nothing epic. Nothing apocalyptic.  Only one out of 31 days in the low 90s.  You could find this kind of weather up north.

We travel further eastward, to the modernized megacity of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.  It's located at the center of the Western Indian coastline, next to the Arabian Sea which, too, is supposed to be undergoing ocean warming at the hands of evil evil man-made co2.  

Plus, Mumbai is a Northern Hemispheric city, at the same latitude as is Mexico City.  Well, in July 2021 not a single day was over 92 degrees Fahrenheit, and after July 7, 2021, there was not a single day over 89F, in Mumbai.  And remember, there are cities, such as New Dehli and Phoenix Arizona, where temperatures are habitually over 100F, two weeks in succession, even with temps going into 111F or 112F for consecutive days at a time.  Mumbai is not one of them.   July 2021 was a typical month there; not the hottest in memory.

We continue our rotation around the Earth and land in Quito, Ecuador.  Now, this is a place where the angle of the sun makes a direct hit.  So, the hottest month in the memory of every living human should have been one where Quito was absolutely cooking.  Well, there was no heat wave in Quito that month.  Throughout that entire month (July 2021) in Ecuador, it was Autumn coat weather.

I can go further, with numerous examples.  But, hopefully you get the message.  You have been the recipient of distortion and dishonesty, at the hands of dishonest abusers of power.

More Examples of Hyper-exaggeration

Then comes the sensationalized two-day period in London, this past July.  It was heralded as the arrival of the Apocalypse of Mankind.  In July 18 and 19 of 2022, there was a report of a 99F Monday followed by a 103F Tuesday in London.  The days immediately surrounding these two days were utterly average.

True Newsflash:  The July 19th temperature was recorded as  PROVISIONAL, at 39.1C (102.38F). The sole place where this 102.4F temperature was recorded was Charlwood, Surrey, England. 

The reputable weather sites marked the Tuesday temperature as being 103F. Eleven days later, there appeared in a couple weather websites an amended temperature.  Monday's 99F day was downgraded to 96F.  At one reputable weather site the July 19th temperature was downgraded to 99F.  At another reputable weather site the July 19 day was posted at 102F.  It was only two days of heat.  An official heatwave required at least five consecutive days of heat.

Rare Occurrence in London:

The more the press kept stating that it was {1} London's hottest day since August 2003, & {2} it's first 100+F degree day since 2006,  & {3} Britain's hottest night since 1990, the more it was confirming that such temperatures have been extremely rare in Britain and are not part of any habitual Global Warming pattern. 

Evidence of true Global Warming would consist in a pattern of repeated days over 100F, year after year.  Global Warming is a weather habit.  It's a repeatedly experienced pattern;  not a once-in-every 32 year (or a once in every 16 year) event.  

Okay now.  Here's London, in July of 2022, where the media was claiming that a deadly heat wave was hovering throughout its city limits.  Now, look at the July 2022 temperature chart (before the revision was made), and show me where the Climate Heat Apocalypse is.

Then comes a video example on how the typical classroom climate doomsayer lies in the midst of blatant contrary evidence, under the guise of being a "scholar."  This literally qualifies as Idiocy 101.

See: Sample of Climate Doomsayers' Ridiculous Misrepresentations

One prediction was that children would no longer see snow.  Explain this, then.

Before anything else, take more than a moment looking at the chart below.  It's the statistical average (per decade) of deaths due to natural disasters.  Also keep in mind that "natural disasters" used to be called Acts of God.  But, they are now called man's fault in an Anthropogenic Climate Crisis that presently has no "data base" statistics that prove increasing numbers of any kind of an atmospheric crisis. 

As examples which prove that the statistically opposite of climate doom predictions have occurred, the Blue Marble Album posted proof showing this to be the case in a number of occasions:

As one example addressed below here, the Blue Marble Album has posted on it the LFB (London Fire Brigade) statistical chart showing that there have been far less Greater London Area fires, since record keeping began in 1966, with a steady downward decline beginning circa 2003 and continuing in 2021.  The least number of fires was 17,993, in 2017.  Greater London means county-wide; not merely within the city perimeters.

As another example addressed below, the US Forest Service provided a chart (that was posted at the Blue Marble Album) which statistically illustrated that there were 5 times more forest fires in decades past than there are today.

On the positive number side, record high crop harvests, crop production, and crop exporting has been regularly occurring, especially in 2021.  Links to those official announcements, with occasional official charts, are have been posted at the Blue Marble Album, too.  

In fact, it was also in 2021 when Antarctica had its coldest winter on record, and such a thing negated any semblance of Global Warming, as opposed to localized warming here and there.  

All in all, look at the natural disaster death rate chart, and notice how intensely the deaths have decreased, thereby showing the U.N. and all of its Third World propagandists to be utterly dishonest.

The U.N. Writers Need to Study Math & Algebra 

The first algebra-mathematics lesson is this:  The American taxpayer of off whom numerous nations have leeched has no more money to spare.  The United States is over $30 TRILLION in debt.   There is no money for the typical political con artist to tell the U.N. assembly that the world is going to come to an end tomorrow, if the United States taxpayers don't shell out all their available money today.  You've drained America dry, and Chinese money has predatory loan strings attached to it.  That would leave you with Russia and its petrol sales profits.

The World is once again coming to an end tomorrow and the tomorrow after the next one. 

In September 2021, as the United States was engaged in record high crop harvesting and exporting, there was an onslaught of media press releases about the U.N. declaring that there were 11,000 "weather disasters" in the past fifty years, due to the rise in co2 (and other greenhouse gases).  The same U.N. declared that there are 4-5 times more weather disasters today, than there were fifty years ago.  

It's time-out time, for a moment, here.  

Example 1 is the list of the deadliest Atlantic Ocean hurricanes.  The vast majority of those deadly storms occurred much before the turn of the Millennium.  Only Hurricane Maria was a 21st Century storm. Other years of the most deadly of storms included 1780, 1900, 1963, 1776, 1928, 1775, 1909.  These deadly storms occurred when co2 levels were much lower than today.  Once again, the Al Gore - John Kerry - Michael Mann co2 causation theory doesn't ride a wave in this statistical department.

This "table" also indicates that the U.N. authors are quite the liars, in having claimed first that there are far more deaths today than in days of old.  The actual September 2021 document states the opposite, in having stated that fatalities decreased due to modern technology.  However, the media, the press, the TV stations, the internet video sites claim that there are more natural disaster deaths today.  That's a big lie.

Ben Franklin was literally alive during THREE of the most deadly Atlantic hurricanes.

of the contradiction in that U.N. claim:  You perhaps looked at the Climate Discourse which displayed the official US Forest Service chart which showed that, in the 1920s, '30s, & '40s, forest fires consumed 5 times more acreage than today ... and in the 2010s, the 2000s, the '90s, the '80s, etc.  The numbers comprise 650 MILLION acres burned between and including 1926 to 1943.  Only 133 million acres were burned between and including 2004 and 2021.

FURTHERMORE, the statistics & press releases of the London Fire Brigade attest to the reality that Greater London Fires, by the Year 2014, occurred at half the frequency than in the '60s, 70s, etc.  The chart looks like a sliding board, in displaying the decrease of Greater London Area fires.  None the less, in its least year, (2017),  the Greater London Area had over 17,000 fires.  Every year since 1966, Greater London had at least 935,000 fires.  Which one of those fires were counted by the U.N. as weather disasters?  Any fire that occurred on July 19 in England was declared as such.

The first question:  What constitutes a U.N. weather disaster?

If this sensational U.N. claim is true, it means that there was an average of one disaster every 40 hours, for 50 consecutive years.  This translates into 4 weather disasters every week for 2,600 consecutive weeks (50x52=2600).  

This also translates into 18 weather disasters every month, for the past 600 months.  Now, where is all the archived newspaper, magazine, and TV coverage on these events?  The phrase, Weather Disaster, is understood to mean "Front Page News" --- "Once in a lifetime" event --- "your-life-will-never-be-the-same-again" event, much like war.  A weather disaster is assumed to be a special occurrence which deserves to be reported & published . . . in the newspaper.   So, where is all the newspaper coverage for 11,000 incidents?

On the other side of the mathematics tree is the fact that US forest fires occur in the tens of thousands yearly, and not merely 11,000.  So, which fires get counted as one of the UN's 11,000 "weather disasters?"  

As an example of the numbers, at the turn of the millennium, in the Year 2000, there were 92,500 American wildfires that consumed 7.4 million acres.  In 2005, there were 64,303 wildfires that consumed 8.5 million acres of American land.  In fact, 2010 saw 71,971 US wildfires consuming 3.4 million acres of American land.   

All in all, that's 401,287 America wildfires were counted in only three sample years. That's a lot more than 11,000.  It makes the UN's 11,000 number not so intimidating.  

The realization is that the attempt to shock Americans into submitting to the will of the UN, Bill Gates, Michael Mann, Al Gore, and John Kerry is NOT going to work with all of the non-defined & vague numbers that the UN keeps shoving in front of humanity's faces.  Where are the data sets that were used by the U.N. for the September 2021 end-of-the-world proclamation?  

Methane & N2O:  Insignificantly low atmospheric quantities

The U.N. harped on the greenhouses Methane (CH4) & Nitrous Oxide (N2O), as if they were the other foreboding presences in the atmosphere.  Well, Methane has 28 times more power in capturing infrared heat than does co2, and Nitrous Oxide is reported to have 265 - 298 times more atmospheric heating capacity than co2.  The cancel-out factor is this: There's not enough N2O or methane in the atmosphere for them to make any difference in anything.

Here's the reality check ====> Methane exists in the Troposphere at 1.889 ppm.  That's One Point Eight Eight Nine parts per million.  Nitrous Oxide exists at 1/3 part per million (aka one part per three million, aka 330 parts per billion.)  Climate Doomsayers always withhold & even hide decisive facts.  That's the sign of deliberate liars acting in tandem.

Africa

Now, it was the Climategate Emails of 2009 which showed us that temperatures in certain African regions were made-up.  In fact, there were record high temperatures being recorded about Africa where there were NO WEATHER MONITORING STATIONS.  Are those fake African temperatures counted among the 11,000 alleged weather disasters of the past 50 years??

    It's Brain Cell Usage Time

Do you remember in 2003, when almost every American believed with assured certainty that there were Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq?   Do you remember reading how solidly the 1930s Germans believed every damning accusation leveled against the Jews per se?  It is now a modern day flashback to acknowledge that an entire nation of Hitler Believers did all they could do to do away with every Jew on Earth --- except for the occasionally defined "noble Jew."

Even in matters of science, do you remember reading how "the science" affirmatively assured humanity that every ulcer was the result of emotional stress, when the truth was that the Helicobacter Pylori Bacteria causes them?  

Do you remember "the science" proclaiming that brain damage is permanent?  Then came the hippocampus being restored in patients.  Also came the discovery that the brain can be replenished of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor.

Then there is the matter of the original assessment of cigarette smoking ladies --- that they only smoked out of a desire to be a man, instead smoking on account of the addicting power of nicotine.   

All in all, when foreboding declarations are made, test them for cracks.  In fact, discern the motive of the people making the melodramatic allegations.  A lot of times, the motive is money, as well as TV networks trying to improve their ratings.  Of course, networks seek to improve their rating for money purposes.

In light of the aforementioned thoughts, a reasonable person would conclude that any or all of the disastrous weather events counted by the U.N. should not include any event that happened in the midst of MONSOON SEASON, being that monsoons are naturally occurring events which help rice crop harvests, and grains planted after Monsoon season.

This would include landslides that result from decades of erosion, while a Monsoon is in progress.  In fact, any flooding that results from land grading projects and the such, must also be excluded in the UN tally sheet.  Well, were Monsoon season events and poor landscaping work counted among the "11,000 weather disasters," by the U.N.?    

You know, the U.N. has its ulterior motive, too.  The motive is to reach deeper into the United Stated taxpayers' pockets and pull out as much as possible, even for Third World Nations.  All that the U.N. needs to do is be honest and ask for charity dollars.  It didn't have to create nightmarish hype equal to Orson Welle's War of the Worlds presentation.

Monsoons are naturally occurring and regularly occurring.  CO2 is NOT a factor in them.  The factors are the tilt of the Earth and cold air entrapping moisture for an extended period.  In fact, the tilt of the Earth is the sole reason for the four seasons. Well, at the Poles there are only two seasons.

Tsunamis must not be counted either, being that earthquakes are not triggered by any atmospheric gas.  They are triggered by tectonic plate motion.  

Wintertime events must be excluded from the tally sheet, too, even though the Global Warming political wing started to blame record winter weather on Global Warming.  This is only possible when a snowstorm comes nine days or less after a heat wave.  Heat waves up North are usually in June, July, and August.  Snow storms are usually in December, January and February.  That's much longer than nine days.  None the less, co2 levels have been claimed as the instigator of every misfortune by climate racketeers, including record cold.

More People = More Infrastructure = More Financial Loss when the Big Bad Wolf Strikes

Any disaster is more costly today, because far more people live on Earth and inhabit areas visited by turbulent weather events, such as the coastline, regions near ample waterways, & Monsoon regions.  

BTW, proof that there is Climate Change Con Game transpiring is in the observation that the prices for coastline property are still in the upper echelon level.  If people believed the Al Gore horror story of rising shorelines, there would have been a mass exodus from all coastlines.  

Today, those coastal areas that do get visited by occasional weather turbulence have much more man-made infrastructure on them.  There are now more houses and more buildings for a big bad wolf to blow down.   Thus, the hurricane damage is more costly per hurricanes.  HOWEVER, there still has not been a Category Six hurricane.  Hurricane intensities did NOT increase.  In fact, in the 12 year period between Huricane Wilma (2005) and Hurricane Harvey (2017), ZERO major hurricanes made landfall on United States shorelines.

The contradiction in the number of weather disaster deaths

Now, the news reports stated that the UN claimed that 2 million lives were lost in weather disasters.   Yet, the September 2021 UN report stated that less lives were lost in the modern weather disasters, due to modern technology.  So, which is it?   Have more people died or less people, during weather attacks?   You can't have both.

Ironically, the most deadly disaster was in 1970, specifically in Bangladesh.  That disaster took away 300,000 lives, as did a 1980s drought in Africa.  So, what goes with the numerical contradiction?

"Fear sells,"  said a one-time CNN employee.

 Concerning the 2021 reports coming from the UN, it will suffice to state that 2021 wasn't third hottest year in the history of anything.  After all,  Antarctica had its coldest Winter in recorded history, in 2021.  Plus,  Greenland had a very cold June, and Greenland also was the place where 12 GIGATONS of snow fell on it in one day; that day being May 26, 2021.  

For the true heat years, look at 1911, 1913, 1931, 1934, 1936, and 1871, as well as 1878.   And don't forget to review the Years 1921 & 1922, when it comes to pronounced arctic ice melt, as was reported by seafaring witnesses.

~ ~ ~

 Next is an example of the scientific findings that the climate doomsayers do NOT show you.  This one concerns Antarctica, and it blows out the window of all the ice melt horror stories that the media has been telling humanity about Antarctic ice shelves.

The following finding was/is decisive.  Conveying this to school-children can relieve the pernicious feeling of dread that students are forced to endure.  The climate doomsayers want you to be constantly afraid, so that you will give-over your money, your freedom, and your life to them.  Thus, they hid (and still hide) a lot of evidence from you.  Watch the video posted below, and you will see that they are one-sided con artists who deprive you of needed info.  It's a National Geographic video, thereby giving the subject prestige.

Let traumatized youth see this:   Crystalizing ice seen at bottom of Antarctic ice shelf, instead of melting ice

Many a Public Servant Has Been Public Enemy #1

At this time in history, in the silence of your thoughts, you need to remind yourself that governments, financial entities, the corporate advertising press, and political factions have lied to humanity, time after time, again and again.  So, why would they suddenly stop doing this now?   

In as much, whenever you are told hyper-sensational declarative statements, you have to test them for cracks, instead of being mindlessly acquiescent to the claims made.  Think:  Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction.  In fact, there are lies told 500 years ago that are stilled believed today.  That's a topic for a different discourse, however.  None the less:

The sign of a political con artist is the accumulation of exceptional wealth in that person's financial portfolio, while he/she promotes a cause under the guise of being the new enlightenment.   Are you aware of the amount of money that was transferred into the hands of Climate Doomsayers?  One answer is ::: hundreds of billions of US taxpayer dollars.   That's a topic for another discourse, due to time & printing space considerations.

Perhaps you remember hearing someone say, "If they could tax you for the air you breathe, they would do it."  Well, this is what the Climate Doomsayers are doing, in an inverted way.  They are simply trying to tax you for the air you exhale.

Smokey the Bear, 1944.  Between 1926 and 1943, 650 MILLION acres burned.  Between 2004 and 2021, only 133 million acres were in flames.

 

We now continue with forest fire facts.  They're not what the media or the Biden admin claims.  Forest fires were far worse in the 1920s & 1930s & 1940s than today.  Observe:

According to the United States Forest Service's official statistics, there were FIVE TIMES MORE forest fires in the United States in the 1920s, 1930s, & 1940s than there have been in the most recent years of the same time duration.  Yet, co2 levels were notably lower during the days when raging forest fires compelled the US  Forest Service to create their first edition of the Smokey the Bear poster. 

The first such poster appeared in 1944, after an 18 year period of forest & grassland incineration, to the tune of 650 MILLION American acres (1926 - 1943).   In contrast, the amount of American acreage burnt in the 18 year period comprising 2004 to 2021 was 133 million acres.  Yet, the 21st Century climate doomsayers have incessantly claimed that today's "weather events" are the most severe & numerous ones in decades, centuries, and even millennia, on account of a rise in co2 levels.  The truth is, "They're not even close."

This needs to sink into your mind and liberate you from the fear & dread being marketed worldwide:   In 1926, the co2 level was 305 ppm.  In 1943, it was 310 ppm.  Today, it's 418 ppm.  Thus, in the early decades of the 20th Century, there were 5 times MORE wildfire acreage consumed in the US than during this present era, even though the co2 level was 108 to 113 ppm lower than today's 418 ppm.  The Al Gore law of co2 behavior is now disproved.  Incidentally ====>

Al Gore, Climate Spaz Extraordinaire, was never a scientist or an engineer, and he never won the Nobel Prize in Science.   The peace prize is a different animal. 

Are you ready to start thinking yet?  Or do you insist on believing the media mindlessly?

  As an added example of US wildfire rates, the acreage burned in the Decade of the 2010s was 65 million.  If you double this number, making it equivalent to a twenty year span, it will amount to five times less than the 18 year span of 1926 - 1943.  There is a lot more co2 today.  Yet, there are a lot less forest fires.

So, if you are a "financially compensated" Climate Doomsayer, you'll abridge the Forest Service graph, and make your starting point, 1984.  This will deceive the viewer into assuming that 1984 was an average year, instead of the lowest.  The viewer will then think that the US is now out of control.  The viewer will feel obligated to donate money to Bill Nye's Union of Concerned Scientists or to the UN, assuming that America now has to be saved.  It's one of many sleight-of-hand deceptions used by the climate hysteria faction, as they present things in a False Light.  

The Most Important Feature of co2 as it Applies to IR Light

CO2 has three varying vibration modes, concerning polarity which, in co2's case, is dipolarity.  In one of those three vibrations, co2 is incapable of capturing infrared heat.  This is how & why there can be an ice age during a time when co2 levels are 9 times higher than today.  Such a thing actually happened on Planet Earth.  During the Ordovician Ice Age, co2 levels were more than NINE TIMES HIGHER than they are today.  This negates the Al Gore & John Kerry assertion that rising co2 levels raise the temperature commensurately.

Important ===> See:   CO2 Vibration Modes   <===

At this point, keep in mind one more thing:  At first, every climate spaz kept saying that the ultimate climate disasters are coming.  This included the failed predictions about the Maldives' sea level, the glaciers at Glacier National Park, and Arctic Sea Ice performing a disappearing act.  However, after years of failed predictions, the climate spaz faction now says that the climate disasters have been here all along, for the past fifty years.  Well, why didn't they say so ten years ago, twenty years ago, or thirty years ago? 

CO2 Gives Life.  It Doesn't Take Lives Away.  It's the Key to Photosynthesis

The much demonized co2 only comprises 0.042% of the Earth's first layer of atmosphere which happens to be called the Troposphere.  In fraction form, co2 only occupies 21/50,000th of the aforesaid Troposphere which mostly reaches a height of 9 - 11 miles in the sky, but only 3.7 - 5 miles in height at the Poles.

In fact, co'2's radiative forcing is a humble 3.7 watts per meter squared, and such a thing can be compared to a night light, and not a military-grade flamethrower.  This shows that co2 is not in a position to be the driver of an entire atmosphere, especially in terms of turbulent climate.  

HOWEVER, co2 is the driver of some of the Earth's Biosphere, by having itself absorbed piece by piece & one by one, by plant after plant, tree after tree, flowers and grasses alike, as well as sea vegetation, one living unit at a time.  

This is symbolic of the rise in co2.  During the rise, there is more green all around.

The Key to Life on Earth:  Photosynthesis, the needed activity when going green.

CO2 is the gateway to photosynthesis.   In fact, if co2 levels ever go below 150 ppm, all photosynthesis on Earth will cease.    Life on Earth will follow suit.  So, contrary to all of the doomsday hype of today, sung by those who ever-so-coincidentally make large sums of money on the hype, co2 is the first requirement in going green.

When a population increases, so too do the needs of greater crop yields.  CO2 is the catalyst of greater food growth.  To suppress it is to starve others.   So, if you want to go green, then increase the co2 levels in the atmosphere.

According to the US Census Bureau, the world population is 7.9 billion.  Fifty years prior, the population was 3.8 billion.  A hundred years ago, the world population was estimated to have been 1.9 billion.  When it comes to recognizing the actual needed level of co2, in as far as concerns the production of grains and vegetables, do the math. 

As was previously stated, there was an Ice Age (Ordovician) that transpired when the co2 levels were more than NINE times higher than today.  And naturally, it was the era of "calcite geochemistry."  This, this explains the high level of airborne co2 at that time span.  Equally as obvious is the fact that today's level of co2 is NOT death threatening to the respiratory tract.  In fact, US satellite operators noticed that the increase in atmospheric co2 made the Earth greener.  One of those witnesses is called NASA.

See:  NASA's Satellite Technology is a witness to the added greening of the Earth 

          NASA reports a greener Earth of recent

           CO2 levels making Earth Greener

            Added co2 and added plant growth demonstration

END OF INTRODUCTION

As far as concerns the California fires, they were the result of pathetically negligent forest maintenance which is addressed later in this discourse.  Those fires cannot rightfully be counted as co2-generated weather disasters.  

In addition, California is host to THREE deserts which are older than the gasoline engine.  Incidentally, an official US agency declared that drought conditions in the US Southwest have been natural and long-term.  The detailed quote pertaining to this is posted further inside this discourse. 

Photo by Marissa Goerke, Jan 6, 2021.  Palmer Station, Anvers Island, (aka Antwerp Island.)

Another Example of Climate Doomsayer Deceit:  This one involves Antarctica 

 It was reported that Antarctica reached a record high of 63.5 degrees Fahrenheit, in the Southern Hemisphere's Summer of 2017, as if Antarctica were in a super meltdown.  Then, in the Summer of 2020, the same location recorded a "record high 64.9 degrees F."  Upon this news, the prognosticators & commentators came out like a deliberated jury who just convicted a defendant.

The truth is that the place where those temperatures occurred was located 1,840 miles away from the South Pole, at a research station that was located 206 miles OUTSIDE of the Antarctic Circle.  In fact, it was located 700 miles from Argentina and/or Chile.   It's called the Esperanza Base, and it's located near the tip of the Antarctic Peninsula.  

Continuing "False Light" Saga

Then came a balancing-out event.  In the following year, the Year 2021, the entire Antarctic continent underwent the coldest Winter in recorded history.  This record-breaking Winter technically NEGATED all Global Warming claims, as did the "Hiatus" (AKA "the Global Warming Pause") which endured from 1999 until the beginning of 2016.  Likewise, this negated the Global Warming hype as much as did the "decline" of circa 1940 to circa 1975. 

Incidentally, the year of the highest concentration of Arctic ice was 1979.   Moreover, there were years in the 1970s and even the 1960s when Arctic Ice was low ... for those particular years.

There is pertinence to the fact that de facto cult leader, Al Gore, amassed $250 - $350 million personal dollars into his personal financial portfolio, while sounding the "Global Warming" alarm ... which was changed to the "Climate Change" alarm, on account of there having been a cessation in Global Warming, starting in 1999.  You should see this wealth accumulation of Gore and others as another sign that this Global Warming Alarm System was nothing more than a money swindle, filled with deceit.   

The lesson herein:  Legitimate facts can still be presented with disproportional perception and twisted into a lie. That's called,"False Light" in American law.

 

Dec 28, 1958.  South Pole Station.  Photo by US Navy and donated by Charlotte Koch.

 And now, a segment of . . . 

Decline Hider & Canadian Court Lawsuit Addict Michael Mann

This episode: His very false claim that he personally was a co-winner of some kind of Nobel Prize, when the liar is NOT recognized as such by the official Nobel Prize Office, itself

The Nobel Prize office, itself, was the evidence to disprove one of Michael Mann's audacious lies.  It consists in an audio recording, recorded by a British journalist working for the National Review.  

This recording assures us that Michael Mann is NOT on the list of co-winning Nobel Prize laureates, in either the science prize, the literature prize, or the peace prize.   The evidence (evidentiary audio) that Mann is a definitive con artist is linked directly below.  So, you do NOT have to feel that you have to be bullied by him and submit to him.  

And you surely don't have to submit to the present-day press-media who happens to be filled with people not known for common sense, honesty, reason ... or humility.  All in all, Michael Mann is the ultimate Climate Denier in having denied the existence of the Medieval Warm Period & the Mini-Ice-Age, not to mention part of the 1940 to 1975 temperature decline, with all his "math trick"ery.  See: climategate emails. 

In his hockey stick climate graph, Mann obviously omitted the decline of 1960 to 1975.  So, why did he not also omit 1940 to 1959?  Was it because WWII and Korea were such well remembered wars that history students will recall how bitterly cold it was during some of those battles, especially those in Korea?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *

Audio Proof that Michael Mann's Nobel Prize Claim is a fraudulent misrepresentation (aka lie) 

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

At this point, it's also important for you to realize that Al Gore NEVER won the Nobel Prize in SCIENCE.  Neither did the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) win the science prize.  The two entities, in a joint awarding, won the Peace Prize, in 2007.  The peace prize is separate from the science prize. 

In addition, Michael Mann, Al Gore, and the IPCC never won the Nobel Prize in literature, as well.

Also, Michael Mann never revealed the data sets that he used to justify the drawing of his asininely ridiculous hockey stick climate graph that denied the Medieval Warm Period and the very well chronicled Mini Ice Age.  

The irony to that graph was that it was a straight declining line for 1,000 years.  This meant that, according to Michael Mann, there are no natural mechanisms to create weather variations on an upward temperature trend.  This would subsequently mean that the Planet Earth was headed to a straight-line crash course into an irreversible Ice Age.  According to Mann, the Earth was saved from the Ice Age by a mere 317 ppm of CO2 (in 1960), followed by not-so-high 325 ppm of CO2 (in 1970) and then a moderate 338 ppm of the same CO2 (in 1980), and then to a more moderate 354 ppm (in 1990).  

Well, there were a number of climate change scenarios in the past 4,000 years, when there were no combustible engines or coal power plants, and in some cases, even chariots.  Michael Mann's graph is an insult to human intelligence.  Well, all of Michael Mann is an insult to human intelligence ... not merely his hockey stick graph.

The 2nd most asinine thing Michael Mann ever said in front of a camera.  

Michael Mann was asked how much CO2 must be removed from the atmosphere.  Mann confidently said, "Half the carbon dioxide in ten years," ... in order to prevent a 1.5C catastrophic temperature rise.  Stop there.  Proxy history showed that not even a 2C rise is catastrophic, but rather, a 2C rise accompanied the rise of the great & historic Roman Empire, the empire of half of my DNA base-lines ---the empire of half my ancestors.

For the record, it was scientifically & professionally surmised, via Mediterranean proxy material, that the Roman Warm Period was TWO degrees CELSIUS warmer than today, and my ancestors fared very well during that time, even during the hot hot African enterprises, and well as during expeditions of Greece.   Plus, the temperature rise helped my ancestors finally conquer a hard hitting Gaul army, in an eight year-long war, in present-day France.  Thus, a 1.5C rise today is NOT anywhere near catastrophic.

None the less, here is the supreme asininity of that one Michael Mann assertion, for those of you who spent your early years in the mind-limiting American public school system:

{1} Half of today's level of co2 = 209 parts per million (ppm).  That constitutes 51 ppm LESS THAN during cave-man days.  That constitutes 87 ppm LESS THAN the start of the 20th Century.  Both time periods were when the human population was much smaller than today.

Here. See for yourself: ===> CO2 levels since 1800

{2a}  Today's population is 7.9 BILLION human beings, meaning that much more crop harvesting is needed today than during cave-man days and during the start of the 20th Century which had a estimated 1.9 billion humans living on Earth.  Thus, much more CO2 is needed, and coincidentally enough, the atmosphere is presently providing the needed amount of CO2 for our era.  

{2b} CO2 is the KEY to PHOTOSYNTHESIS.  When CO2 goes below 150 ppm, all photosynthesis halts.  Life on Earth soon follows suit.  Dropping the co2 count to 209 ppm is irresponsible.

In as much, pursuant to the NY Times vs Sullivan case law authority, I, a private citizen, state my opinion of public figure, Michael Mann:  

Michael Mann is a contrived fad.  He's an artificially propped-up mouthpiece, presented as the wisdom of the ages.  Yet, he never showed the public the data sets upon which his neon-lighted hockey stick climate graph is founded.  

Thus, the one hockey stick graph which made him an artificially constructed news show icon has never been tested for cracks.  It has never been test-driven.  Would you buy a car you never test-drove?  Of course not.  So, we the People of the United States do NOT buy Michael Mann's untested climate change hockey stick graph.

 Plus, Michael Mann has a very financial conflict of interest in the promotion of his hockey stick graph which omits the super obvious mini-ice-age whose depth of cold went from 1645 to 1710, and which also included within its time span the 1816 Summer that Never Was.  Why don't the newscasters ask Michael Mann how much personal money he personally made since the publishing of his hockey stick graph?  Why doesn't Michael Mann simply come out and let us Americans know ... especially how many taxpayer dollars went into his personal pockets?

None the less, for the past 4,000 years, climate change has literally been occurring every 124 to 600 years.  Climate is a long-term roller coaster. 

A muscle-waning, very non-athletic, and equally non-aesthetic presence, with the most waning muscle being his heart muscle. 

Michael Mann proved himself to be utterly heartless, if not an indifferent psychopath, against an elderly retired Air Force pilot, on account of the pilot saying that, even though Michael Mann was teaching at Penn State, he should have been at the State penn.  One sentence spoken, and a ridiculous amount of Canadian civil lawsuit attorney fees ensued.

The retired and elderly pilot who earned a doctorate degree let me know how much suffering Mann put him through, and he informed me that he intended to let the world know about those sufferings after the lawsuit ended.  Well, the lawsuit ended.  I don't know what happened.  There was no communication between me and the Canadian gentleman since I left Chicago, in 2019.

For now, I'll keep silent, out of civility.  If the gentleman does pass into eternity any time soon, I'll be the one letting you know about the suffering caused by Michael Mann.   Michael is hatefully ruthless, for starters.  He also thinks that you are completely stupid and gullible.

And remember, pursuant to NY Times vs Sullivan, a private citizen may publicly state his opinion of a public figure.  I'll be politely reserved for now.  I only stated half of my opinion thus far.

It suffices to state that some people in this world are really sick jokes, and for long periods of relative time, it appears that they will get away with every wrong they ever performed.  But, appearances are not all that they appear to be.  History repeats itself.  

Do the math on this one ... on the person causing schoolchildren dread, causing gasoline prices to skyrocket, and causing an elderly air force pilot the loss of life savings and the accompanying dread.  Justice, in the end, prevails.

For now, allies, be like a charming Latin gentleman, even if you hate us Latins to the marrow of our beings.  Charm doesn't hurt, though. 

Once, an individual experienced in government contract work testified before a state senate committee, on climate issues.  At the end of the session, one of the senators pulled out a pile of folders containing peer-reviewed science papers on atmospheric co2  issues.  The senator acted as if he were the ultimate Sherlock Holmes who caught his man red-handed.  The senator asked the scientist-witness to explain all those science papers, if the witness were so correct.  Okay now, if this happens to you, you do the following =====>

{ 1} Slam on your witness table pile after pile after pile of 18th, 19th, and early 20th Century newspaper articles which show that the weather "back in those good ole days" was tragically worse, time period after time period.  Newspaper archive services will be invaluable to you. 

{2}  Include piles of scientific papers which attest to the true existence of the Medieval Warm Period, the Mini Ice Age, the Justinian era Antique Little Ice Age, the Roman Warm Period and similar time spans in human history.  

{3} Also slam on your table a copy of a private pilot training course's Weather Theory textbook, notifying the senator that Al Gore and Bill  Nye teach contrary to the settled textbook science.

{4} Finally slam on your witness table a file of the 2009 Climategate Emails which proved to the majority of the People that the Global Warming Alarm was a money-grabbing scam, in the search of handsome outlays of Congressional funding, private contributions, and NGO grants.  

Question:  Uhmmm, where on this graph is the man-man co2 driven Anthropogenic end-of-the-world Climate Crisis, again?  This looks like a-need-of-some-dieting chart.

American Sales Training

In American sales training, the trainees are told that one must create a sense of urgency in the potential buyer's mind, in order to make a sale.  The Global Warming Hysteria is the act of scientists trying to make a sale.  They are doing everything they can to create a sense of urgency, allowing school children to be filled with dread, in the process.  

And of course, the goal is to gain massive Congressional funding and/or NGO donations, along with the absolute power one gets when an emergency is declared.  So, the picture constantly being painted by the Michael Manns and John Kerrys of this world is that the world will soon come to an obliterating end, and only they can save it.  So remember, they're too good for you.  You should shut it and say, "Yaas sir" to everything these guys who happen to be white have to say.  They are willing to dictate, but they refuse to debate or to explain themselves to you ... because you and I don't count.

~ ~ ~

Okay now:  Back to trying to make sense out of the constant declarations of a near-death Earth in an emergency, while the stats, facts, plain sight of  Planet Earth, and its history show the exact opposite to the Declaration of Climate Doom.

Let me try again.  Now show me in this graph where the end-of-the-world, man-made climate crisis is, again?  I'm having trouble finding it.

Okay.  One more try.  How about this chart?  Now, the man-made climate crisis which is causing the immediate end-of-the-world is indicated exactly where here?  Me no can find.

Nice End-of-the-World you got there guys.  Oh, I'm terrified over all this cereal production.

We now bring greenhouse gases onto the scene

Climate Doomsayers mention that co2 levels started to rise at the beginning of the Industrial Age which is defined as having begun circa 1760.  Fair enough.  That was 262 years ago.  Well, science data shows that co2 levels have been rising in the Earth's atmosphere for the past 6,700 years.  

Of course, the rate of rise has advanced significantly in the 21st Century, even thought the United States co2 emissions decreased from 2007 to the beginning of 2020 --- during the final two Bush Jr years, most of the Obama years, and the first three Trump years.  Therefore, if you are searching for correlations in the rise in atmospheric co2, look at the significantly advanced growth rate of the human population for the same time span.  Then compare it to co2 levels.  

In fact, compare corn crop harvests to human population growth and to the rise of atmospheric co2 Troposphere.  The graph lines look very similar.

In as much, Climate Doomsayers have shown definitive signs of being eugenicists at heart, if not manipulative & pernicious ones in application.  After all, do you deny that these same alarmists see humanity as the great enemy of the Planet Earth?  

Whatever be the case with the psychological components of the typical Climate Doomsayer, the center of each one's activism is Carbon Dioxide, when it should be mercury, residual lead, synthetic chemicals, sulfur dioxide, and the irresponsible stewardship of plastics.  So, let us review carbon dioxide, while first making a quick review of the Earth's Troposphere in general:  

Firstly, water vapor in the atmosphere exists in varying quantities throughout the Earth, ranging from .2% (2/1,000th) of the Troposphere to 4% (4/100th) of the Troposphere.  For now, water vapor percentage numbers are omitted from the simplex equation below.  The following numbers generally apply at a relatively constant percentage:   

The Troposphere comprises 78% Nitrogen, 21% Oxygen, & 0.93% Argon.  This means that 99.93% of the Troposphere is NOT carbon dioxide.   This furthermore means that co2 is a Trace Gas which is too small in quantity to drive the climate.  In fact, Climate Change has been naturally occurring throughout the existence of the Earth,'s atmosphere, like a roller coaster, despite the level of co2.  

When Climate Change has arrived naturally in years, centuries, and Millennia past, the change has been sudden.  The only possible drivers of such a sudden impact throughout the Earth is either 1} Sun Spot Activity or other solar behaviors which affect the Earth's Magnetic Field or 2} Ocean Oscillation Behavior.  There is no other known factor which would be a candidate in possessing such potential.  

As a pertinent point made in passing, the Sun's Irradiance is NOT a factor, being that it is mostly constant.  Those emissions from the sun which do vary do matter.  At your convenience, look-up Coronal Mass Ejection (CME).  Look up the Milankovitch Cycles.

A Numerical Review  ===>  Firstly, today's level of atmospheric co2 is 418 parts per million, whereas, during caveman days, it was 260 ppm.  In fact, at the end of the most recent major Ice Age, it was 180 ppm.  Today's level translates into 0.042% of the Troposphere being co2.   In as much . . .

 99.93% of the Troposphere (Nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon) + co2's 0.042%   =  approximately 99.972%

~ ~ ~

This leaves us with approximately 0.028% of the atmosphere which is occupied by the following Trace Gases:

1} Xenon, 2} Helium, 3} Hydrogen, 4} Krypton, 5} Neon, 6} the vilified Nitrous Oxide, and 7} the vilified Methane which, at last count, existed in the Earth's 21st Century atmosphere at no more than 1.889 parts per million.    That's One-Point-Eight-Eight-Nine Parts Per Million.   And Nitrous Oxide, as was previously stated, is 1 part per 3 million, aka 330 ppb ... with the "b" meaning, billion.

Oh, and then we need to include the #1 greenhouse gas on Planet Earth which is WATER VAPOR.  It leaves behind ZERO carbon footprint.   

Water Vapor:  80% of all greenhouse gases by mass and 90% of the same, by volume.

Now, water vapor exists in variable proportions throughout the Earth's atmosphere, due to the differences in temperature, pressure systems, & land elevations throughout the Earth.  It's presence in the atmosphere ranges from 0.2% to 4%.  In fractions, water vapor is  1/500th  to  1/25th  of the atmosphere. 

If you insist on a slightly more concise measurement of the molecular components in the Earth's Troposphere, subtract the applicable percentage of water vapor from :  1} The 99.93% constant of Nitrogen, Oxygen, & Argon ... 2} and from the 0.042% of the "gliding variable" known as co2 ...  3} and also subtract it from the 0.028% of the other trace gases.  Next, add the Water Vapor number.  However, without being meticulous, you already have a sufficient idea of the amount of co2 in the air, as well as the amounts of other molecular compounds and atomic elements there.

In terms of a fraction, as of 2022, co2 amounted to 21/50,000th of the Earth's atmosphere.  If you were to compare the atmosphere's molecules to a Rose Bowl audience, 78,000 of the spectators would be Nitrogen, 21,000 of the fans would be Oxygen, 930 would be Argon, 42 would be Carbon Dioxide, and 2 would be the much maligned Methane.  N2O wouldn't even make the scene.

The Cirrus Cloud Factor, a Predominant One

At this point, another revelation needs to be repeated ===> Cirrus Clouds possess far more ability to capture / absorb / retain infrared heat than does co2.  The great irony here is that cirrus clouds are entirely composed of ice.  

In addition, the irony about Carbon Dioxide goes as follows, especially in light of the fact that modern activists accuse it of orchestrating a conspiracy to heat the world to the point of destruction:  In its liquid state, Carbon Dioxide is commercially used as a  . . .  refrigerant.

Inconvenient Goof

Concerning the large CO2 graph that Al Gore presented to the audience at the beginning of his first science fiction movie, that which actually is shown is that temperature first rises.  Then co2 levels follow ... in terms of centuries later.  The rise in air temperature comes first.  Then the rise in co2 follows.

The understanding is that, as the oceans' surfaces warm, evaporation occurs, and more co2 molecules are released into the air.  But, the warming of the ocean comes first.  All in all, claiming what Al Gore claimed about temperature & CO2 . . .

          . . . is equivalent to claiming that "the steering wheel moves the driver's hands."

Now remember, co2 levels have been rising for the past 6,700 years.

 Concerning that time or two when you heard someone say, "If they could tax you for the air you breath, they would do it:::"   Remember that the climate doomsayers are trying to do this ... in the inverted way ... in taxing you for the air you exhale, proverbially speaking.  Well . . . 

The average human exhales 2.3 lbs (circa 1 kg) a day --- 839 lbs a year x 7.9 billion humans = 6,628,100,000,000 lbs  = 3,314,050,000 US Short Tons per year.  It might sound alarming, but 'tis no big deal in the grand scale of the massive-sized Troposphere.  Don't let anyone spook you into Eugenics.

 Most Important Feature of co2 as it Applies to Infrared Light

CO2 has three varying vibration modes, concerning polarity which, in co2's case, is dipolarity.  In one of those three vibrations, co2 is incapable of capturing infrared heat.  This is how & why there can be an ice age during a time when co2 levels are 9 times higher than today.  Such a thing actually happened on Planet Earth.  During the Ordovician Ice Age, co2 levels were more than NINE TIMES HIGHER than they are today.  This negates the Al Gore & John Kerry assertion that rising co2 levels raise the temperature commensurately.

Extremely Important:   CO2 Vibration Modes   <=====

                                    *******************

And remember, it has been recognized that the radiative forcing of co2, when it can capture infrared heat, is 3.7 watts per meter squared.  That's a night light.  After all, CO2 is plant fertilizer ... NOT jet fuel.

And remember folks, photosynthesis comes in many colors.

The True Correlation, or lack thereof, between co2 and land surface temperatures:

 In contrast to the predictions of doom, it has been repeatedly observed that, as the co2 levels on Earth rose throughout the 20th & 21st Centuries, the life expectancy of humans also rose throughout the world.  And amidst the political damning of life-giving co2, the Earth has been increasing its acreage of greenery, as well as enjoying rising crop harvest numbers & record crop harvests.  In as much, if you want to go green, you must first increase the co2 level in the Earth's atmosphere. 

See:  How an increase in co2 increases plant size   

    &  NASA Studies a Greening Arctic  

Also See:  Study Observes Rising co2 Levels & the Re-greening Effect on Earth

All in all, Carbon Dioxide replaced the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, as an excuse for creating fear amongst Americans.  The Weapons of Mass Destruction Scare was in 2003 & 2004  The CO2 Global Warming Scare started with the first Al Gore movie, in 2006.  Ever-so-Coincidental Timing.

All in all, Carbon Dioxide replaced the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, as an excuse for creating fear amongst Americans.  The Weapons of Mass Destruction Scare was in 2003 & 2004  The CO2 Global Warming Scare started with the first Al Gore movie, in 2006.  Ever-so-Coincidental Timing.

Droughts

Scientists and archeologists have repeatedly conjectured the existence of a 150 year mega-drought in the American West, starting in the final century of the Medieval Warm Period.   In confirmed specificity, (via tree ring analysis), there was a Great North American Drought which occurred between 1276 &1299 C.E.  This occurred long before the invention of the gasoline engine, when co2 levels were notably lower than they are today.   This shows that the Medieval Warm Period WAS a global event occurring in more than one Hemisphere, and not merely something limited to Northern Europe.

For the record, the Medieval Warm Period endured from circa 800AD to 1348AD.  In addition, the Mini Ice Age which followed endured from 1348AD to circa 1850AD.

Despite the scientific discovery of a great Medieval drought in America, it was in 2014 when NASA released the details of a study which found that the Drought of 1934 was the worst one in a thousand years.  That drought encompassed 71.6% percent of the western North American land mass.  This is more than the land mass affected by the Drought of 2012, which encompassed 59.7% of the same geographic area in general.  None the less, the second most severe drought in America, as recognized by scientists, was the one of 1580, when co2 levels were significantly lower than today, and when the invention of the combustible engine was 310 years away. 

See: NASA Study finds that the worst drought in the past 1,000 years was in 1934

Also See: The Worst Drought in a Thousand Years

May 1934 was only the beginning of it all.  Summertime was yet to come.

The media deception employed today is to deceive the public into believing that no heat wave or drought in the past thousand years comes close to the one of 2022.  This also diverts attention away from the fact that, the year prior, Antarctica underwent its COLDEST WINTER in known history.  

The drought of this Summer (2022) extended thus far to 39.8% of the US.  The droughts of 1934, 1580, and 2012 have got it beat.  Plus, 1954 was a year of severe drought, as was 1936, not to mention the trio of 1988, 1989, & 1990.  There is also a drought list of centuries prior.  All in all, the United States government officially asserts that "Drought is a normal climate pattern that has occurred in varying degrees of length, severity, and size throughout history."

The exact same United States government declared that:

"Tree ring archives indicate that agricultural droughts such as those that happened in the United States during the 1930s Dust Bowl era have occurred occasionally over the last 1,000 years, and climate model simulations suggest that droughts that may last several years to even decades OCCUR NATURALLY in the southwestern U.S."   (This negates Michael Mann's and David Attenborough's claim that the weather/climate of the past one thousand years was predominately benign and stable.)

This recognition of the American Southwest's natural drought potential also includes Southern California.  In fact, it includes what is properly regarded as the Leeward Side of California, as well as the Santa Ana Side, and as well as the Death Valley side of the state.  Therefore, Gavin Newsom was 100% lying to you, when he stated that co2 levels finally reached the stage where the Apocalypse came to California.  

The lack of "controlled burns" in California for consecutive decades caused the disastrous volume of burnt acreage, in recent years.  When you let massive acreage of fallen trees sit for decades, you create kindling wood that can easily torch forestland as easily as can gallons of gasoline.   Even at that, the forest fires of the 1920s, 1930s, & 1940s, in acreage burned, were far worse than the ones in the 21st Century ... the Century of Liars in Power.

  See:   US National Integrated Drought Information System 

The horror stories of present doomsday droughts have one huge folly which makes the scientists announcing the dreadful conditions look like the stereotypical high school ~nerds, ~dorks, ~dweebs, ~geeks, ~wedgy boys, ~swirly boys, etc.  And that is this ====>  No one in America is thirsting to death in societal quantities.  Bodies are not strewn throughout the lands, in heart-wrenching scenes.  Houses are not covered with windswept dust.

The other outrage is in claiming that certain victims of war are victims of Climate Change.  In as much, there is a difference between a drought refugee and a war refugee coming out of Adiabatic Heating deserts or 30th Parallel convection deserts.   Example, Syria does have a desert and has had it for a long while.

It then got to the point where large snowstorms & record colds were attributed to evil evil Climate Change.   Sometimes, it was done by misinterpreting "Lake Effect Snow."  At other times, subtropical low pressure systems were called the cause of such storms, in a delayed effect of moisture retention in the sky.  However, it does not work "that way" when the time delay goes from August to December.  This is because, according to NASA, a water molecule endures in the atmosphere for an average of nine days only.  Therefore, a heated August will NOT be the cause of heavy January snow.

All of this Climate Change Hysteria has been another sequel to the Revenge of the Nerds.   Do you remember how weird "they" (the real nerds) were in high school?  Well, they're still weird, today.

My travels through Southern California during the Summer & the Drought of 2012.

Even during the 2016 Democratic Party presidential convention, Sigourney Weaver stated, as the narrator of a film presentation, that mankind never saw such disastrous weather events as it did in the 21st Century.  However, weather events were far worse or far more frequent in the 1930s, 1920s, 1890s, 1870s, 1650s, 1600s, 536, etc.  After all, it was during the centuries said to be mild in climate by climate doomsayers when massive sea storms wreaked havoc on entire naval fleets.   

See:  Sigourney Weaver's really really REALLY big lie told at 2016 Dem. National Convention

Learning of the Grindelwald Fluctuation (in Switzerland) alone would have been enough to awaken one to the reality of the true existence of the Mini Ice Age.  In fact, the Dust Bowl Years were not centuries prior to Sigourney's birth.  It was mentioned in classrooms in 1960s & 1970s.  Yet, Sigourney became the ultimate climate denier in having denied massive weather disasters throughout the past thousand years.

There was a super huge irony to this.  She's known as a SCIENCE FICTION actress, in the COMEDY sector of science fiction film making.  That particular political convention night turned out to be nothing more than another science fiction performance.   All in all, the lessons at hand go as follows ===>

   1}  Nuclear Winter is worse than Global Warming could ever be.

 2} There is a distinct difference between a drought (temporary) and a desert (permanent). 

3} There is also a difference between Crisis Flooding and a yearly Monsoon Season.

Next comes the Al Gore & John Kerry list of weather disasters which both non-scientist politician claims are caused by increased levels of co2 in the atmosphere.  Some of those disasters require high pressure systems, while other disastrous weather events require low pressure ones.  So, which one is it, Al Gore & John Kerry followers?  Does added co2 trigger low pressure disasters such as hurricanes or does it trigger high pressure ones such as droughts? 

Actually, according to mainstream atmospheric science (aka textbook material), the cooling of the atmosphere causes the major weather disasters, due to something called, "Pressure Gradient Forcing."

The law of pressure gradient forcing is elementary and it goes as follows ===>  The smaller the numerical temperature difference between the Poles and the Equator, the LESS is the atmospheric TURBULENCE that occurs.  Such an atmospheric turbulence is a hurricane, where the atmosphere is evening-out the heat distribution of the Earth, by sending northward the excess heat in the Tropics.  

4b2} During Global Warming phases, there is less "equalizing heat" to transfer northward.  So, during true Global Warming phases, such as during the Copper Age Warm Period, the Minoan Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, & the Medieval Warm Period, atmospheric disturbances are less frequent.  

4b3} Likewise, if there is a greater difference in temperature between the Poles and the Equator, as there is during any Global Cooling phase, there is more of an imbalance of heat, and that amount of extra heat gets transferred northward ... or even southward until meeting the 50th Parallel South, which is called the Roaring 50s, at its seas.    This transfer of heat is a balancing act. 

Incidentally, northern hemispheric hurricanes spin counterclockwise, and southern hemispheric hurricanes (aka typhoons) rotate clockwise.  Hurricanes are incapable of crossing over the Equator.

Moreover, low pressure systems in the Northern Hemisphere rotate counterclockwise, while high pressure systems throughout that same hemisphere rotate clockwise.  Welcome to a Round Earth that spins at a 23.5 degree tilt, at 1,037 mph around its equator. 

All in all, disastrous weather events abound during Global Cooling phases, including wintertime.  After all, it's only during the wintertime when the Polar Jet Stream meanders so wildly at times.  And it does NOT do so, on account of increased co2 levels, as Bill Nye fraudulently claimed.  It does so, on account of Pressure Gradient Forcing.   All in all, introduce yourself to Heat Transfer science.

Lying Wolf in Shepherd's Clothing

Concerning Bill Nye in all of his passive arrogance, watch him (in the video linked directly below here) belittle an MIT professor, as if the professor were an incoherent lunatic.  This resulted in the public seeing that Nye actually knew nothing about atmospheric physics.  Concerning this, Nye disrespectfully said that the professor's assertions were recognized by 1 in 100,000 scientists.  Well, even if it were true that 97% of the scientists agreed on the co2 climate theory, (It was proven false) 97% translates into 32 to 1, and not 100,000 to 1.  Liars exaggerate.

Moreover, the MIT professor stated that what he mentioned was "textbook material," and if the "Union of Concerned Scientists" were correct in their claims, then all of the schools (colleges) should be closed-down.  The professor was conveying the common understanding of Atmospheric Physics; not Bill Nye.

See ::: Nye being corrected by MIT atmospheric physics professor

Speaking of deception, the Climategate emails revealed that many temperature reports of the African Continent were made-up.  In fact, record heat was reported in African places where there were absolutely NO WEATHER MONITORING STATIONS.

Now watch (in the video linked below) how Bill Nye's Union of "Concerned" Scientists get caught making notably erroneous doomsday assertions which means that those scientists are either deliberate frauds or pathetically incompetent buffoons.  Being that fund-raising was involved, one can suspect deliberate fraud as the motivating factor in the invalid doomsday assertions made by those people.

     See ::: Sea Level Fraud at the Union of Concerned Scientists

The majority proportion of water in the oceans exists at 39 degrees Fahrenheit.

Concerning Global Warming History, science researchers recently found that it was TWO degrees Celsius WARMER during the Roman Warm Period than it is today.  Therefore, according to Bill Nye, it was impossible for there to have ever been a Roman Empire, in that the 2C degree heat increase would have resulted in a climate so hostile that no one could organize government and society.  Well, that warm-weather empire did exist and it flourished for centuries, even in hot-hot Africa.

Okay, if they're so great, then where are the Romans today?  Well, one of those DNA-certified descendants of the Roman Empire is typing-out this discourse as a public service to those who are being readily deceived by con artists who hold a lot of Congressional funding dollars and/or NGO grant money, as well as carbon credit residuals in their bank accounts, not to mention them holding their names on the deeds of luxurious living quarters & the titles of luxurious cars.  

Incidentally, this discourse is being typed in a construction trailer, six feet away from a drafting table.  No wall to wall carpeting is here; or any other luxury that you will find in the homes of Gore, Kerry, or DiCaprio.  

For the sake of time orientation purposes, know that the Roman Warm Period is more concisely understood to have begun at the time of Julius Caesar or Caesar Augustus, and it is understood to have ended at the start of the dreadful Justinian Plague.  In fact, 536 AD was regarded as the most disastrous year in human history ... not 2022. 

 See ::: The Roman Warm Period was 2 degrees Celsius warmer than today. 

The cooling period that started during the reign of Justinian is known as the Late Antique Little Ice Age.  It was described by scientists as "an abrupt 124 year freeze," and it was marked by aridity and famine.  It left continents of people weakened and vulnerable to the invasions of a newly formed religion which imposed death or a tax called the Jizya upon those who did not adhere to the newly formed religion.  The abrupt cooling period is conjectured to have been triggered by three major volcanic eruptions in an eleven year period, the first one erupting in 536AD and the most massive one erupting in 540AD.

 Notice the pattern ::: A couple mini-ice-ages each start at the beginning of a plague.  Think.

During a volcanic eruption, a lot of co2 and a lot of sulfur dioxide is released into the atmosphere.  Now, with the tremendous amount of co2 being thrust into the Troposphere, one would think that the weather after a volcano would be warm.  The truth is, after a volcanic eruption, cold weather ensues.  An example is the 1815 eruption of Mt Tambora.  It resulted in the 1816 "Summer that Never Was."  

The truth is that the sulfur dioxide thrust into the atmosphere by volcanoes supersedes co2 and causes drastic cooling.  This is because sulfur dioxide molecules are like mirrors that reflect solar radiation back into outer space.  Such cooling is known as "the aerosol effect."

None the less, before the Roman Warm Period, there was a cooling period marked by glacier advances on Earth.  In fact, the existence of the Copper Age Warming Period occurred circa 2913 B.C.E.   This began the gradual aridification process of Egypt.   There was also a Bronze Age Warm Period, circa 2040 BCE.  This was a time marked by aridity and famine, too.  It also marked the start of the Egyptian Middle Kingdom.

When speaking of Cooling Phases being more likely to accompany disastrous weather events, take the common tornado as an example.  That which is required for a tornado to form and to activate is  ====> "a downdraft of COLD air."  Without the cold making an appearance, there are no tornadoes.

Incidentally, Global Warming was first mentioned on air in 1983, on the NBC Nightly News, by the late Jessica Savitch.  Tragically, Jessica died in late October of that same year, in an automobile accident.  She and a New York Post manager were found under five feet of water, in the Delaware Canal, 30 miles from Philly.  She was only 35. 

The True Textbook-Defined Signature of Global Warming 

 If there is no temperature rise in the middle of the Troposphere, then there is no global warming.  There was no Tropospheric temperature rise between 1999 and 2016.  This was called the Hiatus (the resting --- the "Global Warming Pause").  

Then certain scientists schemed to find a way to claim that there was no hiatus between 1999-2016, as if scientists didn't get smart until 2017.  They literally claimed that the accumulated heat was hiding in the oceans.   Stop here.   Penalty Flag Time.   Insult to the Intelligence.  This declaration is more of a matter of False Light "sleight-of-hand" deception than a completely false statement.  But, it's instantly invalidating.  Let's go through the steps that will dispel the deception:

The United States National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration recognizes that ===>  

>Functionally Effective Sunlight does NOT penetrate the oceans any deeper than 656 feet.   This layer of ocean water is known as the Euphotic Zone.  From the 656 foot point downward, photosynthesis is impossible.  So, throughout an added depth of 2,624 feet (which is directly below the Euphotic Zone), the descending sunlight becomes the increasingly darker.  The twilight layer of an ocean is the Dysphotic Zone.  

>Below this line there is no light, and this super deep layer of ocean is called the Aphotic Zone.  It begins at the 3,280 feet mark of sunlight's descent into any ocean.  The Aphotic Zone is marked by darkness and cold, until one reaches the bottom of the ocean where "hot spot" volcanoes and other heat sources sit. And remember, remember, remember:  CO2 has no heating power in the dark of the ocean.

>Moreover, at the depth of 660 feet, directly below the Euphotic Zone, the ocean's Temperature drastically decreases, to approximately 55 degrees F (13C).  This spot in each ocean is called the Thermocline, and when traveling past this depth which happens to beat  the 660 feet mark, the temperature decreases to approximately 39 degrees F (4C).  

This decline in temperature takes 3,280 feet to achieve.  This 39F is the temperature of the rest of each ocean ... through the descent to the bottom of each ocean.  At the bottom are ocean floor heat sources (aka Hydrothermal Vents.)  Incidentally, those vents exist where the tectonic plates of two continents are spreading apart, usually.  

Next in consideration is the fact that actual Heat Transfer into the ocean only occurs at the first meter of the ocean's surface.  It happens at the top.  It stays at the top.  And one meter of water is not a Fort Knox vault that can hold ever-increasing amounts of heat.  So, how much heat can one meter of salty ocean water hold?   Here is the follow-up question ===> 

 >Where in any salty ocean is there room for added heat caused by greenhouse gas absorption, in light of the absence of infrared light to be captured by co2?  The surmise is that, when ocean temperatures do rise, they only slowly rise as a result of heat from the ocean floor ... from hydrothermal vents "aka hot spots" which can reach 700F.  Concerning the rise in heat, there is a line in each ocean called the Pycnocline.  It has a lot of influence as to where that heat will or will not float.

               |        Ocean depths       |                      |constant 39 degrees Fahrenheit in Aphotic Zone|

Atlantic  |  avg ~12,881 ft \ deepest ~28,232 ft  \ Aphotic Zone depth ~ 9,601 ft

Pacific    | avg ~13,215 ft \ deepest  35,840 ft   \ Aphotic Zone depth ~ 9,915 ft

India       | avg ~13,002 ft \ deepest ~23,812 ft  \ Aphotic Zone depth ~ 9,702 ft

Arctic     | avg ~  3,953 ft \ deepest ~17,881 ft  \ Aphotic Zone depth ~    653 ft

Southern | avg ~10,728 ft \ deepest~ 25,383 ft  \ Aphotic Zone depth ~ 7,428 ft

No sunlight = No infrared heat = No co2 heat absorption.

Now, there was the matter of the 2018 "Keeling Paper," authored by Ralph Keeling's team and not by the Dr Charles Keeling of the 1950s.  It was actually called, the Resplandy Research Group Paper.  None the less, the 2018 paper claimed that oceans heated 60% more rapidly than previously realized.  The paper's subject matter was regarded as "startling," and the media heralded it as the smoking gun which absolutely proved the existence of a "climate crisis."  

Within two weeks of time, a mathematically inclined gentleman associated with a Georgia Tech Atmospheric Science professor discovered decisive mathematical errors in the Ocean Warming Paper.  This discovery negated the entire conclusion of the paper.  A Nicholas Lewis found the errors.  

In sequence, one of the 2018 paper's authors publicly admitted the errors, as did the prestigious publisher of the paper.  However, any retractions from the rest of the American media could not be located. 

None the less, at the outset of the study, it was obvious that the paper's thesis statement was a falsehood.  This is because it contradicted a well known scientific fact involving Seas Breezes and Land Breezes.  Very simply, a change of temperature at any of the oceans is much more slowly accomplished than is the change of temperature at any land surface.  And being that there was no 60% rate increase in land surface temperatures anywhere, there surely would not be this phenomenon at the oceans.  Thus, the Keeling Paper (aka the Resplandy Paper) was guaranteed to be marked with error.

As was previously mentioned, an ocean's warming would NOT come from co2 engaging with infrared light at the surface thereof.  It would come from the heat sources at the bottom of that ocean which can reach 700F.  None the less, it's notably cold throughout the 9,000 and 7,000 foot descents to the bottom of oceans.  The means that the present heat source for the constant 39F temperature is not at all daunting.

See ::: Team Keeling & Publisher admit to decisive mathematical errors in doomsday paper

See also ::: Widely Reported & Alarming Ocean Warming Study is Wrong

This too :::   Media Gave Blanket Coverage to Flawed Climate Paper 

Mathematician's Statement :::  Major Problem with Ocean Heat Uptake Paper

The Methane Scare is the Most Absurd of the Doomsday Claims

Methane only exists in the Earth's Troposphere at 1.886 parts per million.  Therefore, methane is NOT a factor in Global Warming in any capacity, even though a methane molecule has 28 times more IR heat retaining capacity than does a co2 molecule.  There is simply not enough methane in the atmosphere for you to worry.

A Rocky Mountain Top in New Mexico, 2012.  The clouds stayed on one side of the mountain.  Welcome to Adiabatic Warming.

a} That which is called the result of "global warming" is actually the result of Adiabatic Heating which occurs on the the Leeward Side of mountain ranges; mostly the east side.   This is because, as clouds rise up the Western side (aka the Windward Side) of a mountain range, they release moisture during the ascent.  This is known as the process of Orographic Lifting.  This lifting of a cloud mass accompanies the release of rain as the clouds' ascent continues.  By the time the same air mass reaches the top, all that is left is a cold & dry parcel of air which descends the mountain range, thereby creating deserts.   There is the matter of heating which occurs during the air parcel's descent.

b} The dry air parcels which descend mountain tops are called :::  ~Foehn Winds,  ~Chinook Winds,  ~Santa Ana Winds,  &  ~Down-sloping Winds.   As a dry air parcel descends a mountaintop, it encounters higher & heavier pressured air which easily exists at the surface of the Earth.  As a result, the down-sloping air compresses and shrinks in size.  This causes the molecules within it to collide and vibrate more aggressively, resulting in a sudden rise in temperature. 

c1a} Proof that this dryness is the result of Adiabatic Warming, and NOT co2-driven Global Warming, exists in the fact that, when you are out West, you notice that the clouds in the sky never cross over the mountain tops.  The clouds stay on one side.  

 c1b} Incidentally, I'm the son of a native Wyoming gal.  In fact, I have literally been at the southernmost tip of the Rocky Mountains, in New Mexico.  I witnessed it.  I was there.   

At this point it would suffice to state that the vast majority of Climate Change activists need to do something called, "go outside," and not merely to the park.  People who worked in the outdoors hour after hour and year after year have a more clear understanding of weather behavior, simply by means of decades of experience.   Back to the matter hand:

c2} Examples of deserts created by Adiabatic Heating  :::  The Red Desert of Wyoming is in the center south of the State.   Plus, the center of Oregon has a desert located east of the Cascades and south of the Blue Mountains.  The Leeward Side of California is desert land extraordinaire, and it was that condition long before 21st Century co2 levels increased.  Etc go the examples.  

c3} Plus, the super large deserts of the Earth are all on the 30th parallel (north & south) wherever the desert was not the result of Leeward Adiabatic Warming.  30th Parallel deserts were caused by very large "convection cells."

Example  ===>  The Sahara Desert is the size of the USA, and 6,000 years ago the Sahara was a lush forest/jungle, with cave wall drawings that looked like the ones in France.   This time span is known as the African Humid Period.  There were no gasoline engines to turn the Sahara into a desert.  It was a major convection cell at the 30th Parallel that caused it.  The super large convection cell still exists.  It's presently called the Hadley Cell of the Northern Hemisphere.

When viewing Globes or maps, do not forget the 23.5 degree tilt (aka obliquity) of the Earth.

The geometry of the vast Sahara region and the northern hemispheric Hadley Cell.

 And then there is the alternating of directional ocean flow between El Nino & La Nina ocean oscillations, at the Equator.  This is when ocean water does NOT travel like a rotating gyroscope, but rather, the current-flow travels west to east to eventually west again, etc.  The El Nino & La Nino equatorial currents travel between Longitudes 120E & 80W, and it has had a huge effect on American and Australian weather. 

An El Nino event is one that starts during late December and endures for approximately four years (from 2 - 7 yrs, actually).  It was named after the Christ Child, and it is associated with heat in the American Continent.  La Nina is the eventual counteraction of those equatorial ocean currents, and it is associated with colder than usual temperatures on the American Continent.  The Year 1998 was an El Nino Year.  It was associated with a warm American Winter which frightened everyone who had no experience in atmospheric science.  Yet, it was pleasurable.  It was the Winter of little shivering.

The El Nino Southern Oscillation is abbreviated ENSO. 

At this point, it is important to note that, throughout the rest of the Earth, the ocean surfaces are composed of massive GYRES which rotate like gigantic gyroscopes.  This is why ocean waves crash into the shoreline at an angle, instead of doing so in a straight line.  This angular wave motion is one of many proofs that the Earth is round, and it involves something known as the Coriolis Effect which you can look-up at your convenience.

The Coriolis Effect also involves something known as Eckman Transport which can refute one of Al Gore's paranoiac claims about climate doom in the northern part of the Atlantic Ocean.  Gore and his team claimed that fresh-water ice from Greenland will progressively melt into the Atlantic, thereby lessening the ocean's salt content, and thereby causing the ocean to stop circulating and to cause an Ice Age in England.  Well, if such a melting scenario were possible, it would only result in suppression of ocean down-welling and upwelling.   In order to get the oceans to stop moving, you need to stop the rotation of the Earth and you need to stop the formation of wind.

Incidentally, if you want to identify a climate fraud, simply ask that person this:  "What is the definition of wind?"  The fraud won't know the answer.  Wind is high pressure air traveling toward low pressure air ... denser air making a route to empty itself into air with less compacted air parcels.  It's high pressure gravitating toward low pressure.   You can even effectively define wind as high pressure air chasing low pressure air.   The concept is understood as such.

Upwelling involves the providing of nutrients to sea life which abides in the Euphotic Zone.  Concerning this, nature apparently has within it compensatory features throughout the Earth.  Nature apparently has a Plan B, when upwelling is mitigated or halted.  This is because a certain food source unexpectedly super-multipled as of recently, and such a thing will prevent any environmental oceanic crisis caused by the blocking of upwelling.  It's called coccolithophore phytoplankton.  In fact, there is an area in the Gulf of Mexico which used to be called the Dead Zone, due to the negligent draining of residual industrial fertilizer there, via the Mississippi River.  It's back to life now, and a major presence there is the coccolithophore phytoplankton.

Concerning the effort to understand ocean down-welling, it is needed to look-up Pycnocline.

This discourse also omits mention of Sublimation and Deposition.   Sublimation is when ice turns into vapor without going through the melted liquid stage.  Deposition is when vapor suddenly turns into ice.   

Two points to make about sublimation, before we move on:  A sign that sublimation has occurred is that the ice is jagged.  When ice is partially jagged and only partially smoothed-out, that's the result of partial sublimation, needless to say.  

The greatest example of sublimation is at the top of the Himalaya Mountains.  The greatest example of partial sublimation is seen on the walls of calving ice.  Contrary to mainstream media's explanation thereof, calving ice is NOT the result of melting ice.  Melting ice simply recedes.  It does not perform a grand dive into the ocean.  Calving is the result of an increase of snow toward the center of a landmass, pushing out the snow at the shorelines.  Yes, calving is the sign of increased snow, while calving ice walls are partially jagged and partially smoothed-out.  

Concerning the Thermohaline Circulation which is not to be confused with the Thermocline

An activist giving a speech might simultaneously show a world map projection marked with a colorful band/line traveling through the Indian and Atlantic Oceans.  It looks like a ribbon.  This can deceive the untrained public into assuming that the water motion symbolized by the ribbon is located at the surface of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans.  Well, the previously mentioned gigantic OCEAN GYRES are what exist at the surface of the oceans.  In fact, the massive gyre in the American side of the Atlantic ocean is called the Sargasso Sea.  Al Gore is not a good teacher, in his withholding too many facts.

 

From the United States National Ocean Service --- (the NOS)

Being that ocean gyres are important in understanding how much of a fraud the Al Gore people have been, one needs to understand the Coriolis Effect.  This involves the rotation and tilt of the Earth (aka the Earth's "obliquity").  Firstly, the Earth presently tilts at 23.5 degree slant. Secondly, the Earth is revolving around the sun at 66,660 miles per hour.  At the Equator it rotates around itself at 1,037 miles per hour.  Moreover, the Earth's Rotation Speed at various latitudes go as follows, in miles per hour (mph) :::

10 degrees: 1021mph    20 deg:  975mph    30 deg: 898mph    40 deg: 795mph

50 degrees:  667mph     60 deg:  519mph    70 deg: 355mph    80 deg: 180mph

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now, keep in mind also that the warmest latitude on Earth is NOT always the Equator.  The warmest latitude is the Summertime Tropic,  at 23.5 degrees,  if a Summertime is in progress, as opposed to an Autumn or Springtime. 

Spring vs Autumn CO2 Levels

Speaking of Springtime, Al Gore stated in his first science fiction movie that, during Springtime, co2 is abundant, and during autumn's harvest season, co2 levels in the atmosphere are low.  The truth is that the difference between the Springtime level of co2 and the Autumn level is no more than 2%.  It's merely a 2% difference.  Again, Gore was a terrible teacher.

Heat's Entrance & Exit Rates at the Earth's Various Latitudes

It would also have helped for someone to have admitted that, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, the following occurs ===> From the 40th parallel of both hemispheres to the poles of both hemispheres, more heat exits Planet Earth's atmosphere into outer space than enters Earth's atmosphere from outer space.  The Earth's only viable source of heat is the Sun, and the Earth's storehouse of heat mostly exists from Latitude 40 degrees N to Latitude 40 degrees S  ...  or visa-versa.

Two more things, regarding this :::  1} The Earth is FARTHEST from the Sun during the Northern Hemisphere's Summer and the Southern Hemisphere's Winter.   2} The Earth spins from West to East.

Their Failed Doomsday Predictions & Hypocrisy

The Global Warmists failed in ALL of their doomsday predictions, mostly made circa 1988.  All of the predicted climate doom was supposed to have been complete by 2018-2020.  In fact, during this present time span, when the media obsessively barks out "Climate Change," Antarctica recently had it coldest day in recorded history, so recorded by satellite technology ::: a MINUS 135.7.  

Furthermore, in 2021, the same Antarctica had its coldest six-month period on record.  Even the prejudiced & slanted CNN reported that fact.  BTW, this Antarctic six month period is more commonly known as WINTER.  

The Antarctic held its coldest winter in known history, in 2021.  That's a sure sign that the phenomenon of NOT-Global-Warming is occurring throughout the Earth.  The temperature gets evened-out in such scenarios.

Examples of failed Climate Change predictions go as follows :::  

~The Maldives were predicted to be underwater by 2018.  In 2022, the Maldives are alive and well, with financially affluent human life there.  

~ The glaciers of Glacier National park were supposed to be gone by 2020.   Actually, there were originally predicted to have been gone by 1948.  They are still there, and a lot of snowplowing goes on at Glacier National in April, May, and even June, to make the tourist roads clear. 

~And of course, the Arctic Ocean's sea ice didn't completely or even almost melt away in any Summer since the 1988, or in any Summer since 1388.  However, in 1904 was the sailing of the Northwest Passage, slightly north of Alaska and the such.  

The least amount of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean was during the Summer of 2012.  The remaining ice there was still 1.32 million square miles in size.  In fact, to travel over the Arctic Ocean's 2012 Summertime sea ice sheet was equivalent to driving from Fargo North Dakota to San Diego California, as well as driving from the Southern border of New Mexico to the northern border of Montana.   That is a lot of road travel.  That is a lot of Summertime ice.   Etc go the examples of failed doomsday prophecies. 

There turned out to be a great irony in the Climate Doomsayers having selected the Year 2020 as the predicted year of completed melting.  It goes as follows:  In the month of May 2020, North American towns & cities underwent 233 record low temperatures vs a mere 18 record highs for the same month.

See and hear: 233 record lows in month of May 2020

In fact:  Antarctica's massive Ross Ice Shelf (the size of Spain) was found to be crystalizing at its bottom, instead of melting in any degree thereof.  This was discovered by New Zealand scientists, and it was a decisive discovery:

See:  The Crystalizing of the Ross Shelf

Incidentally, the Arctic Ocean is the exact same size as is the Antarctic Continent; 5.5 million sq miles.  One more thing ::: The largest and driest desert on Planet Earth is not the Sahara.  It's Antarctica.

BTW, Barack Obama purchased an oceanside mansion located at Massachusetts' Martha's Vineyard.  The president who claimed that ocean levels would tragically rise is literally at an ocean's shoreline, living in luxury.  And Obama cannot claim that he solved any co2-driven Global Warming problem, because co2 levels rose throughout Obama's presidency and throughout every year after his presidency.  None the less, during the final years of his tenure, co2 emissions in America did decline.  But, it had no worldwide effect.  CO2 emissions in the United States also declined during the tenure of President Donald Trump.

In sequence, Hypocrite Extraordinaire, John Kerry, purchased an $11.75 million beachfront mansion which is also in Martha's Vineyard.  It's within walking distance of the ocean shoreline.  In fact, Kerry owns 18 acres of land there.  The logical surmise is that Mr. I'm-Leaving-on-a-Jet-Plane apparently has no belief that the oceans will rise and cause 18 acres of beachfront property to be submerged.  

In 2020, Bill and Melinda Gates spent $43 million on an oceanfront mansion in Del Mar California, doing so the year prior to them parting company and going their separate ways as much as is possible for billionaires in charge of a charity organization.  Yet, Bill Gates repeatedly warns of sea level rise and the eventual submerging of shoreline property.  He spent $43 million on shoreline property.

In the 1970s, there were warnings of Global Cooling and an oncoming Ice Age.

The Climate Doomsday Forecasts of the 1970s involved the conjecture that a mini ice age might be returning.   The '70s involved the "decline" mentioned in the infamous Climategate emails of 2009.  Very simply, it got really cold back then, and this was only 120 years after the last mini ice age ended. Refer to newspaper and magazine archives, to prove that articles were being written on the decline of temperatures throughout the 1960s & 1970s.  I was there, as a young child and then as a teenager.  It was cold in the Wintertime.  It was really cold.

Then came the Global Warming Scare, on June 23, 1988, with James Hansen in front of the US Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources.  The kick-off of Climate Doomsday was being announced by Hansen, such as in his prediction that the Maldives would be underwater within 30 years (by 2018).  Of course, that never happened in any degree.

Moreover, Hansen ... and others ... have taken raw climate data and changed it, and in having done so, they ever so coincidentally fitted the "newly amended" climate record to their co2 warming assertions.  They adjusted the numbers to fit the story line.  Doing the numerical changes was called "homogenization" by those changing the temperatures.  Others called it fraud.  Speaking of government employees committing fraud, watch the following:

 See:  NOAA Gold Medalist accuses NOAA of deliberate temperature record keeping fraud

All in all, none of Hansen's predictions have come true.  Now, in a 2007 deposition, with Hansen being an expert witness in the case, he "averred" (claimed) that most of the Greenland Ice Sheet will have melted by 2107, and that the sea level rise will have amounted to 23 feet.  No such melting at the rate predicted is occurring yet.   At present, the Greenland Ice Sheet is at a range of 6,600 to 9,800 feet high.

The Earth's climate has been a cyclical roller coaster ride throughout its history.

If you want evidence that today's scientists are lying about the 21st Century being the hottest and the one most visited by weather disasters, go to the newspapers archives of 1871, 1878, 1896, 1901, 1906, 1911, 1921, 1922, 1934, 1936, 1954, etc.   In fact, go to the 1970s archives, where an oncoming ice age was the predicted event.  You will find that climate catastrophes were much more intense and more frequent in the past 80-150 years than they are today.    The blame for the climate disasters was originally Solar activity, or the lack thereof.  That which was blamed for those weather disasters of the 1970s was ====> Global COOLING.

None the less, if you want to learn about true atmospheric science, purchase a private pilot training course's textbook on Weather Theory.      

Hockey Stick Time

 If you are a youth who was enrolled in the American public school system, you were probably shown Michael Mann's "Hockey Stick Graph," without being shown any data to back up his claim of a sudden rise in global temperatures.  Well, he allegedly mixed apples with oranges in the following way ===>  

He allegedly first used tree ring data which actually tells the amount of moisture in the atmosphere at the time surveyed, and NOT the temperature, per se.   None the less, those tree rings did indicate a decline in moisture (and presumably temps) from approximately 1960 to 1974.  So, Mann allegedly stopped using the tree ring data at 1960 and allegedly substituted it with thermometer data, doing so without justifying any "benchmark" of the tree ring data to any thermometer scale.  To make a long story short, the 2009 East Anglia Climategate Emails mentioned Michael "hiding the decline."  Specifically, the decline of temperatures between approximately or exactly 1960 and 1974 is what was hidden.

First see:  The late Michael Crichton on Michael Mann's Hockey Stick Graph

This paragraph involves the illustration located five paragraphs away:   A number of tree ring scores/tallies were available to Mann.  Predictably enough, he ALLEGEDLY ignored all of them EXCEPT the one with a pronounced incline, when he was morally obligated to submit as fact the average of all of the tree ring samples combined.  Look at the tree ring sample YAD061.  It looks like a ski slope in comparison to the nine other ones.  That is what he ALLEGEDLY used for his very exaggerated hockey stick graph, in addition to him using other pieces of proxy data.

Now, in the background of Mann's hockey stick graph is the jagged "bar of uncertainty" or "error bar." That's a line that represents what the correct temperatures might possibly be, in lesser statistical probability thereof.  Well, if you look at the top of Mann's jagged Error Bar at the left-hand side, you are looking at the Medieval Warm Period.  And if you look at the bottom center-right of the jagged "error bar," you will see the Mini-Ice-Age of 1350 to 1850.  Mann included both climate periods.  He simply hid them in the background, while denying their existence in his speeches.   An image of the hockey stick graph is not included herein.  False graphs & erroneous charts are not permitted to be posted here.

In definitive terms, is it a complete FALSEHOOD to claim that the temperatures of the last 1,000 years were mostly stable.  It's an equal falsehood to claim that the climate of the last 1,000 years was mostly mild and unvaried throughout that time span.  There were intensely turbulent times, and there were distinctively different climate phases throughout the past 1,000 years.    Climate is and has been a roller coaster ride.  Incidentally, the coldest part of the Mini Ice Age was between 1645 and 1710. Sunspot activity was at its lowest, back then.

In recent years, Michael "Hockey Sticks" Mann filed a lawsuit against a retired Canadian meteorology professor who was once a Royal Air Force pilot.  The aging Canadian man said that Michael Mann belonged in a prison, so Mann sued the retired professor for defamation, in a Canadian court.  

Eventually, Mann sought to have the lawsuit dismissed.  In order to agree to the dismissal of the lawsuit, the Canadian defendant promised to let the lawsuit end, on the condition that Mann show him the data that resulted in the hockey stick graph's drastic upward curve.  Mann never revealed the data to the Canadian gentleman.  None the less, how much apparent or pernicious fraud was committed by Mann when he was allegedly using the other alleged proxies for his hockey stick graph?

Anyway, observe Sample YAD061 below, and know that Mann allegedly used multiple "proxies," for his hockey stick graph.   Incidentally, a proxy is replacement evidence for natural phenomenon.  The prime example is the tree rings which are used to determine temperature at a certain time in history.   All in all, Mann still refuses to share his hockey stick graph data.

The Al Gore Science Fiction Movie #1

Concerning the co2 & temperature graph that Al Gore showed the audience at the beginning of his first movie, he neglected to say that a rise in atmospheric heat will cause an added amount of co2 to be released into the atmosphere via oceanic evaporation.  In fact, it's a well established scientific teaching that the water vapor above the oceans is latent heat. 

Now, a prime example of this phenomenon, where the rise in co2 follows the rise in heat is in a recent research finding about the end of the last Major Ice Age (aka "the last glaciation.")   It was found that the heating at the end of the last Ice Age actually began at the bottom of the oceans, with the heat rising to the ocean surfaces.  The time it took for the heat to rise to the top of the oceans was 1,300 years, according to the paper's authors/researchers.  Then, and only then did co2 levels begin to rise. Therefore, in the natural history of the Earth's most recent 650,000 years (or "time units"), temperatures always rose first, and then the co2 levels followed.  The changes in co2 levels throughout that time were not at all pronounced, compared prior eons of time.  They were relatively small changes.

    See:  Univ of Southern Cal: CO2 did not end last Ice Age  🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿

A British Court Had Its Say About Gore's First Science Fiction Movie

In that first Gore movie, there were 9 assertions contested to be falsehoods in a British court.  The British court ended up adjudging that the Al Gore movie could not be presented or advertised as educational material in England.  One of the assertions was that a rise in co2 levels caused Lake Chad to dry out.  Super fraudulent was that assertion.  Observe ===>

Dispelling the Lie that Al Gore Told About Lake Chad, in His First Science Fiction Movie

Lake Chad is located directly below the massive Sahara Desert.  Thus, Lake Chad has very little ground water or water shed "tributaries."  The Sahara doesn't provide much rain, either.  Furthermore, Lake Chad is a shallow lake, and its water capacity is much smaller than Lakes Tanganyika and Lake Victoria.  Observe:

Lake Chad's water volume capacity is 17 cu mi ... vs  Lake Tanganyika's 4,500 cu mi capacity ... vs Lake Victoria's 660 cu mi capacity.  This means that Lake Tanganyika's water capacity is 264 times greater than Lake Chad.  Lake Victoria's water holding capacity is 38 times more than is Lake Chad. 

Moreover, it was only the northern lobe of Lake Chad which dried-out in intervals of time throughout the 1970s and 1980s; not the entire lake.   Do you see what a liar Al Gore has been, while he was amassing approximately $250-350 million into his own bank accounts and/or financial portfolio?

One more point about Gore's first science fiction movie is this :::  It involves Gore's claim that atmospheric co2 first rose, followed by temperatures.  Well, if that is the case, then what caused those co2 levels to rise, in the first place?  There were no coal plants, no factories, and no combustible engines.  Hello?  Anybody home?  To claim what Gore claimed is equivalent to claiming that a steering moves the driver's hands. 

More on Gore

In his second movie, Al Gore claimed that his prophecy about (Lower) Manhattan being submerged under water came true.  He showed a video clip of the very temporary storm surge of a certain tropical storm.  After the storm surge ended, no Manhattan concrete was underwater.  Go to NYC today and see for yourself, if whether or not sea level rise has encroached itself on Lower Manhattan's roads and sidewalks.

 Deception through the Help of the Media

Now, Hockey Stick Graph Maker, Michael Mann, told a newscaster that today's co2 levels must be cut in half within ten years.  Well, if that's done, the Earth's atmospheric co2 level will even be lower than it was when cavemen (or cave women) were giving art exhibitions at their cave walls.   

Caveman co2 levels were at 260 ppm.  By the Year 1800 or so, the co2 level was at 280 ppm.  Mann is prescribing a level of 209 ppm.  In as much, this indicates (in my opinion) that Mann is deliberately marketing fear, in order to get all the more taxpayer dollars & NGO grant dollars into his bank accounts and financial portfolio.  It's called Theft by Deception.  This is what the US Federal False Claims Act was enacted to undo.  And upon me stating this,  I advise you to keep in mind the Times vs Sullivan First Amendment Case, where it was adjudicated that a private citizen may publish his opinions of a public figure. 

If atmospheric co2 levels drop below 150 ppm, no photosynthesis could transpire, and plant life dies.  Plus, we have a heightened population today, meaning that we need greater crop yields.  Thus, we need more plant food.  In as much, CO2 is the plant food needed in higher levels today.  So, what is Mann thinking?  All in all, if you want to go green, you must increase co2 levels. 

Incidentally, the billions of taxpayer dollars that were unleashed were unleashed under the title, Climate Change Adaptation and Climate Change Research.   Moreover ====>

In the Climategate Emails of 2009, it was discovered why the title "Global Warming" was changed to "Climate Change."  This is because there had been NO Global Temperature increase in ten years.  Being that there was no global warming, the scientists had to change the name of their project, in order to deceive you and everyone else all the more.  

As a fact, if there is no increase of temperature in the Middle of the Troposphere, there is no Global Warming.  There was zero increase of such temperatures from 1999 until 2016.  Somewhere within the same general time span, the United States went 12 consecutive years without a major hurricane making landfall on any of its shores.  Thus, the opposite of Al Gore's hurricane predictions resulted. 

The majority of water content in every ocean (except the Arctic) exists at 39 degrees Fahrenheit.

As far as goes the atmospheres on Venus and Mars being almost entirely composed of co2, it simply proves that there is no life on those planets.  Life dines on co2.

The most important thing to do at present is to go through newspaper archives of the past 80 to 150 years, and locate reports on the heat waves, fires, record rains, floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters which occurred during that time.  It was a time when co2 levels were distinctively lower than today.  

Locate and read the November 1922 edition of Monthly Weather Review, wherever you can find it.  All of the aforementioned becomes the evidence which proves Climate Change activism to be a fraud.  It's all a money grab for taxpayer dollars ... and NGO dollars.

Next go through 1970s newspaper and magazine articles that spoke of a coming mini-ice age.  Yes, even though co2 levels had risen, the 1960s & 1970s were times of a lot of painfully cold weather.  Thus, the 1960s & 1970s proved invalid and fraudulent the claim of Al Gore, John Kerry, & company

Arctic Ice volume reached it height in 1979.  This is why Global Warmists omit the ice volume facts of the 1970s, even though there was satellite technology dating back to approximately 1974 or even sooner.   They simply begin their charting in 1979, the year of the highest amount of ice, so that the succeeding years will be made it look as if the world is now melting away like never before.    

They omit the 1970s Arctic Ice Volume statistics as much as they omit the 1920s & 1930s forest fire stats    If they let you know that ice volume rose while co2 rose, then the Al Gore CO2 Warming Model of Science is defunct, invalidated, and found to be historically false.  

In addition, you will find the stumps of rooted trees near the Arctic Ocean.  Moreover, Iron Age skis were found under permafrost that had melted.  This means that there was a time when there was no permafrost there.  Climate is cyclical. 

So, go to the newspaper & magazine archives.  You will discover how much you are being deceived on a major, expensive, and immoral scale.  You are being used as a Useful Idiot ... by other idiots who have no idea what life & essence is all about. 

To all of you Climate Doomsayer computer modelers out there, in order for you to have a clear insight of climate, you need to do something called, "Go outside."