1966, and NOT 2023, had the lowest Antarctic winter sea ice extent.

In the midst of the profitable End-of-the-World climate hysterics, there are FOUR well established points of atmospheric science which novices absolutely need to know, so as to not be duped by the Al Gore & John Kerry World:

1a} The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere comprises less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the sky outside.  At present, co2 exists in the sky at 431 parts per million.  

1b} If the Troposphere were the Ohio Stadium in Columbus, then CO2 molecules would sit in only 44 of the 102,000 seats.  In contrast, Nitrogen molecules would sit in 79,500 of those seats minus atmospheric water vapor which is .02% to 4% of the Troposphere.

1c} Meanwhile, Oxygen would sit in 21,400 Rose Bowl seats minus 0.02% to 4%.  Argon would sit in 948 of the 102,000 seats, minus a small percentage of water vapor.

2} CO2 has three vibrational modes attached to its motion.  When co2 is in its SYMMETRIC MODE ... which looks like a bird flapping its wings in flight ... CO2 becomes incapable of capturing infrared radiation.

This is why an ice age occurred when the atmospheric co2 count was 9 and a half times higher than it is today.  That was the Ordovician Ice Age.

3} CO2 only "effectively" absorbs infrared radiation at two specific wavelengths, and it "moderately" absorbs infrared radiation at only two other wavelengths.  Thus, CO2 is very limited at its ability to absorb IR.  For those unaware, IR stands for infrared radiation.

4} Water Vapor is the major green house gas, and CIRRUS CLOUDS absorb more infrared radiation in the atmosphere than does CO2.  

Meanwhile,  indoor CO2, in schools and office buildings, have been admitted to have recently existed at 1,500 pm to 2,000 pm.   Another report stated that 1,200 ppm is the average indoor amount.  To be more exact, from what I found, the average indoor CO2 level of recent years ranged from 1,300 to 1,700 ppm.  

In order to instantly die from CO2 exposure, you need to be exposed to 100,000 ppm.  Yet, 40,000 ppm is recognized as being immediately dangerous to human life.  

Concerning healthy humans, the ill-effects of too much CO2 occur somewhere around 5,000 ppm.  

Yet, at 3,500 ppm, only submarine crew members were able to do decision-making thinking.  Meanwhile, other people only did the reactive linear-thought type of thinking.  All in all, up to 2,000 ppm of CO2 is not an assault on human health.  3,000 ppm would be tolerable for those without frail health.

In comparison, Mars' atmospheric carbon dioxide is  950,000 parts per million.  Yes, the Martian sky is 95% CO2.  Yet, there is NO Greenhouse Effect taking place on Mars, being that the average temperature on the Red Planet is MINUS 80 degrees Fahrenheit.

Literally the Middle of Antarctica, at 9,301 feet above sea level

Now remember, neither modern science nor history knows what the sea ice extent of Antarctica was in the 1800s, 1200s, or even 600s, as well as in 600 BCE or 900 BCE.  So, claiming the "highest" or "lowest"  Antarctic measurement in any category isn't a correct thing of do.  

The reality is that there were global warming periods ... such as the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period, and the Minoan Warm Period.  There were also global cold periods ... such as the Mini-Ice-Age of 1284 CE to 1840 CE, and the Late Antique Mini Ice Age of 536 C.E. to 660 C.E.   Thus, Antarctic weather would be paralleled by such periods.

At this point in time, it's needed to take the Theatrics & Hysterics out of Climate Talk.  So, beware.  Scientists who are predicting worldwide climatic disaster have a severe financial conflict of interest, concerning hundreds of billions of American taxpayer dollars thrown to those compromised scientists and their universities.   

After all, they're telling you that the World is going to come to an end, unless you give these scientists lots and lots of taxpayer dollars.  That's known as grifting.

That which they and Al Gore have been doing has repeatedly been proven to be acts of Theft by Deception.  And it was done with the help of certain US congressional members and US senators.  This is why there are over 63 or so Atmospheric Science & Weather HISTORY posts at the Blue Marble Album.   They are literally a public service for the deceived.

Those posts are here ... with abundant pieces of evidentiary support ... to illustrate to you how unconscionably deceptive these scientists and Al Gore's associates have been.  The 63+ posts equally show how incredibly dimwitted & easily deceived certain celebrities have been.

Above: Planet Earth, as seen from the Artemis Project's Orion CM-003 Integrity  

It was claimed by less than honest people that the Antarctic Winter of 2023 was accompanied by the greatest amount of sea ice loss in 7.5 million years.  This was said to be the tipping point of human history.  This was now the time to hand over mankind's steering wheel to Al Gore, John Kerry, and the hockey stick graph maker, Michael Mann, also referred to as Michael Scam, Jerk Extraordinaire.  

This is the era when the sky is now full of carbon, even though carbon inhabits less than 1/2 of 1/10th of 1% of the sky outside.  This is the era when the sky is now full of soot, and as a result, New York City and the Statue of Liberty will soon be underwater.  

This is the time when the Category 6 hurricane will rule the high seas, racing onto shorelines and cracking in half every palm tree in the pathway.  This is a redundant horror story.  This is fictional reading.  

In reality, the sky outside is about 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and 0.93% argon, along with 0.07% of the other gases ... minus the water vapor percentage which varies throughout the Earth's atmosphere, ranging from 02.% in polar regions and 4% in the Tropics.  CO2 is among the gases which comprise only 0.07% of the atmosphere.

As far back as 2018, Greta told everyone that she had a sole-scientist-source who told her that the world will come to its end in 2023, if mankind didn't radically change its entire way of life.  As you can see, that was total science fiction, too.  

Moreover, the less than honest media networks reported that it was 99 degrees Fahrenheit in the middle of winter, in Vicuna, Coquimbe, Chile, on August 2nd, 2023.  It was no higher than 63F there, on that day. 

The same hot hot hot temps were reported by the mainstream media as having been occurring in  Santiago, in  July and August of 2023.  The media stated that the temperature hovered near 100F there.  The truth is that it was only 72F in Santiago on August 2nd, 2023.  Therefore, the ultimate truth is that the mainstream media unconscionably lies to humanity.  In conclusion, the world didn't come to its end in 2023, as Greta Thunberg asininely proclaimed it would do.

Concerning the claim that Antarctica had its greatest sea ice loss in 2023, the reality is that this scenario is nowhere near reality.  The Year 1966 was the year of the least amount of Antarctic wintertime sea ice extent ever recorded, and Planet Earth survived 1966 quite well.  So, 2023 only had the least amount of sea ice extent in the past 57 years only.

All in all, the Climate Hysteria People are always lying to humanity, all the while insulting the intelligences of those who studied atmospheric physics and/or pre-Holocene archaeology and/or oceanography and/or weather history and/or maritime history.  

Needless to say, today's "journalists" and "activists" are nothing more than human waste, wasting our lives away with worthless projects.  These people are the Waste Deposits of Humanity.  So, let us become true revolutionary radicals by doing something called, "beginning with the actual truth, for a change."  Sounds scary, doesn't it?  Well, if you are brave enough to face the truth, then let's go to it:

     🔭      🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭     🔭

The Satellite Era began in 1960 ... with the CORONA, ARGON, & LANYARD systems ...  followed by the Nimbus Series in 1964 ... and NOT in 1979.

Preview:  [1] In 2014, the US government admitted to the existence of at least 250,000 satellite images photographed between 1964 to 1978.  The images were retrieved from the government warehouses in Maryland and N. Carolina.  They were then digitized and made available to researchers, historians, and the such.   Therefore, when certain propaganda-minded operatives exclaim that there is no way of proving in what condition the Polar Caps were before 1979, the person is either lying ... or is uninformed. ... or is misinformed.

[2a] The official US government's reason for calling 1979 the beginning of the Satellite Era is that the continuous monitoring & record-keeping of Polar sea ice in both Hemispheres began in October 1978.  The monitoring consisted in every-other-day observation sessions.  Thus, 1979 was the first full year of continuous Polar sea ice record-keeping.

[2b]  HOWEVER, the benefit of the Climate Misrepresentatives claiming 1979 to be the first year of satellite coverage is that, in 1979, the Arctic contained its highest amount ... its most voluminous amount of the Arctic Sea Ice in recorded history.  The falsely claim that the satellite era only began in 1979 is to hide from humanity the fact that several individual years prior to 1979 had much less sea ice extent in the Northern Polar Cap.  

[2c] When you make it falsely appear that 1979 was an average year ... instead of the year of the most sea ice covering of them all ... you make it appear that, all of a sudden, CO2 started its meltdown of the Arctic.   But, there were years when there was much less Arctic sea ice than in 1979, meaning that climate is cyclical and NOT driven by CO2 which happens to only exist at 0.043% of the Earth's atmosphere, at present.  

[2d] Yes, CO2 only exists at 431 or so parts per million, at present.  This is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1% of the sky's gases.  In addition, the radiative forcing of CO2 is presently 3.7 watts per meter squared.  This is less than an incandescent night light.

1970s atmospheric facts were hidden from you by Guess Who

In Year 1979 is the year in which the Arctic sea ice covered the most area in known history.  And of course, the Climate Scaremonger Faction wants all graph-making & statistical charting of the Arctic's ice cover to begin at its highest numerical year, namely 1979.

In this way, every year to follow 1979 will have a lower square mileage area number attached to it, and this will make it appear that atmospheric CO2 has been melting the North Pole region for the past 45 years.  Such a thing is a very predictable trick; sophomoric at best.

The Climate Scaremonger Crowd wants humanity to believe that every year previous to 1979 was a year of equally plentiful sea ice --- that 1979 was just an average & ordinary year when it came to polar sea ice volume, in comparison to 1973, 1974, 1975, and 1976 which had much less Arctic sea ice than did the Year 1979.  

In fact, 1976 was a tragically hot Summer in France.  It was outright hot in Southern England, but not as tragic as in Paris.  In the Arctic, there was not as much sea ice as during 1979. 

According to the Al Gore & Jim Hansen Theory, no extremely cold and ice-ridden year should ever follow three warm years of less sea ice.  But, such a thing happened in the 1970s.  In fact, after the ice-ridden year of 1979, 1980 hosted a Summer of true record heat.

Climate Doomsayers want mankind to believe that the atmospheric CO2 level of Planet Earth reached a tipping point in 1979, causing the Arctic sea ice sheet to begin its  GRADUAL decline in ice-cover in 1980.  In this way, the Climate Corps could easily deceive the People of the Earth into believing in the Al Gore & Michael Mann Theory of Climate.  

Of course, that theory asserts that CO2 principally drives Planet Earth's climate and determines the surface temperatures of every square kilometer of a very divergent Planet Earth ... and that it happens gradually, in proportion to the amount of CO2 in the sky. 

 As a result, the Climate Alarm Propagandists falsely told mankind that the Satellite Era did not begin until 1979, and therefore, when it comes to viewing the condition of the Arctic regions during the previous nine years of the 1970s ... and during all of the 1960s ... "there's nothing to see here, folks.  Just move on."  Propagandists do not tell the whole story.  They present their cases in a false light.  It's the Way of the Grifter.

The problem is that there were a number of years preceding 1979, when the sea ice content of the Arctic and the Antarctic was notably lower than usual.  This invalidated Al Gore's Climate Theory of CO2 as Driver of the Earth's Climate.  This is because there should NOT have been a sudden rise in sea ice in 1979 and during other years of the 20th Century.  

This finding is in keeping with true atmospheric science, because 90% of all greenhouse gases, by volume, is WATER VAPOR, making co2 extremely subservient to water vapor.  If anything, water drives the climate.  But, NASA long since proclaimed that the driver of the Earth's climate is the Sun and that the Sun drive air pressure systems which drive the climate.

Now, I'm well aware of the percentage of "greenhouse effect" Water Vapor is ALLEGED to have upon Planet Earth ... according to a certain university: 41% to 57% of "the warming effect in the atmosphere":

1} as opposed to material volume of water vapor in the atmosphere (which is 90%) ...2} as well as material mass of water vapor in the atmosphere (which is 80%).  Responding to this with qualifying statements will require more length, and therefore, it will require a new post, if time ever permits.  

At this point, it suffices to note that there is a "positive feedback" to Water Vapor, by which 1} the warmer it gets, the more water vapor is able to inhabit an expanding atmosphere, and 2} the more water vapor which goes into the atmosphere, the more the infrared heat that gets retained, enabling things to get warmer on Planet Earth.  So, a certain university has "some 'splaining to do, Lucy."

In addition, CO2 is something constantly being consumed by trees, plants, bushes, seagrasses, kelp, coccolithophores, grain, and even cyanobacteria.  It doesn't merely float around the sky aimlessly.  It's literally plant food, along with chlorophyll.  

Let us review, for the benefit of those who have trouble reading and need to review the basics

The atmospheric CO2 level was on a constant rise in the 1960s & 1970s.  But, polar sea ice was NOT on a constant decrease.  Therefore, if the Al Gore Climate Theory is true, then there should have been a constant decrease in Polar sea ice throughout the '60s & '70s.  

The Polar sea ice decline needed to have been equal to the rise in atmospheric CO2.  Well,  this did NOT happen.  The atmospheric COCO2 count steadily rose, like a department store's escalator, en route to the store's 2nd floor.  But, polar ice extent did NOT decline in proportion to the rise in CO2.

Meanwhile, the Polar sea ice area of the 1960s, when graphed by honest scientists, looked like a roller coaster's track, going up and then going down, etc, etc.  Thus, the atmospheric co2 graph and the polar sea ice graphs were NOT parallel.  They should have been a mirror image of each other.  They were not.  

Shortly After the True Satellite Era Arrived ...

Take note of the following abstract.  It was written shortly BEFORE the time when the record-breaking Antarctic sea ice high of 2014 was measured.  None the less, the finding of & the rescuing of 250,000 pieces of satellite evidence in 2014 helped to prove the present Climate Crisis narrative to be a con game.  It helps to show how non-factual the Al Gore & Michael Mann School of Climate is, in its claim that the Earth's surface temperature proceeds parallel to the atmosphere's CO2 count, in present time.  

There was a lot less CO2 in 1966 than in 2021, as in 320 ppm for 1966 and 411 ppm for 2021.  So, 2021 should have had the record low sea ice and 1966 should have had the coldest Antarctic winter in recorded history.  Well, the opposite occurred.  This is evidence that the Al Gore CO2 Climate Driver Theory is not true.

In as much, if you hear anyone preach about climate, without acknowledging the existence of the Nimbus I, Nimbus II, and Nimbus III satellites of the 1960s & 1970s, then you are hearing a lying con artist who doesn't want anyone to analyze the 250,000 Nimbus satellite images ... ... or else you are hearing one of the many useful idiots of Al Gore who don't even know about the existence of the Nimbus satellite series.

          See:   https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140017193/downloads/20140017193.pdf  

                 📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡     📡

                                                      ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

See:  https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/articles/new-data-from-old-satellites-a-nimbus-success-story

★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

In the shaded pink is what the more recent Climate Profiteers try to hide from you and me.  Yes, they are still trying to ... "hide the decline."  This is in reference to the 2009 Climategate emails.

🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐

Antarctica 2023 vs the stories told about it by climate fearmongers

 One picture is worth a thousand words

Below:  North Central Antarctica, on Oct 9, 2023, after it was reported in September of 2023 that Antarctica had a once-in-a-7.5-million-year significant absence of ice during its recent winter.  There were 22 hours of daylight on Oct 9, resulting in the satellite image below.  Now, you show me where this "massive, once-in-a-7.5-million-year" critical ice loss is located.  

Anyway, look and see how much ice was there, while the Climate Scaremongers were claiming that there was catastrophic ice loss at Antarctica, during its wintertime.  They kept calling it a "7 sigma event."   By the way, a 5 sigma event is one that happens every 3.5 million years.  None the less, 2023 was a once-in-a-57-year event.  It wasn't even a "once-in-a-century" event.  

Incidentally, from April 10 to September 2nd, the Sun was "down all day" everyday, at the inner continental recesses of Antarctica.  Thus, there are no daylight photos of inner-Antarctica during winter time.  

In the photo above, at the top, you will see intervals of thick & tapered black lines.  Those are Nadir Gaps, where the satellite was designed to not photograph those thin areas.  They're like grid lines, for measuring purposes ... for surveying purposes.  In fact, any nadir is a line below a certain point that travels straight to the ground and creates a 90 degree angle when touching the ground.

The 2023 Antarctic Deception

When it's a matter of record low wintertime sea ice maximums in either of the two polar caps, it is NOT a matter of ice melting during the season when -20F, -40F, & -60F temperatures dominate.  It's a matter of not as much ice forming after Summer ends at the polar cap in focus, concerning as much ice as was formed in other years.  

Let it be repeated once again, so that the realization will sink inward

If you could prove that there were years before 1979 when polar sea ice was as low or lower than today ... and simultaneously much lower than in 1979 ... then the Al Gore Climate Theory of CO2 as Temperature Driver gets automatically invalidated.   And of course, 1973, 1974, 1975 were significantly lower in sea ice area.  In other years, the sea ice was moderately lower than 1979, concerning the Northern Hemisphere's Arctic Ocean.

The realization of a unconscionable swindle of taxpayer dollars will come when it's made commonly known that 90% of all of Planet Earth's greenhouse gases --- by volume --- is WATER VAPOR.  The realization will come when the media announces the scientific fact that the amount of space that atmospheric CO2 takes-up in the Earth's atmosphere is 0.042%.  This is LESS THAN 1/2 of 1%.  This is almost 1/2 of 1/10 of 1%.  

In other words, for every 2,358 molecules that were in the sky in the Northern Hemisphere's Winter of 2023, only one was CO2.  This is based on a 424 ppm count.  That's 1 in 2,358 molecules.  That's a score of 2,358 to 1.  There is NO WAY in which co2 drives such a climate.

Incidentally, for every 10 molecules in the Earth's sky, 2.1 are the O2 oxygen molecule.  In addition, for every 5.2 molecules out there in the sky, 4 of them are nitrogen molecules (N2.)  As far as goes Argon, for every 21 and a half molecules in the sky, 2 of them are Argon.  So, we visualize the molecular content of the atmosphere:  

  CO2 ... 1 in 2,358       Argon ... 1 in 10.7       Oxygen ... 1 in 4.7       Nitrogen ... 1 in 1.28

There is Infrared Inactive CO2 and then there is Infrared Active CO2:  Not all co2's are alike.

A deeper understanding of the long-term climate con game will seep inward, when it's made commonly known that co2 exists in three modes of vibration known as dipole moments, and in one of those vibrational modes, co2 is incapable of capturing infrared heat.  

This easily explains why an ice age, such as the Ordovician Ice Age, was able to transpire, while the atmospheric co2 level was more than NINE TIMES HIGHER than today.  CO2's three vibrations have already been explained at the Blue Marble Album, at Youtube, and elsewhere on the internet.  However, at this point, take into account CO2's radiative forcing.

Today, IR Active CO2 operates at 3.7 watts per meter squared (w/2).  In 1890 or so, active CO2's radiative forcing was measured at 1.88 watts per meter squared. (That's 1 POINT 88 watts only.)  As a result, it was declared that the radiative forcing of CO2 doubled since 1890.  Time out here.  Here comes the question ... eventually:  

The vibrational mode of CO2 comes in three modes, but only  one mode at a time.  They are 1} Symmetric  Stretching  2} Asymmetric Stretching   3} Bending Motion, like the flapping wings of a bird in flight.  

Well, when a CO2 molecule is in the Symmetric Stretching Mode, it is infrared inactive (IR inactive.)  It does NOT create "a dipole moment."  It does NOT show up on the IR Spectrum.   It is incapable of retaining infrared heat ... It is incapable of causing global warming.  In fact, it can cause Ice Ages.  This is why an Ice Age can occur when the CO2 count is NINE TIMES HIGHER than today. 

So, here is the question:  Where is there a chart, table, or a graph that marks CO2's watt-per-meter-squared radiative forcing, according to its three different vibrational modes, aka dipole moments?   In other words ...

.[1] At what amount of watts per meter squared does CO2 exist, during its asymmetric stretching mode?   [2] At what amount of watts per meter squared does CO2 exist, during its bending mode?  

Needless to say, CO2 radiative forcing is ZERO watts per meter squared, whenever co2 is in its Symmetrical Stretching Mode.  An atmosphere of symmetrically stretching CO2 can cause an Ice Age.

One more thing about CO2.  While it's claimed to be the cause of Global Boiling as a greenhouse gas, when CO2 is in its solid form, it's a refrigerant.  It's a block of ice called Dry Ice.  Ironic ... sort of.  What it actually does is become a medium ... a go-between for ... heat transference (which see.)  We return to the topic at hand, though:

The lesson here is that Atmospheric Science is exceptionally involved and is NOT driven by only one variable -- one input number.  Atmospheric Science is NOT the simpleton version presented by the Al Gore People, in 2006.  Therefore, to use as your spokesperson a Swedish high school drop-out who does NOT know the first thing about 1] Atmospheric Science,  2] Weather History,  3] Meteorology,  4] pre-Holocene Paleontology, and/or 5] Oceanography is to use one of the most Useful Idiots a political faction can ever use to advance its agenda ... and to keep humanity dumbed-down with emotion-inducing diversionary tactics.  

Such a thing is not clever.  It's predictable for any faction that keeps losing the statistics and proxy evidence war, thereby necessitating that faction to hide such scientific & historic facts from humanity.  Thus, you use an emotionally unstable teenager and give her false statistics.  You tell her the opposite of the fact that the natural disaster death rate declined super significantly since the 1920s, the 1930s, and the 1940s.  

You also tell her the opposite of the fact that American yearly forest fires (wildfires) dropped super significantly since the late 1920s and the entire 1930s, when the western population was so low that there wasn't the manpower nor the technology to put out the massive fires, during the worst drought in the previous 1,000 years.       

You then hide from this misinformed teenager knowledge of the existence of the Nimbus Satellite Series of the 1960s & 1970s.  You finally tell her in 2018 that the World is going to end in 2023.  You also make sure that your false information is channeled through the official channels of an organization controlled by 2nd World & 3rd World political operatives.  

Minus 94 Fahrenheit, in May of 2024

The time of this writing is the Memorial Day Weekend, 2024.  The place of this writing is the United States, specifically near the Three River Confluence of Pittsburgh which is located at 40 latitude & 80 longitude.

There have been constant claims that the Earth is in a state of global boiling and that there have been heat waves in Antarctica, in addition to the provenly bogus claim that Antarctica is suffering from a catastrophic amount of ice absence ... or even ice melt.  Okay then, below is the most recent temperature report from the Amundsen-Scott Base, in Antarctica.  This Accuweather report is placed here as a reality check, for those who actually believe the Antarctica is melting:

We keep being told that Antarctic ice is melting.  Of course, those who get Congressional funding, NGO funding, and other types of funding are the ones who keep saying this, over and over again.  Well, for ice to have melted at Amundsen-Scott in May of 2024, the temperature needed to have risen 126 degrees Fahrenheit.  The report above is that of May 27, 2024.

During the same May week of 2024, the famous Vostok Station dipped to MINUS 99 degrees Fahrenheit.  In order for ice to have started melting there, the temperature needed to rise 131 degrees Fahrenheit.  

During the same May week in 2024, it dipped to MINUS 96F, at the famous South Pole Station.

The Concordia Research Station is well known to the knowledgeable.  During the same May week of 2024, the temperature there dipped to MINUS 99 Fahrenheit, as it did at Vostok.  So, what justifies a person heavily compensated by various "climate funding sources" to tell humanity that Anarctica is melting and that the Statue of Liberty is in the process of going underwater? 

ABOVE:  During the same month of May 2024, Springtime America received record snowfall, at Lake Tahoe.  But, we keep being told that the sea level will rise 200 feet.  Yet, from 1880 to 2020, the sea level only rose 8 to 9 inches.  

Then,  it was recently claimed by well-funded scientists that the sea level rose 4 inches in the past 30 years.  That would amount to 0.1333 inches per year ... or 13 & 1/3 inches per century ... or 16 inches per every 120 years.  This amounts to a sea level rise equal to the width of two pennies per year.  

At today's "reported" rate of sea level rise, it will take 17,158 to 18,000 years to elevate the sea level 200 feet.  Do you have just cause to believe the heavily funded "scientist" who claimed on stage, in front of a video camera lens, that the sea level will rise 200 feet?  He's on video, sounding all so confident ... and in-your-face pushy, like a salesman.

Welcome to the CO2 Gazette:

In 1966, the atmospheric co2 level was 322 ppm.  The Climate Hysteria propaganda teams of today assert that atmospheric co2 levels below 330 ppm are quite safe and do not trigger severe ice melt or weather disasters of note.  This would mean that, in no way would there have been any time in which Polar sea ice would have reached a record low, while co2 stayed below 330 ppm.  And in no way, according to the same assertion, would hurricanes be a menace to any part of Planet Earth.  

Well, those two assertions were proven wrong, simply through reading centuries of weather history.  The 1960s saw a few years of significantly less than usual polar sea ice, and in the early 1960s, there were a couple of world-ending Pacific Cyclones.  Their pressure systems within were the lowest of the low.  They proved the 330 ppm ceiling limit theory to have been worthlessly false, as did any catastrophic cyclone that emerged before the Year 1974.   This included those that date as far back as the day after Christmas, in 838 CE.  

There is a long list of cyclones and major storm tides which transpired when the co2 count was below 300 ppm and which killed thousands upon thousands of people, as well as having rearranged the coastline of the Netherlands ... and even put cities into the history books, such as was the case with the Danish city of Rungholt, in 1362.  

The many natural disasters which occurred from 838 CE to the start of the Industrial Revolution proved Al Gore, David Attenborough, and Michael Mann to have been extremely non-factual.  It is a complete lie to claim that the weather was mild for a thousand years, until the start of the Industrial Revolution in 1760.  There have been horrendous weather events all throughout the Medieval Era, the Renaissance Era, and the Baroque Era.  This included the Age of Exploration ... and Colonization.  This included the reign of Kubla Khan.

The co2/temperature Causation Assertion was long since proven wrong, via the searing heat of 1936, 1934, 1922, 1921, 1913, 1911, 1905, 1901, 1895, 1878, and 1871.  These heated years all transpired when when the co2 count ranged from a very low 295 ppm to a low-enough 310 ppm.   

This same climate assertion was proven wrong in 1966, when the Antarctic wintertime sea ice plummeted.  In 1966, the co2 count was 318 ppm.  That's 12 points below 330 ppm threshold theory.  Yet, co2 didn't follow the rule that the Global Warming People set for it.  Meanwhile, the 500,000 year long Ordovician Ice Age proceeded while the co2 level was at 4,000 ppm.  

The details of that particular ice age is beyond the scope of this discourse.  However, shortly after the Climategate emails were revealed, someone presented a theory for that ice age, by citing the low Carbon-13 count at the beginning of that half million year ice age which came in two major pulses.  Well, it was recently found that a rise in co2 is accompanied by a decrease in carbon-13. This is called "an inverse relationship."  This was concluded through a study that involved the 1990s to the Year 2021.  

During ice ages, there is a much less supply of water vapor in the air, being that extremely cold air also equals dry air.  Being that water vapor is 90% of all greenhouse gases -- by volume -- any discussion of greenhouse gases -- in any era of climate history -- is automatically invalid, if water vapor is not included in the discussion.  

In as much, the mystery as to how a glaciation period can persist is easily solved.  Water Vapor becomes a rare commodity during ice ages.  However, there still remains the mystery as to what actually causes ice ages to commence, in the first place.  There is more to include, but not here, due to the budgeting of printing space.

Recent CO2 Scorecard

As far as goes 330 ppm, that level of atmospheric co2 arrived in 1974.  Then, in 1980, the co2 count rose to 339 ppm.  The 1990 co2 count was 355 ppm, and at the Turn of the Millennium, the co2 count was 370.  The 400 ppm marked occurred in the Year 2015.  And when the co2 count reached 418 ppm in 2021, Antarctica ended up having its coldest winter in known history.  Al Gore & Michael Mann are summarily proven wrong, yet again.  The 418 ppm level should have heated-up Antarctica, when the opposite occurred in the Southern Hemisphere.

As far as goes hurricanes, in the history of Planet Earth, voyagers and coastline inhabitants have witnessed coastline-destroying hurricanes throughout the centuries when the co2 count was below 300.  This included massive sea storms of the 1700s, 1500s, and very late 1200s.  Include the Pacific during the early 1960s, when charting the most extreme cyclones in history on a graph.  In 1962, when the Pacific Ocean delivered a handful of historically punishing typhoons/cyclones, the co2 count was 318 ppm. 

The aforementioned topics have already been detailed at the Blue Marble Album and elsewhere.  There's a search box at the top right-hand side of each of this site's pages.  Make good use of it.

Official Academic Atmospheric Science Teaching

When it comes to natural disasters and temperature, one must learn the science of Pressure Gradient Forcing, as well as Baroclinic stability vs instability.   It goes as follows:

Very simply, when the temperature difference between the Equator and the Poles gets closer to each other ... aka "diminishes" ... as when a phase of global warming occurs, then the atmosphere becomes less turbulent and there are less hurricanes and other types of turbulence-induced natural disasters on Planet Earth.  

On the contrary, when the temperature difference between the Equator and the Poles widens ... increases ... as during the Little Ice Age ... the atmospheric turbulence of Planet Earth increases, and this results in more hurricanes and other turbulence-induced natural disasters.  Once again, for clarity sake, it's the global cooling phases which result in more turbulence-related natural disasters.

As a result, there were tremendous sea storms, aka cyclones, during the Little Ice Age which occurred from 1284 C.E. and 1840 C.E.  This included the disaster of 1780, as well as Kubla Khan's naval invasion fleets being decimated on two different storm-ridden occasions.  There is a notable list of cyclones, coastline floods, and other natural disasters throughout the centuries --- long before the invention of the gasoline-powered engine.  

It was a complete lie to have claimed that the weather was mild for a 1,000 years, until the Industrial Revolution.  There were massive disasters supported by evidence and surviving witnesses which occurred when the atmospheric co2 count was very low.  In fact, numerous grave markers, the Elbe River Hunger Stone, chronicles, captain logs, and monuments of Europe prove Michael Mann and David Attenborough to have been the most egregious of liars, in their claiming that Planet Earth was a hedonist's pleasure palace that hosted no hurricanes, droughts, floods, epidemics, or famines, for a thousand years.

This pressure gradient force reflex is why jet streams only meander during wintertime.  It has nothing to do with CO2.  Plus, realizing that co2 is too small in quantity ... in the atmosphere ... to ever drive the climate, is not an element of cognitive dissonance.  It's an element of common sense.

World peace will be accompanied by the discarding and the disqualifying of many lies that line society today.  Incidentally, the TIROS-1 weather satellite dates back to 1960.  It's first photo was made on April 1 on that year.  Thus, the satellite era did NOT begin in 1979.  It began in 1960.  The full article related to the photo below ... and related to satellite technology of the 1960s ... is found at:

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/earliest-satellite-images-antarctica-reveal-highs-and-lows-sea-ice

Below:  Now remember, the article below involves the year with the HIGHEST (the most) wintertime Antarctic Sea Ice Extent.  It's also known as "Antarctica's Sea Ice Extent MAXIMUM."  And of course, it appears to be a relative tie between 1964 and 2014.  

Below is the same article text, provided at a larger size, for readability purposes.  All in all, when the Climate Hysteria People at the UN and in the present US White House administration claim that the Satellite Record did not begin until 1979, you can now tell them that it started in 1964.  You can also tell them that you know that they are a bunch of liars, making outrageously large sums of money, by means of lying to humanity and creating fear.  Knowledge ends fears. 

                                           ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆     ★☆

115 year old newspaper articles prove today's "revised" graphs to be a wallpaper of lies

Observe the blue graph below.  It looks like Planet Earth is going to soon burn up.  Oh My Dog!!!  We're all gonna die!!!  Hey, wait a minute.  Zoom-in on the lowest part of that graph.  It looks like a trough.  It looks like a valley.  It represents the years 1908 to 1912 ... approximately.  Well, according to the graph below, the coldest years since 1880 were 1910, 1911, and 1912.  

There is a humongous mistake on the part of the people who altered the previous temperature "anomaly" graph, and replaced it with this one here.   And what is the big problem instantly seen by anyone who has even the slightest education in weather history???  

ANS:  The Year 1911 was the Year of epic & tragic heat wave activity, while 1910 was reported as having been "extraordinarily hot."  In fact, there did occur the Great Fire of 1910 in Northwestern America.  There is no way that 1910 & 1911 are the second and third coldest years in the past 143 years.   (1880 to 2025 = 145 years.   1880 is the starting point of the graph below, at the x-axis.)

As a quick example, the only time in Fargo North Dakota history when the temperature reached 80F during March was in March of 1910.  Let's go step by step, here.  The first step is to know what "anomaly" means.  It means incremental change ... step by step change ... unit by unit change upward or downward.

  ⇑⇑⇑ Look upward, into that graph's lowest points.  It's 1910 & 1911.          Next:  Look at the 1910 & 1911 newspaper articles below that reported on extreme heat.

Concerning the drastic upward slope of this temperature "anomaly" graph, it's a simple numbers-game illusion.  Look at the vertical line, aka the Y-Axis.  The smaller the amount of numbers on the Y-axis of any graph means that the appearance of incline or decline ... in the slope of the graph ... will be overly pronounced.  The smaller the number of grid-lines means the more severe is the degree of change.  And such a thing is always deceptive.

Moreover, that chart only reports on the degrees of change of temperature.  It doesn't report the temperatures, per se. Such a thing is a great way to deceive novices --- laymen --- the untrained public.

Now, the blue graph above is certainly fraudulent in its claim of temperature change, concerning the Years 1910 and 1911, for sure.  The 1911 heat wave was extremely ferocious.  And the great lesson taught through it is that there is NO CORRELATION between co2 levels and temperature change.  In 1911, the atmospheric co2 level was 300 parts per million.  That amounts to 125 ppm LOWER than today.  

Now, despite the low co2 level of 1911, 41,000+ people died from the July heat of that year, in France alone.  Also in 1911, England had a brutal heat wave.  The one in 2022 didn't compare to it.  The one in 2022 was chump change, in comparison to the one in 1911.

And of course, the London Fire Brigade already reported, in 2014, that London Area fires DECREASED by almost one-half of what they were in the 1980s & 1990s.  In fact, 2021 was the year of the least number of London Area fires, all occurring when the co2 level was as high as it was in 2022. 

~ ~ ~

Of course, there was a cold November in the same Year of 1911, as well as a cold January in 1912.  That partially offsets some of the deadly and tragic heat of May and then July of 1911.  However, Feb 1912 was not exceptional in cold temperatures, at all.   This means that there is no way that temperatures dropped 0.5F in a consecutive three year span.  

In fact, take a look at a short 2015 report issued by AG Weekly, concerning the Year 1910.  Such reports are written for personnel who don't have the time to sit and read tomes.  Things are presented "to the point."  So, it's a really brief and educational piece of reading material.

See:  Weather Talk: 1910; A Hot Year; Extraordinarily Hot

At the most, the Year 1911 would have "broken even," with record Winter Cold and Record Summer Heat cancelling each other out, and having the temperature-change equal Zero degrees Fahrenheit.  

None the less, 1910 was a heated year, on its own.  Yet, the newer government graph posted above falsely claims that there was a significant drop of temperature during the general time span of 1909 to 1912.  No way.  So, a question remains:  How long will the United States government continue to lie to its people? 

In graph-making, there is something called, "smoothing", where you delete the jagged parts of a graph.  It's simply a matter of "rounding off the edges," so to speak.  This means that you can erase extreme temps, wherever convenient for you.  Thus, a record-breaking heat-wave or cold-wave can magically vanish during graph "reconstruction," thereby making the years represented seem mildly harmless.  

Where there's smoke, there is fire.  Where there's one falsehood on a graph, there are others.

There are other years on the blue graph below which can be addressed as fraudulent, also.  But, I don't get compensated as much as a penny to undo the fraud being done by the usual suspects --- who happen to be highly paid suspects.  Such a thing will take time to do --- if there's ever time to do so.  

None the less, a table of the raw temperature data is far more honest than a "smoothed" graph, especially when the graph looks jagged in appearance.  Cute trick there.  But, it's still an insult to the intelligence of any honest person who studied atmospheric science --- or weather history.

In as much, this post and numerous other ones show that Sigourney Weaver outright lied during the 2016 Democratic National Convention, when she claimed that mankind never saw such catastrophic weather events as the ones which occurred after atmospheric co2 rose above 400 ppm.  There were much worse & more catastrophic weather events decades and centuries prior, when co2 levels were 320, 300, and 280 parts per million.  

Ex-Governor Cuomo said the same thing as did the Sigourney Weaver who now has no credibility.  He was proven to be a liar, just as much.

Let's go to the graph of gray & black, located directly below.  It's the actual "raw data" temperature graph of 1880 to 2015.  The X-Axis begins at zero, making this an honest graph.  Actually, it begins at MINUS 10 degrees Fahrenheit.  Thus, the X-axis increments are plentiful.  Thus, there is proportionality in the viewpoint of the graph, as opposed to a distorted clown show that make every novice assume that the world is coming to an end "in 12 years."   The truth is that, if mankind doesn't nuke itself into extinction, the next 12 years will be one of a greening earth, due to the power of photosynthesis carried by the co2 molecule.

Okay folks.  Here's your "end-of-the-world" "Global Warming,"  I mean "Climate Change."

And voila.  There's your insignificant & non-crisis temperature rise, since 1880.   This is why the typical outdoor working man of the past 20, 25, and 30 years always says that the "Claim of a Climate Crisis, with no time left to spare," is total bull crap, squared and cubed.

And of course, if you have a  problem with the outdoor working man, call one via telephone, arrange to meet him somewhere, and you can tell him to his face that he's wrong.  And you can even mock him, to his face ... like you do from a distance, with Dr. Will Happer, the late Dr. Tim Ball, Meteorologist Anthony Watts, electrical engineer & computer scientist & geologist Tony Heller, Dr. Roy Spencer, etc, etc, etc.

By the way, it's the working man who kept you safe, warm, and fed throughout the years.  Elves did not do those smooth roads & guardrails upon where you safely travel.  Nor did elves build those elevators you smoothly ascend and descend, by merely pressing a button.  Your ingratitude and pseudo-intellectual arrogance is not appreciated.

All in all, if the charts and graphs do not match the newspaper and magazine reports of the times represented on those charts & graphs, then you have yourself one fraudulent chart ... or graph.

Just so that you'll know:  This photo is of THREE news articles of the time (July 1911)

The West Coast fires of recent were nothing new.

Adam Mockler has proven himself to be an even great liar & insult to our intelligence

Poland purchased thirty-two F-35A jets from Lockheed Martin.  A few already arrived in Poland.  However, before that occurred, the Netherlands & Norway flew F-35s to Poland, just in case Putin received inspirations from whatever deeply dark diabolical source sends him inspirations.  In as much, Poland was NOT abandoned by any US presidential administration in the 2020s.  And it has not been ignored by NATO nations, either.  Adam Mockler is simply non-factual and a waste of everyone's time.

Poland keeps getting F-35s, and Russia did NOT invade.

We return to one of the issues presented by Adam Mockler in a very false light.  In fact, Mockler's report was a complete & total falsehood, as opposed to it being a sleight of hand deception ... as opposed to it being deception by semantics.

Back in September 2025, Mockler claimed that Kamala Harris  was a prophetess of uncanny exactitude, in her predicting that Donald Trump would leave Poland abandoned to the Russians who will eventually invade it.  He even asked if she had psychic powers.

At the time of Mockler's assured proclamation ... which was nothing but defamation against Trump ... there were already 8,200 American troops in Poland.  This proves Mockler to be a waste of time and an insult to humanity's intelligence. 

Moreover, in October 2025, a few weeks after Mockler opened his big mouth, NATO commenced its "air policing missions" over Poland, beginning with Norway's Ministry of Defense. 

Now, the time of declaring Kamala a prophetess was September 9th & 10th, 2025.  At the time, Mockler claimed that Russia's invasion of Poland had begun.  Well, it's now the end of May 2026, and in the past 8 and a half months, Russia has NOT invaded Poland in any capacity. 

https://militarnyi.com/en/news/netherlands-to-deploy-f-35s-to-poland-to-secure-ukraine-supply-routes/

https://militarnyi.com/en/news/norway-deploys-f-35-fighter-jets-to-patrol-polish-border/

Current Status of US/Polish Relations

As of late May 2026, the Trump administration ordered 5,000 MORE American military personnel to serve in Poland.  Moreover, three of the thirty-two purchased F-35A jets, tailor-made by Lockheed Martin, have already been delivered to Poland ... by the Trump administration who did NOT abandon Poland, as Kamala claimed he would.

The bottom line is this:  Donald Trump did NOT abandon Poland, as Kamala Harris predicted.

In fact:  Approximately ten days after Trump promised to keep US troops in Poland ... on Sept 13, 2025 ... the Polish Defense Minister, Władysław Kosyniak-Kamysz, reported that the Trump Administration had successfully delivered to Poland thirty-eight M1A2 Abrams Tanks, along with 14 Evac Vehicles.  

This is part of a sales contract with Poland, comprising 250 tanks in all, as well as:  

A] 26 M88A2 Hercules Evac Vehicles,  B] 17 M1110 Bridge Pavers,  C] 276 armor penetrating .50 caliber M2 machine guns,  D] 500 M240C machine guns which have a muzzle velocity of 2,800 feet per second,  E]  15 AGT1500 gas turbine engines to be installed in Alabama, and F] 250 IED countermeasure systems.  Such a contract is the act of NOT abandoning Poland.  

Also see:

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2025/10/liars-for-kamala.html

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆