February 9, 2026

Muslim Aggression toward Catholics, since 634 CE

This is Part 1 of a five part series:  Part 2 is found, by clicking on the link below:



The Intrusive & Physically Violent Islamic Jihad against Christendom has been an Ongoing Enterprise & the Way of the Muslim, dating as far back as 634 CE

Perhaps you remember.  Barack Obama made it sound as if the Muslims were in Jerusalem, polishing their holy holy halos, when all of a sudden, these evil evil white guys in armor came riding into town ... as if no Christian had ever been in Jerusalem before.   

Uhmmmm, Christianity, as was lead by Saints Peter, Philip, John, and James, along with the rest of the dedicated witnesses of Jesus the Nazarene, began in Jerusalem on Pentecost Sunday.  

Many who were there, at the Jerusalem Pentecost,  ended up dying for their faith unarmed ... ~while NOT performing a suicide bombing on a Tel Aviv bus, ... ~and while NOT flying a hijacked jetliner into a skyscraper filled with unarmed office workers.

Only AFTER 461 years of continued Muslim Military Aggression upon Christian lands did the first Crusade transpire

The reality is that Muslims were attacking Christian lands hundreds of years before the Crusades even began.  Those centuries of Muslim Aggression were the one continuous reason for finally embarking on the Crusades, in the first place.  And of course, Barack Obama did NOT tell you this. 

Note:  The list above left out the Invasion of Gaul, in 719.
The list below does not.  By the way, Gaul is present-day France.

The Year 2025 minus the Year 634 = 1,391 years of Muslim Aggression, committed by those sometimes named, the Ishmaelites, "the Believers," "the Saracens," and/or the "Mohammedans."

Then there was the matter of Muslims invading Zoroastrian lands with full military attacks.  That began in 633 AD.  By 651, the Muslims had destroyed the Sasanian Empire of the ancient Iranians.

The One MAIN Exception Occurred in 638

He Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab decreed that Christians would be given protection from violence when in Jerusalem.  Jews were allowed to return there, too.  These civil rights were signed in the "Assurance of Umar."

As time proceeded, the Jews ended up having amicable relations with the Muslim Moors, in Granada Spain.  That is located in Southeast Spain, near the Mediterranean Sea.  This caused the Spanish Crown to conclude that the Jews were accomplices in the Muslims' control of Spain for 700+ years.  This is why Isabella ordered all non-convert Jews to leave Spain, as soon as Spain finally became liberated in full.  

Isabella was afraid that Jews would conspire with the Moors and retake Spain.   And of course, Spain was liberated in 1492.  This is why Columbus embarked on his expedition on the Atlantic Ocean in that same year.

The Year 1085

Now, in 1085, Catholic forces under Alfonso VI, recaptured Toledo, being that Toledo was part of a small Muslim kingdom within the larger Moorish kingdom.  Such a mini-kingdom is a "Taifa."  Thus, 1085 can be regarded as the prelude to the Crusades which officially started in 1095.  

The first crusade actually was a success for the Catholics who needed to stop the westward march of Muslim Aggression which was headed toward toward Greece yet again.  The first Crusade achieve the goal of enabling Christians the ability to travel-to their prime place of pilgrimage, without being harassed and even abducted.  Of course, their prime place of pilgrimage was the land where Jesus the Nazarene performed his miracles, and where Elijah and Elias performed their miracles.

 
Then came the events of the Year 1095

In mathematical review, the Middle Eastern Crusades began in 1095 (CE).  Muslim aggression upon Christian lands began in 634 (CE).  In as much ... 1095 minus 634 = 461.  

All in all, 461 years of Muslim Military Aggression occurred before the first Crusade even began.  Below is a list of 11th Century Muslim attacks upon Christian lands which gave reason for the specific Crusade which began at the end of the 11th Century.


Connect the Dots
Above:  'tis posted pursuant to 17 USC 107.   The red dots are places where the Muslims invaded and then engaged in warfare ... from 633 to the Year 1080.  Take note that the European Crusades did not begin until the Year 1095.
Now, if you capture a staging area, you prevent a major invasion.  So, the ultimate motive for the Crusades was to safeguard Greece.  Thus, territories in the Middle East needed to be taken away from the Muslims.  This included Jerusalem, a place which also had sentimental value for any Christian.  After all, at one time, in centuries prior, Jerusalem was a part of the Catholic Byzantine Empire.

Concurrence

Below is the video of Iranian-born Goldie Ghamari.  She was a member of the Ontario Canada provincial parliament until January 2025.  Her video explains the Crusades in general ... in brevity.  

She is the one who said that the Crusades were a response to the Islamic Jihad.  She also said that, if it were not for the Crusades, every person of European ancestry would be speaking Arabic, and every European woman would be wearing a burka as a requirement.
πŸŒ‘ πŸŒ’ πŸŒ“ πŸŒ” πŸŒ• πŸŒ– πŸŒ— 🌘


πŸŒ‘  πŸŒ’  πŸŒ“  πŸŒ”  πŸŒ•  πŸŒ–  πŸŒ—  🌘

And yes, approximately 50,000 of the 75,000 Iranian mosques have been closed, due to lack of interest amongst the Iranians.  Thus, the Liberation of Persia/Iran isn't an impossibility.

Once again, the link to Part 2 of this five part series is directly below:

February 8, 2026

Muslim Aggression toward Catholics and others, since the 7th Century

This is actually Part 2 of a five part series.  Part 1 is found through the link below:


Now, you know whom & what the Muslims have targeted for destruction,
ever since the 600s CE.  Well, we're tired of it, squared & cubed.
In this series, Ishmaelites, Saracens, Muhammadans, and Muslims are defined as one in the same, in terms of religious beliefs & practice.  

The major difference in the Islamic world is the Shiite Muslim vs the Sunna Muslim.  Now, both sects believe that a man named Mohammad existed and was chosen by God to be the last and decisive prophet.  In as much, the Shiites believe that only descendants of Mohammad can be the leaders of the Muslim Religion.  The Sunnis believe that Muslims are to vote for their leader.  And of course, their religion is Islam, and it means "Submission."

In fact, the word, Muslim, means, "one who submits."  Thus, a Muslim is one who seeks to get everyone to submit to his doctrine and beliefs, in the name of his definition of the Supreme Being whom the Muslim calls, Allah.  More specifically, Allah is Al-ilāh.  The "ilāh" part of  Al-ilāh means, "the Deity."

The War Within the Muslim Religion ... going back to the start

The conclusion is that, even within the Muslim religion there was no unity, due to the decisive debate between the Shiites and the Sunnis.  In fact, the Sunni Ottomans of TΓΌrkiye and the Shiites of Persia fought 11 wars between each other, from 1505 to 1823.  Both sides won 5 wars, lost 5 wars, and tied the same one war.

Then comes the Sufi Muslims who are said to be the sect magnetized toward peacefulness.  There is also the Ibadi Muslim sect which believes that any man who achieves holiness can be made a ruling caliph, despite his ancestry and despite the votes of the people.  Even though Ibadi Muslims are seen as extremists, they also have a degree or two of democratic tendencies.  

The Sunnis are the vast majority of Muslims.  The Shiites are second in population.  The Sufis & Ibadis are significant minorities. 

All in all, the Muslim religion has a track record of invasion, violence, looting, and enslaving others.  Violence & Slavery is the Muslim Religion in practice.  This includes something known as "honor killings."  

The irony is that one of the Five Pillars of Islam is charity to those in need.  However, as soon as the politically reformed Muammar Gaddafi was tortured to death in 2011 ... with President Obama, VP Biden, and Sec of State Hillary looking the other way ... the slave trade had a resurgence in Muslim Libya.  Such a thing is the opposite of charity to those in need.

Nuch alowed in the Muslim religion is the opposite of charity to the needy/  This includes "killing the infidel who refuses to pay the Jizya which is equivalent to paying Mafia henchmen a "protection fee."  Even in 2025, Christians were heavily persecuted by Muslims.  This persecution is not a matter of dusty history books.  It's a matter of Current Events.  


Barack Obama called 2011 "the Arab Spring."  No.  It was a continuation of the 1,400 year old Muslim trend which began as follows and which also included centuries of slave-trading & owning:

          Firstly, there was the invasion of Persia, in 633.   Then: 

In addition, it was in 846 AD (or CE) when Muslims attacked the outskirts of ROME.  Then, in 902 CE, the Muslims successfully captured parts of Southern Italy and Sicily.  

In summary, the events of the 7th to 11th Century, alone, show that the Muslims were never nice people who believed in the motto, "Live and let live."  Their message was, "Submit or die!"  

So, after a plea was made by the Byzantine Emperor Alexios I to the Vatican, at the latter half of the 11th Century, it was surmised that some counter-measure against a constant military aggressor had to be done east of Rome.  It was a necessity, lest Greece be fully conquered, with Venice or Malta being next on the Muslim invasion list ... and with the Vatican being attacked after that.


This Muslim Aggressor included the 1456 Ottoman Siege of Belgrade which the Roman Catholic "Black Army" eventually won.  This also included the Muslims' 1529 failed Siege of Vienna which would be followed by the second failed Siege of Vienna, in 1683.

Incidentally, Vienna was very influential in the Holy Roman Empire.  Therefore, an attack on Vienna was an all-out attack on Roman Catholicism itself.

This trend of Muslim Aggression furthermore included the most emotionally dramatic historic event one can find, namely the 1565 Siege of Malta which included 40,000 Muslim attackers, 6,500 of whom were the elite Janissary Troops.  Those troops were all carried on 200 Muslims ships.  Barack Obama never told you this, either.

Of course, Malta was the second ultimate prize for the Muslims, with the Vatican being Muslim Prize Number One.  Prize #3 was Vienna.  

Christians were repeatedly the victims of the Muslims throughout the centuries.  They had to fight back, being that, time after time, Muslims invaded their countries ... as well as having pirated their ships ... even into the 1400s, the 1500s, and the 1600s.   After all, what would you do, if some gang constantly broke into your house, trying to rape your wife, steal your valuables, and sell your children into slavery, while keeping your house for themselves?

Coincidence or not?

As a point of curiosity, the Algerian naval commander, Turgut Reis, died on September 11th, marking the end of the Siege of Malta.  He is also known as Admiral Dragut. 

Furthermore, the SECOND SIEGE of Vienna was started by the Muslim forces on September 11, 1683.  Plus plus plus, the Battle of Zenta occurred on September 11, 1697.  That was when a Roman Catholic prince intercepted & defeated a Muslim army that was intent on recapturing Roman Catholic Hungary, for the Ottoman Empire.  In as much, did you ever wonder why the NYC Trade Tower Terrorists chose September 11th as their Target Day for Destruction?  

Six Years after the failed siege of Malta, the Muslims 
attacked Christendom with 67,000 military men, by sea

Shortly after the Malta Siege came the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, where the Roman Catholic Holy League decimated the advancing Ottoman fleet, in the Gulf of Patras.  This specific invasion of European Christendom included 278 ships, 222 of which were Muslim Galleys, and 56 of which were Muslim Galliots.  Needless to say, Barack Obama NEVER told you this aspect of Muslim history, either. 

The link to Part 3 is directly below:

February 7, 2026

The Massive Muslim Slave Trade of the Barbary Cosairs, Ottomans, etc.

This is actually Part 3 of a five part series.  Part 2 is found here:

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2025/12/muslims-attacked-first-part2.html

Barack Obama neglected to mention the Trans-Sahara & Maghreb Slave Trading Enterprises, in Northern Africa



In the Catholic World,  Slavery was banned in FOUR SPECIFIC RULINGS AND/OR DECREES.

Three individual popes issued documents condemning slavery, attaching to the transgressors loss of all privileges in and from Europe, as well as in and from the Catholic Church.  Then, in 1542, Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, banned slavery in the New World, to the point of declaring all indigenous People of the Americas FREE PERSONS.  

Then came Pope Gregory XIV.  He issued a Papal Bull ... which is to be understood as a Papal Bulletin and which had the effect of an encyclical and a decree.  In 1591, by the force of law invested in Gregory XIV, the slaves of the Philippines were declared free in every legal level.

Previously, in 1526 Clement VII condemned the slavery in the Cape Verdi Islands, off the coast of Northwestern Africa.  Then, in 1541, Pope Paul III also condemned the enslavement of the indigenous people of the Americas.  

Next came Emperor Charles V, mandating the abolition of slavery in the Americas, with the power invested in him as emperor of the Holy Roman Empire & King of Spain. 


Sixtus V, in 1588, also condemned the enslavement of indigenous people in the Americas.  This was followed by Gregory XIV freeing on paper ... and in canonical law ... the indigenous people of the Philippines.  

Of course, there were no Swiss Guard Troops in the Philippines and in the Americas to enforce papal bulletins and decrees.  Yet, there was the matter of depriving the transgressors of all Catholic, all Spanish, and all Holy Roman Imperial privileges.

As a note for 2025/2026, the nation with the largest population of Roman Catholics in the world is the Philippines.

Just like the future NUREMBERG DEFENDANTS in the '40s

As a review, there were actually 13 distinct Nuremberg Trials.  As one of many results, a major Nazi propagandist was one of the defendants who ended up being put to death for his newspaper which did little more than incite murder and massive theft.  

In as much, people in the present-day mainstream media need to study that specific part of the trials, as well as studying the Tokyo Rose Trial.  You Race Warmongers and defamers of heads of state out there are NOT immune to your mouths and your typewritten articles.  This includes you editors, campaign managers, and CEO's of network TV.   Most important is the long-term observation that HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF.  

Part 4 is found here:

February 6, 2026

Muslim Aggression toward Americans, since the First Barbary War

This is Part 5 of a five part series.  The link to Part 4 is directly below:

 
This Muslim aggression included Somalis dragging dead Americans down the streets of Mogadishu.  It also included the September 11th, 2001 Airborne Terrorist Attacks in the American skies, as well as the Mumbai India, massacres, in addition to the Boston Marathon Sabotage.   
The colored drawing above is posted pursuant to 17 USC 107;  the Fair Use Act.
It depicts the First Barbary War, when white people were hijacked from ships, by Muslims,
and then sold into slavery ... by Muslims.  This included American women being sold into sex slavery ... by and for Muslims, of course.

 ... to the shores of Tripoli

In the 1780s, as soon as America gained independence from England, Algerian Muslim pirates started boarding American ships, commandeering the ships,  stealing property on board, and kidnapping Christian sailors and passengers alike.  This was because these Barbary Corsairs knew that the American ships were no longer protected by the Imperial British Navy. 

At the time, America could only afford to attempt to resolve the ongoing assaults, by diplomacy.  This included paying "tributes" to Muslims.  


Then came the Thomas Jefferson presidency, when the US president stopped paying tribute to these Muslims. North African Muslim pirates, under Muslims lords, kept pirating American ships and taking American hostages, some of whom became sex slaves.  


This resulted in the US Marines being sent to Northern African ... in 1805 ... to liberate the kidnap victims and to subdue the power of the Kingdom of Tripoli.  All in all, at the very beginning of the United States, it was being attacked by traditional MUSLIM MILITARY AGGRESSION. 


In summary ...

...  the Muslim Religion ... aka Islam ... has been a Plague of Locusts upon Christendom, from the start.  The Muslim Religion is an anti-Christian religion, because it's "adherents" spent over 1,391 years trying to destroy Christianity in every way possible ... or trying to make Christians second class citizens who had to pay extortion to Muslims, in the JIZYA .   For the Muslims, it was a matter of attack, attack, and keep on attacking.  

Now, Barack Obama made Catholics look like the demons from Hell.  HOWEVER, no Roman Catholic group ever hi-jacked multiple airliners and flew them into the skyscrapers of a Muslim land.  No Roman Catholic team ever performed 12 mass-shooting attacks in a three-day period, in a large Indian city such as Mumbai.  And no Roman Catholic duo ever performed a bombing at the Boston Marathon.

Concerning this, here is a great contradiction:  In September of 2001, when two hijacked jets crashed into the NYC Trade Towers, how many people within them were Muslim?   That is to ask, when suicide bombers did their many bombings, how many Muslims got caught in the deadly explosions?

Roman Catholic military knight orders started as a response to already-existent attackers of Catholics.  Even though the Teutonic Knights were founded in Acre (Akko) ... which is 80 miles north of Jerusalem ... they were sent to protect people from Lithuanian pagan forces.  Then, after the Lithuanians converted to Catholicism, the Teutonic Knights were eventually disbanded.

Unarmed Missionaries were the ones who expanded Christendom, as in "the blood of the martyrs are the seeds of the Faith."  Saints Boniface, Odilia, and Ursula are example of true martyrs killed for their Faith in Christ.

It's a lie to claim that military forces were sent to expand Christendom.  MISSIONARIES were sent out to expand Christendom, and you cannot deny that the Catholic Church had a lot of unarmed martyrs who were spreading the Faith.  

Catholic military forces were sent to prevent Christendom from being invaded, conquered, and decimated.  Or else they were sent to win back invaded land that was occupied by anti-Catholics.

Becoming Catholic was and is a relatively long process that involves the Catechumenate.  No one instantly becomes a Catholic convert.  Ask today's Catholic converts.  

All in all, putting a sword to someone's neck does NOT result in the person becoming Catholic.  You have to prove that you understand the basic doctrines of the faith and the basic moral precepts of the Church.  You then have to show that you actually want to become Catholic.  That is known as "consent."  

Plus, in Catholicism there is excommunication.  Thus, there were some people whom the church didn't want to join them, until such people reformed for the better.  Thus, it's a lie to claim that Catholics were shoving the Faith down people's throats, at the point of swords.  That's the Muslim Religion that does that.  

Catholics are taught that it's a sin to hijack an airliner and then fly it into a skyscraper filled with unarmed office workers.  Catholics are also taught that it's a sin to explode a bomb at the Boston Marathon.

Catholics are furthermore taught that it's a mortal sin to shoot at Jews who are celebrating Hanukkah in Australia. 

There was a time when becoming a citizen of the United States was a long process.  Well, converting to Catholicism is simply becoming a citizen of the Kingdom of God which "is at hand."  And to those who do NOT believe in Catholicism in any capacity, you have to explain away all of those miracles in the Catholic Church.  

This included the October 13th, 1917 Fatima Portugal Miracle of the Sun, when a rain-drenched region suddenly dried, after people saw the Sun perform a colorful and even slightly terrifying phenomenon.

The fact that everything outdoors dried instantly proves that there was no "mass hallucination" transpiring.  Newspaper reporters went, with the intention to prove a fraud amongst three shepherd children, and then to mock Catholicism.  They ended up reporting the miraculous event with respect.

Oh, and then there is the matter of bleeding hosts, a couple of which were scientifically analyzed, at least in at least three specific hosts which were consecrated at Catholic masses, in the modern era.  The blood on the hosts were found to be AB blood.  

The Shroud of Turin has AB blood on it, too.  However, the rh factor on the shroud was not reported.  This means that the reports didn't mention if the Shroud of Turin blood were AB Positive or AB Negative.
Note:  There are a lot of officially recognized miraculous hosts.  Not merely four.   Such host phenomena date back to 750 CE, with some of the hosts on display, usually in a shrine setting or other consecrated structure.  More than one had cardiac muscle, and more than one had AB blood, presumably AB positive blood.

Jesus said, if you don't believe my words, then believe my works.  These miraculous phenomena are regarded as Christ's works which actually give a message..

And then there is the miraculous Tilma of Guadalupe which contains an image of the Virgin Mary.  The miracles occurred on December 12, 1531, and it was witnessed by a bishop.  

Science found that it has zero brush strokes on it and that it was not sketched in any way.  It looks as new as it was in 1531.  So look up the whole story, before flaring off more atheistic diatribes ... or anti-Catholic rants, etc.

Before 1531, there were about 10,000 native converts in Mexico.  In the immediate years after the 1531 miracle, there came to be 6 to 8 million natives converting to the "Faith of Peter & Paul," and getting baptized in the Catholic Church.

Keep in mind that it was in 1520 to 1521 when Small Pox in Mexico reached the pandemic stage.  Our Lady made her presence known to the traumatized Mexicans ten years later.  

This account began, when the bishop in Mexico city wrote a super important letter to the King of Spain, mentioning the Conquistadors' abuse of the natives.  In prayer, the bishop asked to be given a sign that the king actually read the letter.  The bishop asked for roses to be the sign.  

Well, when Juan Diego returned to the bishop, he had roses in his tilma.  He opened up the tilma, so that the roses could fall on the bishop's desk.  Then the bishop saw the miraculous image.  

Roses didn't bloom in December in Mexico City, during the Mini Ice Age which lasted from 1284 CE to 1840 CE.  The bishop received his message in 1531.   December 12th is still honored ... and/or celebrated ... in Latin America.

Part 1 of this five part series is located via the link below:


Concurrence

Below is the video documentary on Whites having been slaves.  Such a thing is not too difficult to believe.  After all, the history of mankind ... the sad history of mankind ... has mostly been WAR & SLAVERY, in addition to the fight to survive the elements.  In as much, the most accomplished slave traders & owners in history were allegedly none other than . . . the Ottomans . . . allegedly, of course.

February 5, 2026

A Catholic religious order dedicated to paying hostage ransom to Muslim Captors

This is Part 4 of a five part series.  The link to Part 3 is located directly below:


Now remember, the FIRST & SECOND COUNTS of the introductory NUREMBERG TRIALS was CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT WAR OF AGGRESSION, as well as committing WAR OF AGGRESSION.  This was otherwise known as Crimes Against the Peace 

Well, Muslims have been committing such crimes of aggression since its very beginning.  Zoroastrian Persians were attacked.  Indian Hindus were attacked, too.  And of course,  Catholics were attacked, attacked again, and attacked some more, century after century after century.  

All in all, from its beginning, Islam has been a brutal menace to mankind.  As far back as 711 AD (or CE), the Muslims attacked Catholic Spain.  Then, for 700+ years they controlled the provinces of ~AlmerΓ­a, ~CΓ‘diz, ~CΓ³rdoba, ~Granada, ~Huelva, ~JaΓ©n, ~MΓ‘laga, and ~Seville.  Spain was not fully liberated until 1492.  That's 781 years of Occupation & Oppression ... done by Muslims upon the victimized Roman Catholics in Spain.
 
All in all, Christianity had to either counterattack the Muslim Aggressors or completely die.  On occasion, they were given the opportunity to be those second class citizens, called Dhimmi, who had to pay a submission tax, called the Jizya.   This option was basically the SLOW DEATH.

This Jizya was basically protection money and/or extortion.  Sometimes, it was regarded as a tribute.  It was forced upon Christians and other non-Muslims, under penalty of attack and death.  

As another example of early Muslim Aggression, the Muslims were violently trying to bring France into submission as far back as the 700s, during the days when the western part of the land was called Aquitaine.

Odo the Great ... Duke of Aquitaine ... and Charles Martel ... the powerful Mayor of Paris ... saved Catholicism in Western Europe from Muslim Military Expansionism.  Yet, Spain remained a captive of the very Muslim Moors who were a part of the Umayyad Caliphate. 

See:  The 721 Battle of Toulouse and the 732 Battle of Tours, when you have the time and the curiosity to do so. 

Step by step, Spain regained its independence.  None the less, even into & including the Year 2024, Muslim nations outright persecuted Christians.  This included the Catholics and Protestants in Nigeria today.  Meanwhile, western nations welcomed their Muslim persecutors into their high-tech nations which had been based on Christianity throughout the centuries.  

In addition, the Muslims did fail to occupy Constantinople in 717 AD, but they finally conquered it in 1534 AD.  As a result, Russians decided to build a new city, far away from the Muslims.  The Russians called that city, the New Rome.  That city is MOSCOW ... "Москва."   It was named after the Moskva River.

Now, in the Year 1066, the Muslims invaded and conquered Toledo, SPAIN.  Then came the Battle of Manzikert, in 1071, when the Muslims once again attacked a Christian land and occupied it.  This was in Southeastern TΓΌrkiye.  

This triggered the need for some type of Crusade which was said to have begun in 1095 CE.  The reality is that the successful Crusades began in 1085, when Catholic forces liberated Toledo SPAIN from Muslim rule.  This is something that Barack Obama never told you, when he was perniciously damning Catholics.  The Muslims invaded & attacked the Catholic lands first ... for hundreds of years.


In the late 11th Century, the long history of Muslim Expansion was thought to be taking its course back toward Greece.  After all, the Muslims already successfully attacked Byzantine territories in Anatolia, in 634.  They also conquered Cypress in 649.  

Then, in 717, the Muslims placed Constantinople under siege.  Yet, they failed.  So, Greece ... aka Byzantium ... was still a target for the Muslims.  In as much, there was a correct reason for Byzantine Emperor Alexios I to ask Pope Urban II for help, even though the Greek bishops split from Rome in 1054.  That split is called the Great Schism.  Schism means "the scissoring."

The Vicious Irony today

The irony is in a Jewish mayor welcoming Somali Muslims who are taught that Allah commands Muslims to rise-up and kill all Jews everywhere ... including the Useful Idiot Mayor of Minneapolis.  

In fact, it was Somali gunmen who shot an Italian nun/nurse to death six days after Pope Benedict XVI's Regensburg Lecture, where he quoted a Byzantine emperor who mentioned that forcing religion upon a people at the point of a sword, as did the Muslims since 633 CE, was evil.   This murder occurred in the Year 2006, outside of a children's hospital.

That martyred nun, Sister Leonella Sgorbati, was beatified at the Vatican in 2018.  Her bodyguard was also killed in Mogadishu by Somali gunmen, in the same incident.  Sr. Leonella's Memorial Day ... aka Feast Day ... is September 17th.

Below:  Other instances of Deadly Muslim Aggression upon unarmed Catholics 
who were forced to betray their faith in Christ, under penalty of death.  

Those people chose death over betraying the Miraculous Nazarene who happened to have been born in Bethlehem.  By the way, Bethlehem means, "House of Bread" in Hebrew.

The Roman Catholic religious order that paid ransom to Muslims, for the release of Christian Captives, as far back as the 13th Century.

The Muslims took a lot of captives as a part of their looting.  Then came 1218, when a Roman Catholic religious order was founded in Barcelona Spain, solely to rescue Catholic captives.  It was known centuries later as the Order of Our Lady of Ransom, being that paying ransom, in order to liberate captive Catholics, was the principle technique of the religious order.  

At the time of its founding, that particular religious order was officially named the Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mercy.  It's members were-and-are the Mercedarians.
In Catholic religious orders, the members live by three vows, namely the vows of Poverty, Chastity, and Obedience.  Well, the Mercedarians took a fourth vow ... that of offering one's self as a replacement hostage/captive, in order to obtain the freedom of an already existing hostage.  It was known as the "blood vow," because it included giving up your life, to free a hostage, if necessary.

Today, in 2025, that religious order still exists in 17 different nations, specifically in the Philippines, the United States, Spain, Italy, and in certain Latin American nations.  

The Fourth Vow

Now, the Mercedarian Fourth Vow has been revised.  In my personal interpretation of the modernized Fourth Vow, it's to basically speak out against social injustice, becoming subject to a number of types of RETALIATION which includes being killed for standing-up for what is right.  

The revised vow furthermore emphasizes coming to the assistance of those close to losing the Faith ... because of threats, harassment, discrimination, lying propaganda, social rejection, persecution, etc.  The revised vow is something similar to this, thereby making that religious order worth existing. 

The link to Part 5 is located directly below:

February 4, 2026

Part 1: The 1567 Spanish Inquisition Horror Tale (Published in Heidelberg)

Where are the bloodstained torture chambers & mass graves?  Where are the blood-stained roads leading from the 20 Inquisition courts to the 20 mass graves that were never found, in the first place? 

The Inquisition began in 1478 and the terminated in 1834.  There are 356 years of case files still in existence.  They give an account much different than the 1567 horror story pamphlet, published in Heidelberg.  It was one person's account, with zero corroborating witnesses and zero pieces of physical evidence.  Such things are usually called hoaxes.  Sometimes they are called cruel jokes. 
In this case, it was a drastic over-exaggeration, being that the Spanish were no more drastic than the British or the French ... or even the Austrians ... in those criminal justice systems.  That Heidelberg pamphlet was pre-war propaganda that triggered the traumatic Eighty Years War.  Propaganda kills.  It's a Jeannie that does not go back into its bottle.

Intro 

This subject is extremely pertinent at present, due to [1] the recent 300+ acts of vandalism upon Catholic Church infrastructure in America alone, [2] the FBI targeting as inevitable terrorists those people who prefer the Latin Mass, [3] the endless defamation against the Catholic Church of centuries past which infer that today's Catholic Church is the evil evil Whore of Babylon which must be wiped off the face of the Earth,   [4] the sabotage of Catholic churches throughout France,  [5] people cheering the burning of Catholic churches in Canada, in 2021,  [6] the recent murder of priests, nuns, and laymen in Africa, by Boko Haram ... and the murder of Catholics elsewhere --- just for being Catholic --- such as in Nagorno-Karabakh (Azerbaijan) ... and Syria.

You would have to be an airhead or an avowed liar to deny that Catholicism is once again under attack, as it was in centuries prior, during the persecutions orchestrated by:  [1] Nero Caesar,  [2] Aurelius,  [3] Decius,  [4] Gallus,  [5] Valerian,  [6] Diocletian,  [7] Visigoth King Athanaric,  [8] Persia's Shapur II,  [9] the Huns --- and other power-wielding entities, including *Henry VIII, **the two British Cromwells, *Otto von Bismark (during the 1872-78 "Kulturalkampf,")  *the American "Know-Nothing" Party of the mid-1800s,  *the Orthodox Russians of the late 1800s,  *the 20th Century Soviet Union,  *the Boxers of Tientsin China during the 1900 Yihetuan Movement,  *Killer Extraordinaire Mao Tse Tung,  *the Chinese Communist Party,  and *Muslim terror groups such as the previously mentioned Boko Haram.  

Added to the list is the buffoonish, yet deadly, *Adolph Hitler* who let 2,579 Roman Catholic priests die with the Jews at Dachau, proving that Hitler did NOT see the Roman Catholic Church as his bosom buddy.

Plus, exculpatory Inquisition findings reported by the BBC 29 years ago goes ignored in America.  So, we can thank the American public school system and American TV evangelists for that wide gap of missing knowledge which stretches throughout the minds of Americans everywhere.  All in all, it took much longer for me to have researched and then to have written this 4-part discourse than it will ever take for you to read it ... if you're a native English speaker ... and if you are not a product of the farcical American public school system.

The BBC began the reality check

As far back as 1994, the world renown British Broadcasting Corporation produced a documentary which surmised that the Spanish Inquisition Horror Story of the anonymous writer(s), Reginaldus Gonslavius Montanus, was summarily bull crap. 

Before all else, directly below is the link to the 1994 BBC documentary titled, The Myth of the Spanish Inquisition.   Each case brought before the 356 year-long inquisition had a case file attached to it, and the case files were preserved in the Spanish Inquisition archives.  The fact that the case files were meticulously done and reserved as well as museum antiques indicates a disciplined people.  That immediately negates the claim that the 16th Century Spanish were vile, psychopathic, depraved,  terroristic, gore-ridden, & out-of-control people.   These were the People of a maritime empire.  There were very much in control ... in control of themselves and in control of many tracts of European land, as well as being in control of the Americas and the Philippines.

In fact, a historian could easily write-off the one (and only one) hyper-exaggerated Inquisition horror story, because Spain --- both Castile & Aragon, as well as Catalonia --- had vibrant & influential knightly orders in existence.  That translates into a culture of civility, bearing a code of honor.

The BBC Documentary, MYTH OF THE SPANISH INQUISITION:

                             See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhlAqklH0do    

Concerning present-day America and its recent vandalism of 300+ Catholic church buildings ... as well as the FBI's recent memo targeting Latin-Mass Catholics the same way in which the cold-blooded killers of Soviet Russia did ... there has been a super-failure to convey reality to people whose knowledge is limited to the fifteen-second sound bytes of commercial TV newscasts.  Concerning the present American inability to communicate ... as well as the suppression of factual information throughout Digital America ... remember this:  

A person who speaks three languages is tri-lingual.  A person who speaks two languages is bilingual.  And a person who speaks only one language is an American.  How ironic it is that those who know Latin in America get officially targeted by the American FBI, as if knowing more than one language is criminal conduct.   

American paranoia is alive and thriving.  It did not end with McCarthyism.  In fact, today's woke don't realize how much they emulate & imitate   [1] Thomas Cromwell,   [2] Oliver Cromwell,   [3] the Know-Nothing Party's Bill "the butcher' Poole,   [4] the KKK,   [5] Hitler's Brown Shirts,   [6] Mussolini's Henchmen, and [7] the CCP.  There is nothing enlightening about the Woke Movement.  It's the same ole same ole; namely, a faction of dime-a-dozen thugs (in both lying word & in violent deed)  pretending to be the martyrs, making all other people the real martyrs in the process.  Thus, the de-evolution of mankind is superseding the theory of evolution.  Mankind is going backwards.  Mankind is devolving.

In the mindset of today's American government officials, knowledge is a dangerous thing that must be suppressed.  Thus, we have the Era of the American Moron which replaced the previous Era of the American Muscle Car & the American Motor Head.  Motor heads of the 1960s & 1970s were not stupid people.  Let us proceed, unless of course, you believe that knowledge is a dangerous thing.  Shall we? =======>

Qualifying Statement intended to shut Anti-Catholics up, until they can fabricate new lies to tell about the Catholic Church

The matter of 15th & 16th Century Spanish-America is a discourse of its own.  None the less, even when there were reports of criminal conduct in the American colonies, it was Christopher Columbus who ended up indicted in 1500 (during his third voyage), prosecuted & convicted.  He appealed.  He then got to take a fourth voyage in 1502.  He died in 1506.  

The bottom line is that he was not given a carte blanch, enabling him to do whatever he wanted.  However, in Spanish law there was a matter of gathering physical evidence, in order to convict you.  There were neither cameras nor internet access in those days ... nor fax machines.   So, do the math here as to why Columbus didn't hang from the highest tree branch.  None the less, after a rocky start, Central and South America eventually became a new nation of intermingling cultures, as opposed to a vast land of segregation.  

In 1537, a pope issued a papal bull (bulletin) which banned slavery in Latin America & in French America.  However, when the cat is away the mice will play ... as in Haiti.  Then, Anglo America turned slavery into a divine right.  And of course, Protestant Anglo America which rationalized slavery despised the Roman Catholicism which banned slavery. 

One more thing that enrages haters of Catholicism:  A number of the Conquistadors were ====> Jewish, and NOT converted Jews.  BTW, the author of this discourse has Jewish ancestry.  So, cut it out with the alternate version of "Witch!  Witch!"  The alternate version is "Antisemite!  Antisemite!"  The author here IS a Semite with Italian & Greek ancestry ... and French & Irish ancestry ... as well as Spanish & Peruvian ancestry, as well as other ancestries, including  Gujarati Indian, according to his DNA test results.   So, you can take your fake & pompous self-righteousness and ... and ...  you can ... Well, you know the drill.

False Light Defamation against Catholicism

In fact, the Bishop of Mexico City wrote to the Spanish crown around 1530, reporting on the abusive events that needed halted.  That bishop did NOT look the other way.   And yes, I am well aware that the Encyclopedia Britannica people dispute the time line.  Well, the bottom line is that Mexico City houses a miraculous image on a common tilma that has no scientific explanation to it.  It caused a rapid spread of a Middle Eastern religion throughout much of the Americas.   See:  Our Lady of Guadalupe.

The papal act of banning slavery in newly found America, while it was inhabited by Spanish and/or Portuguese and/or French, is found in Sublimis Deus, June 2, 1537: Pope Paul III.  So, you must erase all of your online defamation which very falsely claims that the Catholic Church started slavery.  Or else we can discuss this matter which at least one federal magistrate.  and know that attorneys are outrageously expensive, these days.  It's your call.

Three different popes, at the different times, in three different geographic regions banned slavery.  Plus, the Catholic Church had established two religious orders dedicated to paying ransoms to Muslim captors, for pirated European kidnap-victims who were turned into sex-slaves, inter alia.  AND, the Dutch Calvinists were the masters of the Atlantic slave trade, at its outset.  No slave docks were in Rome, and no pope was selling slaves.  The true Church teaches that slavery is Defraudment of Laborors of their Wages, and such a thing is One of the Four Sins which Cry to Heaven for Vengeance.

BTW, when you read the words, papal bull, think "papal BULLETIN."

To Claim that slavery was started by the Catholic Church which forbade it three times is defamation

A pope ordered the end of slavery in the Philippines, on April 18, 1591, as well.  A number of subsequent popes condemned slavery, even while the very Anti-Catholic Confederate South lived off of chattel slavery.  But of course, the Protestant South declared all popes to be the Antichrist, even though the Sacred Script prophesies that only one Antichrist was left to come ... in the future.  There were over 260 popes since that prophecy.  

So, which pope was the Antichrist?  ANS:  None of them.   Protestants market Fear of Catholicism, in order to fill up their Protestant church pews and fill their tax-free collection baskets.  After all, American political candidates are known for defaming their opponents.  The anti-Catholicism of Protestant America has always been nothing more than political mudslinging.

Protestant Motive for Defaming Catholic Church:  Tax-free collection basket income

Incidentally, Protestant fanatics are liars obsessed with defaming the Catholic Church, so that Catholics will start going to a Protestant fanatic's "house of worship" and put lots of tax-free collection basket money into the fanatic preacher's baskets.  Now, back to the regularly scheduled discourse:

A  pope also intervened 16 years before Columbus was even born, concerning slavery in the Canary Islands.   Pope Eugene IV was the one who ordered it to be halted.  See:  Sicut Dudem, January 1435; Against the Enslaving of Black Natives in the Canary Islands.  

Note:  The ANTI-CATHOLIC propagandists claim that the aforementioned papal bulletin only freed Catholic slaves.  No.  That is yet another lie of those inciting violence against Roman Catholics.  The fact was that Roman Catholics were ordered to free all slaves. 

By the way, the anti-Catholic propaganda machine claims that all of slavery began with a pope's bulletin, in 1452.  Uhhhhm, it was a declaration of war against the Saracens who spent centuries invading Christian Europe, kidnapping European women for sex slavery, kidnapping children for other types of slavery, and inhabiting European lands as their conquering rulers.  This included Sicily, Bari Italy and surrounding terrain.  This included the "Saracens'" failed attempts to takeover certain lands they invaded, such as Sardinia.   

The papal order was to stop the marauding Saracens, and to then make them into prisoners of war, so that they will stop raping Catholic women.  After all, how would you like it if a bunch of Saracens marauded into your childhood neighborhood and raped your mama?  Yes, that's right ... Your Mama.

The Two Previously Mention Ransom Payed to Muslim Captors/Kidnappers

Throughout the Medieval & Renaissance Era, the two religious orders dedicated to freeing the captives of Muslim marauders, by paying ransom to the marauding Muslims, were the Trinitarians and Order of Our Lady of Mercy, also known as the Knights of Saint Eulaia.  Today, it's members are known as the Mercedarians.  That order was founded in 1218 by Peter Nolasco.  Now, the irony about the Trinitarians is that Muslims regarded as the worse trash ob Earth those who believed in the Holy Trinity.  Yet, the Muslim captors were not too good for the money shelled-out by the Trinitarians for the freedom of European kidnap victims.

Falsely accusing Catholics as being the founders of Atlantic Slavery is ultra-insulting to Irish Catholics, being that the Irish were made slaves in their own land, while watching their forests get decimated.  For those in the American public school system, know that there used to be "a saying" which reminded Europe that "the British navy was built from Irish oak."  The British literally stole the forests of the Irish, doing so while Britain was a Protestant country.

 Missionaries of the Sword ... to the Christian Neck   

Muslims attacked and occupied Christian lands for hundreds of consecutive years --- long before the first crusade.   BTW, the first Crusade came about, because Greek-powers-that-be asked for help from the Roman Catholics, to divert the path of the Muslims from Greece.  At the time, the Muslims had a free route into Greece.  So, the original crusade was done to prevent Greece from becoming overrun by a religion whose main practice was that of invading lands and killing inhabitants who would not submit to the invaders' religion.

The Muslim Moors invaded Spanish land in 711, when Roman Catholics were minding their own business.  They were asked to invade Spain by the Basques who, historically, are not the most charitable people on Earth.  That was 385 YEARS before the first Crusade.  

The same Muslims invaded French territory, while Roman Catholics there were minding their own businesses there, also.  This invasion resulted in the famous Battle of Tours, in 732 A.D. (C.E.).  That was 364 YEARS before the first Crusade.  In fact, Muslims attacked Jerusalem and its Catholic king, in 638 A.D. (C.E.) --- 458 YEARS before the first Crusade .  So, Muslims were invading Christian lands -- and taking Christian slaves --- hundreds of years before the first Crusade (in 1095) ever happened.  

Thus, it is defamatory to claim that, in 1095, the Muslims were minding their own business ... polishing their halos ... when, all of a sudden, the evil evil white European Christians came a coming.  At the time, the Muslims were slowly approaching Constantinople, and the Muslims already had a track record of invading Northern African, Anatolia, Persia, and Southern European lands, starting in 632 C.E.  Incidentally,  Anatolia is Turkey and Persia is Iran. .  

The Muslims eventually conquered Constantinople and named it Istanbul ... in 1453.  Then came the First Siege of Vienna, in 1529 ... the Battle of Lepanto in 1571 ... and the Second Siege of Vienna, in 1638.  Muslims attacked and attacked and attacked Europe, over and over and over again, since the 711, (actually 661) under the Umayyad rulers.  The terrorism of the 20th & 21st Century was in keeping with Muslim tradition ... literally.  In fact, September 11, 2001 was a Muslim invasion upon New York and D.C.  The message was, "Submit or die."

Ground Zero after the collapse of the towers
New York, September 2001.  The Muslim Way.

In review, the Christians were already in Jerusalem when Muslims invaded it and started a siege upon its inhabitants, thereby ending Christian freedom-of-religion there.  You need to understand that Islam means "to submit," and the doctrinal goal of Muslims is to have the entire Earth "submit" to . . . you know whom.

For hundreds of years, Muslims invaded Christian lands, as well as having pirated ships occupied by Christian women who ended up being kidnap-victims and sex slaves.  This practice even endured into the presidency of Thomas Jefferson, necessitating him to act.  In as much, the very first military operation ever done by the United States Marine Corps was to free the victim-slaves of the marauding Muslims of Northern Africa.  This is why the Marine anthem mentions "the shores of Tripoli."  Moreover, in that exact same geographic region ... called Libya ... slavery still exists today.  

File:Pan Am Flight 103. Crashed Lockerbie, Scotland, 21 December 1988.jpg
Pan Am Flight 103 wreckage.  Unarmed civilians murdered.  Also the Muslim Way.

News Flash:  Catholics were slaves in history

Protestant Idolatry

Take note that Protestantism identified itself with the names of mere 16th Century mortals, as if they were all the new messiahs.  The names included Luther, Calvin, Bezanson Hugues (the Huguenots), Menno Simons (the Mennonites), etc.  This adds to the Protestant hypocrisy of calling Catholic idolaters.  Even in 20th Century America, Southern Baptists often had a poster of the idol of their age on a wall.  His name was Elvis Presley.  

Take note that the Baptists of the Deep South damned Catholics for having paintings of the Virgin Mary in their homes.  But it was super-fine to prominently display a picture of Elvis Presley.  Needless to say, Roman Catholics do NOT believe that the Mother of Christ created the universe.  Likewise, no Southern Baptist believes that Elvis created the universe. 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Elvis_Presley_1970.jpg
Tragic end.

As a preview to a possible future discourse on early Spanish America: [1] a number of the conquistadors where Jewish ... not converted Jews.  [2] The Aztec Empire was still practicing human sacrifice, and that ongoing crime needed to be ended. [3] The Incan Empire practiced human sacrifice, also.  [4] Conquistadors were being payed a disappointingly lower-than-expected wage for their efforts, and this created animosity. [5] A miraculous event in 1531 changed Spanish/Native relations to the point of resulting in a new nation - new culture - even new race --- a mixed race.  [6] Even at that, people need to remember the axiom, "When the cat is away, the mice will play."  Spain's king and queen were far away.  [7] The great killer of 16th Century America was small pox ... not musket fire and/or swords.

White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Racism in Print

The 1567 Inquisition horror tale was extremely RACIST, in its generalizations of the Spanish People per se.  It was an ad hominid character assassination of an entire nation of people (two kingdoms and Catalonia) who are not the whitest people in existence.  By the way, that sole 1567 Spanish Inquisition horror story was pre-war propaganda for the Netherlands conflict which would turn into the 80 Years War.  At the time, the Netherlands was under Spanish Rule.

In fact, Calvinist fanatics were sneaking into the Netherlands (Walloon & Flanders & Holland) dressed as peasants.  They then committed acts of violence and sabotage during the same year when the Montanus Tale of the Spanish Inquisition was published.  That's very hypocritical, being that the Calvinists were were performing violence without warning.

In keeping with hypocrisy is the modern propagandists pointing out that, in 1565, Spanish Royal Army troops "massacred"  French Huguenots, at Matanzas Inlet, Florida ... without also mentioning that, in 1555, French Hugueonots executed 40 Roman Catholic clergy members in Brazil.   The Spanish acted directly under the orders of King Philip I, husband of British Queen Mary I.  The Spanish were defending its American clergy ... and were fighting against the invasion of the French government, in an invasion directly prohibited by a papal bulletin.  Then, after that military operation, Jean Ribault ... the French navy commander of the area ... ordered an assault upon the Spanish of Florida.  His French fleet was lost in a storm ... aka hurricane.  Jean Ribault was a Huguenot blown away by the wind.

Spanish Inquisition Timeline    

The Spanish Inquisition existed from 1478 to 1834.  It was established five years before Martin Luther was even born.  It was founded 43 years BEFORE Martin Luther was excommunicated for his unrepentant insistence on adhering to 41 doctrinal heresies, inter alia.   Thus, the Spanish Inquisition was NOT created to execute Lutherans.

(NOTE for those of you in the American public school system: This does NOT refer to the civil rights activist of the 1960s, named Martin Luther KING.  This discourse refers to the very white, antisemitic, overweight, admittedly flatulent & constipated ale drinker who had a documented "seizure disorder" in the 16th Century.  Therefore, when the Spanish Inquisition was founded, Lutherans didn't even exist.)

This was mentioned, because, when I was speaking of the very white 16th Century Martin Luther once, a product of the American public school system thought that I was referring to the civil rights activist who was shot to death on April 4, 1968.  That graduate was only 451 years off the mark.  In fact, that person had no idea that there existed a very white 16th Century German man named Martin Luther, in the first place.  Way to go, American Public School System.  Dumbing them down the American Way.

Inquisition Archives

Now, decades ago, the Spanish government opened the archives to the public the same way in which public library contents are made available to none other than . . . the Public.  The BBC took up the Spanish government on its open invitation, and payed credentialed historians to report on their findings, after they scoured --- sifted through --- the Inquisition archives.  

Now, there were 20 tribunals ... which were the same as 20 "district courts."  Thus, there were 20 archives to research.   Once again ... for the sake of convenience, the 1994 BBC documentary is once again linked directly below, for your convenience:

THE MYTH OF THE SPANISH INQUISITION:

                             See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhlAqklH0do     

Added Note:  Except for a couple of quick quotes, that which is mentioned in the BBC documentary is NOT addressed in this discourse, and that which is mentioned in this discourse is NOT addressed in the 1994 BBC documentary.

Simply remember that the BBC producers only had fifty-some commercial-free minutes to present their case.  So, there was still a lot to convey on the Spanish Inquisition, all of which shows that the 1567 horror story of Reginaldus Montaus was total bull crap & the defamation of an entire nation.