 |
| It's a new day. Time to get real. |
During a US House hearing of recent, an asinine Congressional Rep told Kristi Noem that Donald Trump will be gone one day, and he won't be around to protect Kristi, any longer ... but that the congresswoman will still be there with her band of Trump hating politicians ...
... and that she will make sure that she will hold Kristi fully accountable for the actions of others which the congresswoman blames on Kristi. After all, Kristi was NOT the one blowing whistles in the face of law enforcement agents and ramming automobiles into Border Patrol vehicles, while blocking their way to criminals who already had the paperwork on them finished and filed.
Okay folks, what is deadly wrong with this picture painted by the "Tough Guy" Congress Lady?
ANS: She is in the LEGISLATIVE branch of government, and NOT in the judicial branch. Thus, she has no power to prosecute Kristi Noem.
Perhaps the Congresswoman's response would be that she will get legislation soon passed that will declare all of Kristi's actions illegal and punishable by prison time and fines ... or even by the death penalty. Now, what is the asininity of such a claim?
ANS: The United States constitution FORBIDS ex-post facto laws. Case closed.
The Congresswoman claimed that Kristi terrorized children as a matter of habit, as well as having done evil after evil. So, what is asinine about that statement?
ANS: Kristi had ICE agents and Border Patrol agents concentrate their efforts also in WASHINGTON DC, in MEMPHIS, and in NEW ORLEANS, and everything went fine there, for the most part. Nothing that happened in Minneapolis to the exact in which it transpired there occurred in Washington DC, in Memphis, and in New Orleans.
In fact, the New Orleans expedition was regarded as ICE coming, doing their thing, and going, with little extra-curricular incidents.
So, how is it that Kristi Noem had ICE do in Minneapolis exactly what is regarded as legal in DC, in Memphis, and in New Orleans, with it being declared a crime only in Minneapolis ... and maybe LA ... and perhaps in Chicago.
Whatever be the activity, anything which is done in New Orleans and is not considered a crime in federal law there is that which is done in Minneapolis and is equally NOT considered a crime there. So, the vicious Congresswoman made herself look like the asinine buffoon she is.
And of course, keep in mind that the democrat politician want illegals kept in America, so that these illegals can quickly be granted citizenship and the right to vote. It's the Democrat Party's way of rigging the next ten elections.
Also remember, federal law always SUPERCEDES state law. The United States government is far more powerful than the government of Minnesota ... and Maryland ... and Illinois ... and even California combined.
The Congresswoman is the actual criminal
The crime that was committed recently was committed by that vicious and hate-filled Congresswoman, in her giving terroristic threats to Kristi Noem, all the while inciting rioting against Kristi Noem and even inciting the assassination of Kristi Noem.
To that vicious hag congresswoman who really did commit a crime in front Kristi Noem, I say ... "Nuremberg American Style, coming soon enough, to a theater or drive-in near you."
Trump will have nothing to do such proceedings, being that he will be out of office soon enough. Others will be in power when such a court arrives.
Quick Lesson
As a quick lesson, the difference between a Nuremberg-style court and the present International Court of Justice is that Nuremberg style trials involves actual judges already attached to existent sovereign nations. At the first set of Nuremberg trials, two judges each were contributed by the USA, the USSR, the UK, and France.
A World Court configuration involves persons elected for a judicial term who are not practicing judges of any sovereignty at all.
Today's 15 World Court judges were elected to nine year terms each, by the UN General Assembly. These are people who may have experience in diplomacy, or in teaching law, or in having been legal advisors, but they do not bring with them any sovereign nation's coercive power.
All in all, today World Court has 0% coercive power. Thus, it's 100% worthless.
Concerning the congresswoman whose name I am withholding, so that this post doesn't get flagged with a complaint, she is one of those people dedicated to "giving them France 1789." Her role is the role of Robespierre, and perhaps you know what happened to Robespierre.
History actually does repeat itself. Those who do not learn from the mistakes made in history are condemned to repeat them.
