Showing posts with label The E Jean Carroll Defamation Case. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The E Jean Carroll Defamation Case. Show all posts

March 22, 2024

The Case of MASSIVE Apprentice Fan, Elizabeth Jean Carroll

Quick Note:  This was written  by a registered Democrat who was raised to be a JFK Democrat & an FDR Democrat.  In fact, he studied economics under one of JFK's ad hoc economic advisors.  In addition, the person who wrote this discourse never owned a MAGA cap.  In fact, he lives in a northern American metropolis, and NOT in the backwoods of the former Confederate Deep South.

And it came to pass:  The jury consisting of residents of a federal district that prejudicially hates pro-life presidential candidate Donald Trump awarded an extremely pro-abortion woman $83 million in defamation damages.  Yet, she had no forensic evidence of any kind, in an accusation she claimed to have happened 27 years ago.  She also had ZERO on-the-scene witnesses in the same.  Thus, we have too much of a coincidence at the outset.  None the less ...

The plaintiff only asked the Southern District of New York to grant her approximately ten million dollars in compensatory & punitive damages, because Donald Trump called her mentally ill.  My assessment of her ... of that particular female public figure who is subject to NY Times v Sullivan, 376 US 254, and who is therefore unable to sue any private citizen, on account of any private citizen's public opinion of her ... is much worse.  This is because, if I thought that she were mentally ill, as opposed to malicious & manipulative, as well as sexually crass & void of decency, then I would have a moral duty to extend charity toward her.  However, there is a MASSIVE difference between Malice and Mental Illness.

None the less, any other adjectives used to correctly describe E Jean Carroll are reserved for private conversation, and NOT for printed text.  However, many more adjectives & nouns do apply.

It should read, "Too many good TV shows on Sunday."  Plus, it's interesting that she mentioned "God" on a Sunday, as she shows no signs of being a Sunday church-goer.  BTW, I never watched the Apprentice or Falcon Crest or Dallas or Dynasty or Breaking Bad or Beverly Hills 90210 or Desperate Housewives or West Wing or Game of Thrones or Fargo or ER, etc.

Above:  The Year 2012 minus 1996 = 16 years.  The Year 2023 minus the Year 2012 = 11 years.  16 + 11 = 27 years ago.   The pertinent point is that, in a 2023 Southern District of NY courtroom, it was testified that, as soon as E. Jean Carroll saw ... for the first time ... the Apprentice, she went into severe mental & emotional trauma.  Yet, outside of that courtroom she claimed to have been a MASSIVE Apprentice fan, where the star of the show was Donald Trump.  This is a credibility destroyer.  Contradictions usually are.  To contradict oneself in court is known as "committing perjury."

None the less, it looks like a NYC jury became drunk on power and thought that it could award any amount of money it wanted to designate, mindless of the concept of unjust enrichment.  This is why appeals courts exist.  Even at that, it appeared that the jury of Carroll v Trump 2.0 wanted to punish Trump for not cow-towing to the May 11, 2023 verdict.  

Well, that case was still under appeal at the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, in 2023.  This meant that the legal doctrine of collateral estoppel could not yet take effect ... unless the 2nd Circuit Court of Banana Peals made a ruling that was never reported.  Someone misinformed the jury.  The bottom line is that one case was not even finished, while another case was started-up.  That looks a lot like harassment ... and vexatious litigation.

For the record, the Spring of 2023 case is/was 1:22-cv-10016-LAK.   The judgment is Document 178.  The Notice of Appeal is Document 179.  There was an error in doing the appeal paperwork.  However, it was amended.  

Of course, Trump Hater, Reid Hoffman, was said to have funded Carroll, in her legal adventures.  Confusion then arose when Carroll said that she was only going to need to pay her law team if and only if she won her case.  Such a thing is a Contingent Basis, aka a Contingency Fee Agreement.  Concerning the contradiction here, it's times like this one when you toss your hands up in the air, and walk away from your files, thinking "What's the use?  Who's telling the truth, anyway?  I quit.

Even at that, in a civil trial the jury is not required to hold the same scrutiny as one would hold in a criminal court jury.  In a civil trial, the standard is "the preponderance of the evidence where at least 51% of the evidence favors the plaintiff."

In a criminal trial, the benchmark of judgment is a point known as "proof beyond a reasonable doubt, to a moral certainty."  If there is a reasonable doubt in any criminal trial, then the jury is instructed to declare the defendant not guilty.  An American jury is not to declare such a person as "innocent"; only "not guilty."

Civil trials are not that stringent in rendering a jury verdict.  None the less, the burden of proof (aka the ONUS of proof) is still on the plaintiff.  So, where is Carroll's "clear & convincing evidence?"  

It's NOT a matter of concluding that something could have possibly happened in a department store dressing room in 1994 or 1995 or 1996."  Needed was evidence to show that something definitely did occur, with Donald Trump being in the area where the "something" definitely happened. 

Thus, needed was [1] at least the proof that Trump and Carroll were certainly at the same place at the same time, in 1994 or 1995 or 1996 ... [2] that a physical assault of a sexual variety actually did occur at the department store in 1994 or 1995 or 1996 ... or at least upon Carroll in 1994 or 1995 or 1996.  

Concerning this, sometimes a sexual assault victim takes a nearby item, to prove that she was in her aggressor's home or near his person etc.  So, where is the physical evidence, to prove that Trump "raped" Carroll?  Why did she take so long to write or speak about it, if it actually did happen?   All that is known is that FOUR body language experts analyzed Trump during his deposition, and they concluded that Trump most certainly was telling the truth.  The report even mentioned "micro-gestures" where Trump was said to have been "disgusted" with the subject matter.

Moreover, a huge tale sign was in Trump freely and repeatedly saying the word, "rape."  A person who actually did commit rape, according to the expert analysts, refrains from using the word, "rape."  A guy innocent of such a charge, rattles off the word, rape, without reserve.  That video is already linked here, in a list of linked videos pertinent to the Carroll/Trump case.

Going into detail on either of the two Carroll trials is beyond the scope of this discourse, however, on account of time and space already consumed.  None the less, simply because someone said something on the witness stand, it doesn't mean that that person was telling the truth.

Concerning mainstream media's writers, editors, and mouthpieces:   Do "they" not know that reasonable  Americans are "on to them?"  And then comes the unreasonable Americans.  They do NOT think for themselves.  They're puppets ... sheep ... programmed robots.

And concerning Donald Trump, he has spent the past 7 1/2 years sabotaging himself.  The details are beyond the scope of this discourse, due to time & space.  

None the less, a quick example is that of Trump appointing Jeff Sessions as the AG.  Firstly, this caused the Mueller Investigation, being that Jeff recused himself from the Russia investigation.  And secondly, Session's absence from the Senate caused the Republican Party to lose the Senate.  That was super fatal for a Donald Trump who most certainly did have successes during his presidency which benefitted America.  

However, some of Mr. Trump's presidential track record . . .  namely the rise of the US National Debt ... was the Same Old Same Ole.  And of course, the national debt skyrocketed under Bush II, Obama, and Trump.  Even at that, from the emergence of COVID onward, Trump's presidency must be regarded as a sabotaged presidency.  

Mainstream Media in 2020:  The Inciters of Riot after Riot after Riot after Riot

The mainstream commercial media damns and mocks Donald Trump, in everything about him.  In this endless condemning of Trump, there is one blatant observation which shows that these people do not believe that they're telling the truth.   It's the blatant fact that they do NOT let Donald Trump defend himself in detail, on the air, on their less-than-intellectual news & commentary shows.  

If Trump is so evil, mentally deficient, & dangerous to Planet Earth, the mainstream media would have gone out of its way to bring Trump before television cameras, to show how "evil," how "mentally deficient," how "racist," and how "dangerous" he is.  But, the mainstreamers of the media did NOT employ the decency of doing so.  These media personnel are nothing more than hit-and-run cowards who mock Trump and then run and hide.  

These mainstream networks need to be stripped of their FCC licensing.  After all, all that they did in 2020 was incite riots, while withholding all exculpatory evidence from the viewing public.  Inciting riot after riot is a criminal offense after criminal offense.  There media personnel should be criminally indicted and prosecuted, pursuant to the Nuremberg Caselaw Authority.  

An example of the deadly dishonesty of the mainstream media is presented in the video linked directly below.  If you are a manipulative & avowed liar, you are too cowardly to watch it from beginning to end ... or you will obsess yourself with finding something within it, to condemn Donald Trump:

For the record, this discourse has been written by a registered Democrat who was raised to be an FDR & JFK Democrat.  The writer of this discourse does NOT own or wear a MAGA hat.  The same writer ... of this discourse ... was also taught college-level econ by one of JFK's "ad hoc" economic advisors.  He even scored a 100% in a national accounting exam ... in the 1980s ... issued by none other than Harvard.  None the less, he asserts that Harvard is entirely over-rated.  Numerous colleges throughout America require discipline, the ability to read, and the ability of juxtapose numbers well.  To graduate from those schools is impressive, also.

All in all, "Harvard Worship" has got to end.  It's not the school that matters as much as the major which the student pursues that matters.  There are worthless majors, per se.  There are also majors which are formidable tasks, no matter which school you are attending.

Back to Donald Trump who is hated by the mainstream media, only because he's pro-life

From November 2016 to 2021, Trump kept sabotaging himself.  Yet, he did have successes as president.  More importantly, any adult over 35 years of age in America who is not afflicted with a brain injury would make a far better president than Biden.  Biden is definitely a danger to America.  Biden is a Pathological Liar.  Biden is an insult to the reasonable person's intelligence.  Biden is a Sick Joke.  Biden had two brain surgeries in 1988, and he never did have much intelligence, anyway.  There's more about Arrogant Joe Biden to convey, but that is beyond the scope of this discourse.

Below, posted pursuant to the Fair Use Act:  Compared to a 2012 posting by E. Jean Carroll, the opposite was stated in a 2023 federal NYC courtroom, where millions of American dollars were at stake.  Again, we have a credibility destroyer.  All in all, if you're going to condemn somebody, you better condemn him for the right reasons.

         End of Independent article.

How can you have a case without a day and a year --- or a much more narrowed time span than three vague years --- stated as having been the time when an offense was alleged to have occurred? The accuser never stated a day or even the year when this sexual assault was supposed to have happened. This, of course, is another red flag, being that Donald Trump travelled a lot in the 1990s.  

Very simply, if this accuser stated a specific date of offense, then perhaps it would have been a day when Trump was nowhere near NYC.  Plus, the other red flag comprised the "Donna Karan Blazer Dress" that Carroll claimed to have been wearing when she was allegedly sexually assaulted.  It most certainly was not made or sold in 1994.  So, if Carroll "averred" on court documents to have been assaulted in 1994, the case would have been dismissed and she would have become subject to a defamation lawsuit, under the title, "vexatious litigation."  Stating a general season or a three-month period would have sufficed.

  The vagueness of time was enough to invalidate the case from the start.  After all, there was no evidence to prove that Donald Trump even brushed shoulders with E Jean Carroll outside of one "reception line moment" in the 1980s which was always a dime-a-dozen event for someone as famous as Donald Trump.  No police report was filed in '94, '95, or '96, either.   No medical record describing a sexual assault in '94, '95, or '96 was ever produced in any capacity or variety, as well.

Plus, the accuser made no contact with any woman's help-group or organization that helps women when physically harmed.  There was simply a very crass, uncouth, and disrespectful pro-abortion advice columnist claiming to have been sexually assaulted by the most famous pro-life political candidate on Planet Earth, and claiming that this occurred approximately a quarter of a century prior.  Can a journalist be quiet about something for 25 years of time?  It was ever-so-coincidental that the accusation came out when it was time to promote her 2019 book.  This woman's life is so full of coincidences.  In the alternate, this woman is so full of ...

Let's review:  The Year 2023 minus 1996 or 1995 or even 1994 = 27 or 28 or 29 years.  The Year 2019 ... when the accusation ended up on the news stands ... was 23 or 24 or 25 years after 1996 or 1995 or even 1994.

The other contradiction is that this E Jean Carroll claimed to have been raped IN New York City, but she had no fear of living in New York City.  Only in her remote cottage does she have fear to the point of sleeping with a gun.  Well, why doesn't she move out of her cottage and live in NYC?

I personally knew two rape victims.  E Jean Carroll did NOT act like either one of them when speaking of being "assaulted."  They did NOT have the mentality of "forgetting about it and just moving on with life."  I can go into detail later.  But, having personally known rape victims enabled me to instantly tell that E Jean Carroll is an insult to my intelligence.  

Plus, I personally know what it is to be the victim of an "attempted sexual aggression" done by a very pushy male body builder who LITERALLY couldn't keep "it" in his pants in a car.  I can go into detail about this later, in another post . . . unless I don't want to spend time on this.  HOWEVER, this enabled me to easily detect certain false accusers, as well as certain "credible accusers."  For now, know that the "insult" gets inflamed when a false accuser gets center stage on TV --- without a defense made for the accused.

Even when it came to her praising the Apprentice in 2012, she claimed that she did so, because she ALLEGEDLY had two friends who were on the Apprentice, and she wanted them to do well.  That, too, was a mighty coincidence.  After all, how many people even have one friend who was on the Apprentice?  Plus,  the audience size did NOT determine if a contestant would do well or not.  All was dependent upon the judgment of Donald Trump, as in the famous quote ===>  "You're fired." 

Or was she referring to two friends and/or acquaintances who were on the staff and/or cast of the show?  Well, if Carroll were promoting the Trump hit show for the sake of her two friends doing well on it, then she didn't do a very good job at it.  Moreover, if she were raped by Trump, then she would have told her two friends in the present tense that they shouldn't be on that show.  After all, a successful show empowered Trump.  A woman does not want her rapist to be empowered.

On a personal basis, if that male body-building weightlifter who tried to have his way with me had a TV show, there is no way in which I would be praising it or encouraging anyone to appear on it.  E Jean Carroll spit in the face of everyone in America who actually was targeted for sexual assault.  And remember, that particular guy who tried to have his way with me literally literally literally couldn't keep "it" in his pants.  (I'm trying to be polite in describing this.)

Now, I am not narrating the details of having been the target of very physical sexual aggression ... and I'm not line-itemizing the mindset of the actual rape victims I knew ... because any liar & con artist can memorize what I would state and then come off as credible in a con game.  Very simply, perhaps sometime in the future someone somewhere will consult with me and ask if Ms. So-and-So seems to be lying or telling the truth about her accusation against somebody somewhere.  Then I can  go into detail.

I can definitely go into detail about the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh, line item by line item.

And remember, I'm a registered democrat who used to wear his hair down to his shoulders.  So, you can take your "right-wing MAGA-hat-wearing Trumper" sticker and stick it somewhere else.  I'm also a member of Democrats for Life.  In fact, Donald Trump used to be a Democrat.  In as much, tagging someone as a right-wing deplorable Trumper insurrectionist is like forcing the Jews of Germany to wear yellow Star-of-David patches/badges.  Tagging people educated in atmospheric science as "deniers" is another defamatory sticker that immature pseudo-intellectuals put on people's faces.  

The Ballad of Jessica Leeds

Now, concerning the Jessica Leeds accusation, it was made known in 2016.  It resulted in a British gentleman coming forth, claiming that he was on that particular flight and remembered seeing Leeds basically grovel over Donald Trump.  In fact, the TV interviewer tested the British man's honesty and asked what Leeds was wearing that day.  The British gent quickly & confidentially said "She was wearing a white pants suit."  Therefore, you can rightfully say that the Jessica Leeds accusation was made-up in 2016; an election year.

Also concerning Jessica Leeds, a passenger jet is a public forum.  This means that a number of people were readily able to see Trump and/or Leeds.  Would a celebrity actually grope a woman in public?  Donald Trump was able to get a percentage of America's "available women" very easily and willingly into a posh & private apartment ... or hotel room ... bungalow ... etc..  He didn't need to do something as desperate as grope a woman in public.  

This accusation is an intense insult to the American intelligence.  Yet, CNN & MSNBC rode this horse as if the groping absolutely occurred.  A man who lives in palatial settings doesn't act like human trash in public.  Such a person does worry about his public image.   And Trump very easily could have gotten a woman into his private property.  He was in demand amongst certain lust-ridden women.

You must admit that women have been known to lie.  They have been caught lying, time and time again.  The Southern District of New York Federal Courthouse was turned into a Kangaroo Court.  Kaplan should be titled, Captain Kangaroo Court, and summoned to a judicial review board and then  ... bye-bye to one of the Southern NY gavels.

E Jean Carroll also accused CBS's former head as having sexually assaulted her in an elevator which has no guarantee of privacy.  Anyone in the building could have pressed an elevator button from any floor and ended up catching Moonves in the act.  This allegation is exceptionally difficult to believe, especially when the other accusers of Moonves are very easy to believe.  It seemingly & ALLEGEDLY appears that Carroll was ALLEGEDLY jumping on the proverbial gravy train, to accuse someone already accused.  It definitely makes you sound more credible when you accuse someone already accused . . . until you tell a story that's logistically & ALLEGEDLY asinine.

Now, the other accusers of Moonves are easy to believe, because there are no dramatic theatrics in their story lines.  And none of the accusers claimed to have been raped.  They claimed to have been in unwelcomed & awkward situations --- even in stressful situations --- even in "close-calls." 

Concerning credible accusers, Tara Reade is most definitely credible.  She's Five Star Credible.  As a reminder, a credible accuser is one who does not contradict himself/herself as did E Jean Carroll more than once, followed by her allegedly covering-up the contradictions by adding allegedly bull-crap lines, bull-crap reasons, and bull-crap excuses.

Was she really motivated by Weinstein?

The news of Harvey Weinstein came out in 2017.  So, Jean Carroll claimed that the news of Weinstein motivated her into writing her book which contained accounts of the five most nightmarish men she encountered.  One of the five, according to her was the Donald Trump who said that he didn't know her beyond a few moments of niceties, in a reception line once.  Uhm, excuse me, but Weinstein was intruding upon women and paying undisclosed settlements for decades.  Weinstein was an open secret.

Jean Carroll was some type of journalist for the American edition of Elle Magazine, and Elle publishes in 45 countries.  It also has a syndication dept which allows local content to be published internationally.  Any journalist working in the realm of Hearst Publishing & Lagardere Global would have the deepest newest from the central places of the modern media, including Hollywood news.  She would have learned about the real Harvey Weinstein decades ago, unless if she worked with under-achievers.  So, why did she wait until 2017 to begin writing a book that was said to have been motivated by Weinstein?

The suspicion as to the motivation of Carroll publicly accusing Trump in 2019 was that, on July 25 2019, it was concluded that the Mueller Special Counsel investigation failed to get anything on Trump.  That was Plan C.  Now, it was time for someone to go to Plan D, in order to eject Trump from his seat of power.  Why did Carroll remain silent about this while Trump was securing the Republican presidential nomination, 2016?  Why did she remain silent in the public forum for 23 years, only to come out when she could ever so coincidentally ruin the political career of the most highly positioned pro-life candidate in America?  Yes, the Mueller Team was drifting away into pointlessness.  But, the "squad" was emerging before TV cameras owned by obsessive pro-abortion media outlets.  She would be able to ride their "coattails."

If E Jean Carroll truly were sexually assaulted by Trump, she would have sounded the alarm, to warn "her fellow women" that a sexual predator was on the loose in NYC.  If he did assault her, then she did a disservice to the women of New York, by remaining silent about a danger to womanhood in NYC.  So, why did she remain silent for 23/24/25 years, if Donald Trump were such a danger to women everywhere?  Note:  2019 minus 1994/1995/1996 = 23/24/25 years.

The following video links could finish the train of thought here, and there are notable & "revealing" allegations concerning the Carroll case mentioned in the clips linked below that are NOT mentioned here.  After all, there is the matter of Carroll's claim of wearing a Donna Karan Blazer Dress at the time of assault which could have been 1994, 1995, 1996, or never:

Her own words: E Jean Carroll's motive for going after Trump  (It had to do Trump's Pro-Life stance.)

Of course, lie after lie after lie after lie has been pushed by the mainstream commercial media.  This included the [1] Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Hoax, [2] the incitement of violence toward the young Nick Sandman, [3] the Duke Lacrosse team accusations proven false by something as simple as an ATM camera, and [4] Jussie Smollett's harrowing tale of a MINUS 7 degree FAHRENHEIT Chicago night that is intolerable weather for any MAGA-hat-wearing Southerner not used to such cold weather.

There was even the young native American lad wearing a replica of his ancestors' headdress, during a recent Kansas City Chief game.  Oh, he was a white, racist demon from Hell, according to the media.  Etc go the examples of lie after lie after lie told by the modern media.  

And then there was the Michael Brown horror story which resulted in lots of violence before the harrowing tale was found to have been a malicious falsehood, according to forensic evidence.

Like Nazi Dictators ... like the ruthless tyrants of old ... CNN & MSNBC would NOT allow counterpoint . . . open discussion ... written responses ... or live defense of defamatory accusations.

CNN, MSNBC and those similar are the real threats to "freedom."  They refuse to adhere to the intended American Way which is often called "democracy."  Well, for the record, the Intended American Way was that of a bicameral federal Republic, based on representatives and two houses of Parliament.   Democracy only works in small population jurisdictions.

In addition, the USA resembles a Constitutional Monarchy far more than any European government does, simply because the American president has access to several executive order options than Europe.  After all, Europe's elected heads of state often are designed to operate "at the pleasure of the parliaments."  The president is a viable third sector of government.  

Plus, throughout the decades, the media focused-in on the president as if the president were king.  Well, American presidents operate as checked & balanced constitutional monarchs, in their executive ordering and in their power to veto.

The actual greatness of American law, aside of the judicial doctrine of Stare Decisis (precedents & case law authorities in the courtroom), is the concept of amending courtroom pleas, witness accounts, and statistical reports.  This includes the concept of amending the constitution.  Thus, there is flexibility.  On the contrary, there is no flexibility with CNN, MSNBC, and others who will not be mentioned here.  The ones who condemned political opponents of being Nazi dictators are the actual Nazi tyrants.  These are the liars who call incendiary riots "mostly peaceful."  Well, if you are sick & twisted enough, you could call mass murderers mostly peaceful people, and do so with a straight face.  It is also insult the intelligence of anyone reasonable & rational listener.

How much longer will America's intelligence be insulted by the mainstream corporate media?   How much longer will Americans have to endure the Mainstream Media Dictatorship of the United States?  And how much longer will me being a registered Democrat continue to be one of the more worthless wastes of time?   If anyone is the Nazi politician, it's the Joe Biden who sought to have freedom of speech deleted from the internet.  The American tyrants are the ones who accuse everyone else of being the tyrant.

Is being a Republican much better?  Or is it preferrable to be a Natural Party member or a Green Partier or a Whig or a Tory or a Klingon or a member of Fred Flintstone's Loyal Order of Water Buffaloes or whatever else you can print on a voter's registration card?  

But of course, it's not the political party that matters.  It's the character of the candidate that does.  After all, there do exist pro-life democrats.  They're mostly skilled laborers who live in or work in a major city.  Some are college-aged youth.  Some are even Black democrats whose DNA comes from south of the Sahara.  They simply believe in the livable wage.   And they believe in making city life livable for children. 

To a pro-life democrat, abortion is a cop-out ... unless if the mother's life is in danger.  When the mother's life is in danger, then abortion is self-defense.  Moreover, pro-life democrats know that you can always let your child be put-up for adoption with zero objections.  And of course, the democrat way was and maybe still is that a child put up for adoption will be cared-for as any other child. 

They also believe that life should be the choice for the disabled & dying, as opposed to euthanasia.  After all, we are all gonna die.  So, why speed things up?   

None the less, pro-life democrats also understand why the modern mainstream media and obsessive left-wingers of the Democrat Party hate Trump.  They only hate him and seek to destroy Donald Trump, because he is a Pro-Life candidate.  If Trump were for abortion-on-demand, he would be regarded as America's loving uncle by the mainstream media and left-wing fanatics of the Democrat Party.  Abortion.  That's it.  That's the reason for hating Trump.

An obsessive pro-abortion hag's motive in seeking to destroy the most influential pro-life candidate in the United States has been in front of America's face, all along

Elizabeth Carroll's motive in attacking Donald Trump and Kavanaugh is posted below.  She wants baby-killing to continue to be done upon demand.  Now, this is an 80 year old human obsessed with keeping premeditated & medically assisted murder of other humans in operation.  Thus, if Donald Trump were a pro-abortion candidate, he would have never been accused of that which the pro-abortion E Jean Carroll accused him of having done.  

And of course, Trump had easy access to a number of hotels and office buildings near the department story where he was accused of being a sexual predator.  He also had easy access to champagne and other luxuries.  Rich men first seek to impress ... then seduce ... and to do so in comfortable and protected spaces, such as a apartment or hotel room, etc.   He didn't need a dressing room from where screams could easily be heard.

Plus, wherever Trump went, there was always a woman here and a woman there who were 'magnetized' toward him.  Thus, he was never so desperate that he would physically and instantaneously assail a woman in a public forum, thereby risking screams and the attention that screams bring.  All in all, the insulting of the American intelligence continues.  This becomes very easy to do when you 'dumb down' a nation's public school system for consecutive years at a time ... and then replace wisdom & logic with bullies.

The greatest irony is that Tara Reade had to escape the tyranny of the American president for the land regarded as the most evil land of them all by . . . the proponents of the American president.  

Of course, the present president is obsessively pro-abortion.  He apparently never heard of the caselaw authority of NUREMBERG, where people who get away with committing crimes against humanity for years think that they will never be held accountable.  Well, study history.  Everyone gets held accountability for long-term evils, eventually.  And when interviewed, they always say that they never thought that "it" would happen to them.  

In as much, Hell does exist and it's filled with people who never thought that they would go there.  The Number 1 indication that you're going to Hell when "your time is up" is that of you making life on earth a living Hell for others.  You get what you give.  This includes Hell and its chaos and its viciousness and Satanic grade of bullying.  Hell is a place where bullies end up getting bullied by much more powerful & hate-filled forces forever:

One more thing:  There is one ultimate reason why the "new" Democrat Party embraces homosexuality.  The power-yielders of the party see homosexuality as birth control.  That's it.  And it takes a democrat to know the secrets of his party.

All in all, it's the content of a politician's character which matters in elections, and Joe Biden is a cruel joke played upon my Democrat Party and America in general.  He is hateful & arrogant, as well as mathematically & logistically incompetent.  

When he speaks, he speaks as if he is picking a fight, instead of speaking to make the nation feel secure ... or at ease ... or hopeful.  He doesn't want you to understand anything.  He wants you to back-down.  Biden thinks that he's King Kong, but he only pounds on a caved-in chest.  

Hundreds of thousands of other adult Americans would make a far better president than Biden.  This includes Donald Trump .... Tulsi Gabbard ... K.T. McFarland ... Bryon Donalds ... Viv Ramaswamy ...  and probably you (if you're of age) ... or at least a few neighbors of yours ... or workmates of yours ... or relatives of yours ... or fellow club members of yours, whatever be your club of choice.  

Of course, RFK, Jr blew it.  Yet, he's mathematically not out of the running.  However, he blew it, anyway.  If you are clueless to what recently transpired in the Kennedy Campaign, then refer to the following links:

Actually, millions of Americans would make a far better president than Joe Biden; especially the ones who protect him and wait on him and brief him.  Anyone in the Pentagon would be a better president.  Anyone in an American submarine crew.  Any pilot, be he/she military or civilian.  Any ship captain, be he military or civilian.   Anyone in logistics ... in engineering ... in the construction trades ... in forestry ... in library science ... in accounting ... in Classical & Baroque music ... in literature ... in a school's foreign language department ...  in philosophy ... in psychiatry ... in architecture, etc, etc, etc, etc.  

Biden is the second worst choice you can possibly make.  The worse choice would be all those who promote Biden.  This is because they only want to USE BIDEN for their selfish goals.  Biden is meant to be their puppet ... their figure head ... their front.  The only person who would want Biden to be president is the one who wants to make all the decisions of a president behind the scenes.

Brain Surgery Biden

BTW, do Americans know that Joe Biden had TWO BRAIN SURGERIES in 1988, after a stroke?  Do Americans know that Biden graduated near the bottom of his law school class, long before his stroke?   Do Americans even know that Biden lied so embarrassingly in front TV cameras in 1988 that he had to withdraw from the presidential race?  Michael Dukakis ended up winning the Democratic presidential nomination.

The mainstream commercial media has lied about a number of topics, in addition to the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Hoax.   There is a list.  But, that list is beyond the scope of this post, being that academic homework is required to pinpoint & specify the dishonesty of the media in decades past.  And at present, time has to be dedicated to other projects.

For the record, the way "it" used to be --- concerning debates --- was that there was [1] the Point, followed by [2] the Counterpoint, with [3] a response to the Counterpoint, and [4] a response the counterpoint response.  This was done out of fairness, so that both debaters had two opportunities to speak . . . or to write.  Today, there is only censorship, preceded by name-calling and bullying.  The concept of honesty and fairness were thrown out the door, when it came to the modern mainstream media.

Of course, when it comes to American politics, those who are in their late 70s and 80s today, while having been in power for consecutive decades, keep a greed-stricken clinch on political power.  They are the Me-Me-Me & Mine-All-Mine generation.  This means that these United States have been an oligarchical dictatorship where you and I don't count.  We are the "Little People,"  even though we're the ones who have done what it took to keep people alive and society civilized.  The roads, crops, utility lines, appliances, warehouses, medical equipment, repair shops, and utilities don't build themselves.  We are the ones who built and/or maintained and/or renovated it all.  But of course, we don't count.  We are slaves to these oligarch's egos and lust.  This includes the lust for money.

The Real Dirty Dozen & the American Dictator for Life Phenomenon

In light of this, why did [1] the 83 year old Nancy Pelosi, [2] the 83 year old Jim Clyburn, [3] the 81 year old Joe Biden, [4] the 90 year old late Dianne Feinstein, [5] the 85 year old Maxine Waters, [6] Maryland's 84 year old Steny Hoyer, [7] New Jersey's 86 year old Bill Pascrell, [8] the 82 year old Bernie Sanders, [9] the 80 year old John Kerry, [10] the 76 year old Benghazi Barbie, [11] the 77 year old Donald Trump who has been in public life for 43 years, as well as [12] the Chuck Schumer who has been in the US Congress for 42 years ... refrain from passing the baton to a younger generation???  Cannot anyone else get a chance?   Does power and influence have to stay in the hands of a small cadre  of politicians who live quite comfortably and who are starting to look like Halloween movie characters?  

BTW, E Jean Carroll is 80 years old.  This brings us to a question:  What is the authoritarian tyrant factor possessing those in that age-group --- concerning people born between 1933 and 1948?

Stated for the record, a 72 year old, a 75 year old, and a 78 year old with no appreciable mental encumbrances entering into political office for the first time is morally acceptable, being that the individual had not yet been heard.  Such an individual did not spend the past 20, 30, and 40 consecutive years attending lobster dinners, all the while destroying American opportunities, increasing the American Trade Balance Deficit, and raising the national debt to an obscenely high amount, as well as creating division amongst the races, and making America an accomplice in crimes against humanity, such as sweatshop labor profiteering.  

In as much, the 6TH NUREMBERG CRIMINAL COUNT was slave labor.  To profit from slave labor is to be an equal to Adolph Hitler and his merry band of Nazi art thieves.  Donald Trump spoke against the foreign sweatshop economy, as in the USMCA ... which is not to be confused with the Village People hit song, YMCA.  

Chuck Schumer praised Trump for it.  Therefore, the MSNBC & CNN line-up of on-air mouthpieces who endlessly mock Trump supporters are no different than Hitler's Nazi party members, spreading lies intended to create hatred toward a political opponent. They have been obsessively damning a man who was trying to lift people out of poverty.

The Political Oligarchs' Clinched Fists of Greed.

Why did today's politicians keep "it" for themselves, with "it" being defined as money & power, influence & perks ... as well as a long ego trip.  These very-long-term congressional members should be declared Dictators for Life.   After all, these were the people who oversaw the annihilation of American manufacturing and the rise of the American importation of Chinese slave labor products.  So, (except for Schumer, in his proper anti-NAFTA stance) they are accomplices to the labor abuse in the China, Nepal, Vietnam, Indonesia, Honduras, El Salvador, and other victimized countries when the Slavery Index went on the rise.  But, those politicians go unaccountable for having destroyed the American Dream.

Throughout the slave labor years, Joe Biden was there, letting it occur in a China which ever-so-coincidentally sent checks to the Biden families members' LLCs.  That, of course, was a mighty coincidence, for sure.   Quite frankly, that was and is more of an insult to America's intelligence.

Democrat Chuck Schumer Praised Donald Trump in 2018

Ironically, Chuck Schumer is portrayed as harboring quintessential anti-Trumpness.  Yet, in 2018, he praised Trump for the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, while always having been against Slave Labor NAFTA.  He and Trump were on the same page, when it came to the American worker ... and foreign labor abuse.   But, the media had to make them look like mortal enemies, of course.  Media Hype in search of ratings.

None the less, the Never Trump Movement ever-so-coincidentally came at the same time span when the E Jean Carroll accusation against Trump went into print.  Yes, the 2018 election was the Never Trump Movement's introduction into politics.  The squad of extreme pseudo-intellectuals formed during the first half of 2019.  Other Never-Trumpers entered congressional chambers in the first half of 2019, as well.  Then, on July 21, 2019, E Jean Carroll's accusations against Trump came out in the New Yorker.  Yet, she never reported any sexual assault to the police.  After all, the New Yorker influences voters.  Police departments do not.   So, the question which persists is, "How long does the media intend on insulting America's intelligence?"

Moreover, how is it that US congressional members are such successful investors in the stock markets of Wall Street?  That's an amazing coincidence.  

In 1787, Ben Franklin announced that America now had a republic, IF AND ONLY IF Americans could keep it.  In as much, do you mean to tell us that the stronghold held by the 40-year-plus congressional dictators-for-life is why we overthrew monarchs?  Do you really think that it was done to replace monarchs with money-grabbing senior citizens like Pelosi & Biden who have been sucking-in the money & political power like vacuum cleaners for consecutive decades?  Do you mean to tell us that the monarchs were overthrown, so that the United States could be strangled with a $34 TRILLION debt, accrued by the 70+ & 80+ plus year old members of Congress who will leave that burden upon younger generations of today & younger generations yet to come ... and to do so with no sense of shame?

For the record, the debt was only $34 BILLION in 1936.  In fact, it was $33 TRILLION 3 months prior to January 2024.  Yes, a trillion dollars of debt was accrued in 3 months' time, during the Biden rule of law which, in reality, is the Biden Absence of Law.

There is at least a tiny amount of fairness involved today, concerning the retail sales of foreign imports, such as coffee and cacao/cocoa.  After all, Nasreen Sheikh has been championing the cause of sweatshop laborers.  Therefore, even during times of great evil, there is always hope within humanity.  Thus, the belief that we are near the End of the World . . . or near the End of Mankind ... is political propaganda stunt, done for votes from terrified voters.  Well, I can assure you that the end of your world ... and the end of my world ... will come a whole lot sooner than the End of THE World.  There is most definitely still hope today.