| Operation IceBridge, Weddell Sea, 2017. Compliments of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Ctr |
Actually, these were "I-told-you-so videos," where the shallow meltwater ponds and/or unsmooth stretches of surface ice are evidence of an atmosphere overloaded with CO2 so badly that the oceans will soon rise to the point of drowning the Statue of Liberty.
Well, here is your atmospheric reality check, compliments of MIT, otherwise known as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology:
Those Antarctic meltwater ponds have nothing to do with Planet Earth's CO2 level which comprises less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1% of the Earth's atmosphere, at 431 or 432 parts per million. They have everything to do with the Sun's ultraviolet light rays being cast upon the Antarctic ice sheet twenty-fours a day, 7 days a week, for an approximate 6 month period:
1} Antarctica really does undergo six consecutive months of constant sunlight beating down upon its 2-mile thick ice sheet.
2} Antarctica is the driest desert on Earth, meaning that the sky above it is a contiguous high pressure system which has very little water vapor and very little "condensation nuclei." This means that the Antarctic sky doesn't readily induce the development of clouds, even though you'll see some clouds off the coastline.
3} The constant, 24/7, unblocked sunlight causes surface ice to melt, even where the temperatures are always below freezing. The albedo effect then increases the melting of such ponds.
The meltwater has nothing to do with the CO2 level of Earth's atmosphere. In fact, it's meltwater's action that caused the cracks seen on the Antarctic Ice Sheet to widen. This includes the cracks on the ice shelves, even in sub-freezing temps.
The creation of meltwater has everything to do with the Sun's ultraviolet light rays & albedo. I've already explained albedo in a previous post or two ... or three.
Oh, and then there's the lie told by the young climate activists about penguins needing Antarctic ice or they will be unable to breed, followed by the penguins going extinct: The opposite is true.









